Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER - 9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 11:32
  #1541 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere up there
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst waiting for my luggage in T1 last week, I noticed on the belt info screen that a flight from 'Domodedevo' had arrived. This is the regular EZY scheduled flight from Moscow.
Whilst I and no doubt other seasoned travelers will know that this is Moscow's show-piece airport, how many others do?
Surely it would be better to display 'Moscow DME' on the boards so that the other few hundred captive audience - waiting for their bags- would think 'Oh I didn't know there were flights to Moscow from here....interesting' Instead of thinking 'Domodedevo? WTF is that? Can't even pronounce it.'

A huge marketing opportunity lost as well as confusion for local taxi drivers who will be looking in vain for a flight from Moscow that they are meeting.

The airport management really does need to get a grip. Maybe because we all expect low fares, the airport company can only afford to hire idiots these days.
Pay peanuts......
All names taken is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 12:25
  #1542 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But whats even stranger is the fact recent football charters to/from Moscow actually displayed Moscow!
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 12:31
  #1543 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Raised the whole Moscow thing with their PR people. No response.....

I did question whether there are also confused Muscovites looking at the Moscow dep board asking "where is this Ringway?"
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 16:19
  #1544 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: crewe, cheshire, uk
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only Bentley cars are made in crewe now... Rolls Royce are built near Oxford. Bentlry owned by VW and Rolls owned by BMW...
mytravela330 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 16:29
  #1545 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good ole German engineering!
GrahamK is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 16:42
  #1546 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also know somebody in Manchester who emailed MAG Marketing re Moscow board also a deafening silence !

Route Development is I believe an internal dept BUT marketing which includes Facebook, Twitter , Website etc is I believe outsourced !

Not sure if this includes the boards.

Sadly as long as the passenger figures keep going up the management seem to go into self congratulatory mode completely missing the fact that they may be going up simply because the economy has improved, and people have more money in their pocket, precious little to do with the airports own marketing performance.

Have PM you BetablockerUK
Navpi is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 18:09
  #1547 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M-ABEU arriving as FR01 tomorrow at 09:15, departing 13:20 with a certain M O'L on board. Lets hope he is bringing some good news with him. Bucharest would be nice.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2013, 21:36
  #1548 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M-ABEU arriving as FR01 tomorrow at 09:15, departing 13:20 with a certain M O'L on board. Lets hope he is bringing some good news with him. Bucharest would be nice.

Compared to the mega expansion in the South East with EZY and Norge at LGW and RYR at STN, a dozen based 737s all operating NEW unserved routes would be good !
Bagso is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 09:48
  #1549 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aer Lingus Regional have increased SNN-MAN to 3 daily (excluding sat which is 2 daily).

Extra flights begin in April.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 10:52
  #1550 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool First -8 to MAN

For those interested, the first CX -8F is planned into MAN on 19th Dec.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 12:22
  #1551 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info spanners. Lets hope it turns up this time.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 15:48
  #1552 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

It will, they say, then 1 or 2 every week from then on!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 20:07
  #1553 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Routesonline has an article on Birmingham trying to attract a Chinese link. But it also gives these are the bi-directional traffic flow between the UK and China for origin + destination passengers in 2012

LHR 808231 pax = 67.6% market
MAN 145812 pax = 12.2% market
BHX 58988 pax = 4.8% market
LGW 44805 pax = 3.8% market
EDI 38816 pax = 3.3% market

For MAN, it's 399.48 passengers per day or 199.74 one-way. Almost enough for an A330 or 787 one would say, with the ability to haul some cargo as well to bolster a route.
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 20:12
  #1554 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And its worth noting that the table does not include Hong Kong, which at last count accounted for something like 136,000 MAN-XXX-HKG passengers alone.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 22:19
  #1555 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American Airlines will upgrade MAN-ORD to a B767-300 2 months early, on 1st April instead of June 5th for 2014.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2013, 22:41
  #1556 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monte Carlo
Age: 65
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For MAN, it's 399.48 passengers per day or 199.74 one-way. Almost enough for an A330 or 787 one would say, with the ability to haul some cargo as well to bolster a route.
Only if the operator would be able to capture a 100% market share of the available market which is unlikely. You don't say with which existing carriers the 400 per day are travelling with but presumably the market will be scattered across a wide range of hub feeds out of MAN. With the economics of hubs being what they are, then you'd have to assume they'd have a considerable seat cost advantage over a Chinese operator offering a single route into MAN. That's before you add in the fact that there would be enough margin in the front end yields to allow any existing carriers to cut prices from the get go to kill off the chances of anyone getting a foothold into the attractive part of the market. Lot of choice going East via the legacies and the MEB3 which makes it a tough ask. No surprise really that there is virtually nothing direct any further East of the gulf, the Pakistan market aside.
North West is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 05:54
  #1557 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere up there
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting statistic.
That means, if my mental maths are correct that MAN has more of the UK-China market than BHX, LGW and EDI combined.

I''m nor surprised really: Manchester has a huge Chinese community, noticeable even if you walk around town.
The trouble with this statistic though in attempting to justify a route to 'China' is that the definition renders itself useless, as China is such a big place.

A route to, say, Beijing would inevitably capture only a tiny piece of that overall market.
Stats on point to point travel would be more interesting but would probably 'prove' that it's not commercially viable, except of course HKG.

On that basis, the next several UK-China routes would be to LHR, unless something extraordinary happens.
All names taken is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 09:53
  #1558 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All Names Taken,

Yes your bang on here, and agree LHR will probably get more flights first.

If you go to Warwick Castle or Stratford, there are swarms of Chinese tourists, so does that mean for that reason BHX will get flights..no, for the same reasons you state.

BA alone want 7 more Chinese routes out of LHR.

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 11:19
  #1559 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ainsdale
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumours going Round that US Airways are moving to Terminal 3? Anyone know anything?
MKY661 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 11:32
  #1560 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumours going Round that US Airways are moving to Terminal 3? Anyone know anything?
Well, that's going to go down like a lead balloon. T3 cannot handle an extra A330 and B757 Trans Atlantic flight in the morning peak.

The only way the new AA can fit together is to either move AA to T1 or T2, or move another T3 operator out to fit in the US Airways flights.

There was a plan in 2010 to merge T1 and T3, if US Airways is intent on moving, as well as any additional growth Ryanair may bring, this plan may now be needed more than ever.
LAX_LHR is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.