Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER - 9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2014, 20:37
  #2941 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flynas had a grand total of 6 passengers on the inbound!

Almost a private jet.....
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 05:47
  #2942 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,272
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I cannot understand why Saudi Arabia has been promoted by Saudia and Flynas. It's not as though you can just visit the place as a tourist. Granted it has history dating back thousands of years but if you want to visit you usually have to have a work visa of sorts. Medina is probably the only reason that comes to mind where Hajj visas are issued for this restricted market. Then it sometimes takes weeks to get one. The country is probably the most conservative of the region with penalties for certain crimes that will leave your head rolling.

Having said that good luck to the carriers.
crewmeal is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 06:06
  #2943 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit of blurb referencing Manchester in the FT yesterday.

BBC helps revive Manchester?s vibe - FT.com

At least it reaffirmed Manchester as largest metropolis after London, although also reference a missing San Francisco link


ref post 2945; I cannot understand why Saudi Arabia has been promoted by Saudia and Flynas


This is a shot in the dark but I think it might possibly be because both airlines are based there !
Bagso is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 11:15
  #2944 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flynas had a grand total of 6 passengers on the inbound!

Almost a private jet.....
19 today reported elsewhere!
GrahamK is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 14:05
  #2945 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The FlyNas scheduled service was always destined to be heavily dependent on Manchester-originating traffic. Few to none of those paying customers who flew out aboard Wednesday's inaugural could be expected to return home on today's flight. Let's give the service a chance to build up and prove itself before pointing accusingly at the loads aboard pseudo-positioning legs. This situation is really little different from the first couple of flights of the season returning near-empty to Manchester from Corfu or Crete.
Shed-on-a-Pole is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 15:46
  #2946 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stafford
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Few to none of those paying customers who flew out aboard Wednesday's inaugural could be expected to return home on today's flight. Let's give the service a chance to build up and prove itself before pointing accusingly at the loads aboard pseudo-positioning legs.
Exactly! I would be interested in knowing how many pax they carried back.
chinapattern is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 18:51
  #2947 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This situation is really little different from the first couple of flights of the season returning near-empty to Manchester from Corfu or Crete
Im really sorry to disagree as Im obviously very pro-MAN and normally agree with your analysis, but I just cant agree on that statement.

The flynas route is nothing like our Corfu, Crete or any other seasonal charter. The inbound flights could just as easily been booked up with those from the subcontinent visiting the relatives in the North West, albeit on a slightly smaller scale than the traffic going the other way. Or even Saudi's looking for cheap deals to come and watch the footy and go shopping etc. Im sorry but 6 and 19 pax on the first 2 inbounds is pitiful whichever way you try and word it, and like I say, as a pro-MAN, pains me to say it.

The Crete and Corfu charters don't normally fill up on Greeks visiting the UK before the summer rush, however.....
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 21:23
  #2948 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The brighter side of life.
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello,

You may be pleased to know, Cathay have adverts on digital media billboards all over Manchester CC right now.

Regards.
CabinCrew747 is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 21:56
  #2949 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re flynas, have to agree with LAX_LHR on this, and the same source on another site gave the outbound load as only 10.

I don't know what vehicles the airline is selling tickets through or how much advertising of the route there has been over there. I wonder what the early loads on LGW were like - although they don't have direct competition as far as I know, there are of course flights to LHR.

The early outbound loads on Saudia from MAN were reportedly very good but inbound loads were much thinner but better than flynas. I seem to recall a figure as low as 23 but a couple of others over 50.
MANFOD is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 22:47
  #2950 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they are reporting 50% to 60% loads for the whole set of new routes, then I would be inclined to think LGW/Casablanca flights are going to be at least three quarters full to make up for the shortfall here


as for CX, I too have seen their City Centre advertising last week and also ads in the Evening News. I wonder if they will maintain these level of advertising for the next 6 months but must applaud them in spreading the news of their services as widely and as early as they have.
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 02:39
  #2951 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the FlyNas loads outbound from MAN are as low as reported here then that would certainly be cause for concern going forward. But if Saudia are getting some excellent loads (as we are told) on the same route, then the city-pair cannot be the problem. Awareness and ticket distribution will have to be addressed quickly before losses mount. Has FlyNas agreed ticketing deals with agencies serving the key ethnic markets? If not, are such deals in the pipeline?
Shed-on-a-Pole is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 16:29
  #2952 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was just searching the flythomascook.com website and couldn't help but notice Boston has re-appeared in the 'Thomas Cook' routes.

Its not viewable on the home page, but search say, Manchester-Verona for Summer 2015, and it will give a 'where we fly' drop down box due to those flights not being available. Boston is in there.

No Smoke without fire and the Brochures are far from the final versions so could be added if there is some slack for a short long haul flight.......
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 16:40
  #2953 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Boston would be a great route addition, much wiser than competing on NYC. Boston is only a short hop too, (relatively). In fact I'm surprised that Jet2 have not tested this out as a seasonal longhaul schedule, they seem to like the odd transatlantics.
Mr A Tis is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 17:10
  #2954 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disappointing Flynas showing non op tomorrow .

I suppose what with the growth this year in long haul one or two are inevitably going to fail.

Flynas have simply not done their sums or got the requisite contacts in the ethnic travel departments or so it seems.

Doesn't help to have an easy connection Karachi- Manchester but not so the return.

Right now the return flights seem to go on to Kuala Lumpur with many hours lay over for Pakistan and lets face it Saudi really isn't cut up and ready to handle significant transit traffic is it !

Unless they have solid bookings for Umrah and Hajj in September they might as well give up me thinks !
rutankrd is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 18:25
  #2955 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boston is only a short hop too
This was my thinking. Boston isn't exactly much more time wise than Tenerife (in the grand scheme of things), so, could well fit in a quick 2-3 weekly route to Boston in some 'down time' (Im going to research the schedules later on to see if such 'down time' exists in the A330 fleet).

Could be quite a nice little route if it does come off. Destinations wise, to say we are not a capital city nor a hub/base for the flag carrier, we are not that far behind Dublin now USA wise, which is not a bad place to be.

suppose what with the growth this year in long haul one or two are inevitably going to fail.
While we don't know forward bookings, and if it would have made a difference, but with the better known Saudia on the Jeddah route, I can't help but feel they may have been able to carve a slightly different market if flynas had stuck to the original plan of serving Riyadh?
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 18:32
  #2956 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't help but feel they may have been able to carve a slightly different market if flynas had stuck to the original plan of serving Riyadh
Agreed that may well have been a better plan.
rutankrd is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 18:38
  #2957 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's all this about Boston then?
rutankrd is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 19:39
  #2958 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockport
Age: 69
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rutankrd read post 2955 from LAX_LHR this afternoon re Tommie Cook

Ian
Ian Brooks is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 19:48
  #2959 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TCX flights have been quite difficult to decipher given the seasonal changes between the GLA peak period, then shifting the aircraft to STN and so on.

What I can gather so far:

5 long haul aircraft required on Monday's, Friday's and Sunday's.

There seems to be 2 gaps that a MAN-BOS flight could run, which is Tuesday and Saturday, and depending how the LGW long haul flights rotate (ei a MAN based machine or the 5th 'floating' aircraft that goes to STN/GLA), there could possibly be room for a Thursday flight too.

This is of course, based purely on long haul flying and the aircraft could well do a short haul mission instead, which I have not looked into. I know the A330 has been used on MAN-DLM this winter so could well do something similar in 2015.

However, it is encouraging that there are at least 2 gaps where Boston 'could' be run.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 10th May 2014, 20:59
  #2960 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The brighter side of life.
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tomorrow's flynas service is cancelled.

Regards.
CabinCrew747 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.