BELFAST (BHD) - 3
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Belfast
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think that bhd should stick to the old domestic stuff and bfs should concentrate on the international routes. bfs will always be the main airport and I do agree that it does need a revamp and the fact that there is no rail link doesnt help but on the other hand, i agree that belfast is still a relatively small city and yet we hav 2 airports!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
news coming from white house is that ryanair belfast base is doing poorly and will most likely be shut down in the near future.
Perhaps some cut backs but I would bet big that they wont pull out as that would be an admission that the model does not work in Belfast. Besides all that they could cut some STN frequencies and do flights to other UK bases, so until all these avenues have been explored be quite confident that Ryanair will be around for some time to come.
Why not a Bristol rotation as this route is not served from the city airport, or Luton?
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Work associated address
Age: 42
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As to the Ryanair RUMOUR of Belfast base closure I'd see it yes with them closing the base BUT still operating into out off the airport from the other bases.
Regards
Regards
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 52
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EGAA v EGAC
Much fun to be had from following this heated debate!
Sadly, our two airports are actually robbing us of choice. I'd rather use either than go to Dublin, but I'm sure there are passengers using DUB because it offers direct services that neither BHD or BFS can offer at present. Combine the two airports passenger numbers, and we must be around 6 or 7 million per year...if that was in one place, the major airlines would be having a real look...
As it is, I generally prefer BFS...easier access from where I live, cheaper car parks, and smaller security queues (although BHD has improved drastically)...but I'll happily use either.
And whatever the debates...we're stuck with two from here on anyway. The recent sale of BHD shows that it is here to stay...and maybe the runway extension will open it up to widebodies!
Burghers of North Down beware!
Sadly, our two airports are actually robbing us of choice. I'd rather use either than go to Dublin, but I'm sure there are passengers using DUB because it offers direct services that neither BHD or BFS can offer at present. Combine the two airports passenger numbers, and we must be around 6 or 7 million per year...if that was in one place, the major airlines would be having a real look...
As it is, I generally prefer BFS...easier access from where I live, cheaper car parks, and smaller security queues (although BHD has improved drastically)...but I'll happily use either.
And whatever the debates...we're stuck with two from here on anyway. The recent sale of BHD shows that it is here to stay...and maybe the runway extension will open it up to widebodies!
Burghers of North Down beware!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I reckon that every major town in NI should have their own international airport. We will soon have 3, a few more won't hurt. And the govs seem to have plenty of dosh to spend on local egoes.
True Blue
True Blue
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Co. Antrim UK
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So where did this rumour come from. I don't think that the BHD/FR marriage has been roses all the time, I think that Mr Ambrose will have been on the phone a couple of times telling FR to wise up with some of the statements MOL has come of with. BHD have nothing to lose in standing up to MOL, yes their passenger figures have went up massively since FR's arrival, but BHD has been making money all along, do you want to have to invest in extra terminal size, apron space, parking area's, maybe upsetting BD/BE business customers in the process, a runway extension as well, and what if FR don't come up with the goods. All this for a few bucket and spade routes. BHD has another business plan-to build a multi-storey carpark and hotel complex, which went into planning a couple of weeks ago. Who knows!!!!!!! with FR anything can happen
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a serious note re Fr at Bhd. The Pik route from Bhd has not exactly been a roaring success at about 50%lf. With the introduction of the winter timetable, they go to up to 3 flights a day. This I don't understand. Do they expect a massive increase in pax, if so where will they come from as they are not there at the minute? Who are they going after, the ferries? Or is this another example of bad planning from Fr, they seem to have done that before? Will the extra flights be pulled soon? And why do they think Pik can support up to 3x daily when they are cutting Stn to 3x daily? Lpl is only 2x.
Any views?
True blue
Any views?
True blue
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The interesting thing for me is that Ryanair has not went in head to head with Flybe on any specific route pair. In the south Ryanair have jumped in with many competitors but they seem to avoid Flybe I think. Prestwick takes passengers from the boats, and the schedule is no match for Flybe's Glasgow offering. FR need to adopt a Bologna/ Forli approach to this one. Serve Glasgow international where people mainly want to go. I mean the flight is so short. THey should try. London is saturated with flights and deals. Manchester and Birmingham are big markets and FR with a reasonable schedule could capture some of the market...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Co. Antrim UK
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would hazzard a guess that BHD will not permit FR to compete on any route already served from the airport, unlike BFS. Example FR announce base at BHD serving PWK, EMA & LPL. Several months later Air Berlin withdraw STN/BHD. At this point FR ask BHD if they could now operate that route. Bhd think about it and then go okay. The problem is for me that you cannot think rationally about FR in BHD. 1. It would appear that they are not making a lot of money if any at all. 2. The airport just does not fit into the FR model. 3. The EI at BFS announcement last year element to the whole situation. Basically mix this all together and analysis is difficult.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lisburn
Age: 54
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NWSRG
BHD will never handle widebodies. The runway and apron PCN values are not high enough and unless a widebody parked out in the middle of the car park it wouldnt get its tail under the 1:7 transition slope.
Sorry, 'never' is a long time. If they relay the runway and aprons and move the terminal building and car parks then it would be a possibility
BHD will never handle widebodies. The runway and apron PCN values are not high enough and unless a widebody parked out in the middle of the car park it wouldnt get its tail under the 1:7 transition slope.
Sorry, 'never' is a long time. If they relay the runway and aprons and move the terminal building and car parks then it would be a possibility
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 52
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ROSEMOUNT,
My comment was only intended to be mischievous! Why don't we see if we can get the rumour into the Belly Telly or East Belfast News..."new Airbus giant jet to terrorise Sydenham...double-deck disaster looms!"
My comment was only intended to be mischievous! Why don't we see if we can get the rumour into the Belly Telly or East Belfast News..."new Airbus giant jet to terrorise Sydenham...double-deck disaster looms!"
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hiding in an office
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All BHD needs is the runway extension and build another stand capable of handling a 757 and get conti down from the ice age era which is BFS!
In regards to comments bout FR, bums on seats don't really give a good sense of profit margins. Just because a flight operates at %50 capacity doesn't mean the fares charged a low. The ancillary revenue helps support the flights big time, and simply saying FR will pull out soon, its not profitable doesn't really stand.
Im willing to bet the farm on this one, FR are doing quite well at BHD, the LPL flights will be high earners on a SAT morning due to the crappy prem league teams over there!!!!
In regards to comments bout FR, bums on seats don't really give a good sense of profit margins. Just because a flight operates at %50 capacity doesn't mean the fares charged a low. The ancillary revenue helps support the flights big time, and simply saying FR will pull out soon, its not profitable doesn't really stand.
Im willing to bet the farm on this one, FR are doing quite well at BHD, the LPL flights will be high earners on a SAT morning due to the crappy prem league teams over there!!!!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"...the LPL flights will be high earners on a SAT morning due to the crappy prem league teams over there!!!!"
Not unless there's an evening return flight, they won't!
There used to be, then somebody rescheduled the flight back to Saturday afternoon.....now most of our members use easyJet again.
Not unless there's an evening return flight, they won't!
There used to be, then somebody rescheduled the flight back to Saturday afternoon.....now most of our members use easyJet again.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Co. Antrim UK
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im willing to bet the farm on this one, FR are doing quite well at BHD, the LPL flights will be high earners on a SAT morning due to the crappy prem league teams over there!!!! (super737)
There used to be, then somebody rescheduled the flight back to Saturday afternoon.....now most of our members use easyJet again.(ESCNI)
Oh dear super737 you have potentially just lost all your assets by gambling on, FR are doing well at BHD. I am not going to gamble on it but checking flight prices, looking at stats and weighing up, I would say they are losing money at BHD. (it is almost a wild guess)
There used to be, then somebody rescheduled the flight back to Saturday afternoon.....now most of our members use easyJet again.(ESCNI)
Oh dear super737 you have potentially just lost all your assets by gambling on, FR are doing well at BHD. I am not going to gamble on it but checking flight prices, looking at stats and weighing up, I would say they are losing money at BHD. (it is almost a wild guess)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: belfast
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do any of us really know how well or badly FR are doing at BHD? While we're on the subject of new bases, one wonders how EI are doing at BFS. If the media reports are to be believed, not too well.
If FR are closing their BHD base, will that be before or after EI close their BFS base?
If FR are closing their BHD base, will that be before or after EI close their BFS base?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The ancillary revenue helps support the flights big time, and simply saying FR will pull out soon, its not profitable doesn't really stand."
On such short routes, ancillary revenue will not be making much of a positive impact on the base. All the flights are under an hour so less people will be checking in bags, using the check in desks, purchasing priority boarding or buying snacks on board the flight. If Ryanair is selling seats at such low fares they are relying on ancillary revenue alone.
Ryanair won't be leaving anytime soon though, they're just waiting for flights to Europe where they can make more money.
Regarding Aer Lingus, I wouldn't pay to much attention to press reports. There are very weak routes that I'm surprised Aer Lingus are still operating, AMS, CDG and FCO are a few that come to mind. On the other hand stronger routes include FAO, APG, LHR, ACE and BCN. Hopefully Milan and Munich will perform well as they take off next week.
On such short routes, ancillary revenue will not be making much of a positive impact on the base. All the flights are under an hour so less people will be checking in bags, using the check in desks, purchasing priority boarding or buying snacks on board the flight. If Ryanair is selling seats at such low fares they are relying on ancillary revenue alone.
Ryanair won't be leaving anytime soon though, they're just waiting for flights to Europe where they can make more money.
Regarding Aer Lingus, I wouldn't pay to much attention to press reports. There are very weak routes that I'm surprised Aer Lingus are still operating, AMS, CDG and FCO are a few that come to mind. On the other hand stronger routes include FAO, APG, LHR, ACE and BCN. Hopefully Milan and Munich will perform well as they take off next week.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Co. Antrim UK
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Outrage at Ryanair City Airport ad - News - Belfasttelegraph.co.uk
Runway extension by next autumn-there may be a few obstacles in MOL's plans, if one reads between the lines in this article.
Runway extension by next autumn-there may be a few obstacles in MOL's plans, if one reads between the lines in this article.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Runway extension by next autumn-there may be a few obstacles in MOL's plans, if one reads between the lines in this article.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N.Ireland
Age: 48
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Todays Continental still on stand 22 , not sure why, possibly a combination of a shortened runway 25 ( due to work in progress at 07 end ) plus wet runway compounded with high winds ? Just a guess, similar probs in Dublin; BD129 diverted to BFS after go-around on 16 one of many today.