Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Decision to axe Harrier is "bonkers".

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Decision to axe Harrier is "bonkers".

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2011, 18:22
  #841 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Ward, West and Woodward have lost the plot and those that continue to use their arguments will be weakened by it. Most serving dark blue are deeply embarrased by their inaccurate rants. "


No, we really are not.

Go and have a look on Rum ration and find me the "Oh I wish the admirals would shut up" thread.
Tourist is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2011, 18:28
  #842 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tourist,

Rum Ration is nowt but the navel equivalent of ARRSE and the fact you offer it as credible opinion is quite telling
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2011, 18:35
  #843 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Rum Ration is nowt but the navel equivalent of ARRSE"


Yes, it is exactly that, and exactly where you would expect to see some evidence of dissatisfaction in the ranks if there was in fact any such evidence to find.


If you don't like my suggestion, where can you point to evidence of

"Most serving dark blue are deeply embarrased by their inaccurate rants. "?
Tourist is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2011, 20:05
  #844 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,156
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Neither scientific nor necessarily indicative of any particular percentage, but of ALL the Dark Blue aviators I have spoken to (more than 1 but probably less than 10), they all appeared to think the Ward et al were an embarassment.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 12:34
  #845 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sharkey is ranting in the Daily Fail.

RAF strips jets for spare parts: Typhoons torn up for Libya air fleet | Mail Online

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 12:53
  #846 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Another nothing story with which the Bearded Bulls****er can flex his idiocy.

Aircraft have been 'robbed' for, well probably since flying squadrons came about, hell is even used to happen with Harriers.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 14:37
  #847 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,816
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
A well-connected chum told me that the provision of spares for the TypHooon had been provisioned at the level it has, as an 'at-risk' venture. Signed off by Jock Stirrup....

Most new TypHoons have therefore been robbed to keep known-to-be-serviceable jets serviceable, or so I was told.

He might have been wrong - but somehow I doubt it.

Of course it gives the bearded bull$hitter yet another chance to rant.....

RAF engineering practice was once described as "Borrowing the wheels from your mate's car to get yours through the MoT". Harsh words.....but fair!
BEagle is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 14:49
  #848 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beags

In my experience, the support budget for a programme has always been robbed to fund the bits the procurement programme forgot and late breaking good ideas. The in-service engineers were generally handed a crock with a new platform.

regards

retard
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 17:25
  #849 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Exactly the same thing happened on Merlin HM1.

"Need to reduce initial spend"

"Lets cut the spares buy - it's a new aircraft it's bound to be more reliable / have higher-lifed spares (??!!)"

IFTU and sqn work-ups fall behind flying hours budget....endless STOROB / canning of cabs. Op costs go up.....

"Bl00dy Wastelands...."
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 17:36
  #850 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I joined in1974 and the "Xmas Tree" was a normal part of daily aircraft servicing thing so this current load of old "dog cock" is very confusing, but no doubt Tourist and others can fill in the gaps for us
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 19:25
  #851 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
I see that Ocean's Sea Kings and Lynx are getting a mention at last:

Commander United Kingdom Task Group Takes Command Of Libya Maritime Strike Operations From HMS Ocean

Although it is HMS Ocean’s Apache attack helicopters from 656 Squadron Army Air Corps who have had much of the press following their strike missions into Libya, they have been ably assisted by Sea King Mk 7s of 857 Naval Air Squadron providing airborne surveillance and Lynx Mk 7s of 847 Naval Air Squadron providing force protection, all of which are also embarked in HMS Ocean.

Back (strictly) on topic - what state were the Harriers in prior to the SDSR axe/storage?

Last edited by WE Branch Fanatic; 12th Aug 2011 at 10:07.
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 19:57
  #852 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
"Rum Ration is nowt but the navel equivalent of ARRSE"

Actually, having a very good idea of RRs core audience, I would suggest it has very few serving matelots onboard, a fair number of retired 'life was better when I was in' matelots and a few civilian hangers on. RR in no way has the audience, support or attention that ARRSE has - its a damp squib of a site.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 21:20
  #853 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Midlands
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back (strictly) on topic - what state were the Harriers in prior to the SDSR axe/storage?
The Harriers were, as I'm sure you'd all expect for a 20+ year old aircraft, in a tired but fully serviceable and managed state. The higher FI aircraft were going through a fatigue life update with Mod KT553 and KT554 which strengthened the top longerons between the Front and Rear fuselage and was designed to more than see out the aircrafts expected OSD. Tail sections had a full upgrade programme planned in as part of the HPAC contract and were also designed to see out the OSD.

As has been mentioned many times however, spares were an increasingly frustrating issue. Thanks in no small part to the LEAN principle, the spares stock was run down to practically nothing, and what 10 years previously were routine demands or held stock, suddenly became "No Item Record" thus requiring all kinds of inventive solutions and Xmas trees!! This problem steadily got worse throughout the final 2 years of the Harrier's life

Thank heavens for 'Christine' which now adorns Wittering's gate!!

Here endeth my 2p worth!!


Flipflopman
flipflopman RB199 is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2011, 04:36
  #854 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
So the RN have refit the Illustrious at great expense and are sending it back to sea with its Ski Ramp as what, a decoration ?



The three ships, Invincible, Illustrious and Ark royal seemed to me, despite all criticism to be an ideal compromise for a Navy short on funds and looking for the maximum capability for its money.



The combination of this unique platform and the incredible Sea Harrier seemed and still seems unbeatable.



Many experts have said that a conventional carrier, in the Falklands could not have launched or recovered Aircraft in the sea states and other abysmal weather that existed down there.



An exceptional ship with an exceptional Aircraft, what a waste.
stilton is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2011, 07:18
  #855 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North West England
Age: 54
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sharkey Ward, Sharkey Ward, flying through the glade................

Sharkey Ward, Sharkey Ward, human hand greeenade.............

Makes more noise than a w*nking skelleetton....

Sharkey Ward, Sharkey Ward, Sharkey Waaaardd....


Repeat ad infinitum till he shuts his ill-informed beardy cakehole - some hope!

Blatantly plagiarised from the Python Sketch "Dennis Moore" - but hey it's my own lyrics!

Chorus : (sings) Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore,
galloping through the sward,
Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore,
and his horse Concorde.
He steals from the rich, he gives to the poor,
Mr. Moore, Mr. Moore, Mr. Moore.
Gaz ED is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2011, 08:14
  #856 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,156
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
I've just re-read some of Sharkey's World (minutes of my life I will never get back ), in particular a letter from Adm Woodward to Oliver Letwin in Apr 11. What a lot of utter tosh: DJRP "at least as good as RAPTOR", GR4 can only carry "perhaps 50 rounds" in high temperatures", and he claims Stormshadow was used against moving targets in Libya "(moving tanks/armour)". Just 3 random examples of total fabrication and disinformation. But I think I can see Sharkey's plan - he makes so many factual errors or misleading statements that no-one can be bothered to counter each and every one in the way he argues. Quite clever.

I still cannot fathom why men of such (former) respect are prepared to demean themselves by flying their flags on such a ship of drivel.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2011, 09:52
  #857 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North West England
Age: 54
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed - he grinds you down with complete garbage. It's part of his master-plan.

I hope nobody is listening..................

Mind you, StormShadow TOO mode would be worth it for a laugh against a technical or AFV. Wouldn't be much left!
Gaz ED is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2011, 13:08
  #858 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Thanks in no small part to the LEAN principle, the spares stock was run down to practically nothing, and what 10 years previously were routine demands or held stock, suddenly became "No Item Record" thus requiring all kinds of inventive solutions and Xmas trees!! "

Not 100% accurate, a 'no item record' will only appear if there is no MOD stock on the shelf and there has been no movement for the past 2 years. So if someone had demanded such an item it would have gone as an 'inability', which should (and I use the word should) have meant a request for spares on BAe for the airframe and Rolls Royce for the engine. And as for using the good ol' Chrismas tree, not a very good idea for 'C' class stores.
romeo bravo is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2011, 20:20
  #859 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the wife
Posts: 371
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
"Thanks in no small part to the LEAN principle, the spares stock was run down to practically nothing,
The disposal of spares for in-service aircraft was nothing less than a disgrace. In the charge for smartie points by ambitious, desk driving numptys, under the guise of RAB, we were directed to dispose of stock for which there was still a need - the kit was current and in use. It resulted in the obscenity of having to drive down to a civilian company in Somerset to recover, at vastly inflated prices, stock which we had been ordered to dispose of less than six weeks previous. The kit was still in the boxes which we had used and the paperwork , bearing my signature, was still attached to the boxes.

rb,

I think you may have meant to use the term 'No Unit Record' for the circumstances you describe. 'NIR' applied to a NSN that was not recognised - at least it did when I left although subsequent re-organisations may have changed that.

Last edited by 4mastacker; 27th Jun 2011 at 10:15. Reason: can't spell
4mastacker is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2011, 18:53
  #860 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know the RN are unhappy about losing the Harrier but did over 300 of their 'finest' air engineers really have to spend their 2 day conference chanting anti air force slogans and looking at pictures of RAF Police dogs?? Still, I supose they do have a lot of time on their hands. The bearded one will be so proud of his children.

"sticks and stones may break break our bones but the FAA still don't have any fast jets" I like this playground stuff, it reminds me of my youf.

Ps Love to know how much T&S was spent getting all those Captains, Cdrs and so on to and from the secret RN base near Gosport.
Neartheend is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.