Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk V

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jan 2010, 13:21
  #1401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker

Ill post it again

From the BA Press Office Website British Airways - Press Office

Summary of the headline figures

In December 2009, passenger capacity, measured in Available Seat Kilometres, was 4.2 per cent below December 2008. Traffic, measured in Revenue Passenger Kilometres, fell by 4.0 per cent. This resulted in a passenger load factor increase of 0.1 points versus last year, to 76.8 per cent. Traffic comprised a 0.7 per cent decrease in premium traffic and a 4.6 per cent decrease in non-premium traffic. Within premium, Club World was up 1.6 per cent. Despite severe weather in the month, 98 per cent of flights operated.
Cargo, measured in Cargo Tonne Kilometres, rose by 7.2 per cent.
My bold. Club world up by 1.6% but overall traffic up by only 0.1%.

Regards
binsleepen is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 13:43
  #1402 (permalink)  
cym
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys - Load Factor is a bad metric to use when looking at the financal health of an airline - anyone can get 100% LF - charge £1 per seat. In this context its yield thats important ie the difference between making a profit or a loss on a flight
cym is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 13:51
  #1403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker

If you mean that December's traffic was up on November's then I appologise but it was not how I read your post. I would have thought that December would always be a busier month than Nov or Jan for that matter. After all thats why Bassa chose the 12 days of Christmas in order to screw the most people

Regards
binsleepen is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 14:19
  #1404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You never compare load factor (or any other) changes to the previous month. It's meaningless. You do VLY (variance last year) instead - i.e. same month previous year.
Papillon is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 14:30
  #1405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker however you cut it BA is haemorrhaging money. The actions of BASSA are certainly not helping that and over the Christmas Period may have actually exacerbated the situation.

Posting BASSA "State Controlled" Galley FM on here is not going to convince anyone that the actions taken/threatened by a large portion of Cabin Crew at BA, due to a great deal of misleading information from senior BASSA reps, is sensible or proportionate.
Matt101 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 14:49
  #1406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rugby
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker wrote:
For your information the word regime is used to distinguish what is actually being enforced from what is considered legitimate. Im my opinion regime fits our current management quite nicely.
In which dictionary was that definition given, the BASSA flexible?
in my Oxford it states:
Regime: Method or system of Government, prevailing system of things.
Dawdler is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 14:53
  #1407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bucks
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dawdler

In which dictionary was that definition given, the BASSA flexible?
in my Oxford it states:
Regime: Method or system of Government, prevailing system of things.
You went to the trouble to look it up in your Oxford

Politics

In politics, a regime is the form of government: the set of rules, cultural or social norms, etc. that regulate the operation of government and its interactions with society. For instance, the United States has one of the oldest regimes still active in the world, dating to the ratification of its Constitution in 1789. Although modern usage often gives the term a negative connotation, like an authoritarian one, Webster's definition clearly states that the word "regime" refers simply to a form of government.[2]

The term is also used to distinguish what is actually being enforced from what is considered legitimate. Enforcement of an unconstitutional statute would be a regime but not a law.

State and statute: In general where people are made to statute and salute the government on a daily basis or live under the government's guidelines where idealism took dictative roles is a regime. In a regime, over time, ideological warfares dogmatize thought, replace politics with its own interests, and carries a large presence of hardliners in top positions. The dogmatism of the ideology outwhelmes all other interests.
A Lurker is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 15:07
  #1408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rugby
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must have led a sheltered life: I have never heard the word used as a negative connotation. But then perhaps I am old fashioned in outlook prefering dictionary definitions as indicated by your own reference to Websters. But then I regret the loss of the word "fewer" and the gaining usage incorrectly of "less" We clearly live in different circles.
Dawdler is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 16:04
  #1409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by A Lurker
What Galley FM have I posted?
Below are a selection of quotes from yourself which are based on BASSA hearsay and conjecture, are you the only one guilty of such things - no. Both sides of the debate are guilty of posting opinion disguised as fact but please, I respect your ability to fight your corner well and to have your say, but to say that you don't base some of your posts on Galley FM (or BASSA rumours) is not entirely true.

Ahhhhhh yes - but then of course BA will have to pay every longhaul crew member the agreed payment for working one down since the date of imposition. Plus BA will have then to agree the new working routines with the trades unions as per our agreements.
Quote: from HighFlyer14
Where does it say anywhere in the entire universe that we are going to be "put onto new rates of pay"?
When you've found it, can you please tell me WHAT my new rate of pay is going to be?
When you've done that, can you please tell me WHEN my new rate of pay is going to start?
Market Rate plus 10%

Your new rate of pay will start as soon as possible if BA win this fight
We have been through this time and time again - in many many posts - the changes are contractual
Ahhhhhh yes - but then of course BA will have to pay every longhaul crew member the agreed payment for working one down since the date of imposition. Plus BA will have then to agree the new working routines with the trades unions as per our agreements.
Matt101 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 16:30
  #1410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Epsom
Age: 65
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those of us who are not cabin crew, what does Galley FM mean?
Jpax is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 16:45
  #1411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Galley FM is simply gossip amongst cabin crew.
MissM is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 16:50
  #1412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A. Lurker - does it not strike you as odd that all other departments have come to an agreement with management other than cabin crew? Perhaps the fault lies with BASSA rather than the management?
Maybe because all the other departments gave up too easily and haven't realised that they will have changed their terms and conditions forever. They won't get them back!

As for our management and leadership team, I do not always agree with them. However, to refer to them as a joke is nothing short of insulting. BA have survived when many airlines have not. You have a job when many other cabin crew (on far lesser T and C's than you) have not. Perhaps it is BASSA that is the joke this time?
Why is BASSA a joke? Because they are sticking up for us and have made a good deal for us?
MissM is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 16:51
  #1413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CYM: Yield defined.

Sorry to correct you but yield is not the difference between fare paid and the cost. Yield is defined as the average fare paid per pax when you divide total revenue by the total pax numbers flown for a given period. I guess this thread is straying, my apologies.
TruBlu123 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 17:11
  #1414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MissM
Why is BASSA a joke? Because they are sticking up for us and have made a good deal for us?
No, it's because they lost 2 court hearings, because they made basic legal errors in preparing their ballot, because they think PWC are corrupt, because they thought their cost reductions added to £173million, then £100 million, then £50million, because they said they were striking with a heavy heart yet stood cheering as soon as the strike ballot was announced, because their leaders wanted a fist fight in the car park, because they said the recession was a temporary blip, because they believe they should have hands on operational control of their department, because they won't be flexible in the face of the worst snow in 30 years, because.........

I could go on, just got bored.

Other unions listened, NEGOTIATED, and came away with an acceptable solution to both parties that might help ensure their future employment, terms and conditions.

It's not hard, it just takes a little humility.
midman is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 17:23
  #1415 (permalink)  
28L
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker

For the umpteenth time it is VLY not from the previous month
I'm really not sure where you get your figures from. The latest BA published stats show the December 2009 Load Factor to be 76.8% and the December 2008 figure to be 76.7%.

Where does your figure of 1.9% come from when you say
I WILL SAY IT AGAIN - THE ORIGINAL POSTING WAS ABOUT DECEMBERS FIGURES NOT YEARLY FIGURES - LOAD FACTOR MONTH COMPARED TO MONTH UP 1.9%
?
28L is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 17:34
  #1416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, it's because they lost 2 court hearings, because they made basic legal errors in preparing their ballot, because they think PWC are corrupt, because they thought their cost reductions added to £173million, then £100 million, then £50million, because they said they were striking with a heavy heart yet stood cheering as soon as the strike ballot was announced, because their leaders wanted a fist fight in the car park, because they said the recession was a temporary blip, because they believe they should have hands on operational control of their department, because they won't be flexible in the face of the worst snow in 30 years, because.........
...because they offered a 2.61% paycut without consulting the members, because they offered LH767 to SH without consulting the members, because BASSA refused to be in the same room as Amicus during the negotiations but now they're bossom buddies, because they offered a 12 day strike over Xmas without informing the members, because they made the public hate us causing people to get spat at in their uniform, because they earn £150,000 in subscription fees but achieve nothing on our behalf, because they say everyone is corrupt (BA management, PWC, High Court Judges, etc) except themselves, because they refused to listen to members who dared to voice their concerns about the VR people getting a ballot, because speaking up for what we believe in is not allowed on CrewForum or the BASSA forum, because some of the reps are now allegedly committing gross misconduct and whingeing when BA take action, because they wouldn't negotiate due to imposition but now they're negotiating with imposition....and most importantly because they are PUTTING MY CURRENT CONTRACT WITH BA AT GRAVE RISK.

Good God, when it is all written down, I feel quite sick.

I am BA cabin crew and the above is my own view and not that of BA.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 17:55
  #1417 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can you not see the damage you are doing to the Company [or don't you care]?
What WE are doing to the company? What do you think the management is doing to the company? Let me think.. What about WW's intelligent comment about BA fighting for its survival?

Do you militants really think another airline will employ you [or are you financially secure]?
Personally I don't care because I will never go to another airline.

How do you think the travelling public, who pay your wages, actually feel about this [or don't you care about customers either]?
We care about our customers but we also care about our lives.

It's always easy to blame the innocent ones instead of the guilty ones. Of course management is not to blame over this. Of course not. Never! Why should they get any blame?

God, this is a madhouse
If this is a madhouse (and apparently you have also taken your business elsewhere), why are you here?
MissM is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 18:35
  #1418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's always easy to blame the innocent ones instead of the guilty ones. Of course management is not to blame over this. Of course not. Never! Why should they get any blame?
From one crew member to another, I sincerely ask you:
Can you honestly put your hand on your heart and say that UNITE are totally innocent in all this?

Can you honestly put your hand on your heart and say that "Yes PWC must truly be a corrupt company"? (They are not)
Can you honestly put your hand on your heart and say that "Yes, High Court Judges only rule according to their own personal travel plans."? (They do not)
Can you honestly put your hand on your heart and say that "Yes, BA Management (and IATA, the FT, etc) are lying about the recession"? (They are not)

Miss M, we are not saying these things to make you feel bad. We are saying them TO SAVE OUR JOBS. You say you care about your life. What life will that be, if BA goes under? What life will that be if we get the 90 days notice to change our contract?

At the moment OUR LIVES ARE NOT AFFECTED. Please do not tell me that working one crew member down is affecting our lives. It is not. So therefore, what on earth are you fighting for?

You were going on strike about imposition. Now, Unite are talking, and imposition is still there. So does that now mean the strike was a farce? How do you feel about that Miss M? I mean here we are still with imposition and Unite haven't done what they promised it's members. Personally I'm glad that they're talking, but it just shows Unite to be full of even more false promises.

So you have still have imposition, and the Union are talking. Errrr, why couldn't they have done that in July, Aug, Sept, Oct, Nov, Dec????

I am BA cabin crew and the above represents my own view and not that of BA.
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 18:38
  #1419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Lurker - still no date or amount or any factual evidence about my new pay deal then?
HiFlyer14 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 18:43
  #1420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 35,000 ft
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I can put my hand on my heart and say that BA are not lying in this. There is a recession on and we have to save money.
Yes, I can put my hand on my heart and say that BA have acted reasonably in all of this. They have made Voluntary redundancies. They have taken one crew member off an aircraft. They have as promised, "minimised the effect on me personally."

Your turn now Lurker. Answer the questions, without another question, if you can.
HiFlyer14 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.