Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

All borders to reopen.

Old 24th Jul 2021, 07:50
  #6401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,218
Check it out Aussie Bob… pass it on to your friends too
I did check it out, very interesting. Perhaps you should check this out: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...lence-of-evil/

Personally I don't believe or disbelieve either stats, I simply don't know. All I do know is that I don't feel particularly threatened by "the virus". I don't know why that is either, its just the way it is.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:12
  #6402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: The Swan Downunder
Posts: 855
Originally Posted by Aussie Bob View Post
You miss the point totally Xeptu, in 10 years time there will be the vaxed, the unvaxed, those that have been infected and survived (around 99.9% of cases survive) and those that have passed away, both vaxed and unvaxed as well as those who have never had been infected or never had any symptoms.

A perfect trial will have been completed. If you think this virus is going to wipe everyone out I think you have been misled.
My point was about "perfect clinical testing" It's not about dying and never has been. you need comparisons for vaccinated never infected, unvaccinated never infected, vaccinated infected.
In ten years we probably wont find a never infected person. Except perhaps lead balloon on his 11,000sq property
Xeptu is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:18
  #6403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,432
Another day, another bunch of lies to debunk spread by the anti-vaxxers that have infected this site.

Originally Posted by Aussie Bob View Post
The vaccine is classed as experimental in the USA and is released here in Aus under an emergency authorisation.
Rubbish and rubbish

The vaccine was rushed to market in record time and the usual long term testing and animal trials were skipped
Nonsense and bulldust

The manufacturers and the government plus the doctors and nurses are all indemnified from any liability regarding the administration of this vax
Not unusual

The vaccine itself is not without its risks and the long term effects are unknown
Try again

Perfect clinical testing I reckon :-)
Already done

dr dre is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:19
  #6404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 936
those that have been infected and survived (around 99.9% of cases survive)
The survival rate of infected individuals, that is those that don't die, is between 99% and 95% of those that catch Covid. The survival rate with no long term associated conditions is about 75%-85%. The survival rate among 60+ is much lower graduating towards 60% and below 40 year old or so better than 99%, with current strains that is. The US is running at just under 2% death rate from Covid pre vaccination, the UK running at about 2.5%. Australia is around 2.8%, so to be specific your chance from dieing in Australia, should you catch Covid is currently sitting at 2.8%, or 97.2% survival rate. Which is roughly the same chance of dieing if you try to intentionally kill yourself using prescribed medication, so intentionally catching Covid gives you similar rates of death to intentional suicide attempts.

The vaccine is classed as experimental in the USA and is released here in Aus under an emergency authorisation.
If you are referring to Astro Zeneca, only two versions manufactured in Asia are classified as such. Don't rely on simple google searches for this stuff, it is actually complicated and different manufacturers and location of manufacture of the same named vaccine have different approvals for use.

The manufacturers and the government plus the doctors and nurses are all indemnified from any liability regarding the administration of this vax
All Covid vaccines have been given general exemptions to liability.

In ten years we probably wont find a never infected person. Except perhaps lead balloon on his 11,000sq property
The down side to this tactic is that when you are finally exposed to the virus it could be worse, as you havn't built up progressive immunity to its effects. Similar to the European nations introducing viruses to native populations around the world. The longer you sit out these things the worse it could be for you.

Last edited by 43Inches; 24th Jul 2021 at 08:32.
43Inches is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:28
  #6405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,432
So now we have Holocaust Deniers posted here as a source?
dr dre is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:32
  #6406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: The Swan Downunder
Posts: 855
Originally Posted by Aussie Bob View Post
I did check it out, very interesting. Perhaps you should check this out: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...lence-of-evil/

Personally I don't believe or disbelieve either stats, I simply don't know. All I do know is that I don't feel particularly threatened by "the virus". I don't know why that is either, its just the way it is.
Most likely because you havn't been touched by the virus yet, Most don't know anyone who has been infected let alone became seriously ill. That leaves us with a sense of virus, what virus.

When Vic was in it's hour of need 4 of our girls volunteered to help, Because procedure and PPE was seriously flawed, something they realised the moment they went on duty, all 4 came home infected, 12 months on, none of them can say they are restored to perfect precovid health, Breathlessness for no apparent reason, bruising that comes and goes in the legs, arms and hands, for apparently no reason. loss of sensation, numbness.
Will they volunteer again, hell no, if a more severe strain emerges that is likely to overwhelm the health system, we are bugging out. These girls are professionals not scared easily, so that's a big deal coming from them.
Xeptu is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:38
  #6407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 936
When Vic was in it's hour of need 4 of our girls volunteered to help, Because procedure and PPE was seriously flawed, something they realised the moment they went on duty, all 4 came home infected, 12 months on, none of them can say they are restored to perfect precovid health, Breathlessness for no apparent reason, bruising that comes and goes in the legs, arms and hands, for apparently no reason. loss of sensation, numbness.
As I said earlier some hospital staff in Victoria are seriously afraid of this virus. They all relate the same story of friends that are bedridden months after 'recovery'. Also you here of the struggle some go through, the BA captain that died from Covid not long ago was seriously ill for 4 months before passing, it is not a nice or easy way to die.

One thing to note; I have mates in the US and UK, not once have I heard the same debate from there as it is here. They all went and got whatever vaccine was being offered and showed the vaccine slip like a badge of honor afterwards. None of them make light of the death rate or that its just "like the flu". As said above I think Australians again being in the lucky country have no real idea what its like if it gets loose, out of sight, make stuff up.
43Inches is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:55
  #6408 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,445
I just got home from visiting my mother. On the way back home, I was delayed by a “convoy” of anti vax protest cars blocking a 3 lane, 70 Kph highway by driving at 20 kph in all lanes. Their cars were covered in anti vax slogans.. including my favourite ..5G kills.

With these morons around, we have no hope.
SOPS is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 08:57
  #6409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 573
Originally Posted by Chronic Snoozer View Post
That would be 50% higher would it not?
Yes, bad maths on my part.
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 09:02
  #6410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nosar
Posts: 1,218
DOCTOR DRE:

You may be interested to know that I have read most of your posts and clicked through most of your links. I reiterate, I don't know. Clearly you do. You give the impression you know everything about this Covid thing. I am a simple pilot on a pilots forum and I now bow out of this discussion. I am not interested in a "battle of the links" either and will post no more on this thread .But before I leave, I will correct my 99.9% comment:

If you are fit and well with no underlying medical conditions I tend to believe you have a 99.9% chance of survival of this thing. (Perhaps I do believe something :-)

Also Doc: Nowhere, have I stated I am an anti vaxer, nowhere. This is just another "I know" viewpoint of yours and it is simply not true. Enjoy your superiority.
Aussie Bob is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 09:13
  #6411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 815
Originally Posted by SOPS View Post
I just got home from visiting my mother. On the way back home, I was delayed by a “convoy” of anti vax protest cars blocking a 3 lane, 70 Kph highway by driving at 20 kph in all lanes. Their cars were covered in anti vax slogans.. including my favourite ..5G kills.

With these morons around, we have no hope.
Volunteers for Aussie Bob's clinical trials?
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 09:18
  #6412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,432
Originally Posted by Aussie Bob View Post
If you are fit and well with no underlying medical conditions I tend to believe you have a 99.9% chance of survival of this thing. (Perhaps I do believe something :-)
The good thing about Science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it

Neil deGrasse Tyson

dr dre is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 09:31
  #6413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: HKG
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by SOPS View Post
With these morons around, we have no hope.
Oh yes, a classy bunch indeed- these Aussie heroes were also in Brissy today. When we open up and they want a hospital bed let’s tell them to get pf^cked.



Green.Dot is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 09:47
  #6414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 573
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon View Post
And there we have it!

Someone made a decision based on cost.
No, they likely did not. When the Australian government placed its order for AstraZeneca nobody knew what the delivered cost of any of the vaccines was going to be.

Moreover - and this seems to be lost on many - coming into the pandemic, despite 25 years of trying no pharmaceutical company had ever produced an mRNA vaccine. None, nobody, zilch, zero. mRNA vaccines had been spruiked as a concept for years - a good mate of mine did his PhD thesis on them back in the mid-1990s - but the concept had never been made real. Viral vector vaccines, on the hand, were a proven commodity. So, in what at the time looked like a prudent, low-medium risk decision the Australian government initially committed to a viral vector vaccine - AstraZeneca - and a molecular clamp technology vaccine - the University of Queensland v451- that they knew could both be manufactured here.

Of course, in the this pile-on mentality to just sh^tcan the government at every turn, what's also lost is that the initial decisions taken by the United States and the EU on vaccine acquisition were heavily biased towards which vaccine? AstraZeneca! Why? Probably the same reason - lower delivery risk. The Yanks ordered 300 million doses of AstraZeneca essentially right out of the blocks. Their commitment to Pfizer at that stage was around one third of that, 100 million doses.

Originally Posted by Lead Balloon View Post
But if only that someone had realised that the real costs of that decision would be vastly more than chump change like the "$100 million" to which you referred.
Yes, and 'if only' the fox hadn't stopped to scratch itself it would have caught the rabbit. If only.

Originally Posted by Lead Balloon View Post
From January this year, when it still wasn't a race:Quote:
Clinical trials for both vaccines have shown they’re broadly safe. In terms of efficacy, the Pfizer vaccine protects 94.5% of people from developing COVID. The AstraZeneca shot protects 70% of people on average — still pretty good and on par with the protection given by a flu vaccine in a good year.
From January this year, when it still wasn't a race:The Pfizer vaccine is better (on current data) than AZ.
Wrong measure of efficacy! Stage III trial vaccine efficacy against symptomatic infection is the wrong measure for comparing vaccines largely because the prevailing conditions in which the trials are conducted vary. The vaccine efficacies that count from a public health perspective are efficacy against hospitalisation, efficacy against ICU admissions and efficacy against deaths. On those measures, AstraZeneca and Pfizer were, and still are, line ball.

Originally Posted by Lead Balloon View Post
Aren't Australians worth the better vaccine?
At the time, both AstraZeneca and Pfizer were line ball on key efficacy measures. The latter was by then known to be eight times the cost of the former. Additionally, at that time Pfizer was failing to hit its production and delivery targets such that the EU was embargoing AstraZeneca to make up the shortfalls. You tell me which one you'd be opting for at that time.

Last edited by MickG0105; 25th Jul 2021 at 00:39. Reason: Spelling
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 10:06
  #6415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by MickG0105 View Post
No, they likely did not. When the Australian government placed its order for AstraZeneca nobody knew what the delivered cost of any of the vaccines was going to be.

Moreover - and this seems to be lost on many - coming into the pandemic, despite 25 years of trying no pharmaceutical company had ever produced an mRNA vaccine. None, nobody, zilch, zero. mRNA vaccine had been spruiked as a concept for years - a good mate of mine did his PhD thesis on them back in the mid-1990s - but the concept had never been made real. Viral vector vaccines, on the hand, were a proven commodity. So, in what at the time looked like a prudent, low-medium risk decision the Australian government initially committed to a viral vector vaccine - AstraZeneca - and a molecular clamp technology vaccine - the University of Queensland v451- that they knew could both be manufactured here.

Of course, in the this pile-on mentality to just sh^tcan the government at every turn, what's also lost is that the initial decisions taken by the United States and the EU on vaccine acquisition were heavily biased towards which vaccine? AstraZeneca! Why? Probably the same reason - lower delivery risk. The Yanks ordered 300 million doses of AstraZeneca essentially right out of the blocks. Their commitment to Pfizer at that stage was around one third of that, 100 million doses.


Yes, and 'if only' the fox hadn't stopped to scratch itself it would have caught the rabbit. If only.

Wrong measure of efficacy! Stage III trial vaccine efficacy against symptomatic infection is the wrong measure for comparing vaccines largely because the prevailing conditions in which the trials are conducted vary. The vaccine efficacies that count from a public health perspective are efficacy against hospitalisation, efficacy against ICU admissions and efficacy against deaths. On those measures, AstraZeneca and Pfizer were, and still are, line ball.


At the time, both AstraZeneca and Pfizer were line ball on key efficacy measures. The latter was by then known to be eight times the cost of the former. Additionally, at that time Pfizer was failing to hit its production and delivery targets such that the EU was embargoing AstraZeneca to make up the shortfalls. You tell me which one you'd be opting for at that time.
Curious that you refer to speaking against the Federal Government's efforts to be a "pile on" yet you write dismissive commentary about the Victorian Government "of sign me up to CCP belt and road fame".

Seems to me that your comments just smack 'slightly' of apologetics for what has effectively been on several criteria one of the worst governments we've had in Canberra - Robodebt, millions spent locking up 2 adults and 2 children, couldn't run a census competently when every other government has managed it ok for the preceding 114 years, my favourite was in the Abbott era he set up a committee to see how the Commonwealth could save money and it was abandoned after spending $M's more than budgeted, NBN a complete waste of money, spent more on copper to replace copper when fibre was a fraction of the cost, you couldn't write this stuff and have it accepted as not exaggerated for an episode of Yes Prime Minister.... why should the vaccine roll out be any different... and that's before we get into the absolute stacking of the AAT and mean legislation to attack charities that don't say nice things about the government as well as millions spent to try and discredit political oponent and sports and carpark rorts....
AerialPerspective is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 10:25
  #6416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 573
Originally Posted by AerialPerspective View Post
Curious that you refer to speaking against the Federal Government's efforts to be a "pile on" yet you write dismissive commentary about the Victorian Government "of sign me up to CCP belt and road fame".
Ah yes, because in dealing with the question of whether FIRB approval for a Chinese investor to acquire Virgin from Bain is likely, I wrote,
Unless Chairman Dan, of sign me up for CCP Belt and Road Initiative fame, makes it to the Federal Treasury benches the likelihood of that happening is essentially zero. It simply is not going to happen under a Coalition government given the current and foreseeable relationship with China.
Guilty as charged!


Originally Posted by AerialPerspective View Post
Seems to me that your comments just smack 'slightly' of apologetics for what has effectively been on several criteria one of the worst governments we've had in Canberra - Robodebt, millions spent locking up 2 adults and 2 children, couldn't run a census competently when every other government has managed it ok for the preceding 114 years, my favourite was in the Abbott era he set up a committee to see how the Commonwealth could save money and it was abandoned after spending $M's more than budgeted, NBN a complete waste of money, spent more on copper to replace copper when fibre was a fraction of the cost, you couldn't write this stuff and have it accepted as not exaggerated for an episode of Yes Prime Minister.... why should the vaccine roll out be any different... and that's before we get into the absolute stacking of the AAT and mean legislation to attack charities that don't say nice things about the government as well as millions spent to try and discredit political oponent and sports and carpark rorts....
And seems to me that you not so 'slightly' dislike the current government. You do you, maybe start a thread on that theme. I mainly do numbers, facts and stuff, generally "on thread".
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 11:33
  #6417 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,445
Just watching the vision of the protests in Sydney. Mostly no masks.. some moron punching a Police Horse.

Just like the Gold Standard Girl told us.. we do it different in NSW.

I can’t wait to see the spread from this.
SOPS is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 20:49
  #6418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 47
Posts: 1,218
Are we not keeping up with the scientific guidance? Outdoor transmission is not a thing anymore. Outdoor masking is only recommended in very crowded situations. (I guess this march qualifies.)

NYTimes special report on exaggerated outdoor transmission
mattyj is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 21:21
  #6419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NQLD
Age: 35
Posts: 251
Originally Posted by mattyj View Post
Are we not keeping up with the scientific guidance? Outdoor transmission is not a thing anymore. Outdoor masking is only recommended in very crowded situations. (I guess this march qualifies.)

NYTimes special report on exaggerated outdoor transmission
Hahahahaha!!! Australia keeping up with scientific guidance??

If that was the case they’d be allowing home quarantine for vaccinated travellers from low case countries (not just planning a trial).

Or they would have recognised that placing arrivals in a hotel room with windows that don’t open and recirculating air is a bad idea. Because it’s an airborne virus….

How many cases resulted from the various Victorian protests last year? Pretty sure it was none.

How many cases resulted from the various “infected persons” travelling on domestic flights? Pretty sure it was none.

The vast majority of cases are from spread between family members at home.

Even most of the initial “fleeting contacts” would probably be prevented by enforcing masks indoors ALL THE TIME, not just when there’s an outbreak.

After all, the risk today, is exactly the same as it was last year in Australia, because of the incredibly low vaccination rates. The risk of spreading the virus is still high.
aviation_enthus is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2021, 21:45
  #6420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 557
That last post is the only post that remotely makes sense. Australia has f$&ked it up big time and now we will pay the price for the next 50yrs.

On the upside I was listening to 2GB money show yesterday and they were talking about the share market this guy named 3 shares that he recommended to buy as a sure return on investment. 1 of those three were QF surprisingly. They closed at $4.55 on Friday they could go further down but he seemed to think it’s not if, but when and they will go above $5.00 when all is said and done with this border closure. He estimated you could make up to 25%.
SHVC is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.