Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Rumour: Sunstate Engineers suspended over aircraft sabotage?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Rumour: Sunstate Engineers suspended over aircraft sabotage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 10:06
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ROMULUS

As has been mentioned in the other JHAS thread the guys gave us a lot of slack to try and make it.
What do you mean by that exactly.

And what did the guys get for cutting you the slack????
Arnold E is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 11:38
  #222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1967 a year to remember

I wish to god I had never mentioned 1967

Arnold, I disagree mate. 1967 was an interesting year not to be forgotten -

The Vietnam War was raging

The Doors self-titled debut album is released

The Boston Strangler is convicted of numerous crimes and sentenced to life in prison

A Fistful of Dollars, the first significant “Spaghetti Western" film, is released in the United States

Apollo 1U.S. astronauts Gus Grissom, Edward Higgins White, and Roger Chaffee are killed when fire breaks out in their Apollo spacecraft during a launch pad test

The first Boeing 737 100 series takes its maiden flight. (I believe this aircraft may still be flying in Russia, Africa or Mexico!)

Boxer Muhammad Ali refuses military service

Elvis and Priscilla are married in Las Vegas

Free love was all the go and the 'moral compass' was yet to be invented so nudity, group sex and regularly smoking the green stuff was the norm !!

The Beatles release S’GT Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band’

Pink Floyd releases their debut album ‘The Piper at the Gates of Dawn’

Jim Morrison and The Doors defy CBS censors on The Ed Sullivan Show, when Morrison sings the word "higher" from their #1 hit Light My Fire, despite having been asked not to

Supersonic airliner Concord is unveiled in Toulouse France

Harold Holt, Australian Prime Minister, disappears when swimming at a beach 60 km from Melbourne

'Airlines were airlines' and not run by suckholes and accountants

Australain aviation regulatory reform was likely first discussed !!!!!

Last edited by Cactusjack; 23rd Dec 2010 at 12:46.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 19:53
  #223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Australain aviation regulatory reform was likely first discussed !!!!!
I think that was the year before....
newsensation is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 20:34
  #224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wish to god I had never mentioned 1967, that was the first time, when I was an apprentice, but please dont believe that I walked out the door for frivolous reasons.
Okay, now you have me confused.

I was an Apprentice too, from 1963 until 1967, and yes the then LAMEs went on strike in 1967 and we Apprentices wanted to support them, however we were advised that as Apprentices were could NOT strike, it was illegal for Apprentices to strike.

How did you do it???
airsupport is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 21:47
  #225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
we were advised that as Apprentices were could NOT strike, it was illegal for Apprentices to strike.
That's correct, it was illegal and probably still is. However, there were a fair few of us, around 40 from memory, and when our illegal action was presented to the Apprentice Commission,(dont know if such a body still exists) an investigation was started and the truth came out. No way was the Commission going to the cancel 40 apprenticeships.

Just as an aside. I was a second year at the time and it is interesting to note that not one of the fifth years joined us outside.
Arnold E is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 22:00
  #226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well as I said we wanted to support the LAMEs. but were prevented from doing so.

I am also sure that NONE of our Apprentices went out because of these threats.

Maybe you were with Qantas or someone else in NSW?

In Victoria (with Ansett) they were very strict about it, the Apprentice Authority and Ansett.

Also the then LAMEs told us we should NOT to get involved, and they promised to look after us as well, but they didn't of course.
airsupport is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 22:17
  #227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well ok I hear you, everybody here is telling me what you cant do,
So tell me what you can do.
And..... What is happening about the wages unlawfully removed from people's pay packet?
Arnold E is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 22:18
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
notwithstanding the flow of the apprentice debate, the fact that this shameful episode still remains unresolved is in itself a perversion of the principles of equitable justice.

AT
airtags is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 23:03
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well ok I hear you, everybody here is telling me what you cant do,
So tell me what you can do.
I would but you seem to have an inability to read or comprehend what is presented. You like to attack my union with crap like this.

Well, you have done really well then, haven't you.
NOTE: That for all the times I have walked out the door, I have never lost 60 day's pay TOTAL.
If you had been reading this (not just selective pieces) you would have noted that the 6 that are stood down are not losing pay. They will be enjoying Christmas with their famalies whilst the managers work in their place.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 23:16
  #230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well ok,fair point about the done well comment, but I am NOT attacking yours or any other union, I am actually a union supporter.
You are correct I did miss the important point of the guys still getting paid, that being the case, then well done, and infact that changes things considerably.
Arnold E is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2010, 23:57
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thnx for being reasonable in response. Just in brief -

6 are stood down on pay for snagging cockpit doors.

20 (which includes the six) were docked 4-28 hours pay for working on aircraft and not getting them out in the estimated time.

What can we do? Currently have on overtime bans and stopping for 4 hours on the 25th. Watching managers cut every corner in the book and reporting every breach to CASA. Supporting our mates to make sure they can still feed their families whilst being docked. We have initiated action under the General Protections Laws under the Fair Work Act for the 6. Some other things behind the scenes that are best left unsaid.

cheers
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2010, 00:01
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 6 that are stood down are not losing pay
Steve,

I didn't realise that either.

I thought they were not being paid at all.

So the only pay being lost is the ones that ARE working, but (in Sunstate/Qantas's opinion) are taking too long to start work and complete tasks etc?

The situation, though NOT as bad as I thought, needs to be resolved soon.

PLEASE continue to provide any news about this disgusting business.

Apologies to those that don't like to hear about Apprentices.
airsupport is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2010, 00:03
  #233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were 2 other replies why I was slowly typing that.
airsupport is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2010, 10:20
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: aus
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Long time reader first time writer from what I gather is going on with this predicament With Qantas / link is that Qantas is testing how far they can push little brother and get away with dirty tactic and to see how the union will deal with each curve ball they through and test the legal system aka fair work Australia, if Q can get away with prothetic alligations and can stand engineers down and dock wagers from engineers for simply doing there jobs with very little evident and that CASA simple do not wish to get involved and use the excuse that they are currently in negations it sounds very much like a bad day for the safety of aviation in Australia. I believe if this goes south it will certainly filter through to the rest of the aviation world in oz and if this is the case I would not like to work in the current environment and would be better of digging holes
I don’t know how managers can brake CASA regs and not be made examples off these people are meant to be in charge and be leading by example how can there be two different rules within the same company? One for engineers and pilots who do there best and rase safety issues be disciplined and managers that go out of there way to brake not only company policy but the aviations regulators laws and get away with it, something smells very bad in Q town,
Please correct me if I am wrong
L Riding hood is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2010, 21:37
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not Sydney
Posts: 139
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
LRRH - you got it!
1746 is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 00:19
  #236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 65
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the big Q

It would seem that in AJ's eyes the only people who he can't control are the engineer's.
Probably because way back you employed people who could think for themselves and make decisions, without running to management going " look what I did"
Both groups of Qlink flight attendants (sunstate & eastern) have knocked back their EA's - but no buggery happened there.
Eastern pilot's new EA I believe got knocked back too - true or false.
engineer's in Tamworth knocked back their EA - no buggery there yet either.

Are they really that scared of the engineer's or is that we generally have a brain and use it on a regular basis to make decisions without having to form a committee and waiting 3 months to get a result, if ever !

Without the shift penalties the QLink wages for a fully licensed engineer is crap $61k QL managers (word used loosely) seem to feel that holding a license for 5 mins is as good as having held one for 5 years or longer.

Too all who support - Thank you.
May the new year be better than the last.
Bigdog01 is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 02:08
  #237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: clouds
Age: 39
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Without the shift penalties the QLink wages for a fully licensed engineer is crap $61k


Hey Bigdog01, $61k is as you say, crap money (more money as an AME contracting by far). You guys used to have around 4 aircraft in the shed every night. Pull them appart then have them back on line the next day for the first departures. From here it is quite obvious the company is missing the main point. They were extremely lucky to have you guys doing this for them. If fact how did they get you guys to agree to it in the first place? I have known a few blokes who work there over the years and they reckon that all the work was done fairly early and you could get away at a reasable time. But that was back in the Shorts days. The Sydney guys work a rotating shift to give them a break from the nights, how come you guys did not do the same?

What is the local management doing? Their pride and joy in Brisbane is being ripped appart at the seams. Surely they are accountable for this!! It is a disaster for QLink, then paying third party companies huge sums to do what you guys did night after night.

No wonder guys are leaving. Are they ever going to attract people back? Maybe if the big Q realizes that the lower and middle managers have completely let down the Company, workers and paying passengers. Big chang is required. Word is spreading about the rubbish going down at QLink. I reckon the Mud will stick.
Isamu Pahoa is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 08:45
  #238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: under a rock
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Council knocked back the companys proposed *very generous, aka BS* EA. Voting of the pilot suggests that some action will be taken.
bubble.head is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 11:31
  #239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe if the big Q realizes that the lower and middle managers have completely let down the Company.....
What, like MH? Disappeared to state rail but has any of the damage been undone?
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2010, 15:44
  #240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: s28e153
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
none of these fine maintenance facilities deserve to be decimated
by a bunch of assclowns. they must be weeded out before any real
progress will be made.
the Sunstate situation is a glaring example of where the boss should
get turfed, imho.
to watch these pricks that blow in and out the door while destroying
the workplace is sickening. engine lines, heavy maint, every customer
that paid the bills. gone, gone, gone. makes you want to .
division1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.