|
Manchester Statistics - August 2019
Destinations that are either new (no passengers since my records started in January 2005), or have not been served for a number of years - if the latter then the month and year of the last service is shown. No new routes Million passenger routes (Rolling annual figures) Amsterdam - 1,055,088 passengers The following domestic statistics are missing from the CAA report for August. Belfast City & London City have not reported for this month In August 2018 these accounted for 27,904 passengers. Moving monthly and annual figures - based on CAA statistics/MAG statistics Monthly passengers - 3,336,826 + 5.79% Annual Total – 14,523,228 + 5.41% Moving Annual Total - 29,402,454 + 4.99% Monthly Movements - 20,791 + 3.07% Annual Movements – 95,690 +2.19% Moving Annual Movements - 203,729 + 1.44% Manchester Airport's August statistics Top destinations with highest percentage increase. https://i.ibb.co/4ThZj4c/Screenshot-381.png Top 25 destinations - by passenger numbers https://i.ibb.co/WD5YMDK/Screenshot-380.png Figures for the European and long-haul destinations that I consider to be the main points for our connecting traffic. https://i.ibb.co/v1WmVQp/Screenshot-382.png Istanbul figures are affected by the start of the Pegasus service to Sabiha Gokcen airport which I now show separately. Comparison of top 25 destinations - August 2009 versus August 2019 https://i.ibb.co/5KxBmp2/Screenshot-383.png Major changes to Domestic traffic https://i.ibb.co/cLwqdgQ/Screenshot-384.png CAA statistics for August are provisional. |
Originally Posted by Scottie Dog
(Post 10585750)
Manchester Statistics - August 2019
Destinations that are either new (no passengers since my records started in January 2005), or have not been served for a number of years - if the latter then the month and year of the last service is shown. No new routes Million passenger routes (Rolling annual figures) Amsterdam - 1,055,088 passengers The following domestic statistics are missing from the CAA report for August. Belfast City & London City have not reported for this month In August 2018 these accounted for 27,904 passengers. Moving monthly and annual figures - based on CAA statistics/MAG statistics Monthly passengers - 3,336,826 + 5.79% Annual Total – 14,523,228 + 5.41% Moving Annual Total - 29,402,454 + 4.99% Monthly Movements - 20,791 + 3.07% Annual Movements – 95,690 +2.19% Moving Annual Movements - 203,729 + 1.44% Manchester Airport's August statistics Top destinations with highest percentage increase. https://i.ibb.co/4ThZj4c/Screenshot-381.png Top 25 destinations - by passenger numbers https://i.ibb.co/WD5YMDK/Screenshot-380.png Figures for the European and long-haul destinations that I consider to be the main points for our connecting traffic. https://i.ibb.co/v1WmVQp/Screenshot-382.png Istanbul figures are affected by the start of the Pegasus service to Sabiha Gokcen airport which I now show separately. Comparison of top 25 destinations - August 2009 versus August 2019 https://i.ibb.co/5KxBmp2/Screenshot-383.png Major changes to Domestic traffic https://i.ibb.co/cLwqdgQ/Screenshot-384.png CAA statistics for August are provisional. Load factors analysis on certain routes https://i.ibb.co/v3mxTY7/Screenshot-385.png Calculations are based of FlightRadar24 for days of flight operation, Planespotter.net for Seat Plans and CAA data for monthly figures. |
Originally Posted by DUB19
(Post 10585798)
some of the LFs aren’t great, such as Singapore Airlines and Saudia,Unless the yields are strong |
MAN doesnt get 100% of the a/c to IAH, SIN or ADD, all are shared with SIN, IAH or BRU. Fares to Iraq are sky high and SV will be probably mostly be used by business, so I'd suggest yeilds aint that bad.
|
Originally Posted by CabinCrewe
(Post 10585840)
Oooft! not great. IAH, Iraq, Ethiopian, Saudia all pretty dire. They surely can't be sustainable. Doubt anyone believes they're being bolstered by yields. With regards to BGW & JED yes, i would agree but I understand that IA are able to charge high fares which should, if true, give a reasonable yield on a lowish load. What freight does SV carry - a good cargo figure could offset a lower passenger number. These are only my thoughts as a non-airport person. |
I was told that ETH only allocated 30% of seats to Manchester but has a good uplift of cargo, there are due to be quite a few B772 this winter so guess all OK ( ps someone I know said loads out of Brussels are very high)
|
Quick question: The terminal extension was planned to be open by summer next year but now hearing from MAN-based colleagues that it has been delayed until autumn as it’s six months behind schedule. Is this official? Not seen anything in the aviation press but maybe it’s appeared in the local papers? |
Originally Posted by Scottie Dog
(Post 10585849)
You have to remember that both IAH & ADD are split loads. What I don't know is what the split is for Manchester? Does MAN have 50pc, 30pc of the seats allocated to them - I don't know. Remember the flown seats are presumably the uplift at MAN and therefore the load-factor might need adjusting accordingly.
With regards to BGW & JED yes, i would agree but I understand that IA are able to charge high fares which should, if true, give a reasonable yield on a lowish load. What freight does SV carry - a good cargo figure could offset a lower passenger number. These are only my thoughts as a non-airport person. Singapore ship a magnitude of boxes both west and east ! and the available seats available for Manchester varies. Revenue targets and yield more than adequate one would have thought Ethiopian only one of any concern , however again loads of boxes going in the belly and some home office support in bolstering the cabin from time to time , along with NGOs . They need to address the backfill through with those paying customers with their African connection advantages . If they cant do that it tells us all how weak sub Saharan traffic demand from the North of England is in reality. |
Biman now bookable on website. 3 weekly with 788 from 4th Jan
|
Originally Posted by Mr Good Cat
(Post 10586149)
Quick question: The terminal extension was planned to be open by summer next year but now hearing from MAN-based colleagues that it has been delayed until autumn as it’s six months behind schedule. Is this official? Not seen anything in the aviation press but maybe it’s appeared in the local papers? |
I had it in my mind that April had been quoted previously.
|
It was April, but it wont be April.
|
SQ an ET are distorted as we've already established.
SV is a strange route as it's sort of seasonable with the Hadj. Sep/Oct figures will just look very weird with TCX etc. |
Originally Posted by Ex Cargo Clown
(Post 10586673)
SQ an ET are distorted as we've already established.
SV is a strange route as it's sort of seasonable with the Hadj. Sep/Oct figures will just look very weird with TCX etc. |
Originally Posted by eggc
(Post 10586665)
It was April, but it wont be April.
|
Originally Posted by Nostoodian
(Post 10586704)
In the next couple of years as Saudi Arabia relaxes its visa regulations and opens up to mass tourism, the Saudi route may well see an increase in loads.
|
Originally Posted by CabinCrewe
(Post 10587024)
That route cant last til' then surely with those loads? |
Originally Posted by CabinCrewe
(Post 10587024)
That route cant last til' then surely with those loads? Tickets at the back are cream but ain’t cheap most of the time Please stop applying pure capitalist profit loss and bums on seats methods- they are irrelevant here and In the case of the weekly Iraqi service |
Originally Posted by Rutan16
(Post 10587048)
Why again it’s massively subsided by BAE Systems both mid cabin and in the belly .Yield is adequate.
Tickets at the back are cream but ain’t cheap most of the time Please stop applying pure capitalist profit loss and bums on seats methods- they are irrelevant here and In the case of the weekly Iraqi service Meanwhile, BE MAN-GLA gone. |
You don’t know what that sweet spot is or indeed the depth of the BAE Systems contract I have an idea on the boxes alone !
There Heathrow flights rarerly touch much over 60% cabin loads either. Saudia go where the family and BIG business want them to and let me the you BAE Systems are HUGELY important to the Saudi’s . That freight is their very life line I can tell you. Oh and yes they’re projecting the Saudi Whiabi ”message” at the same time These flights are part of the reason you no longer see to many 4 and 12th squadron Hercs these days! |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 17:21. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.