Bournemouth-5
Guest
Posts: n/a
It is alleged that cargo will be further ramping up once again imminently. The current 3x weekly A340 to China is proving to be a success, despite busy commercial ops.
Despite the W23 schedule increasing slightly on last year, it’s disappointing to see a lack of new routes.
Despite the W23 schedule increasing slightly on last year, it’s disappointing to see a lack of new routes.
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Wales
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking at Ryanair it doesn’t look like DUB is on sale yet for winter! Maybe with the loads from April/May, the route may be doubtful going into the winter season?
April - 70% LF 132 pax
May - 61% LF 115 pax
April - 70% LF 132 pax
May - 61% LF 115 pax
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sadly there had been some negative publicity regarding staffing levels at the airport which inadvertently were affecting commercial operations.
I imagine an airport the size of BOH must have a shared pool of personnel who are involved in commercial & cargo ops.
Based on the consistently efficient turnaround of cargo aircraft, it is clear that despite a busy summer schedule (in BOH terms), cargo is not being compromised. It seems the airport is coping well, which is encouraging for yet another busy S24.
I imagine an airport the size of BOH must have a shared pool of personnel who are involved in commercial & cargo ops.
Based on the consistently efficient turnaround of cargo aircraft, it is clear that despite a busy summer schedule (in BOH terms), cargo is not being compromised. It seems the airport is coping well, which is encouraging for yet another busy S24.
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sadly there had been some negative publicity regarding staffing levels at the airport which inadvertently were affecting commercial operations.
I imagine an airport the size of BOH must have a shared pool of personnel who are involved in commercial & cargo ops.
Based on the consistently efficient turnaround of cargo aircraft, it is clear that despite a busy summer schedule (in BOH terms), cargo is not being compromised. It seems the airport is coping well, which is encouraging for yet another busy S24.
I imagine an airport the size of BOH must have a shared pool of personnel who are involved in commercial & cargo ops.
Based on the consistently efficient turnaround of cargo aircraft, it is clear that despite a busy summer schedule (in BOH terms), cargo is not being compromised. It seems the airport is coping well, which is encouraging for yet another busy S24.
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guest
Posts: n/a
SOU & BOH are very different places. SOU is nowhere near as superior to BOH as some people make it out to be. It has better transport links & a nice bar before security. That’s about it. SOU is a major transport hub for domestic flights, business & leisure. IMO, I think it’s unlikely SOU will ever compete directly with BOH. With current infrastructure, I believe SOU could perhaps manage some additional extra international routes. Certainly not enough to warrant TUI, Ryanair or EasyJet to create a hub. I believe BOH will continue to tick over commercially not exceeding 1.2M but not dipping below 750K passengers.
All personal assumptions of course.
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TUI already have S24 on sale. Two base aircraft, an increase in current schedule & 1 new route. It was rumoured earlier on Pprune that Ryanair were increasing their base aircraft to 3. Not sure how legitimate this may be.
SOU & BOH are very different places. SOU is nowhere near as superior to BOH as some people make it out to be. It has better transport links & a nice bar before security. That’s about it. SOU is a major transport hub for domestic flights, business & leisure. IMO, I think it’s unlikely SOU will ever compete directly with BOH. With current infrastructure, I believe SOU could perhaps manage some additional extra international routes. Certainly not enough to warrant TUI, Ryanair or EasyJet to create a hub. I believe BOH will continue to tick over commercially not exceeding 1.2M but not dipping below 750K passengers.
All personal assumptions of course.
SOU & BOH are very different places. SOU is nowhere near as superior to BOH as some people make it out to be. It has better transport links & a nice bar before security. That’s about it. SOU is a major transport hub for domestic flights, business & leisure. IMO, I think it’s unlikely SOU will ever compete directly with BOH. With current infrastructure, I believe SOU could perhaps manage some additional extra international routes. Certainly not enough to warrant TUI, Ryanair or EasyJet to create a hub. I believe BOH will continue to tick over commercially not exceeding 1.2M but not dipping below 750K passengers.
All personal assumptions of course.
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: La Manche
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TUI already have S24 on sale. Two base aircraft, an increase in current schedule & 1 new route. It was rumoured earlier on Pprune that Ryanair were increasing their base aircraft to 3. Not sure how legitimate this may be.
SOU & BOH are very different places. SOU is nowhere near as superior to BOH as some people make it out to be. It has better transport links & a nice bar before security. That’s about it. SOU is a major transport hub for domestic flights, business & leisure. IMO, I think it’s unlikely SOU will ever compete directly with BOH. With current infrastructure, I believe SOU could perhaps manage some additional extra international routes. Certainly not enough to warrant TUI, Ryanair or EasyJet to create a hub. I believe BOH will continue to tick over commercially not exceeding 1.2M but not dipping below 750K passengers.
All personal assumptions of course.
SOU & BOH are very different places. SOU is nowhere near as superior to BOH as some people make it out to be. It has better transport links & a nice bar before security. That’s about it. SOU is a major transport hub for domestic flights, business & leisure. IMO, I think it’s unlikely SOU will ever compete directly with BOH. With current infrastructure, I believe SOU could perhaps manage some additional extra international routes. Certainly not enough to warrant TUI, Ryanair or EasyJet to create a hub. I believe BOH will continue to tick over commercially not exceeding 1.2M but not dipping below 750K passengers.
All personal assumptions of course.
Guest
Posts: n/a
With many things, this forum is mostly speculation (there’s no problem with that). It will be interesting to see whether BOH & SOU gain any additional routes and/or operations for S24.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SOU & BOH are very different places. SOU is nowhere near as superior to BOH as some people make it out to be. It has better transport links
Last edited by LTNman; 31st Jul 2023 at 15:12.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brighton uk
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An excellent set of passenger figures for June which saw just shy of 115 , 000 passengers go through the airport
Bournemouth is now in the middle between Belfast City and Cardiff
Obviously the 2 nd based Ryanair has done the trick this year and hopefully with a 2 nd based TUI next year things will continue to improve
( still find it baffling though there is zero public transport links to the airport !! )
Palma saw a whopping 20 , 000 passengers and increased capacity to Malaga, Alicante , Faro and Gerona also saw big improvements
Ryanair should start to realise there Summer 24 schedule next month
Bournemouth is now in the middle between Belfast City and Cardiff
Obviously the 2 nd based Ryanair has done the trick this year and hopefully with a 2 nd based TUI next year things will continue to improve
( still find it baffling though there is zero public transport links to the airport !! )
Palma saw a whopping 20 , 000 passengers and increased capacity to Malaga, Alicante , Faro and Gerona also saw big improvements
Ryanair should start to realise there Summer 24 schedule next month
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: public transport
What's surprising is how rubbish the service is 🤣
https://bustimes.org/services/737-bo...outh-airport-3
What's surprising is how rubbish the service is 🤣
https://bustimes.org/services/737-bo...outh-airport-3
The bus service is aimed at the industrial site workers in the NW quarter.
I don't think the airport operators want public transport as they can make a lot of money fron car parking and drop off charges.
The road to the terminal doesn't even have a foot path and a sign says "No Pedestrians".
I don't think the airport operators want public transport as they can make a lot of money fron car parking and drop off charges.
The road to the terminal doesn't even have a foot path and a sign says "No Pedestrians".
Guest
Posts: n/a
The bus service is aimed at the industrial site workers in the NW quarter.
I don't think the airport operators want public transport as they can make a lot of money fron car parking and drop off charges.
The road to the terminal doesn't even have a foot path and a sign says "No Pedestrians".
I don't think the airport operators want public transport as they can make a lot of money fron car parking and drop off charges.
The road to the terminal doesn't even have a foot path and a sign says "No Pedestrians".
Likewise, it doesn’t seem appropriate to allow vehicles to stop and drop off on the access road into the airport. It will cause traffic and be a hazard to pedestrians, more so since the increased schedule for cargo (large articulated lorries).
By installing a footpath, I believe it would almost encourage individuals to be dropped off and walk into the airport.
I suppose the only alternative would be for the airport to purchase some additional land & allow lay-by installation. This all involves cost & also willingness of the land owner to sell their land.
A National Express service would be the even better option!
People do drop-offs at the entrance to the NMSB quarry opposite the airport entrance. Quite a few people walk to the terminal along the road.
Before the current terminal was built there was a footpath.
Before the current terminal was built there was a footpath.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brighton uk
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bit of a “ Rumour “ and I repeat “ Rumour “ going around , that the airport is possibly looking at the potential of extending the runway again for the cargo operation with the A340s of European to China etc
Is this a possibility within the airport boundaries, I am guessing it would have to be the threshold of runway 26 to be of any potential ?
Is this a possibility within the airport boundaries, I am guessing it would have to be the threshold of runway 26 to be of any potential ?
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waters edge
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How to extend a runway without pouring concrete
Bit of a “ Rumour “ and I repeat “ Rumour “ going around , that the airport is possibly looking at the potential of extending the runway again for the cargo operation with the A340s of European to China etc
Is this a possibility within the airport boundaries, I am guessing it would have to be the threshold of runway 26 to be of any potential ?
Is this a possibility within the airport boundaries, I am guessing it would have to be the threshold of runway 26 to be of any potential ?
The location of the road at the western end currently requires that the 08 threshold be displaced (not unlike Runway 20 and railways at Southampton).
At Hurn with the displaced threshold the 08 landing distances for a heavy aircraft will be marginal at times, for instance a wet runway and little/no headwind.
However with operating measures to close the road for 08 landings when required (traffic lights/barriers for instance), it should be possible to move the 08 threshold markers closer to the western end of the runway while meeting CAA requirements. And voila, you have improved landing distance on 08, closer to or equal to those on 26.
A runway extension with no runway extension if you see what I mean.
It would necessitate moving the ILS Glide Path, new runway threshold and touch down markers and revised lighting. As well as traffic controls perhaps even barriers on the road for the few occasions when an aircraft wishes to use 08 for landing.
Conversely the 08 Take Off Distance Available is excellent, whereas 26 is somewhat impeded by the road. The 08 measures might also permit improvements to 26 take off distances for instance with arrester tools such as EMAS.
There is almost certainly some scope for achievable improvement of the usable distances without actually extending the runway.
FF