Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Coronavirus Impact on Air Travel

Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Coronavirus Impact on Air Travel

Old 30th May 2020, 10:50
  #1061 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 2,389
Originally Posted by Vokes55 View Post
As of yesterday, the UK has now done more tests than any other country in Europe, and is third in the world behind the USA and Russia. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ is a good source of information, including the all important deaths per million population figure, much to the annoyance of the sensationalist drama queens in this thread that can't see past the raw death figures.
Yes, I know that website and was hoping to use it to obtain the daily numbers for other European countries. The trouble is that the 'Total Tests' for Spain, France and Germany have not been updated for at least two days - they obviously must have carried out a large number of tests since the total numbers currently shown on the website.
Expressflight is offline  
Old 30th May 2020, 10:52
  #1062 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,859
Vokes - the positive test cases reported by the Department of Health do not include the number of people staying at home while coughing away. The question for Spain is whether 2,000 cases per day represents a very small tip or a large chunk of the iceberg
Not strictly true. There is a longitudinal study ongoing at the moment where 10,000+ people chosen at random are being tested regularly, whether or not they have symptoms, and as far as I am aware, these tests form part of the UK daily figures. That said, it only forms 10% or so of the total daily testing in UK. These people may, or may not be coughing away, and of course may or may not be asymptomatic.
ATNotts is online now  
Old 30th May 2020, 12:38
  #1063 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,450
And the testing of everyone at Weston hospital showed that a large majority of the positive tests came from people without symptoms, but obviously still infectious.
​​​​​​Several posters are assuming that the numbers will continue to fall over the next weeks, and that we can safely plan on that basis. I and others, including the epidemiologists, think that we should wait until we have the situation clearly fully controlled. The chaos if thousands book holidays which then have to be cancelled....

Perhaps we should only allow self catering accommodation?

As the Canary Islands tourism minister said, very limited this summer with a view to a full winter.
inOban is online now  
Old 30th May 2020, 12:48
  #1064 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: The EU
Posts: 308
Originally Posted by inOban View Post
As the Canary Islands tourism minister said, very limited this summer with a view to a full winter.
Easy for them to say that when Winter is their busiest season. I donít think youíll get anybody responsible for tourism in the Balearics saying the same.

And yes the number will go down. And life will go on.
Vokes55 is offline  
Old 30th May 2020, 12:59
  #1065 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,450
True, but increasing numbers are going to the Costas on winter also. With global warming, I don't know why anyone wants to go to the Med in summer.
inOban is online now  
Old 30th May 2020, 13:03
  #1066 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 4,021
Originally Posted by inOban View Post
True, but increasing numbers are going to the Costas on winter also. With global warming, I don't know why anyone wants to go to the Med in summer.
Palma de Mallorca city centre in January can very easily be cold, rainy and miserable. Beach would probably be a complete non-starter
davidjohnson6 is online now  
Old 30th May 2020, 19:38
  #1067 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 121
Originally Posted by inOban View Post
There seems to be a sense of British exceptionalism among some posts. The world no longer revolves around us.
I think it's spin. Look back on the peak of the crisis in Italy and we were showed reports of army trucks carrying coffins.
In the UK, with a higher number of deaths, it seems that the message is that we've done quite well.

Or maybe UK funeral directors have more resources...
mike current is offline  
Old 30th May 2020, 20:07
  #1068 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,450
The number of deaths in Italy was much higher than could be recorded in real time.
If you read the article below you will find a comparison between the recorded Covid19 deaths and the total number of excess deaths.

https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...article-link-6

In summary, Belgium has no xs deaths. Many other countries, inc the UK, have quite a lot of xs deaths, but in Italy the real death rate is twice the declared number.
inOban is online now  
Old 31st May 2020, 06:59
  #1069 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 5,153
The Covid-19 coronavirus is still relatively new, so accurate data on how it can spread between aircraft passengers is in short supply. But previous studies have looked at the spread of other respiratory illnesses. Based on the available information, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention generally tries to track down people sitting in the two rows in front and the two rows behind passengers found to have serious infections.

A 2018 study by researchers from Emory University in Atlanta attempted to model how passengers and crew moved about an aircraft, and how that might affect the transmission of infectious diseases. "A droplet-mediated respiratory infectious disease is unlikely to be directly transmitted beyond one metre from the infectious passenger. Thus, transmission is limited to one row in front of or in back of an infectious passenger," the researchers concluded.

But contrary to this, earlier research - led by the same academics - had shown that in real life cases passengers with Sars or influenza actually appeared to have infected a number of people well outside their immediate area. Their explanation was that some of those who became ill had become infected in the airport, while embarking or disembarking from the plane, or from touching contaminated surfaces, rather than by breathing in infected droplets.
"Filtration only works on mass airflows, most of the transmission during a plane journey will be those short-range face-to-face conversations. Close range aerosol transmission is what you have to be worried about on a plane, train or a bus - this is the biggest risk."

And even if you are further away, the risk is not eliminated, says Dr Tang. "How long Covid-19 can remain airborne depends on a range of factors. It varies between different people, it varies depending on the state of your infection, and you can't say all the droplets will fall to the ground within two metres. Some smaller droplets can stay suspended and travel up to 16 metres - and they all could be carrying the virus."
BBC - Coronavirus: How safe is it to get on a plane?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 18:41
  #1070 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 61
Posts: 218
Under the current circumstances who in their right mind would want to go abroad from the UK ? Currently the FCO still advises against it, countries like Greece and Spain have banned us. If you got to your destination you might have to quarantine, social distance etc etc. It would be the most unrelaxing experience and a holiday from hell. Then travel home and spend another couple of weeks in quarantine, all the time wondering have I caught it ? There are so many stories about being safe in an aircraft, people will be paranoid if someone sneezed or coughed in the aircraft. Have heard that some airlines are going to make it mandatory to wear face masks, example five hour flight, no food or drink, permission to use the toilet. It's a nightmare ! But I guess there will be some who will try ?

Not for me, I am waiting it out, my family is far too important to risk them !
helipixman is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 19:14
  #1071 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 4,021
If quarantine-on-arrival is dropped by the UK Govt, I'm beginning to think a summer holiday in rural Sweden could be a good option.
davidjohnson6 is online now  
Old 31st May 2020, 19:39
  #1072 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Luton/Tenerife
Posts: 883
''Under the current circumstances who in their right mind would want to go abroad from the UK ?''

I for one would be happy to come back here to Tenerife, where yesterdays figures were 2 new cases and Nil deaths, 14 days quarantine in my apartment and then feel safer than in the uk. Listening to friends that have made the journey to/from uk on that 'dreaded' plane was not as you describe but was quite orderly. but each to their own and I would have no hesitation in making the journey.
ericlday is online now  
Old 31st May 2020, 19:45
  #1073 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Luton/Tenerife
Posts: 883
Spain has delivered a huge blow to British tourists who have their sights set on a Spanish summer holiday this year.

THE country’s Minister of Industry, Commerce and Tourism Reyes Maroto has stated that the UK’s Covid-19 statistics must improve before Brits can return to Spain, but welcomed tourists from low-risk coronavirus countries like Germany and the Nordic states. In an interview with Efe yesterday, she pointed out that “holidaymakers from the UK would have to wait to come to Spain until the country’s coronavirus statistics improve,”

Although Maroto has spoken with tour operators like TUI and Jet2holidays, she is adamant that the UK’s health statistics must improve before holidaymakers can come back, pointing out that “the British authorities are also advising against international travel, so tour operators in the UK are at a standstill right now.”
According to Maroto, it’s vital that the “first tourists to Spain are at the same stage of the pandemic as us.” So she plans to welcome holidaymakers from low-risk Covid-19 countries first, particularly if Spain can open its doors to international tourism in mid-June, thanks to the ‘safe travel corridors’ concept. If the safe corridors concept can be agreed, “Spain will prioritise and welcome tourists from countries with low rates of coronavirus, such as Germany and some Nordic nations,” confirmed Maroto.

Spain could potentially start to welcome international tourists from mid-June to areas that are safe and ready for international tourism, like the Baleares and Canary Islands once the safe corridors are approved. Some of the islands in both territories are expected to enter Phase 3 of de-escalation on Monday June 1, which are well ahead of most of the other regions in the country. They include La Gomera, El Hierro, La Graciosa in the Canary Islands and Formentera in the Baleares.

ericlday is online now  
Old 31st May 2020, 20:48
  #1074 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 567
Ericlday, this may be true now, given that we're some weeks behind Spain, and will probably still be the case mid-June, but given that the U.K airlines are realistically looking at a Jul start, we'll probably be in a whole different picture by then.
The96er is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 20:58
  #1075 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,450
I think that probably is too strong a word. The current trends do not suggest that numbers will have fallen to a level any sane European government would consider safe.
inOban is online now  
Old 31st May 2020, 21:27
  #1076 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: scotland
Posts: 102
Originally Posted by ericlday View Post
''Under the current circumstances who in their right mind would want to go abroad from the UK ?''

I for one would be happy to come back here to Tenerife, where yesterdays figures were 2 new cases and Nil deaths, 14 days quarantine in my apartment and then feel safer than in the uk. Listening to friends that have made the journey to/from uk on that 'dreaded' plane was not as you describe but was quite orderly. but each to their own and I would have no hesitation in making the journey.
Looking forward again to arriving at the Cristiano Ronaldo Madeira International Airport, 24July,can't come soon enough,05/23 wonderful.
ericsson16 is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 22:38
  #1077 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,450
The last two posters are quite free to make a personal risk assessment on the danger of travelling in a confined space with 180 other people to a place with little or no virus.

The governments of Tenerife and Madeira have to make an assessment of the risk to their communities of receiving planeloads of visitors from the virus hotspot of Europe.
inOban is online now  
Old 31st May 2020, 23:07
  #1078 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: The EU
Posts: 308
The governments of Tenerife and Madeira will also have to make an assessment of the socioeconomic impact to their communities of having their largest industries, and associated jobs and livelihoods decimated by an overcautious approach to a virus that is largely dying out in Europe.

Change the record, inOban. Spain had more deaths per 1000 population than the UK, and it looks like Tenerife is happy to let people in from the mainland. Maybe listen to facts instead of believing everything you see and hear by "experts" on the news. Hearing somebody say "the UK has more daily cases today than when we went into lockdown" by a so-called expert on Sky News this morning was enough to reach for the remote.
Vokes55 is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2020, 00:41
  #1079 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,450
I know that it's getting late, but that statement on Sky need is factually correct isn't it?
It does not matter what the infection rate was 8 weeks ago. It's the current rate that matters. It seems that many Med destinations have decided that, balancing the risk to their tourist economy vs the health of their residents, they can accept visitors from those places which now have consistently low rate of new cases. The UK is not such a place at present and unless things suddenly improve, won't be for longer than we would wish.
inOban is online now  
Old 1st Jun 2020, 09:02
  #1080 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: The EU
Posts: 308
Originally Posted by inOban View Post
I know that it's getting late, but that statement on Sky need is factually correct isn't it?
It does not matter what the infection rate was 8 weeks ago. It's the current rate that matters. It seems that many Med destinations have decided that, balancing the risk to their tourist economy vs the health of their residents, they can accept visitors from those places which now have consistently low rate of new cases. The UK is not such a place at present and unless things suddenly improve, won't be for longer than we would wish.
You honestly believe more people are being infected now than on March 23rd?
Vokes55 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.