Durham Tees Valley-7
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by highwideandugly
History..tells us it wouldn’t work.
The next question is who goes first on the ABZ route?? Because someone will...and we will be back to square one..
The next question is who goes first on the ABZ route?? Because someone will...and we will be back to square one..
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 42
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The flight will still operate, it just won't pick up passengers. I think they would continue to offer it if there were other flights anywhere near the departure time. I stick by my point of earlier in the week, it can't have been economical to open up departures for those handful of people.
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stockton On Tees
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1
The flight will still operate, it just won't pick up passengers. I think they would continue to offer it if there were other flights anywhere near the departure time. I stick by my point of earlier in the week, it can't have been economical to open up departures for those handful of people.
The flight isn't going to be operating. The flights you book on Loganair website for the Aberdeen to Norwich are BMI regional flights.
It is very good news to hear Loganair are very pleased with how things are going on the DTVA - Aberdeen route.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: England, UK
Age: 59
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The next question is who goes first on the ABZ route?? Because someone will...and we will be back to square one..
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Durham
Age: 78
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought Loganair could have utilized the spare couple of hours by flying to either Dublin or Belfast. I suspect the downturn in the oil industry would have affected the Norwich route. Any prize for the next route they will operate!
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Galway ROI
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rumour has it Dublin may be on the cards, not sure if they'd be able to swing
Am interline agreement with Aerlingus.
It was a bit in a local Conaught newspaper , though most comments said they felt the story was wrong and that Belfast was most likely.
But they are said to be firmly committed to extra routes , I'm not sure the range on their Aircraft but would Stavanger fare any better than Norwich ?
Am interline agreement with Aerlingus.
It was a bit in a local Conaught newspaper , though most comments said they felt the story was wrong and that Belfast was most likely.
But they are said to be firmly committed to extra routes , I'm not sure the range on their Aircraft but would Stavanger fare any better than Norwich ?
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The down turn in the oil industry has obviously affected such routes as DTV to Norwich with minimal loads so I can't see a link to Stavanger fairing any better during the down turn and I would have thought that if there was sufficient demand an airline would have resumed a link from Newcastle by now.
Companies say that they are 'fully committed' all the time it's just PR most of the time unless any written agreement is signed it means sod all, look at how many airports that have had airlines saying that and before you know it they are history.
I wouldn't hold my breath regarding Loganair having a long term relationship with DTV, I'm not knocking the airport in anyway but that's how I personally see it.
The limited amount of Guernsey flights could always remain at DTV considering that they are aligned with a travel company so seat sales more or less will be taken up especially considering the amount of flights available.
Companies say that they are 'fully committed' all the time it's just PR most of the time unless any written agreement is signed it means sod all, look at how many airports that have had airlines saying that and before you know it they are history.
I wouldn't hold my breath regarding Loganair having a long term relationship with DTV, I'm not knocking the airport in anyway but that's how I personally see it.
The limited amount of Guernsey flights could always remain at DTV considering that they are aligned with a travel company so seat sales more or less will be taken up especially considering the amount of flights available.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Graham it wasn't until I sent it that I immediately realised that BMI do fly from Newcastle to Stavanger but fair play to you for being quick off the mark
I won't change my post though to correct it I'll leave it to you for being so quick to remind me.
I won't change my post though to correct it I'll leave it to you for being so quick to remind me.
EGPO - interesting that flights from DTVA are being discussed in the Connaught press - can you provide a link?
Canberra97 - which company is involved - no reference in the licence application?
Canberra97 - which company is involved - no reference in the licence application?
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well my mistake then but I thought I had read somewhere regarding a travel company backing the Guernsey flights, it's not Superbreak but again I could have mistaken it but if I do find it I will post a link.
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stockton On Tees
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is time the LAs got on with the plans for the new train station and the park & ride system next to roundabouts on airport approach road.
If that happens it will mean the freight sidings can be added to airport site next current location of the pointless railway halt. All covered in the DTVA masterplan documents. http://www.durhamteesvalleyairport.c...Masterplan.pdf
If that happens it will mean the freight sidings can be added to airport site next current location of the pointless railway halt. All covered in the DTVA masterplan documents. http://www.durhamteesvalleyairport.c...Masterplan.pdf
The airport itself is nowhere near the position where it could justify a train station - if the LA's feel that the housing development (plus those nearby) warranted a train station, it should have been made a condition of the planning permission.
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stockton On Tees
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The plan wasn't for station to be at the airport. The plan was for a park & ride system for the Tees Valley area with train station next to it. That site was chosen because it has good road access and is next railway line that gives access to the local town centres and business parks. It is a bonus that it will give better transport links to airport but it would still require a bus between the park & ride / train station and the airport terminal building.
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stockton On Tees
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Work on the Premium Lounge should be completed by spring 2018. Premium Lounge
The maintenance and remedial costs of maintaining the current infrastructure are estimated as high as £6m over the next five years – expenditure which is not in line with our business goals. We are not currently pursuing full closure of the station which would require support from both regional stakeholders and the relevant rail authorities.
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Behind a desk, dreaming of the sky
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saving £6m by 2022. Exactly HOW does one platform and footbridge cost £1.2m-£1.5m to maintain? I admire the need to cost cut, but that'd be like me saying "i'm gonna save £1m by not drinking and selling a kidney"
