Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2017, 12:17
  #8101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Call for direct India flight

From MIDAS, reported in the MEN.

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/business-news/businesses-back-direct-flight-india--13262781
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2017, 15:35
  #8102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sparkysam
To compare MAN with RHO is probably not a true reflection, we spent 95 minutes checking in last night and 10 minutes scanning bags. The temperature in the departure hall was approx 35c. Arrival at MAN was easy the only thing was the walk from the aircraft to T2 as it was very wet. We are very lucky to have such a great facility on our doorstep
Cheers Sam
In all my flights in and out of MAN it has never approached my experience at RHO for chaos. However, I can imagine a bad day in T3 especially might be worse than a good day at RHO. Other than security I have never had a particularly bad experience in T2. Like many places I have been T2 security is as much a factor of the passenger mix as anything else.
pholling is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2017, 18:44
  #8103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Thomson route to Podgoricia next summer:

TOM648 MAN 0600 TGD 0955
TOM649 TGD 1055 MAN 1300
Sunday's from 20th May.

2nd route to Montenegro with Easyjets Tivat route.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2017, 22:19
  #8104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roverman
The image LAX_LHR posted was indeed Option 5 of 6 considered at the feasibility stage of MAN-TP. One of the drawbacks of this particular design was the lack of a dual Code E (B777/A330 etc) taxiway system. The retention of stands in front of the cargo sheds meant only enough room for a dual Code C taxiway system along the terminal (B737 / A321, and just visible in the image). This was found in simulations to be inadequate for the volume of large aircraft now using MAN and thus the adopted Option 6 was modified to include a dual Code E taxiway. Developing on the basis of Option 5 is not currently a working project but clearly going for a continuous linear extension through the current T1 footprint is an attractive option and becomes more feasible once T1 has been replaced by the expanded T2 next decade
Hi Roverman

From what I've seen and heard, my understanding is that "scenario 6" would be progressed with flexibility to 2020 to consider "scenario 5".

That seems to follow your explanation, but it does leave a question mark about the land to the north of where a replacement for T1/3 would be situated. Is that a "scenario 1" type of solution (which to me doesn't seem the most optimal) or is there something more significant - to create additional space next to the runway - a viable option?

Cheers!

Dobbo
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 05:55
  #8105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American excelling themselves again PHL on time JFK 3 hours late and ORD CNX
with aircraft due operate flight having diverted earlier in day and obviously no spare aircraft
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 09:09
  #8106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK & Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chaps1954
American excelling themselves again PHL on time JFK 3 hours late and ORD CNX
with aircraft due operate flight having diverted earlier in day and obviously no spare aircraft
When AA cancel an ORD its easy to divert passengers on the shuttle down to LHR or via one of their US hubs - even if they are delayed!
brian_dromey is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 11:42
  #8107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern skyport
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It`s not so easy to reroute pax onto the shuttles when they are full, as they inevitably are.
bar none is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 12:02
  #8108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And it's very well to say that it's easy to divert passengers down south, but what about the 27 poor sods that were travelling AUH-MAN-ORD, who are now faced with yet another stop en-route. Thank god it wasn't yesterday, there were 59 connecting on the same route!

How about rather than divert passengers, and not cancel the flight at all. It seems for the past 2 years at least, AA are finding it far too easy to cancel the Manchester flight. It must be one of the poorest OTP TATL routes AA has now.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 12:55
  #8109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Given that there are at least 6 AA/BA a day ORD-LHR, would it not be easier to drop one of the LHR flights than the sole MAN to/from ORD ?
Mr A Tis is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 13:27
  #8110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 63
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr A Tis
Given that there are at least 6 AA/BA a day ORD-LHR, would it not be easier to drop one of the LHR flights than the sole MAN to/from ORD ?
Drop an LHR flight dont be silly, much easier to drop the MAN-ORD flight !
BHX5DME is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2017, 09:52
  #8111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given that there are at least 6 AA/BA a day ORD-LHR, would it not be easier to drop one of the LHR flights than the sole MAN to/from ORD ?
You were being flippant?

How about distributing some of the LHR daily deps around the regions....

ATL (5), BOS (6), ORD (9), DFW (4), IAH (4), LAX (9), MIA (6), JFK (20), EWR (10), PHL (4), SFO (6), IAD (6).

30 deps to NYC... I cant even be bothered ranting about it.
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2017, 20:30
  #8112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think there is any point getting pent up about the volume of services from LHR. It is the primary hub for the U.K. and for London, which is one of the two primary cities on the planet. The other is New York, so it's hardly surprising that there is a vast number of services between the pair.

MAN has traditionally lost market share through LHR, but is starting to claw it back. It's a major player on the European stage, and for that reason I'd rather focus on what MAN and its airline partners can achieve, together with the rest of the northern cities, over the next few years.
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2017, 21:46
  #8113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was about 40plus transferring LHR-MAN -JFK/ORD/PHL from AA this morning. Not sure if AA are overbooking their LHR-US services, but it's becoming in more common for pax to transfer LHR-MAN-US than the other way around.
The96er is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2017, 07:22
  #8114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cornwall, uk
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see that NQY-MAN on flybe has topped 8000 for the first time ever in May.

Would seem just a matter of time before it goes double daily year round and then a morning, lunch and evening during the summer.


cs
cornishsimon is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2017, 08:58
  #8115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was about 40plus transferring LHR-MAN -JFK/ORD/PHL from AA this morning. Not sure if AA are overbooking their LHR-US services, but it's becoming in more common for pax to transfer LHR-MAN-US than the other way around.
Isn't that just bizarre! Can you imagine leaving your booking to a company travel agent, or getting a great deal on Skyscanner, who books you through LHR. Only then to get rerouted via your local airport. Bet there's a few 'sod's law' faces!
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2017, 17:45
  #8116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all kicking off with big evacuation of T1, police, fire in attendance, something to do with a water leak! ouch
VickersVicount is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2017, 17:49
  #8117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry, plenty of water collection buckets ready and waiting to go!
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2017, 07:24
  #8118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Video: https://twitter.com/craigowenUK/stat...72452633604098

Response:
https://twitter.com/BFGcontrol/statu...87215451176960

Comment:
Ramshackle | Define Ramshackle at Dictionary.com
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2017, 07:43
  #8119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Water leaks and bursts can happen anywhere and at anytime, I have seen one or two over time that have caused major problems including one where I worked a week after the building was finished.
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2017, 07:44
  #8120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA sun Air to re-start Gothenburg from 1st August:

BA8233 GOT 1650 MAN 1850
BA8234 MAN 1920 GOT 2130

Operates daily ex Sat with DO328 jet. Not bookable yet.

Also, BA Cityflyer to run 2 weekly Chambery (Sat/Sun) and weekly Salzburg (Sat) as well as the London City flight, means BA and its subsidiaries will offer a total of 12 routes from Manchester. Slowly building back up again.
LAX_LHR is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.