Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BIRMINGHAM - 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2013, 23:05
  #1501 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: u.k.
Age: 56
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gatwick's O & D is lower than Birmingham's and they HAVE A FLIGHT.
That was the point I was making . Yes we all know Manchester's catchment area is bigger than Birmingham's we are reminded enough times.
getonittt is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 09:47
  #1502 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ringwayman,

You shot yourself in the foot,

As the LGW figures on your assumption should mean BHX has more than enough to get a Chinese flight

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 10:15
  #1503 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: stockport
Age: 69
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only reason LGW got chinese route was lack of slots at LHR same
with Korean and Vietnam

Chaps
chaps2011 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 10:18
  #1504 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel,

Hardly shooting himself in the foot, as the figures suggest MAN should have 3 times as many China passengers and deserves a flight even more.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 11:28
  #1505 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't be surprised if EDI pulls off a Chinese flt somehow before BHX or MAN,
Oh it's getting silly now.....
What's the segmentation between EDI-PVG / PEK / CAN / HKG? Lumping EDI-China in as one is actually more misleading than EDI-USA as one entity. By your logic, you're expecting people traveling to New York to be changing in Los Angeles? Also what's the breakdown of open jaw where this customer base doesn't visit London or arrive / depart via a London airport?
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 12:53
  #1506 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK039 ?

Saw it lining up over Hatton-and at 13.50 the screens still showed eta 12.25
The outgoing is shown as delayed.
Was it a last minute diversion due to the vicious cross wind and if so to where?
ssflyer is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 12:57
  #1507 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK39 has gone to LGW. Been quite a few diversions around the northern half of the country today.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 13:52
  #1508 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: u.k.
Age: 56
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also what's the breakdown of open jaw where this customer base doesn't visit London or arrive / depart via a London airport?
Nobody knows, likewise nobody knows how many have driven past or near to other airports to get to another to fly direct to China. I'm sure there is thread buried away on pprune somewhere about the complexities of O & D surveys!
getonittt is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 14:08
  #1509 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aegean

Apologies if this has been posted previously ....


Aegean to add flights from Birmingham | Buying Business Travel
111KAB is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 14:43
  #1510 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Birmingham
Age: 41
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a video of the Emirates aircraft making a go around. Although sensationalist reporting my the mail!

Good vid though.

Video: Plane at Birmingham Airport misses runway trying to land in high winds - Birmingham Mail
bhxstu is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 14:51
  #1511 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LAX-LHR

As someone else pointed out the Chinese figures are pretty meaningless anyway , as they are not figures for Beijing or Shanghai but for all Chinese visiting from all of China .

So how does that help any of us guess what the market share potential per Chinese district is ?

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 15:58
  #1512 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: birmingham
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based purely on geography it's inevitable that catchment numbers from MAN and LHR will include passengers from the 'greater' Birmingham metro area, EMA and BRS to a less extent also. As LAXLHR alluded to above (I think) the same could work the opposite way however the status quo is to a large extent now set. That said I have this view based on nothing factual that in time China will be connected to both MAN and BHX, there's just to many business interests established around Birmingham and too many O&D passengers available, add to that the number of Chinese airlines who have to expand somewhere there's a sense of inevitability to me.
hammerb32 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 17:38
  #1513 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 39
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Positive rate, gear up"? On the emirates video?
busz is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 19:17
  #1514 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel,

You say the figures are meaningless but lets face it they are not.

The table shows that for every BHX passenger to China, there are at least 2.5 from MAN. That points to the likely outcome that most, if not all the China destinations are bigger from MAN. Also, even on the very off chance BHX has a higher number to destination XYZ, the sheer fact MAN is more than twice the size of the BHX market at this time still means MAN stands a better chance of a route for the numerous connection oppertunities.


Also, you say the figures are meaningless, but, lets be 100% honest with here, if the MAN and BHX figures were swapped I have a sneaky suspicion the figures would not be so meaningless then, in fact, likely to be highly promoted.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 19:21
  #1515 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And we need to remember that Hainan Airlines is launching Beijing-Boston on the back of, wait for it, approximately the same number of visitors from all over China going to Boston as there are who MAN bound.
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 19:52
  #1516 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monte Carlo
Age: 65
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And we need to remember that Hainan Airlines is launching Beijing-Boston on the back of, wait for it, approximately the same number of visitors from all over China going to Boston as there are who MAN bound.
Rather proving the point I think many have been making, which is that they are at best only a small part of the story and at worst, misleading

Still, if it helps the my town is better than your town brigade feel better about themselves, then they have at least some use
North West is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 21:24
  #1517 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LAX-LHR

Think we will have to agree to disagree on the question of meaning and usefulness of the figures.

Your entitled to your opinion and can see where your coming from, but it can only be wild speculation.Nobody knows how many are from which region especially if they are transiting on different airlines and alliances through different airports to get to MAN

In relation to your BHX comments again disagree due to exactly the same reason ,any BHX figures are meaningless too in my opinion anyway.Although until after another pointed out the obvious that being a bit thick I had missed..

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2013, 21:29
  #1518 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think we will have to agree to disagree on the question of meaning and
usefulness of the figures.
I think we will Nigel, as when you look back at the history of MAN vs BHX debates, I have a very very hard time believing these figures would have been seen as meaningless had BHX been shown more favourably, but there you go.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2013, 11:22
  #1519 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HOWEVER, it doesn't work like that. People don't necessarily flock to a
non-stop service especially one that is not daily. If they are on business they
won't sit in (and pay for) a Beijing hotel for an extra day waiting for the
non-stop flight, instead they'll be on Lufthansa or Finnair or any of the other
'hub' possibilities to get home asap.
I agree with you to an extent, but, to say this in a very layman's term, surely all routes have to start somewhere?

There are so, so many routes in history that started less than daily, and for long 'thin' routes such as MAN/BHX-PEK, a daily flight is likely to be overkill initially and gives the route less chance of working than one that starts off less than daily.

It could be seen as a catch 22. Not enough punters to go in at a daily level, but then punters reluctant to book a flight that is less than daily.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2013, 15:57
  #1520 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And until MAG somehow address the issue of the price comparison web sites it will be dead within 6 months !

The default position is geared to lowest price which can mean you cannot even find departures on those services that operate already as price dumping means it can be cheaper to fly back an hour to Amsterdam , Frankfurt or Paris than fly direct.

I am not sure how you get round it but I do find it bizarre that somebody hasn't questioned this, it penalises Manchester everytime as our flights are totally buried.
Bagso is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.