Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BIRMINGHAM - 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Apr 2015, 04:42
  #3041 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I have said before on another forum nobody in their right mind would go to Florida between May and November due to it been extremely hot, humid and above all hurricane season, but there again the Brits go because it is so much cheaper in the ´´off´´ season.
compton3bravo is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2015, 06:56
  #3042 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,082
Received 292 Likes on 163 Posts
As I have said before on another forum nobody in their right mind would go to Florida between May and November
Exactly. You've got to be slightly daft. Best times are November to April, when UK schools don't have longer holidays Canadians know this only too well!
ATNotts is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2015, 07:44
  #3043 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cannock
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've done MCO the last fortnight in August when most American kids are back at school. Better than July to early August.

Going back to the earlier point I'm sure BHX could maintain someone like VS operating a 789 or 333 five times a week... especially as man operates a 744 twice daily. Only sticking point is I presume them all being configured to LHR 3 class.
cheesebag is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2015, 15:49
  #3044 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: u.k.
Age: 56
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only sticking point is I presume them all being configured to LHR 3 class.
The MAIN sticking point would be that the bearded one has stated there is no chance of VS operating from BHX.
getonittt is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2015, 18:16
  #3045 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stafford
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by getonittt
The MAIN sticking point would be that the bearded one has stated there is no chance of VS operating from BHX.
While I don't expect VS to be setting up shop BHX can airlines really ever say 'never'? Markets change and I'm also thinking of AA who reportedly vowed never to set foot in BHX again.
chinapattern is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2015, 05:28
  #3046 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: W. Midlands
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S15 - Stobart Air (Aer Lingus Regional)

The Shannon service will now utilise the Cork aircraft, with a revised earlier departure from Cork at 15:00, so no more decent day returns from Birmingham to Cork!

15:00 ORK - BHX 16:30/16:55 BHX - SNN 18:35/19:00 SNN - BHX 20:35/21:05 BHX - ORK 22:40 (SUN-FRI)
jon01 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2015, 20:07
  #3047 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: W. Midlands
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has any else on this thread noticed that a number of posts, including mine, from here are being copied and pasted at the forum linked below without permission? No credit is being given at all.

I think that this has to stop as it is breaking forum rules

I hope that the culprit has taken note of this

Birmingham Transport | Birmingham Airport (BHX) - Page 308 - SkyscraperCity
jon01 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2015, 21:51
  #3048 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockport
Age: 69
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the guy has said he is sorry as he was rushing at the time


Ian
Ian Brooks is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2015, 07:40
  #3049 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jon01
Has any else on this thread noticed that a number of posts, including mine, from here are being copied and pasted at the forum linked below without permission? No credit is being given at all.

I think that this has to stop as it is breaking forum rules

I hope that the culprit has taken note of this

Birmingham Transport | Birmingham Airport (BHX) - Page 308 - SkyscraperCity
This copy and paste action has been going on for a long time, so the posters in question seem to be notoriously short of time and so for months if not years already... don't understand how much it would take to simply add sth along the lines of "as posted over in pprune..." maybe they will learn.
insuindi is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2015, 13:45
  #3050 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAT111NDB.


BHX runway extension taxiway work /resurfacingis now completed.

BHX runway and taxiways are capable of supporting a fully laden A380 and planes don't get much heavier than that .


Although they have taken out some of the bumps its still undulates especially 15 end.

Runway lighting upgraded to full LED and will be back to CAT3B after enough calibration runs have been made.

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2015, 17:24
  #3051 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Nigel

That's interesting to know. It illustrates that having a 3 Km runway is in its self is not the complete story.

I hope it bodes well for the future. Being able to support a fully laden A380, (Yes I'm watching the Cargo B777-300 argument too) must be a strategic asset for the facility and the Midlands as a whole.

I have watched with interest the long haul developments at Birmingham and over the next 20 years or so, this investment might come to be seen as an historic turning point (no pun intended) for the Economy of the West Midlands.

Airports have now become the "Sea Ports" in part, of centuries past [and present] Towns and cities that the roads, canals and railways bypassed did not thrive. There's an almighty warning in economic terms for all of the UK here. If the project succeeds economically; all well and good (greater trade, tourism(in and out). If there is little or no additional trade (extra long haul bucket and spade outward is of limited Economic value), the 50 Year wait/delay will have extracted a terrible cost.

Nigel: there are echo's of the LHR hiatus here and BHX is now possibly part of the solution. The critical thing is that the runway infrastructure at Brum is here and ready not vapour ware and not PDF's or verbage.

CAT III

Last edited by Guest 112233; 26th Apr 2015 at 18:02.
Guest 112233 is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2015, 18:36
  #3052 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MCT
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BHX runway and taxiways are capable of supporting a fully laden A380 and planes don't get much heavier than that .
Nothing to do with the aircraft's overall weight, but to do with the wheel loadings.

Have a read of this

Pavement classification number - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and this

Aircraft classification number - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Suzeman is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2015, 18:57
  #3053 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suzeman,

Yes I know that was just trying to answer a general question simply.


As you like the tech stuff BHX is between.. PCN 93/84/75/R /B/WT on most of its taxiways and aprons


Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2015, 19:29
  #3054 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suzeman and Nigel

Yes I do understand the engineering concepts related to PCN and ACN (I alluded to this in the original question).

Of course I looked at the Wiki links before posting the question and Nigel's answer was sufficiently technical for a layman like me. I do appreciate the effects of aircraft undercarriage geometry and mass distribution.

My starting point was from the EDI thread and I consulted the UK AIP to establish the 15/33 PCN - The text supports Nigel's answer. I had wondered if the !5/33 PCN will eventually be will be upgraded as a result of the work undertaken. Hence my ref to the age of the runway.

I realise this actually takes time as [edit: I imagine] literally bedding in takes pace.

All in all, Nigel’s reply to my question was appropriate for the description of what I imagine is a branch of civil engineering.

Thank you.
Guest 112233 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2015, 11:24
  #3055 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks CAT111.

The engineering for the extension was amazing.They had to build a large 14ft x 14ft and 500 metre long re-enforced steel tube aquaduct underneath the extension to carry the large brook through the airfield.

They sunk the main A45 down 30 feet at the end of 33 incase they want to add a start up strip at the end of the extension in the future. This allows them to build a wide bridge over the A45 for that purpose.

Due to water run off in heavy ran onto the A45 below they have buried 2 huge fanned water pumps either side of the A45 to suck any flooding up.


Only down side, the spoil has been put into a large bank one side blocking views of the extension as you drive past.


Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2015, 22:10
  #3056 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Nigel. Great to get an insight into what has gone into the Airport project.....
davebham is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2015, 22:41
  #3057 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 63
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Monrach at BHX win American Contract

Monarch Aircraft Engineering Ltd (MAEL), the engineering division of The Monarch Group, has been contracted to provide line maintenance technical handling to American Airlines.

The contract, which commences in May, will see Monarch’s highly experienced engineering team support American Airlines Boeing 757-200 aircraft at Birmingham Airport in the UK.

The American carrier, which is a new customer for MAEL, will be operating the Boeing 757-200 on its new daily route from JFK Airport into Birmingham.

Commenting on this contract win, Dave Norton, Head of Sales for Monarch Aircraft Engineering said: “Our rapidly expanding customer base at Birmingham is testament to our efficient, reliable and high quality line maintenance teams and we are delighted to be American Airlines partner of choice.”

Oliver Barnes, Regional Manager Line Maintenance for American Airlines comments: “We look forward to excellent service from Monarch in Birmingham with safe, on-time performance for our customers.”
BHX5DME is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2015, 18:34
  #3058 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 60
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Norwegian

Malaga is released for winter 2015/6 at twice weekly Monday and Friday but no change as yet with Madrid and Barcelona as they are still showing only to October.

Not really checked Thomas Cook summer 16 but some routes appear to be a little down although early days.

Pete
OltonPete is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2015, 21:11
  #3059 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No extra flights to DUB with Aer Lingus, the Shannon service is being operated by a Cork based aircraft.
AerRyan is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2015, 10:09
  #3060 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BHX5DME.


Any advertising of better links between BHX and American Airlines is welcome.

However surely this is just spin.

1. If an AA 757 went tech at BHX without this agreement surely MAEL would be called in to fix and if required hangar it anyway ?

2. Reported elsewhere that MAEL already have the contract with AA for their 757s that have been visiting Manchester for some years !! ?

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.