Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BMI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Mar 2010, 16:03
  #1821 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LHR
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, bmi British Midland International now, dare I say it, but common sense seems to be creeping in and maybe a sense of direction!?? i.e. profitable Midhaul routes, 'neighbourhood flying' for our lufty stable mates e.g. lufty wet lease, Swiss wet lease, thin Brussels Airlines routes being operated by bmi regional, and route 'sharing', i.e. VIE and apparently now HAM, CGN and maybe DRS...who knows!! and maintaining a basic UK and Ireland feeder too....

I've also heard that Star is keen to establish some LHR-MAD feed and upset BA/IB's monopoly...so maybe sharing LHR to MAD and BCN with Spanair???

Who the devil knows!
ayebmi is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2010, 16:18
  #1822 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LHR
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, bmi British Midland International now, dare I say it, but common sense seems to be creeping in and maybe a sense of direction!?? i.e. profitable Midhaul routes, 'neighbourhood flying' for our lufty stable mates e.g. lufty wet lease, Swiss wet lease, thin Brussels Airlines routes being operated by bmi regional, and route 'sharing', i.e. VIE and apparently now HAM, CGN and maybe DRS...who knows!! and maintaining a basic UK and Ireland feeder too....

I've also heard that Star is keen to establish some LHR-MAD feed and upset BA/IB's monopoly...so maybe sharing LHR to MAD and BCN with Spanair???

Who the devil knows!
ayebmi is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2010, 17:03
  #1823 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK - Hants
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Midland used to fly to DRS ten years ago or so...before it became bmi...so it sounds like it's coming full circle (at least with that route).
11K-AVML is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2010, 17:17
  #1824 (permalink)  
jpthomas72
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was looking at flying TXL-LHR in march/april, and noticed Bmi have an extra rotation on the route departing at 9pm aprox, so now 4 daily as opposed to 3 daily. This flight is operated as a bmi flight (BD848) rather than a lufthansa operated by bmi flight.
This is interesting when you followed the VC-union pilot strike recently at LH (which went down after one day, mostly due to very arrogant behaviour of the union leaders, overlooking labour laws in Germany), but this is exactly what they feared: Less and less LH operating into UK, more and more taken over by bmi. Wouldn't even be surprised if BHX-FRA would become partially bmi. BHX-DUS and BHX-MUC are already non-mainline-LH (Cityline and Eurowings), which are mostly outside of the VC-union's influence. Wouldn't mind a modern A319 instead of the aging B737, honestly. Oh, DRS ? Great destination, but no profitable market (tried and failed by BA recently) all demand goes nicely via FRA, plus DRS is too close to SXF (2h drive). FR's Saxony airport also is not so far from DRS.
 
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 10:05
  #1825 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: over the hill
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Alliance flights in-out of UK
--about bloomin' time! - The company line in the past has been that we can't operate between 'x' & 'y' either because they don't think they can make a profit, or because of an existing Star carrier on the route. Well, times are tough; I've just seen a lot of good guys forced out with the threat of redundancy if they didn't jump. Pretty much every Star carrier in europe comes into LHR; it's about time bmi put themselves on more of those routes to bring some revenue our way, not just to let the routes be served from the 'other end'. We're probably the cheapest labour now if a comparison was made. (not that I'm proud of that)
skip.rat is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 10:41
  #1826 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbus321-200
talk about confusing you brand!!
If you want brand confusion look at the departure board for a BMI, or whatever it's called today, flight from say London to Glasgow, about 10 different flight numbers on it, takes up a whole screenful for one flight.
WHBM is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 11:31
  #1827 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: edinburgh
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's called code-share, it is up to the airline/airport to decide if they want to show all the flight numbers on the screens. If you display all flights it takes an age to get back to the operating (BD) flight , if you don't then you have customers staring in confusion at the screens looking for which desks to check-in at. Your are damned if you do and you are damned if you dont, This problem is not unique to bmi.
frontcheck is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 12:25
  #1828 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK & Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's even more schizophrenic than usual at the minute. The airline has about 7 brands, British Midland, bmi british midland, bmi, flybmi, bmi British Midland International and so on. Just pick one and stick to it!

To me the new branding is a mouthful "bmi British Midland International, in association with our Star Alliance partners..."
brian_dromey is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 15:16
  #1829 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,652
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by frontcheck
That's called code-share, it is up to the airline/airport to decide if they want to show all the flight numbers on the screens. If you display all flights it takes an age to get back to the operating (BD) flight , if you don't then you have customers staring in confusion at the screens looking for which desks to check-in at. Your are damned if you do and you are damned if you dont, This problem is not unique to bmi.
I've never understood why codeshare needs to show all these dfferent flight numbers, with the confusion described, and elsewhere, why exactly the same codeshare benefits cannot obtain if the UK flight shows just BD123 instead of BD123, LH4567, GF 8910, etc, etc, especially as tickets then have to say "this flght is actually operated by BMI" if the code is different. What a good thing it doesn't carry forward to ATC callsigns !

Not totally off-topic for the BMI thread here as they steadily position themselves more as a Star feeder rather than an O&D operator.
WHBM is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 16:29
  #1830 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: edinburgh
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately the vast majority of itineraries do not have the "operated by bmi" line and even if it does , customers do not read it
frontcheck is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 18:50
  #1831 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: dublin
Age: 56
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In fact im sure most people, if the aircraft is on an airbridge dont have the faintest idea wot airline they are on nor even care
dublindispatch is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 20:02
  #1832 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's even more schizophrenic than usual at the minute. The airline has about 7 brands, British Midland, bmi british midland, bmi, flybmi, bmi British Midland International and so on. Just pick one and stick to it!

To me the new branding is a mouthful "bmi British Midland International, in association with our Star Alliance partners..."
The 5 brands mentioned is hardly 7.
British Midland was the old name for the airline, before being rebranded to bmi british midland & then finally bmi.
Flybmi is the website address only.
bmi - British Midland International is now being used as years later people still think bmi & British Midland have no relation.
TCX69 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 21:26
  #1833 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,478
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
So let me get this straight. There once was an airline called British Midland which was well regarded by its customers, provided a decent standard of service and didn't do too badly financially.

It then decided to start flying to the USA and because Midland, Texas sounds about as far away from civilisation as you can get, the name "British Midland" was deemed unsuitable.

The name was changed to bmi British Midland and then bmi. Great idea - far more acceptable in America. Name your airline after the acronym for body mass index. I suppose it's an acronym which at least is instantly memorable for part of the American population.

bmi then starts losing pots of cash. They then start reintroducing the "British Midland" bit because no-one really knows what bmi is or what it stands for, despite the efforts to establish the brand having continued for what - about eight years?

How's about another re-brand. Just call it British Midland. I think the powers-that-be could be amazed at the effect which this would have.
Flightrider is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 22:53
  #1834 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: bournemouth
Age: 54
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bookings for BOH-jER has been good according the our airprt director,
Bournemouth Air is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 23:11
  #1835 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Confused - you will be

bmi's business plan was always a bit like the clues in 3-2-1 with dusty bin.

I worked for this airline previously, one season it was Eastern Europe - flying to Warsaw, Prague and Budapest. Next season "hey Scandinavia - LHR - CPH< OSL, next season, Rome,and Milan, next season, Madrid and Barcelona.


When they unvield the new name, at a staff breifing, Marketing said, they wanted bmi be as catchy as "IBM" for example.

In the brand ideologies, they actually said "We're not Beligan Chocolates, we're Kit-kats, British! "

Very Very poor business vision, at one time running A321 between Edinburgh/Glasgow to London in a C140Y34 config !! and filling C section !
tictack67 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 00:34
  #1836 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got a copy of this months Voyager today and indeed at the bottom it says bmi, British Midland International.
EC-ILS is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 08:36
  #1837 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skip Rat
Comparisons on cheapest labour can be difficult because of pounds to euro calculations, depends on the euro rate used. (comparison excluding any social benefits etc)
Mr Angry from Purley is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 09:14
  #1838 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: over the hill
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Point taken Mr. Angry, maybe I should have been more specific. The carriers I had in mind were those operating the 'other end' of routes into LHR. They are mostly flag carriers (possibly subsidiaries of), so their cost base will be higher than the LoCos. Maybe now that there are some professional managers in place the opportunities that undoubtedly exist might be exploited. (You never know, it might even be possible to operate a 330 profitably once we stop paying 3x the market rate for its lease with those proceeds topping up an already swollen retirement fund for a certain individual)

Last edited by skip.rat; 3rd Mar 2010 at 21:11.
skip.rat is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 14:41
  #1839 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: edinburgh
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spot on skip.rat
As for the name I think they were trying to do a BCal.
For those of you who remember British Caledonian managed to trade using both their full name and "BCal" without too many problems, in fact none that I can think of. Unfortunately it didnt quite work out for bmi so it is back to basics
frontcheck is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 16:26
  #1840 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: He was here a moment ago
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know this is somewhere in here but I cant find it:
Which aircraft are being gotten rid of and when?
G-WWBM left at the end of February. G-WWBB leaves this month. Not sure about G-WWBD.
ara01jbb is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.