Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

British Airways - 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2009, 19:33
  #681 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: where ever i wake up!!!!
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flightrider assuming that BA wish to use the BACF brand and LCY in the way they have in the past, maybe they see LCY and BACFs use in a different way in the future. The wet lease of the now defunct Flightline to cover the DUB flights was brought about by BA insisting that BACF got more slots out of LCY not through BACF wishing to over extend themselves .
marlowe is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 23:10
  #682 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's clear that EZY have driven a cart and horses through the yields and loads on the EDI / GLA to LGW market. Flew LGW-GLA with Ba on Saturday.
Glasgow is now down from 6 a day to 3, and is no real use for business so yields will fall further. I think a more frequent service with the ER9 is a good bet, either BACF or flybe operated. The current B737-400 service must be losing more and more each year. Amazed at how senior the staff are on these routes.....
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2009, 11:39
  #683 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA changes TLS route from LGW to LHR

I saw advertising this morning at Toulouse airport that as of March 29th BA's Toulouse services will move from LGW to LHR. And confirmed this by checking ba.com. Will be happy to see the more modern Airbus instead of the 737 classics we currently get here.
Move makes sense inmo for connections.
European flyer is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2009, 11:49
  #684 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probally make much more sense to fly the domestic routes with smaller prop jets with more frequent services.Flexibilty of timings is the key for business people.Its a shame mixed mode was not taken up at LHR as we need to give passengers (or what passengers are left) a more flexible service - are you listening BA /BMI ?
stormin norman is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2009, 13:08
  #685 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Still surprised that PVG is one of the top ten destinations.
I agree.

Guess it depends how you define top ten whether its actual increase in Passenger numbers, % increase in passenger numbers, yields etc etc.

Give the numbers to PR and Marketing department and they wil put a positive spin on it and redefine each and every time to get a top ten.
racedo is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2009, 13:13
  #686 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
A cynic might say that an airline publishing a 'top 10 destinations for the new year' would be just a way of trying to promote some routes for which sales are looking a bit weak and could do with a marketing boost !
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2009, 17:44
  #687 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snow diverts

can someone please explain to me why BA are sending their LHR long haul inbounds all over the UK, when every other airline seems to be landing at LHR OK.
MAN777 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2009, 19:24
  #688 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can someone please explain to me why BA are sending their LHR long haul inbounds all over the UK, when every other airline seems to be landing at LHR OK.
Has happened before. I think it is due to lack of space, not too much is departing so there is no space and capacity in the terminals to handle these aircraft. Better to send them elsewhere than to have them land at LHR and have no where to go for a very long time.

Last edited by 747-436; 2nd Feb 2009 at 21:08.
747-436 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2009, 20:40
  #689 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely there must be space somewhere at Heathrow, what about the freight stands and maintenance areas.?

It seems a bit tough on all the thousands of passengers and crews that are displaced, not to mention the expense of relocation of everyone concerned.
MAN777 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2009, 21:47
  #690 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is little free space as you well know. The neighbours go mental every time the BAA want more space. This is what happens when you constrain capacity for years.....
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 17:22
  #691 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think BA or maybe even if it gets to the point of BA/IBERIA would make a move for Aer Lingus?
4567 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 17:39
  #692 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont see why they would bother, they already have alot of Ireland's LH traffic via LHR and they show no interest in the UK regions so why Ireland?
VanBosh is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 18:48
  #693 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Between a rock & a hard place.
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
EI, I believe, hold the 3rd highest number of slots out of LHR. And yes they bring alot of BA's long haul passengers over from Ireland. Seems a good move by BA to make an offer to protect it's market. Major problem seems to be O'Leary/Ryanair and the 30% shareholding of EI. In fact until this is reduced I cannot see any major airline looking at EI.
PC767 is online now  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 08:10
  #694 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that even if FR were to sell (and MO'L apparently wants to do so), it might be difficult to attract buyers. After all, with a stake in EI, FR is hardly going to want to stomp it into the ground. With no stake ...

----------------------------------------------------------

BA is finally to divest itself of its last 11 757s. After 26 years of service with the airline, the aircraft will be sold over the coming Winter 2009/10 season. Finding buyers might be a bit of a challenge, but they won't be in BA service anymore.

JetPhotos.Net Photo » G-CPEM (CN: 28665) British Airways Boeing 757-236 by John Fitzpatrick
akerosid is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 11:51
  #695 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manila
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HKG to LHR

As a regular on HKG to LHR I notice that for a few dates in Feb and Mar for BA its 2 flights a day rather than 3, I havent noticed this in other years and wonder if its a response to the credit crunch or other operational reasons. With 2 B747 within 45 minutes I assume its the time of year and a fall off in passengers. With 4 CX, 2 VS, 3 BA, 1 QF and 1 Air New Zealand all direct, the route is well covered and I hope we get A380 from BA one day.
mybrico is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 13:52
  #696 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its a shame the 757's are leaving, last year i spent many a trip to MAD and back on them from LHR. i understand though that due to age BA needs to modernise and move forward. Boeing i think found a winner in the 757 - its certainly my favourite passenger aircraft and one which is still very popular around the world by airlines. Shame Boeing couldnt extend the shelf life of the production a little longer.

Still i have gone off the point, rumour i heard is some of the BA 757's are cargo bound - DHL i believe could be the new operator, and the deal might already be done? ........
uklad007 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 19:57
  #697 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MON and LS maybe sniffing around, dependant on the age of the a/c.
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 20:45
  #698 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd be very surprised to see MON being interested, since it's doing much the same - getting rid of 757s and standardising short haul on A320/321s.
akerosid is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 20:50
  #699 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does anybody have an hour/cycle/age profile for these aircraft?
The 757 will do routes that a 321 cannot so I would not discount interest from the charter operators.
tubby linton is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 21:10
  #700 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to think that there is interest from a cargo conversion company. As for pax use it may be difficult as airlines may still be down scaling the seat numbers for the next few years.
HZ123 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.