Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

WATERFORD Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jun 2016, 18:48
  #381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cityjet - replacing a 50 seater with plenty of empty seats with a 100 seater?

bmi regional - can an ER4 operate from WAT with 1.400m of runway?

Eastern - is their usual fare structure attractive for the WAT clientele?
virginblue is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2016, 19:18
  #382 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite right indeed Virginblue,

My point was more that if they are saying that are talking to 4 airlines, I am trying to speculate who they might be. That said there are so few who would actually be positioned to serve such a route as WAT LTN. With the contraction in airline numbers over the last decade, not many viable options left.

As you say there are valid reasons why many of the mentioned may not work. They may be waiting for a runway extension and perhaps we may see WAT treated like say KIR or LDY and get at least a daily STN rotation etc. But that is some way off. Sad to see them lose their remaining services.

EI-BUD
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2016, 20:26
  #383 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad to see that after SXL and GWY, WAT is the third regional airport that disappears (well, at least from the scheduled air services map). Only KIR, SNN, CFN and NOC remain nowadays (if we consider ORK as "big" airport). Let's hope that CFN is not the next to bite the dust...
virginblue is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2016, 20:49
  #384 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
Getting Stobart Air back would be the ideal arrangement, though unlikely given the demand for aircraft ex Dublin and also the probable use of SEN over LTN where the demand is.

The only other options I can think of are Cityjet, Eastern and Bmi Regional. Unless Aurigny would be interested in doing a W through STN when they land there, I am fresh out of ideas...

EI-BUD
I have also been racking my brain to think who could possibly operate the route successfully ! Maybe Flybe out of Birmingham (again) on a W pattern !

Maybe Aer Lingus Regional are a consideration but again I'm clutching at straws here and I think it's already been mentioned that the Stobart ATR's are in high demand.

Hopefully something will come to fruition sooner rather than later.
robbie1973 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2016, 20:52
  #385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Róisín Dubh
Posts: 1,389
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by virginblue

bmi regional - can an ER4 operate from WAT with 1.400m of runway?
AFAIK Bmi regional's Embraers don't have thrust reversers fitted
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2016, 21:11
  #386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cityjet - replacing a 50 seater with plenty of empty seats with a 100 seater?
Well WX wouldn't be charging between 150-250 for a return flight, when 60-90 minutes driver you can pay less than 50.....
EI-A330-300 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2016, 21:45
  #387 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, regrettably that logic does not work everywhere. If you have a 100seater, you need to fill a certain percentage of those seats and even cheaper tickets must be met by sufficient demand for those cheaper tickets unless you can pull a Ryanair and sell tickets for a fiver. Realistically, Waterford is a 50 seater market at best.
virginblue is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2016, 21:53
  #388 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, regrettably that logic does not work everywhere. If you have a 100seater, you need to fill a certain percentage of those seats and even cheaper tickets must be met by sufficient demand for those cheaper tickets unless you can pull a Ryanair and sell tickets for a fiver. Realistically, Waterford is a 50 seater market at best.
Problem is VLM quiet quickly increases fares significantly soon after the service started and the cheap fares became almost non existent and you could easily pay up to 400-500 for a Fri in, Sun out. It was never going to last long term as only foolish people would pay such fares.

For 2-3 people doing a trip could are talking 600-1000 minimum for a flight to London......
EI-A330-300 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 10:09
  #389 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 60
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe

robbie1973

Flybe are the obvious ones on a BHX originating aircraft operating into Luton in between.

However there are several issues to overcome even assuming Waterford throw lots of money their way.

Their BHX schedule is full, which will mean waiting until winter or reducing frequencies elsewhere, which of course is never out of the question but makes things difficult.

Flye also seem to have Dash 8 delivery issues, as BHX received major French route expansion this summer which was to be an extra based Dash 8 but what happened in reality is that they reduced the Hanover to daily from double daily and the extra aircraft never arrived.

Then there is the double daily Rotterdam which was to start in September and has been put back until October. I have heard that this is due to aircraft shortage blamed on Republic going into chapter 11 and delaying deliveries of the Dash 8.

None of this is insurmountable but BHX would only support 3-4 weekly in winter I would have thought or 5 at a push and it depends if the sweetener is enough to tempt them.

Pete
OltonPete is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 18:30
  #390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
If some sort of promtional money was to be provided to encourage a route from Waterford to the UK, which legal company would be paying the money (airpory, local Govt or central Govt in Dublin ?) and where would that money ultimately come from ?
I'm sure Govt in Dublin can find the cash given the political desire but I suspect Dublin will need a lot of persuasion. Will the residents of Waterford be prepared to see their local council spend the money or will locals decide they have had enough of pouring money into a potentially bottomless pit when Dublin airport is not so far away by road ?
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 19:49
  #391 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Waterford has a strong representation in government, with a local independent in place, name escapes me, but runway extension at Waterford were part of his terms for going into government.

With current airfield limitations, and with a white sheet in terms of a plan to attract an airline, the best fit, with brand etc. Would have to be Aer Lingus Regional flying the Luton route...
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 20:47
  #392 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If some sort of promtional money was to be provided to encourage a route from Waterford to the UK, which legal company would be paying the money (airpory, local Govt or central Govt in Dublin ?) and where would that money ultimately come from ?
I'm sure Govt in Dublin can find the cash given the political desire but I suspect Dublin will need a lot of persuasion. Will the residents of Waterford be prepared to see their local council spend the money or will locals decide they have had enough of pouring money into a potentially bottomless pit when Dublin airport is not so far away by road ?
It would be from central Gov via Tourism authorities if anything was paid especially for it to be legal in the eyes of Brussels.

The local council has been bailed out with 700,000 for this year with a further 450,000 shortfall after the Valuation Office decided to revalue properties owned public utilities which has resulted in 22 million drop in commercial rates nationwide each year for 2-4 years. Off course all this happened after 2016 budgets were passed.....the neighboring councils are similar it not worse.

Locals won't decide they had enough but they will also be realistic on what they pay for flights. They will pay more but not be ripped off.

Waterford has a strong representation in government, with a local independent in place, name escapes me, but runway extension at Waterford were part of his terms for going into government.

With current airfield limitations, and with a white sheet in terms of a plan to attract an airline, the best fit, with brand etc. Would have to be Aer Lingus Regional flying the Luton route...
He got next to nothing, the amount agreed once divided will be next to nothing. It also relies on the Gov lasting which most don't expect a budget will be passed in October
PPRuNeUser0176 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 21:16
  #393 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OltonPete
robbie1973

Flybe are the obvious ones on a BHX originating aircraft operating into Luton in between.

However there are several issues to overcome even assuming Waterford throw lots of money their way.

Their BHX schedule is full, which will mean waiting until winter or reducing frequencies elsewhere, which of course is never out of the question but makes things difficult.

Flye also seem to have Dash 8 delivery issues, as BHX received major French route expansion this summer which was to be an extra based Dash 8 but what happened in reality is that they reduced the Hanover to daily from double daily and the extra aircraft never arrived.

Then there is the double daily Rotterdam which was to start in September and has been put back until October. I have heard that this is due to aircraft shortage blamed on Republic going into chapter 11 and delaying deliveries of the Dash 8.

None of this is insurmountable but BHX would only support 3-4 weekly in winter I would have thought or 5 at a push and it depends if the sweetener is enough to tempt them.

Pete
FlyBe had the chance to serve WAT when they had a presence at LTN until a few years ago. What has changed to make them think differently now?
wallp is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2016, 06:48
  #394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,076
Received 277 Likes on 154 Posts
Just supposing for a moment that Flybe could make some sort of agreement with Virgin Trains where passengers could buy a through ticket from Waterford to London which included a Virgin West Coast ticket to London Euston, that might make a daily - perhaps even twice daily WAT/BHX service viable, selling BHX as the gateway to London.

Far fetched? Well possibly yes given the totally un-joined-up nature of the UK's public transport system, but Swiss do it perfectly well with SBB - and Lufthansa with the DB. Any anyway, the transfer from BHX to Birmingham International station is quick, free and painless, and the Virgin service to Euston frequent and quick.
ATNotts is online now  
Old 6th Jun 2016, 07:37
  #395 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps Loganair could operate the route as a flybe franchise as Saab 340 or 2000 rather than Dash 8. I don't know about their aircraft availability but would suspect Waterford would have approached them.

The idea of linking air and rail services sounds appealing except it would mean a change in marketing strategy for flybe who currently quote "faster than road or rail" on their aircraft. But this type of innovation could be interesting.
bananamanuk is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2016, 12:14
  #396 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will this be the first time that there are no scheduled services from WAT or was there a period after EIR and before BE and VLM where there were no services?


The problem here is that every time a route or carrier is unsuccessful from the airport it makes it all the harder to try to get someone else in to take on the route. Unlike CFN and KIR there is no PSO to fall back on here, so unfortunately it may be some time before we see further scheduled operations after tomorrow. It could certainly become a heavily politicised issue given the current make up of the Irish Government.
Kinocker is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2016, 18:17
  #397 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plenty of capacity soon!

Stobart Air axing routes between Dublin and Britain - The Sunday Business Post
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2016, 20:26
  #398 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hopefully WAT dies off, followed by KIR and CFN.

Then, we can focus our funds on useful things like roads and have only 4 airports in ROI. We only need 1 regional Airport, NOC. SNN,ORK and DUB do well as the primary airports.
AerRyan is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2016, 06:49
  #399 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's hard to think who might pick up the WAT routes. Both Aer Lingus Regional and FlyBe have had their chance in the past and neither wanted it or made it work.
wallp is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2016, 11:03
  #400 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North of "The Divide"
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AerRyan very poor spirited of you to say; "Hopefully WAT dies off, followed by KIR and CFN."

I think people here are too quick to write Waterford off, the airport has survived through the toughest of times (J41 once a day to London Stansted in 1990s) the airport will survive.
NABLAG is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.