Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

SHANNON

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Mar 2009, 10:01
  #541 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: around
Age: 43
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RYR is reducing it a/c numbers to 4 not 2 as stated above. In relation to earlier post BHX_SNN is showing good load factors high 70's i was told.
B257 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2009, 10:35
  #542 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B257.....my understanding is that FR have already announced a reduction from 6 to 4 and will further reduce to 2 for W09. The previous poster to my knowledge IS correct!
iwhak is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2009, 14:04
  #543 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B257.....my understanding is that FR have already announced a reduction from 6 to 4 and will further reduce to 2 for W09. The previous poster to my knowledge IS correct!
Yes, this is my understanding too. Ryanair are to reduce from 6 to 4 at the start of April. However they are to reduce down to just 2 aircraft by the start of the winter season. As far as I know they will reduce from 4 to 3 at the start of July, and from 3 to 2 at the end of October.
en2r is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2009, 19:00
  #544 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 60
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bhx-snn

B257

BHX - SNN for February per the CAA stats was 7717 pax.

Assuming no weather cancellations and taking into account the
additional Sunday, Wednesday & Thursday flights at the end of
the month then the average pax was 124 or 66%.

However since the cancellation of Easts Mids - Shannon the BHX
service has been hitting 70% most months.

However everytime I have looked the fares they have been somewhat
low to say the least.

Pete
OltonPete is offline  
Old 17th May 2009, 18:52
  #545 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: shannon
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TNT Gone from SNN

TNT operated their last flight from SNN last Friday. Freight will be trucked from DUB to SNN. TNT service into Ireland now reduced from daily flights to Ork,DUB and SNN in 2007 to 1 daily into DUB. Also DHL service into SNN reduced from B757 to Bluebird B737 hire in. Difficult times for the cargo industry.
EINNMAN is offline  
Old 18th May 2009, 08:36
  #546 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Drop it, Hide it Loose it

Have cut capacity to DUB, not SNN really.

Whilst SNN is served by a BBC 737 not company 757, the service is direct from EMA. The 757 used to operate via DUB and wait for SNN freight from the later EMA-DUB A300.

However, no argument, tough times in cargo for sure.



Bored
boredcounter is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 13:53
  #547 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: nirvana
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Irish Aviation Authority - Flight Statistics

Interesting figures from the DAA on flight statistics from the 3 DAA run airports.
vkid is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2009, 22:16
  #548 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the dark side
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Some Aer Lingus transatlantic flights to go

Aer Lingus cut Shannon Transatlantic flights - TV3
horatio_b is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2009, 08:17
  #549 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SNN-JFK is only 4 weekly. Is there a A330 based at SNN just for these 4 flights a week or are there flights with A330 to European destinations?

Thanks
Seljuk22 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2009, 20:13
  #550 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UIP : 4° 10’ 0” W, 47° 58’ 0” N
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A330 that operates 4 times weekly to JFK is brought in to hangar for maintenance on the other three days. Aircraft are mostly swapped around in JFK, ORD and BOS depending on what a/c is needed for weekly maintenance. eg. if a/c comes from BOS on ei132 there will sometimes be an a/c change in SNN to continue on up to DUB. The a/c that will continue up to DUB on these occasions is usually the a/c that arrived in from JFK the same morning or sometimes ORD.

Hope that was clear enough.
EISNN is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 09:28
  #551 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: somewhere
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possibly some good news for EINN

From local news:

Minister Indicates Interest in Shannon Facilities | clare.fm

The Minister for Transport says that there are a number of airlines interested in doing business with Shannon Airport once the Border, Customs and Pre-Clearance facilities are in place.

Noel Dempsey was in Shannon on Friday meeting a delegation from the US on forging business links between America and the Mid West Region

Minister Dempsey said that he believes a fundamental change in attitude by people will form an essential part of the economic recovery of the region

He also revealed that there are a number of airlines from America and the UK that have expressed an interest in Shannon Airport for the pre-clearance facilities it will offer for passengers travelling to the US.

Would be nice to see some more airframes on the ramp even if only for pre-clearance. Though if airline(s) were to land for pre-clearance and pick up passengers it would expand the options for getting to the US.
mcgrath is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 11:13
  #552 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would be nice to see some more airframes on the ramp even if only for pre-clearance. Though if airline(s) were to land for pre-clearance and pick up passengers it would expand the options for getting to the US.
But what about getting back from the US? The benefit of an SNN stop westbound is clear (whether being able to offer pre-clearance can actually translate into extra passengers or revenue for the airline is another question) but what about eastbound? Unless there's a significant passenger flow to/from Shannon, an airline choosing to stop there is inconveniencing all of its would-be non-stop passengers from the US to [somewhere in Europe]. So for example BA if their LCY-JFK service actually gets off the ground will only stop in SNN westbound.

Now if SNN could persuade Jet Airways to move their BRU hub operation to SNN, *that* would provide some volume...
Cyrano is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 13:23
  #553 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Barton Upon Humber
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Though if Jet moved to SNN they would loose the Brussels Airlines feed they get
airhumberside is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 14:47
  #554 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shannon pre customs.

The cost and inconvenience of landing at Shannon will make it unlikely that any passenger airline will use the facility unless they have to make a technical stop on the
way to the US. There aren't too many airlines left in this category.
ryan2000 is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2009, 22:11
  #555 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: somewhere
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why should getting back from the US be such a problem? Ideally for those travelling to SNN a stop on the eastbound journey would be the most convenient. However, you could travel direct to the eastbound destination and return to SNN on the westbound which is stopping for preclearance, provided arrival/departure times allow of course, not much different to connecting to Aer Lingus or CityJet if connecting through LHR or CDG as currently has to be done.

I agree if SNN could make itself a European hub then they could be onto a winner and I think that is what they should have been looking to try and establish. Don't think there is much of a chance of the two Irish airlines working together in this respect- RYR to provide flights to SNN and EI to cross the pond
mcgrath is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 07:42
  #556 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can reality intrude here for a moment? Shannon isn't going to become an international passenger hub. If my flight had to land somewhere to clear US customs before entry in the US I would choose another flight as would the vast majority of travellers. It's a no brainer.

The *ONLY* reason BA are using SNN is because of the performance limitations from a short runway in London. The region does not have enough population, connectivity, industry or wealth to maintain an international hub operation. It struggles to make a low cost point to point operation work in Ryanair and that in itself is an achievement!

Transatlantic transit traffic is an evil neccesity from another age and is almost dead in modern international airlines. The only people who need it are the military and those niche carriers flying aircraft beyond their usual routings or flying aircraft that ought to be parked in the desert by now.

I mean for God's sake, you can't have a European hub that far from the centre of Europe !
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 15:15
  #557 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, you can, so - if you are still living in the cloud cuckoo land of the 1960s.

I think the SAA should get FR to try snn-Mars and, no, I do not mean Marseilles but MARS, the red planet! It might be a way around the Euro 10 travel tax!?

Ha, ha. My first good laugh in weeks and, yes, my life has been that sad of late!

Last edited by Tom the Tenor; 25th Jun 2009 at 16:06.
Tom the Tenor is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 18:38
  #558 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can reality intrude here for a moment? Shannon isn't going to become an international passenger hub.
The reality is that the pre-clearance facility presents some unique opportunities for SNN that shouldn't be overlooked. The potential to develop the airport as a low-cost transatlantic hub should be explored IMO.

The facility will enable airlines to fly into cheaper, secondary airports in the US and whilst the population of the SNN catchment area itself isn't large enough to sustain multiple services linking SNN with these airports, if passengers from Europe could be fed into SNN to connect to these flights, it could work. Fares would have to be significantly lower than the alternative options via LHR, CDG etc to encourage passengers to put up with the inconvenience of flying into a secondary airport of course. It goes without saying that no passenger will choose a less convenient option unless the price difference involved is significant.

Whether costs could be kept to a level which would ensure the profitability of the operation is debatable, since the airline would have to incur the added costs associated with offering connections. Nevertheless, I do think the idea should be explored.


flying aircraft that ought to be parked in the desert by now.
Why? If the carriers in question are happy to continue operating the old birds, why should they be parked up in the desert?

I think the SAA should get FR to try snn-Mars and, no, I do not mean Marseilles but MARS, the red planet! It might be a way around the Euro 10 travel tax!?
Mars is outside the 300km radius rule so there's no avoiding the tax unfortunately. Nice try though
EI320 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 19:50
  #559 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Europa
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The facility will enable airlines to fly into cheaper, secondary airports in the US and whilst the population of the SNN catchment area itself isn't large enough to sustain multiple services linking SNN with these airports, if passengers from Europe could be fed into SNN to connect to these flights, it could work.
But why not just develop such a hub in Stansted, Dublin, Bristol, Birmingham where you have a larger local population?
Pre-clearance is't such an advantage is this set-up. What's the idea? You get off your Hahn - SNN flight, go up to the pre-clearance area, board your SNN - Buffalo flight. What about when your Hahn - SNN is delayed a bit, and you're rushing to your SNN - Buffalo flight, which then you miss due to having to pass through preclearance...
Charlie Roy is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 22:41
  #560 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But why not just develop such a hub in Stansted, Dublin, Bristol, Birmingham where you have a larger local population?
Because there's no US pre-clearance facilities at any of those airports! The advantage of having the pre-clearance at SNN is that airlines can fly into any US domestic airport, the same cannot be said for STN, BRS, BHX etc. That's the sole reason why I'm suggesting the low-cost hub idea for SNN. In the absence of pre-clearance, it would of course make more sense to develop the hub at an airport with a higher local population.


Pre-clearance is't such an advantage is this set-up. What's the idea? You get off your Hahn - SNN flight, go up to the pre-clearance area, board your SNN - Buffalo flight. What about when your Hahn - SNN is delayed a bit, and you're rushing to your SNN - Buffalo flight, which then you miss due to having to pass through preclearance.
If you miss a connection at any hub due to the inbound flight being delayed, the cause of missing the connection was not what happened at the airport in question (having to change terminals, pre-clear etc - time will have been allocated in the itinerary for these), but due to the fact the inbound flight was delayed in the first place.
EI320 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.