Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

LGW BA lite

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th December 2021 | 13:09
  #141 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 93
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Originally Posted by SW1
got my PFO today
yeah , me too , all capital letters 😂
Jonnyknoxville is offline  
Reply
Old 14th December 2021 | 16:11
  #142 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 197
Likes: 13
From: ??-ask crewing
Well, I can see this being real"lo cost" ha ha - mainline (LHR?) crews for who knows how long, mainline everything including the mindset, a cheapo version of the already pretty shabby BA product (oo yes please)!, trying to re-enter a market they already abandoned.
*sarcasm mode off* - it's laughable. I wouldn't give it long. Even Go was an infinitely better concept.
Sick is offline  
Reply
Old 14th December 2021 | 22:03
  #143 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 11
From: Here and there
It said in the Daily Telegraph that BA Lgw was never maki g a profit prior to the pandemic, so how low will they have to go to make it so now??
and how long will they give it before abandoning LGW again??
Serenity is offline  
Reply
Old 15th December 2021 | 11:34
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 22
Likes: 2
From: UK
There used to be a PDF/link on this thread with the T&C/salaries, anyone know where it’s gone?
iFunFlyer is offline  
Reply
Old 29th December 2021 | 11:43
  #145 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 581
Likes: 411
From: UK
As far as the travelling public will be concerned it won't be any different to BA at Gatwick before the pandemic. It's just lower Ts&Cs for the staff. So, it's not a new concept. But it will have separate management who will be able to choose the most profitable routes, unlike before when LGW just mostly got the routes that weren't profitable to work at LHR.
Propellerhead is offline  
Reply
Old 4th January 2022 | 22:26
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Voted out
Are many of the pilots voted out of BA expecting to be joining BA LGW? Are they looking at a significant pay cut? Was the possibility of pilots on higher pay scales taking a community pay cut discussed so these pilots are disadvantaged again?
balpalover69 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th January 2022 | 11:19
  #147 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 6
From: Here
Latest on the grapevine- Smartlynx out of LGW subbing for BA , once again utilising cheap foreign labour, any surprise not really!!
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th January 2022 | 12:17
  #148 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 202
Likes: 6
From: Somerset
I did my Master's Degree thesis on the introduction of small regional jets into BA which included looking at the cost base and culture. It decided that they really needed to separate the whole RJ operation off, otherwise it would be loaded with LHR costs, Head Office overhead etc and would never be able to compete. This was in 1991, long before LoCos became a thing. BA flips and flops between making LGW a core site with lots of "waves" of shorthaul feeding longhaul and dropping the whole base because it doesn't make money. I doubt the accounting principles have improved much since my day when shorthaul was loaded with extra costs due to the absorbtion costing method where overheads were added per landing, not per flying hour, making Long Haul seem to be immensely profitable. Short Haul flights were sold in bulk at cheap rates to feed longhaul too.
Of course BA had a proper LoCo in Go!, run by Barbara Cassani, but sold it off to its management and then they sold it for a profit to EasyJet. Typical BA corporate decision making.
Blackfriar is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2022 | 14:35
  #149 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 231
Likes: 9
From: Earth
If SmartLynx are operating for BA or others from the U.K during 2022, will all the non U.K crew members require work visa's?
turbine100 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2022 | 20:24
  #150 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 332
Likes: 75
From: Oxford
Originally Posted by turbine100
If SmartLynx are operating for BA or others from the U.K during 2022, will all the non U.K crew members require work visa's?
I'm not an immigration lawyer, but I think for temporary work on non G reg aircraft they don't need a work visa.
QR wet leased some 320's to BA, their staff didn't have work visas.

Again I'm no immigration lawyer, so could well be wrong
SpamCanDriver is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2022 | 12:20
  #151 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: in geosynchronous orbit
does anyone know someone who was actually invited to assessment for his perceived job opening ? AS FAR AS I CAN SEE, ITS SOME CLEVER PLOY TO HIRE THEIR OWN PEOPLE BACK UNDER WORSE TS AND CS , sorry of the caps, too tired to correct it now, Im not shouting, i just work in an LCC
manflexsrsrwy is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2022 | 12:50
  #152 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 368
Likes: 88
From: Neither here or there
Everyone i know that applied got a PFO. You have to laugh at the nominated post holder adverts too. All HR smokes and mirrors.
CW247 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2022 | 13:08
  #153 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 126
Likes: 7
From: At home
I’ve applied. Never worked there. I’ve not received a PFO yet. I asked when could one expect to find out about being invited for assessment and all I’ve been told is there are many applications that they are still working through and expect to hear back from them soon.

that was over a month ago 🤦🏽‍♂️
EGKK. is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2022 | 17:19
  #154 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: in geosynchronous orbit
18 years in commercial operations, plenty of current command time , over ten k on the bus, never stopped flying through the pandemic, current LPC/OPC and class one without restrictions, under 45 years of age, over 400 hours in the last year, uk passport holder, vaguely foreign sounding name , which should help with the pc brigade and i also was told to PFO, maybe i should've identified as trans or summfink ?
manflexsrsrwy is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2022 | 17:26
  #155 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 171
Likes: 31
From: European riviera
I think the answer, ironically, is in the Wizzair thread. According to one poster, the vast majority of available positions have been filled by internal transfers, and the the various BA holding pools set up after BA made some pilots redundant, and put the 747 out of commission.
Alrosa is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2022 | 17:48
  #156 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: in geosynchronous orbit
yes, thats what i thought in all honesty, or suspected rather, I wasn't aware how many people were put in from internal transfer, numbers etc and I'm guessing by the law of the land, they must advertise the position to make it a fair competition, at least on paper, even if the result is well known in advance. oh well it would've been good to get back to blighty...even if it is Laaandon Gatters....some day maybe eh ?
manflexsrsrwy is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2022 | 19:06
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: UK
Guys/girls,

They pretty much had the airline filled barely halfway down the PRP list (e.g the list of 249 folk they sacked last year).

If there is any external recruitment it will be an absolute trickle to tick some HR box somewhere.

T's and C's are dire in in the context of what your colleagues are on to fly the same jets up the road but sadly as you've still got tens of thousands unemployed or on zero hours etc who would jump at it they aren't going to improve (ever, your BACC will see to that)

Cheers,

(Ex BA)






FRYVA is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2022 | 19:42
  #158 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 231
Likes: 9
From: Earth
Perhaps the unemployed could find work elsewhere in other industries, then BA will have to improve the terms to attract the talent. People need to say NO to these companies offering poor terms and no retirement.
turbine100 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2022 | 20:14
  #159 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 171
Likes: 31
From: European riviera
Originally Posted by turbine100
Perhaps the unemployed could find work elsewhere in other industries, then BA will have to improve the terms to attract the talent. People need to say NO to these companies offering poor terms and no retirement.
Whilst I don’t disagree, and know of people made redundant from airline X, Y and Z that have indeed turned down airline jobs offering what they consider to be unacceptable conditions, I also see the law of supply and demand at work.

Unfortunately COVID has turned the industry upside down, and most pilots have suffered. I’m therefore not surprised that BA have apparently had no issue crewing the new set up at Gatwick.
Alrosa is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2022 | 22:11
  #160 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Oxfordshire
Originally Posted by turbine100
Perhaps the unemployed could find work elsewhere in other industries, then BA will have to improve the terms to attract the talent. People need to say NO to these companies offering poor terms and no retirement.
Happy for you to take the lead on this one if you’d like. Personally, I’ll wait until my former airline takes me back as redundancy due to LIFO isn’t worth a career change IMHO.
HEJT2015 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.