Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

P2F Cancer of Aviation (merged)/ petitions.

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

P2F Cancer of Aviation (merged)/ petitions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2010, 11:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great letters chaps, has anyone actually sent one though? I have to say I am disappointed by BALPA's lack of action on this issue.

Regards P.
Pizzaro is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 11:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kent
Age: 47
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with an earlier poster that the way to stop this is to make the general fare paying public aware of the P2F schemes.

BALPA, Ministers etc. Already know about it and choose to do nothing. What it needs is for people to actually stop using certain airlines because they are crewed by someone who has paid to be there. Im really suprised one of the big newspapers hasn't picked it up already. I only hope it doesnt take an accident to happen before this comes out.

What really suprises me though is the fact that none of the airlines that choose not to use P2F pilots isn't using it as a marketing tool to discredit the airlines that are.
Prophead is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 14:59
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Inverness
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Super Pilot!

Please find a list of media contacts:

Superpilot, why not send your letter to them all!

Newspapers:
Editorial Photographers UK | Newspaper email addresses


If you dont mind me (us) using your letter then I'll send it........
piemaster is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 18:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Europa
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation How about a No10 petition

Yes the ministers are away over Easter but we can do this in a week or so:

Create a new petition | Number10.gov.uk
angelorange is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 21:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go ahead, the more the merrier.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 21:36
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The combination of press and political lobbying will be very powerful. Where do i sign the petition? May i suggest that any approach be based on the safety aspect with supportable evidence/experiences of incidents?

And whilst I see BALPA are indirectly supporting the PTF line then perhaps their opposite number, the IPA/IPF, might be a little more inclined to highlight our cause. They have an AGM on the 21st May 2010, 1830 @ Ditchling Golf Club. If you cant make it then write to them.

And if they do feel inclined to help, which as an organisation of integrity I am sure they will, then vote with your feet. BALPA might just stop and appraise the situation a little differently.

Happy to get together (virtually or otherwise) and form some kind of committee. This thing just needs some momentum to fly...
Pilot Positive is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 21:48
  #27 (permalink)  


Chieftan o'the Pudden Race
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Location: Scotland usually, and often other parts of Europe
Age: 55
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wrote to BALPA abut this subject in 2002, then spoke to Chris Darke personally about it. Sadly, my concerns were not taken seriously, as were my warnings on PPRuNe that if a stand were not taken then, this practice would be the norm and ingrained in the aviation industry. The IPA magazine actually ran an article asking for members to recommend the best P2F suppliers.

Pilots only have themselves to blame for this situation.
Flypuppy is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2010, 23:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Age: 45
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FlyPuppy,

Youre absolutely on the money when you said 'pilots are to blame for this' I find that as a group with a common interest in aviation, the new low of P2F just goes to show/prove how low individuals will go just to enter a profession they profess to love. Its what Capt Sully said to the house in USA regarding this profession, that were no longer attracting the best to the industry with the degrading of T and Cs, it might be my two cents but dont you think no self respecting individual would P2F ? it takes the whole cookie jar! I hope it gets addressed before we desend below DH without Visual.

Cheers

VK
VKwannabe is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 02:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: >>>My profile has been hacked by a stupid 20 yo moderator<<<...somewhere where people don't speak english! don't point at my mistakes unless you are at ICAO level 7.
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I only hope it doesnt take an accident to happen before this comes out
it's not when it will happen, but where? where the plane will crash? maybe over london!, then it will be worldwide in the news...and politicians will have to blame them selves!

look at these P2F guys who can not even take off a cessna 172 in cross wind, you can expect the worst! (I don't talk about the landing...)

stay away from easyjet! (with BA at least I feel safe!)
flyhelico is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 06:38
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire physically; Perthshire and Pembrokeshire mentally.
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stay away from easyjet! (with BA at least I feel safe!)
I'm sorry, flyhelico but that is a crass, ill-informed remark. I'm an easyJet TRE, an ex BA captain (retired just before the retirement age went up) and further back an ex-RAF instructor. Let me assure you and anyone else that doubts it that easyJet training standards are at least as good as BA's and are held up by the CAA as a standard that other companies should aim for. None, I repeat, NONE of these P2F trainees will fly without a safety pilot or be cleared for line operations if he/she does not meet the standard expected. I trust myself and I trust my TC colleagues at EZY to see to that.
Wingswinger is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 08:27
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Age: 56
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sorry, flyhelico but that is a crass, ill-informed remark. I'm an easyJet TRE, an ex BA captain (retired just before the retirement age went up) and further back an ex-RAF instructor. Let me assure you and anyone else that doubts it that easyJet training standards are at least as good as BA's and are held up by the CAA as a standard that other companies should aim for. None, I repeat, NONE of these P2F trainees will fly without a safety pilot or be cleared for line operations if he/she does not meet the standard expected. I trust myself and I trust my TC colleagues at EZY to see to that.
Well then i'm sorry but i aint flying easyjet ever again!!!!!

None, I repeat, NONE of these P2F trainees will fly without a safety pilot
I think you will find a BMI Pilot on the other thread about this said words to the effect that a full time employee has the right to a day off OR he may turn up, ride the jump seat and be paid his allowances for the day.

If Easyjet has such a bloody wonderful training department.......... why dont they stick to training full time employees? If you sir are training these wannabees with a fat wallet or a credit rating...... you are directy contributing to this cancer. Maybe when they have 120 hours they can go somewhere, get a 320TRE rating and come back and replace you for minimum wage!!!!!
Global Warrior is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 08:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Age: 56
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With regards to the letter, the first 2 lines, although pertinent, do make this sound like whinge.

I think the very first lines should shout about lack of safety and the increased danger the travelling public are exposed to by any airline operating these schemes............The papers will pick up on that for sure.

As i stated on the other thread, theres a statistic that i think came out of the current log magazine and it goes something like

The Regionals in the USA are responsible for 75% of the flying and 100% of the fatal accidents in the USA last year.

Now, due to the mountain of debt that some pilots have incurred, they are having to work 2 jobs..... obviously safety standards are being eroded due to the lack of experience of the people in the flight deck.

Whilst wanting to write a letter to the above mentioned is a great idea and i think we should send it to the press, regularly and often........

i think we should all boycott those airlines that we know participate in the scheme. After all, what is the point of conducting a media campaign if your argument then collapses in a pile of s**t by paying good money to travel on the airlines you are deriding.

If you are not prepared to do this, there is no point in even beginning to bang on about it. I would much prefer to pay £250 to go to Paris (for example) on BA than £50 on an airline that is an extension of a second rate training organisation!!!!!!

Last edited by Global Warrior; 31st Mar 2010 at 09:02.
Global Warrior is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 09:00
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am a great believer in P2F, any time I go on holiday I do it. have tried sneaking in via the U/c bay but I am allways caught. Tried hiding in the toilets , every time I just seem to get caught. So guys cough up and pay your money.
pilot999 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 09:06
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kent
Age: 47
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And you can choose where you sit depending on your budget. Starting with economy at the back, then moving forwards through business class up to first class near the front.

Oh wait a minute there is a new one now, its expensive but you actually get to sit in the cockpit and operate the aircraft, they call that being an FO.
Prophead is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 09:08
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire physically; Perthshire and Pembrokeshire mentally.
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GW,

If Easyjet has such a bloody wonderful training department.......... why dont they stick to training full time employees? If you sir are training these wannabees with a fat wallet or a credit rating...... you are directy contributing to this cancer. Maybe when they have 120 hours they can go somewhere, get a 320TRE rating and come back and replace you for minimum wage!!!!!
Because, my friend, it does what it is told to do by the board of directors. If any training manager or training captain refused to do the work he/she would be out of a job. There are plenty of potential replacements. You wish us to make that sacrifice? Don't be silly.

I am not directly contributing to the cancer and I resent your remark. I deplore it but I am powerless to stop it as is everyone in the industry apart from the directors and the regulators.

I think you will find a BMI Pilot on the other thread about this said words to the effect that a full time employee has the right to a day off OR he may turn up, ride the jump seat and be paid his allowances for the day
I did read it. It is not the same as requiring a safety pilot to be on the flight deck. No-one has the right to absent themselves from a rostered safety pilot duty unless released by the TC concerned or replaced by the company. Without a safety pilot (if one is required) the flight cannot take place. I would have thought you would have understood that.

Last edited by Wingswinger; 31st Mar 2010 at 09:13. Reason: spelling
Wingswinger is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 09:22
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Age: 56
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When i fly on BA.......... they DONT NEED A SAFETY PILOT
Global Warrior is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:03
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On a quest for the 'Big Picture".
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, of course the BA cadets go straight from the simcheck to fly on the line. Because they get paid a better wage they must be better and don't need a safety pilot on linetraining. Maybe don't need linetraining at all.

P2F can only be stopped from within the companies.
Eazy is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:15
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
They are better because they have passed the relevant selection process, not because they are paid better.

I have no problem with cadets flying jet aircraft. But it should be based on their ability to fly not on their ability to pay.
Jonty is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:28
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloud Cookoo Land
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P2F can only be stopped from within the companies
It would require pilots to stand side by side and refuse to fly with PTF cadets. To make it work every LTC would have to refuse to train, whether it be a PTF cadet, a CU, a line check - whatever. This type of action will cause management to stand up and take note. However would every LTC in EZY, BMI, TCX etc be willing to do that? Will BALPA stand up and say we will support you in doing so? It is all very well in balloting action where a decision to act is formed. However like the BA CC strike, how many that said 'yes' to a walk out turned up for duties on the first day of the strike? When it comes down to it, the environment that we are currently faced with, people who may have appeared to be coerced in to action will simply come to a conclusion on the eleventh hour. They will not risk their status or position within the airline for fear of reprisal. For action to work you require strength in numbers and thats something that the pilot group historically has been pretty poor at.

For PTF to stop it needs to be stopped by the regulators. The CAA, DofT etc. And for these guys to act it has to be on the grounds of safety. I think the battle against PTF would be won or lost by directing our concerns to these authorities. BALPA should be at the forefront of this campaign, however for some reason or other they prefer to hide from it.
Callsign Kilo is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2010, 10:53
  #40 (permalink)  
Ramasseur des pommes
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 802
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of the last few posts are demonstrating how some have no idea about how the industry and training system works post type rating. I think its best these people not posting anything.
Absolutely! The Safety Pilot issue is separate from the problem of P2F. Having a Safety Pilot is part of the prescribed process for flying a new aeroplane. For example, the CAA recommends that even TREs returning to the aircraft type after a twelve month break initially fly with a safety pilot, having "refreshed" their skills in the sim. (Standards Document 43, 26.2).

Can we please move on to a proper debate about P2F?
AppleMacster is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.