BA pilots 'prepared to strike'?
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I take it that all the unhappy BA pilots will be leaving BALPA should they 'capitulate' to management? That'll be the day.
BTW, there have been more non-BA pilots than BA in BALPA for a while. I think they have managed ok.
I suspect that there will be a flurry of activity in the ad-hoc market and a surge in profits across the industry if there is a strike.
The pax will just love being flown across the pond in old Jumbos.
BTW, there have been more non-BA pilots than BA in BALPA for a while. I think they have managed ok.
I suspect that there will be a flurry of activity in the ad-hoc market and a surge in profits across the industry if there is a strike.
The pax will just love being flown across the pond in old Jumbos.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Out of the loop
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA Pilot Strike
I see others think that BALPA will do a deal and not strike.
The problem is that the BA pilot workforce is split 4 ways without even taking into account other unions positions on the pension problem.
1st BA pilot group..... very senior Captains APS age just over 55. These members have a protected old style gold plated pension with all the civil service type bells and whistles and will not strike... BALPA can offer them nothing they already have a 70K+ inflation proofed pension and a 120K BA job which makes them 200K pilots.... the highest earners in the UK. Numbers total less than 50 to 100 all on the 777 or 747 till they loose their medical or reach 65.
2nd BA pilot group the NAPS senior men age 50 +. The current BA proposal will not hit them that hard since they have a large amount of service in the old NAPS which is protected under the BA offer. They will not strike total 500 pilots.
3rd BA plot group junior captains and first officers members of NAPS 27years to 49 years old. Depending on their current length of service they will be hit hard by the BA offer. . They will probably strike total 2500+ pilots
4th BA pilot group new entrants 23 to 26 years old all first officers . they are members of BARP the current contribution scheme . They gain nothing from a strike, they are not members of NAPS. They will not strike . total numbers 500
All my numbers are approximate but BA nows the EXACT numbers. Add to this a pool of Retired BA pilots who have left in the last 2 years numbers about 500 who are only 56 -57 and know the BA procedures and could be revalidated to UK/ JAA rules in 4 days or so with an LPC in the in the sim and a route check by management trainers, if they can be induced to return to break a strike and ensure the security of their pension.... plus fly for a few more years, if thats what they want to do.
With all this in the wings you can see why BALPA has the twitch.
The problem is that the BA pilot workforce is split 4 ways without even taking into account other unions positions on the pension problem.
1st BA pilot group..... very senior Captains APS age just over 55. These members have a protected old style gold plated pension with all the civil service type bells and whistles and will not strike... BALPA can offer them nothing they already have a 70K+ inflation proofed pension and a 120K BA job which makes them 200K pilots.... the highest earners in the UK. Numbers total less than 50 to 100 all on the 777 or 747 till they loose their medical or reach 65.
2nd BA pilot group the NAPS senior men age 50 +. The current BA proposal will not hit them that hard since they have a large amount of service in the old NAPS which is protected under the BA offer. They will not strike total 500 pilots.
3rd BA plot group junior captains and first officers members of NAPS 27years to 49 years old. Depending on their current length of service they will be hit hard by the BA offer. . They will probably strike total 2500+ pilots
4th BA pilot group new entrants 23 to 26 years old all first officers . they are members of BARP the current contribution scheme . They gain nothing from a strike, they are not members of NAPS. They will not strike . total numbers 500
All my numbers are approximate but BA nows the EXACT numbers. Add to this a pool of Retired BA pilots who have left in the last 2 years numbers about 500 who are only 56 -57 and know the BA procedures and could be revalidated to UK/ JAA rules in 4 days or so with an LPC in the in the sim and a route check by management trainers, if they can be induced to return to break a strike and ensure the security of their pension.... plus fly for a few more years, if thats what they want to do.
With all this in the wings you can see why BALPA has the twitch.
PPRuNe Person
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whoop out of the loop.
Your numbers are fairly accurate but your predictions are not. BALPA has the pilot workforce united on the issue. BA know this, and it is from the strong position BALPA holds that it has been able to get the management on the back foot.
That is why it is 'quiet' at the moment.
FYI I haven't met an APS member who won't strike. They are the most senior men and they are very angry at the way the management are behaving.
Your numbers are fairly accurate but your predictions are not. BALPA has the pilot workforce united on the issue. BA know this, and it is from the strong position BALPA holds that it has been able to get the management on the back foot.
That is why it is 'quiet' at the moment.
FYI I haven't met an APS member who won't strike. They are the most senior men and they are very angry at the way the management are behaving.
Controversial, moi?
I am group two. I will strike if necessary.
Given that at the last elections the new reps were by their own admission some of the most militant and vociferous of the group dissatisfied with previous representation why would anybody believe that they want to back pedal over a strike?
The amount of polling done has proven the immense level of support BA BALPA enjoy which is why BA's position has moved significantly - twice.
Read the BA BALPA website to fully understand the history and situation so far. And if one rep. in particular tells me that a deal on offer is likely to be the best I will vote accordingly.
Given that at the last elections the new reps were by their own admission some of the most militant and vociferous of the group dissatisfied with previous representation why would anybody believe that they want to back pedal over a strike?
The amount of polling done has proven the immense level of support BA BALPA enjoy which is why BA's position has moved significantly - twice.
Read the BA BALPA website to fully understand the history and situation so far. And if one rep. in particular tells me that a deal on offer is likely to be the best I will vote accordingly.
Couldonlyaffordafiver
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And if one rep. in particular tells me that a deal on offer is likely to be the best I will vote accordingly.
WWW
I very much hope that a satisfactory pension solution can be found and a strike avoided.
With a single digit seniority number, I am one of your so-called Group 1 pilots, I do not want to strike, I have little to gain and a lot to lose.
As others have said, I will be paying especial attention to what one particular BALPA rep has to say. If, as I fervently hope will happen, he tells me that the deal on offer is the best possible and we should accept it, I will vote to accept it.
But if he does not, then let us be clear about what will happen next.
If BALPA issue a strike ballot, I will vote Yes.
If BALPA call a strike, I will strike.
The fact that you think that the Group 1 pilots will not support BALPA and their NAPS colleagues, shows me how much out of the loop you really are.
Regards
Bellerophon
I very much hope that a satisfactory pension solution can be found and a strike avoided.
With a single digit seniority number, I am one of your so-called Group 1 pilots, I do not want to strike, I have little to gain and a lot to lose.
As others have said, I will be paying especial attention to what one particular BALPA rep has to say. If, as I fervently hope will happen, he tells me that the deal on offer is the best possible and we should accept it, I will vote to accept it.
But if he does not, then let us be clear about what will happen next.
If BALPA issue a strike ballot, I will vote Yes.
If BALPA call a strike, I will strike.
The fact that you think that the Group 1 pilots will not support BALPA and their NAPS colleagues, shows me how much out of the loop you really are.
Regards
Bellerophon
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope you're right guys, I really do!
It's just that the machinations of the BA/BALPA relationship over the past number of years have made me.....Somewhat cynical! (Even if the individuals HAVE changed! There seems to be an overwhelming temptation to 'go native' by those 'representing us)
I don't want to strike, but I am ABSOLUTELY prepared to (particularly if it includes an improvement for BARPers!)
I just don't see BALPA pushing hard enough for BA to be left crying rather than sniggering!!
So sadly the only ballot I'm expecting, is a recommendation to accept something MUCH less than I'm currently hoping for!
Hope I'm wrong!
It's just that the machinations of the BA/BALPA relationship over the past number of years have made me.....Somewhat cynical! (Even if the individuals HAVE changed! There seems to be an overwhelming temptation to 'go native' by those 'representing us)
I don't want to strike, but I am ABSOLUTELY prepared to (particularly if it includes an improvement for BARPers!)
I just don't see BALPA pushing hard enough for BA to be left crying rather than sniggering!!
So sadly the only ballot I'm expecting, is a recommendation to accept something MUCH less than I'm currently hoping for!
Hope I'm wrong!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Out of the loop
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA Pilots Strike
I understand your helpful position to your junior pilots.
However my view is unchanged.
BALPA has not had a strike involving ANY of the current pilot workforce save your senior group. It is easy to talk tough when you have never been tested.
The last BALPA BA strike was nearly 30 years ago over merging BOAC and BEA.
Since then in every case BALPA has struck a deal with BA.... always talk of a strike but it never happened.
APS BALPA allowed NAPS to start as long as APS pilots were protected.
NAPS BALPA allowed BARP to start as long as NAPS pilots were protected.
This has led to the current situation.
With so many different groups wanting different things it will be impossible to hold a strike together when BA gets tough ,and it will, have no doubt .
We will soon know the answer BALPA cannot stall for ever.
However my view is unchanged.
BALPA has not had a strike involving ANY of the current pilot workforce save your senior group. It is easy to talk tough when you have never been tested.
The last BALPA BA strike was nearly 30 years ago over merging BOAC and BEA.
Since then in every case BALPA has struck a deal with BA.... always talk of a strike but it never happened.
APS BALPA allowed NAPS to start as long as APS pilots were protected.
NAPS BALPA allowed BARP to start as long as NAPS pilots were protected.
This has led to the current situation.
With so many different groups wanting different things it will be impossible to hold a strike together when BA gets tough ,and it will, have no doubt .
We will soon know the answer BALPA cannot stall for ever.
Controversial, moi?
WWW
Your postings are so off the wall as to be hardly worthy of a response. APS became unaffordable and NAPS arose. I joined BA/NAPS of my own free will.
NAPS has a serious deficit problem courtesy of robber Brown and his ilk. BARP was introduced. BALPA would never ever have managed to get incumbent employees to vote to strike to prevent future employees only having the option of BARP. Life is just not like that.
If we can improve BARP on the back of defending NAPS all well and good.
The wider issues of capitulating entirely over the NAPS issue are what people such as Bellerophon and myself and innumerable colleagues WILL strike over if required. Make no mistake.
Many of us have personally written to LCG to personally advise him of that fact.
The fact that we haven't had a strike for many years speaks volumes of the innate intelligence of both sides during negotiations over contentious issues.
The last ballot was over LGW around 1996. The results of that ballot were so overwhelming that even I was suprised. I suspect Ayling broke into a sweat.
I see a strike as a failure, the fact that BALPA have looked after the majority of its BA membership so well during my 20 years in the company without needing to resort to calling a stoppage makes me feel that my 1% has been a wise investment.
P.S. BALPA is not stalling. If you truly knew the facts you would realise what nonsense you are posting.
Your postings are so off the wall as to be hardly worthy of a response. APS became unaffordable and NAPS arose. I joined BA/NAPS of my own free will.
NAPS has a serious deficit problem courtesy of robber Brown and his ilk. BARP was introduced. BALPA would never ever have managed to get incumbent employees to vote to strike to prevent future employees only having the option of BARP. Life is just not like that.
If we can improve BARP on the back of defending NAPS all well and good.
The wider issues of capitulating entirely over the NAPS issue are what people such as Bellerophon and myself and innumerable colleagues WILL strike over if required. Make no mistake.
Many of us have personally written to LCG to personally advise him of that fact.
The fact that we haven't had a strike for many years speaks volumes of the innate intelligence of both sides during negotiations over contentious issues.
The last ballot was over LGW around 1996. The results of that ballot were so overwhelming that even I was suprised. I suspect Ayling broke into a sweat.
I see a strike as a failure, the fact that BALPA have looked after the majority of its BA membership so well during my 20 years in the company without needing to resort to calling a stoppage makes me feel that my 1% has been a wise investment.
P.S. BALPA is not stalling. If you truly knew the facts you would realise what nonsense you are posting.
PPRuNe Person
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There seems to be an overwhelming temptation to 'go native' by those 'representing us
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
overstress
I have always been impressed by the contributions of 'the moose'. We aren't far away from seeing what he, and us is prepared to settle for.
I repeat. I just don't see balpa pushing hard enough for there to be a strike ballot. I genuinely hope I'm wrong, not because I want to strike (per se) but because I think anything less than a strike, or near strike, will simply result in the company getting whatever it was they wanted right from the very outset!
Very closely followed by record profits, record management bonuses, and huge investment in new aircraft. All on the back of a massive reduction in my 'deferred pay'!
The company CAN afford whatever it wants to!
QED
I have always been impressed by the contributions of 'the moose'. We aren't far away from seeing what he, and us is prepared to settle for.
I repeat. I just don't see balpa pushing hard enough for there to be a strike ballot. I genuinely hope I'm wrong, not because I want to strike (per se) but because I think anything less than a strike, or near strike, will simply result in the company getting whatever it was they wanted right from the very outset!
Very closely followed by record profits, record management bonuses, and huge investment in new aircraft. All on the back of a massive reduction in my 'deferred pay'!
The company CAN afford whatever it wants to!
QED
Controversial, moi?
If you believe that Tandemrotor you really have not been listening to the Union Pension Services actuary nor the other highly qualified and respected advisers employed on our behalf by BALPA.
I am prepared to be realistic but not prepared to be screwed by short term opportunists and there obscene 'bonus' arrangements.
I am prepared to be realistic but not prepared to be screwed by short term opportunists and there obscene 'bonus' arrangements.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M.Mouse
Is it not possible for anyone to have a different opinion to you, without suffering your personal abuse?
I HAVE been listening. I also know that 'advisors' only advise, they do not negotiate!
I may very well be proved wrong. So may you!
My personal experience has led me to believe that my cynicism is well founded. Perhaps your experience leads you to a different attitude.
Perhaps the only difference between us is that I will be happy to be wrong.
Is it not possible for anyone to have a different opinion to you, without suffering your personal abuse?
I HAVE been listening. I also know that 'advisors' only advise, they do not negotiate!
I may very well be proved wrong. So may you!
My personal experience has led me to believe that my cynicism is well founded. Perhaps your experience leads you to a different attitude.
Perhaps the only difference between us is that I will be happy to be wrong.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Strood, Kent
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I'm with you TM, I believe that the Company can afford it too. I also believe that they will announce record profits and new aircraft orders almost as soon as the pension 'deal' is done.
Sadly, BALPA paid for top advice and the response was that BA actually can't afford your obviously preferred 'no change' option.
There is no-one whom I would trust more than 'The Moose' to fly in the face of said advice if he felt there were the slightest justification for so doing. I have to believe BALPA when they say that 'no change' is no longer an option... Remember, the regulator and the trustees are running around in this particular maze as well as BA and BALPA.
The Moose would not have changed his tune for any other reason than that it were the most sensible course of action.
All I can do is look forward to explaining to the Labour canvassers why I shall not be voting for their candidate in the next election (if they have a few weeks to spare on my doorstep, that is - it is not only pensions I am extremely angry about).
Sadly, BALPA paid for top advice and the response was that BA actually can't afford your obviously preferred 'no change' option.
There is no-one whom I would trust more than 'The Moose' to fly in the face of said advice if he felt there were the slightest justification for so doing. I have to believe BALPA when they say that 'no change' is no longer an option... Remember, the regulator and the trustees are running around in this particular maze as well as BA and BALPA.
The Moose would not have changed his tune for any other reason than that it were the most sensible course of action.
All I can do is look forward to explaining to the Labour canvassers why I shall not be voting for their candidate in the next election (if they have a few weeks to spare on my doorstep, that is - it is not only pensions I am extremely angry about).
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tandemrotor,
Think your feeling is right, am hearing George Lucas is very interested to know why so many from the dark side are gathering at Heathrow at this moment in time.
.
Always best to remember that many of these dark forces are using cloaking devices to trick people who have soft memory cells fitted.
.
I belive the best result will be acheived just before any IA is taken by staff(say -7days), 2nd best will be after IA has started, 3rd and last will be if unions don't ballot for IA.
.
One thing for sure, the bigger the reductions in pensions for staff will ensure managers get loads of money one way or another???
Think your feeling is right, am hearing George Lucas is very interested to know why so many from the dark side are gathering at Heathrow at this moment in time.
.
Always best to remember that many of these dark forces are using cloaking devices to trick people who have soft memory cells fitted.
.
I belive the best result will be acheived just before any IA is taken by staff(say -7days), 2nd best will be after IA has started, 3rd and last will be if unions don't ballot for IA.
.
One thing for sure, the bigger the reductions in pensions for staff will ensure managers get loads of money one way or another???
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Age: 67
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm confused
Reading the Q&As from the NAPS trustees, it appears that has BA paid off at least £1.4bn of the pensions deficit between 2003 and 2006 in real terms. But what do they know.
All I can say is that that nice LCG bought my dessert in Waterworld not 6 months ago, due to a cock-up in my counting my change, and I shall be forever grateful to him.
Some of you folk appear to imply that the company and it's directors are being less than forthright with us in a bid to fleece us all. I'm sorry, I just don't know where you're coming from.
All I can say is that that nice LCG bought my dessert in Waterworld not 6 months ago, due to a cock-up in my counting my change, and I shall be forever grateful to him.
Some of you folk appear to imply that the company and it's directors are being less than forthright with us in a bid to fleece us all. I'm sorry, I just don't know where you're coming from.
PPRuNe Person
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of you folk appear to imply that the company and it's directors are being less than forthright with us in a bid to fleece us all. I'm sorry, I just don't know where you're coming from.
Very droll, Halfbiscuit! Let's hope that the Moose and his team have a shrewd review option in the deal they're cutting. So that when the record profits are announced, some of that money goes to NAPS and BARP instead of into the bank accounts of the dark side.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would bet my bottom dollar, that ever since the last pension valuation three years ago, BA have been hatching their plans about which working practices to target, and how much money they will make from those plans. They have similarly been planning to reduce our pension benefits as much as possible.
They are being less than forthright, by leaving these working practice attacks (and hence savings), until after the pension deal is struck.
This time in three years time, when the new pension deficit is calculated, and we have had three years of serious profits (even though with the shambles that is BA, we quite frankly do not deserve them), we will all be scratching our heads and wondering what has happened!
BALPA cannot second guess what is going to happen, just like BASSA cannot - although they are trying to. All BALPA can do is protect us as well as they can at this moment in time. Anything short of the maximum amount that BA can afford right now, would be a total failure. Personally I think we should be pushing for more than they can afford, and explain to the trustees that whilst it does not look like BA can afford it, they will be able to by the end of the year... Perhaps we could lose the planned benefits at the end of each year, only if BA have not made above a certain profit?
No chance of that though. Because otherwie, we might just as well leave the benefits where they are now. BA looks like it cannot afford the deficit. But in reality, by the time they are done with their cost cutting (at the passengers expence I might add, they will easily be able to afford to pay).
They are being less than forthright, by leaving these working practice attacks (and hence savings), until after the pension deal is struck.
This time in three years time, when the new pension deficit is calculated, and we have had three years of serious profits (even though with the shambles that is BA, we quite frankly do not deserve them), we will all be scratching our heads and wondering what has happened!
BALPA cannot second guess what is going to happen, just like BASSA cannot - although they are trying to. All BALPA can do is protect us as well as they can at this moment in time. Anything short of the maximum amount that BA can afford right now, would be a total failure. Personally I think we should be pushing for more than they can afford, and explain to the trustees that whilst it does not look like BA can afford it, they will be able to by the end of the year... Perhaps we could lose the planned benefits at the end of each year, only if BA have not made above a certain profit?
No chance of that though. Because otherwie, we might just as well leave the benefits where they are now. BA looks like it cannot afford the deficit. But in reality, by the time they are done with their cost cutting (at the passengers expence I might add, they will easily be able to afford to pay).
