Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Reload this Page >

Mixed Flight Crew (m/f) a Human Factors Issue in any airline ?

Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Mixed Flight Crew (m/f) a Human Factors Issue in any airline ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2007, 23:26
  #21 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not that it's a verboten subject but that it's been done to death before.

There MAY be some general differences between men and women but they are just that; general. Some women have more testosterone than others and some men have more oestrogen than others. Whilst their sexuality is not in question, the way in which they think may not follow the "conventions".

Therefore, if you treat everyone as an individual with their own quirks and personality, you'll get along just fine.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 03:52
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: It wasn't me, I wasn't there, wrong country ;-)
Age: 79
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mixed Flt Deck

Perhaps you should direct a few questions to ex Dan Air crews. Ask about Captain Yvonne Pope, 1st Female UK Airline Captain in 1975, also 1st Jet Capt. Yvonne also was the 1st UK Female ATCO in 1960.

All the folks that I knew who flew with Yvonne, had no problems it seems.

I seem to remember that People Express (may be Braniff) had the 1st B747 Female Capt to chug across the OGIN EWR/LGW, correct me if I'm wrong SVP.
The name Rippelmeir (prob incorrect spelling) comes to mind.

Does this not reflect this really stupid PC attitude which has crept in to all aspects of todays life? Surely good CRM applies in the air, as it does on the ground, irrespective of gender?

Last edited by merlinxx; 14th Nov 2007 at 03:56. Reason: Add
merlinxx is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 12:59
  #23 (permalink)  

Life's too short for ironing
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scotland, & Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the eminently wealthy (56p) Whirlygig pointed out, this subject has come up many times on pprune. It would be interesting to know how many times the subject was brought up by the female of the pilot species. I would wager the 56p that it is mainly brought up by the male portion of the pilot species.

How would RvB like to see this finally dealt with? Ban all females from the cockpit? How about banning all males from the cockpit? Or banning mixed sex cockpits? Why not go the whole hog and ban mixed sex, mixed race and mixed religion cockpits. There, that should solve all and any issues... Right?

Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it? But is that what you are ultimately suggesting? How else do you propose to finally deal with the problem that you perceive?

Alternatively, address the problem directly on the day with the person beside you in the cockpit regardless of race, religion or sex. If you, RvB, find you have repeated problems with numberous female pilots, you might want look within yourself and ask if the problem begins there.

As Shakespeare said, "Much Ado About Nothing"....

Last edited by fernytickles; 14th Nov 2007 at 14:45.
fernytickles is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 15:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Heart of Gold
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bravo! Well said fernytickles!
tgflyer is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2007, 11:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: By a river
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ladies/Gentlemen;
If one goes back to the early days of studying the crew environment in an aircraft cockpit and the evolving process to todays CRM. we know that the three main points initiated were,
Interpersonal Communication
Leadership
Decision Making
Time showed that technical skills were not a primary consideration, however cognitive and interpersonal communications were primary in the successful management of an aircrew.
It is not a long jump to extrapolate and deal with the word EGO. probably the most limiting factor in any people management scenario.
The old story goes, "In a group of people, if there is an asshole standing around, he is usually in my shoes".
Barring major cultural differences which may require more understanding and training, if the EGO factor is honestly evaluated by every member of the crew, management becomes much more effective because the "me only" is removed from the equation.
Whether you are pink, green, male or female should then be of little concern and all of us then have an input into good management and helping to reduce the human error factor. If I am open minded, I accept, if I am closed minded, I reject.
carholme
carholme is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2007, 13:29
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can generalise: men and women do bring different skills to the table. Where generalising falls down is in applying preconceptions, categorising a person as such without learning what they as an individual can do.

Generally, I believe it is true that women are of the same skill as men, but that differences in they way they operate exist - probably largely borne of our genetics.

Those who dismiss outright any notion that sexes differ are really putting themselves up to be shot down - not only does science show differences, but being PC is quite different from being a militant PC-enforcer.

In my current field, I have come across some women who are more pre-disposed to getting the task done - this translates occassionally to neglecting the big picture and missing key changes even if the detail has been completed correctly and as asked. I find that men are more pre-disposed to letting their mind wander on their task, allowing the big picture transformational items to be picked up, but missing some details.

Knowing how people operate is key to efficency in performing the task - DvB's suggestion that there might be a difference is a valid question.

As to why he asked the question - he may well indeed recognised that he believes women should be in the kitchen - many women do as well - this is largely irrelevant so long as you understand your own prejudices and work around them.

I challenge anyone to say that they have no prejudices whatsoever - I know you are lying if you say you do not!
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2007, 23:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't figured out the answer yet to the question as following.

Why are men generally better in sports even if the sport doesn't depend on the physical strength of the player?

I can understand why men and women don't compete against each other in football, hockey, running etc. Why is it that females generally can't compete with men in sports like golf and table tennis which do not depend on the physical strength of the player?
Martin1234 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2007, 23:47
  #28 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not quite sure why you say men are better than women at sport? OK, the physical games to one side, I would suspect that the reason men and women don't compete together in golf is one of tradition; after all, there are still golf clubs which won't even accept female members!

As for table tennis? Don't know. At a local league level, it can be mixed as I remember my father's chagrin when he was thoroughly thrashed by a 16-year-old girl!

Equestrian sports are totally mixed sex and it's probably evens whether a man or a women is champion dressage, show-jumper etc.

Sport is very traditionally based and culturally based. How about .... why aren't there many (if any) black champion swimmers yet they excel at track events?

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2007, 12:37
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm talking about elite level, the best of the best.

I would suspect that the reason men and women don't compete together in golf is one of tradition
That is not true at elite level. Take the 10 best men and women playing golf at elite level on a specific 18 hole course. The best woman will probably need to hit the ball more times than the least best man.

How about .... why aren't there many (if any) black champion swimmers yet they excel at track events?
Different races are better suited at different tasks. Why do you think that dogs of the race poodle normally don't compete with greyhounds in races?
Martin1234 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2007, 12:46
  #30 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite. I think you've answered your own question! Surely, it's one of physically differences!

Or perhaps you're after the answer, "that women are not as competitive as men"!

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2007, 13:18
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: By a river
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ladies/Gentlemen;
What do sports have to do with the topic of mixed crew? Is this the kind of rationale that is used in your CRM thinking? As the sports question appears to have been raised by men, what do you have to say about figure skating where there are far more women than men? I guess that would not be a fair argument as it would probably lead to unfair and wrongly presumed responses about sexuality.
Here in Canada, the male domain of ice hockey has been virtually smashed with every small town embodying women's programmes. Are these programmes as good as the men's? Probably not if you are a male domain thinker but in fact they are every bit as good as the men's because it is a thinking game. Historically the best players have been the thinkers whether they are male or female.
If the sports analogy is in any way being used to justify male dominance in the cockpit, I feel sorry for how far we have really come in this business.
Ther CP in our company is a woman and the quality she brings to the operation is unique. Women have exceptional skills as do men but I can tell you that this lady has brought a new light to our operation. She thinks with her head, not her gender. I don't think she is good at any sports but she is not the CP because of that.
carholme
carholme is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 00:56
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
carholme & Co, no one has claimed that there are no good female pilots. I'm sure that there are lots of good female pilots out there. Having said that,

what is wrong with RvB and his concern that he has problem more often with female pilots than male?

Possible reasons I can think of are,

* As already stated, men and women focus on different things. Hence the male captain might not appreciate the way the female co-pilot solve things. On the contrary, do female captains find it easier to fly with female co-pilots?

* The "average" professional male pilot is better than the "average" professional female pilot, in the same way as the average professional male golfer is better than the average professional female golfer.

* It's easier for women to get employed as a pilot, hence the employers accept less qualified pilots if they are female.



I haven't flown in a multi-crew environment but I have flown with several instructors. I have found the female instructors to be less good and the one which had the least good flying skills, taking into account her flying experience, and a really bad attitude was a female. I have an open mind and I'm sure that there are lots of female pilots, with about the same amount of hours as I have, that are much better pilots. Having said that, I don't know if my experience that male instructors are generally better than female is a coincidence or not. It's interesting to hear that RvB also has found that gender is a factor to figure out the likelyhood of a pilot being "good or bad".
Martin1234 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 02:30
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: By a river
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Martin1234;

Sir;

It is not a question of male/female better pilots, male/male better pilots, female/female better pilots. It definitely is not a question of better pilots, period. It is a question of pilots and other crew, regardless of gender, forming the best possible cohesive unit, in spite of ourselves.

As for the rest of your comments, I have no clue what you are talking about.

carholme
carholme is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 09:37
  #34 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Martin1234, I think your post tells us a lot about you!!

Originally Posted by Martin1234
what is wrong with RvB and his concern that he has problem more often with female pilots than male?
Nothing, as long as he recognises that the problem might be within himself rather than with the female pilots concerned. Somehow, from the tone of the original post, I didn't get that impression.

Originally Posted by Martin1234
On the contrary, do female captains find it easier to fly with female co-pilots?
As has been stated before, of the dozens and scores of threads started on this subject, every single one has been started by a man. Every one. No, female pilots do not give it a moment's thought. That is one generalisation I feel I can be fairly certain on. I cannot say whether I'd prefer a male or female co-pilot; there are some people with whom I'd rather not work and some with whom I enjoy working. I would have to sit down and think whether there is any correlation to their gender.

Thought about it. No there isn't!!!

Originally Posted by Martin1234
The "average" professional male pilot is better than the "average" professional female pilot, in the same way as the average professional male golfer is better than the average professional female golfer.
No. The average female pilot has to be better than the average male pilot to be thought of as average!!!

I'd love to know where you got that snippet of info. I do hope this isn't your own prejudice coming through by making up stuff and then dressing it up as fact.

Originally Posted by Martin1234
It's easier for women to get employed as a pilot, hence the employers accept less qualified pilots if they are female.
Some airlines may have positive discrimination policies; I can't comment as I don't work for an airline. I would have to take your word on that as you must have more experience in the recruitment field than me in order to make such a sweeping statement.

However, I can guarantee that in the highly male-oriented profession that is my own career, women do not find it easier to get a job at a high level. At a junior level yes, but then they hit the glass ceiling and cannot go any further.

Now, your last post raises some, to me, interesting points and questions:-

If you are talking about male and female instructors, then you are, ipso facto, a student. Are you really in the best position to judge their skill set?

Also, it is not clear whether you've had one female instructor who had both the poor skills and bad attitude or whether you've had several female instructors who displayed one of each of the negative characteristics you've mentioned. No matter. I am afraid that you need to look to yourself as well if you find that you can't relate to someone, or feel more comfortable with certain types of people.

However, if all these female instructors were so bad, you appear to believe it's because they're female not because a) they were badly taught themselves, b) just haven't got the hours yet etc.

Again, if those negative characteristics were found in your male instructors, would you assume it's because they are male or would you assume it's down to another reason.

You've got yourself in a loop now Martin; you are prejudiced. You may have had one or two bad experiences but you will assume, when you meet a new female instructor, that she is going to be as bad as the rest and therefore, any little fault she has will escalate in your mind.

If you cannot see that happening in your head, I'm sorry for you. The biggest thing you can do, is recognise it.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 14:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Martin1234, I think your post tells us a lot about you!!
Here we go. As soon as someone is saying or even alluding "females" and "pilots" in a not positive manner, the problem "always" is with the one saying it no matter what. I'll try to reply to your post anyway.

Nothing, as long as he recognises that the problem might be within himself rather than with the female pilots concerned. Somehow, from the tone of the original post, I didn't get that impression.
I didn't get that impression. Perhaps he was trying to be politically correct by not saying everything out loud. After all, he was mentioning the bigger span between female pilots as opposed to male pilots.

No, female pilots do not give it a moment's thought.
Perhaps because they normally work with male co-pilots and try to be forgiving to their female co-pilots.

I'd love to know where you got that snippet of info. I do hope this isn't your own prejudice coming through by making up stuff and then dressing it up as fact.
I never said it's fact. I just stated it as a possibility, please note "possible reasons", not that it is an absolute fact.

The average female pilot has to be better than the average male pilot to be thought of as average!!!
..but I'm curious where you got that information from?

I would have to take your word on that as you must have more experience in the recruitment field than me in order to make such a sweeping statement.
See above regarding "possibility". I have seen when recruitment in Sweden is taking place to positions where there is a male dominance. Take the military for example, I don't think that it's a coincidence that in some areas there might be a 10 times bigger drop-out rate of females than males. Not necessarily because females as a general are less good, but that it's easier for females to be recruited and there are less female applicants. If that is true in the European aviation world I don't know, I just said that it is a possibility. You say it is at junior level, which I suppose is applicable to RvB's co-pilots that he mentions.

If you are talking about male and female instructors, then you are, ipso facto, a student. Are you really in the best position to judge their skill set?
I was a student. I don't claim to be in the best position although I believe that when I had about 150 hours I could tell if someone's flying abilities was above or below average, taking into consideration the experience of the instructor. In addition to that, you don't need to be a rocket scientist (or experienced pilot for that matter) to recognise bad attitude.

I am afraid that you need to look to yourself as well if you find that you can't relate to someone, or feel more comfortable with certain types of people.
Of course I feel more comfortable with certain types of people, that's how humans are. One of the best bosses I've had (non aviation) was female but the worst one was also a female.

However, if all these female instructors were so bad, you appear to believe it's because they're female not because a) they were badly taught themselves, b) just haven't got the hours yet etc.
I just want to reiterate that I did take into account their flying experience. As you say, everything is possible. It's like those criminal law series you watch on television, where the defence is trying to find reasonable doubt, that it just might be something else that is the explanation.

You've got yourself in a loop now Martin; you are prejudiced. You may have had one or two bad experiences but you will assume, when you meet a new female instructor, that she is going to be as bad as the rest and therefore, any little fault she has will escalate in your mind.
That is not true. To be quite honest with you it's not until afterwards where I have thought of which instructors were the best and the ones not so good, where I did see that all females ended up on the wrong side. I don't know if it's a conincidence ot not. I suppose I need to fly with alot of instructors to make a statistically reliable conslusion. Having said that, it's still interesting to hear the observation of others.

If you cannot see that happening in your head, I'm sorry for you. The biggest thing you can do, is recognise it.
I think that your comment is the crux of the matter - it can't be discussed in a proper manner.

If I would have told you about the instructors, without revealing their gender, you would probably have said that I had bad luck and that instructors shouldn't behave like that. What I do is that I just say that I had more bad luck with female instructors as opposed to male, without drawing any conclusions. Now all of a sudden it's me that is the problem!

Living in Sweden I'm sick and tired of the "equal right" debate so I rather not spend more time on this thread. However, I think that it's a pity that the issue, if it at all is an issue, can't be discussed openly.
Martin1234 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 14:31
  #36 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that it's a pity that the issue, if it at all is an issue, can't be discussed openly.
If this isn't an open discussion, I don't know what is and secondly, (my emboldening), I don't believe it's an issue.

Why are these types of threads (and there are loads on Pprune alone) all started by men? Why is it always a man who differentiates the sex of the pilot?

Really, I don't have issue with the gender of anyone in any job; only with people who do seem to think it matters.

Again, your female instructors who were no good: was it because they were female, or because of other factors? Simply question!!!

Women are different from each other as well as being different from men. Men are different from each other as well as being different from women. What does that mean? Oh yes, we're all individuals.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 14:32
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As already stated, men and women focus on different things. Hence the male captain might not appreciate the way the female co-pilot solve things. On the contrary, do female captains find it easier to fly with female co-pilots?
Important, correct, and frankly worthy of consideration by both to ensure correct outcomes. Has no bearing whatsoever on skill or aptitude though.

The "average" professional male pilot is better than the "average" professional female pilot, in the same way as the average professional male golfer is better than the average professional female golfer.
No data: what could be judged are aspects such as spatial awareness, nevertheless spatial awareness is proven to be a non-genetic, cutural difference between sexes.

It's easier for women to get employed as a pilot, hence the employers accept less qualified pilots if they are female.
Always a danger if positive discrimination is legal: irrelevant however to the point of the thread - dealing with women (as opposed to dealing with women of lesses ability, of which there are undoubtedly some, as there are men), but dealing with such an issue is not different from working with any other person of lesser competence. Take countries where this is illegal (UK) to make proper comparisons.


The issue with your three comments was the unfounded preconceptions in the second point, and the fuzzy third point, which is not the case in all airlines and countries.

The point is not that any comment portraying women as diffeerent abilities does not have some grounding in reality, but generalising that they are all of lesser ability, when the standard of judgement is irrelevant or misleading.
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 14:35
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I have time, I'll find the citation for the point in bold above - it is pretty comprehensive in proof over a number of studies.
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 14:40
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Again, your female instructors who were no good: was it because they were female, or because of other factors? Simply question
Consider: would you find it harder to notice a poor instructor if you had a better rapport with him over the poor female instructor...or did the female instructor push you harder than the male instructor resulting in your flight being less successful in your mind even if you learnt more...

I'm not saying you didn't have poor female instructors (from what is presumably a statistically insignificant pool), but are you sure you can disentangle all these factors and assess the instructor objectively...

...as a student and not an instructor yourself at the time...
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2007, 18:33
  #40 (permalink)  

Mach 3
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fly with my wife all the time.

She is a right pain in the ass.....right up to the point where she reminds me to turn right not left.

Brilliant!

SR71 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.