BA Strike - Your Thoughts & Questions II
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thought for the day....
Well Holley does think he is a senior BA Manager
The article was printed in the Grauniad a month or so back as I recall. I note that HV hasn't provided the link and thus is breaking copyright (unless of course he was the original author, surely not
)
Edited to add link to article: Guardian article
The article was printed in the Grauniad a month or so back as I recall. I note that HV hasn't provided the link and thus is breaking copyright (unless of course he was the original author, surely not
)Edited to add link to article: Guardian article
Last edited by Mariner9; 10th Aug 2010 at 09:36.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes indeed, the self destruction is well advanced. Hector Vector's latest post on the other thread so clearly reveals the poster to be DH. He takes every opportunity of polite and considered dissenting opinions to attempt to construct rifts based on unreasonable views from his own stable. He then goes on to relate an unsubstantiated tale of a disillusioned manager at Waterside as if this is the majority view at that facility to open his wrongly perceived rift between other pro-BA posters further.
As the very same tale came out of his stable in an earlier propaganda release of several weeks ago it has done nothing but reveal the extreme desperation to which this individual has sunk. Imagine being the general secretary of a trade union and feeling you need to spend any time whatsoever unwittingly embarrassing yourself on a public web forum to win your fight. BASSA's leaders are not worldly-wise business people they are regular high-school leavers who through a bit of savvy found they could use intimidation to wield power over management and better their lot. For the first time they are getting an insight into what it really takes to play at the level of managing a major global coporate entity and are way out of their depths. They narrow-mindedly believe their problems will be solved when WW leaves not realising that he is simply being promoted to a position where he will still have responsibility for BA CC's costs and will thus hire competent staff under him to continue the action he has started. They pretend to understand what is good for BA but have no idea of the complex inter-relationships and balances that a CEO has to deal with on a daily basis to make the entity function.
BASSA and its leadership need help to do the honourable thing before somebody's desperation leads to endangerment of personal safety. The kindest help would come from close friends. Beyond that it should come from the UNITE leadership through its personnel (sorry, HR - showing my age!) department. Unfortunately BA has done everything it possibly can to show compassion in offering to preserve living standards, etc., until these valued staff retire but BASSA's leadership has simply not seen the light.
As the very same tale came out of his stable in an earlier propaganda release of several weeks ago it has done nothing but reveal the extreme desperation to which this individual has sunk. Imagine being the general secretary of a trade union and feeling you need to spend any time whatsoever unwittingly embarrassing yourself on a public web forum to win your fight. BASSA's leaders are not worldly-wise business people they are regular high-school leavers who through a bit of savvy found they could use intimidation to wield power over management and better their lot. For the first time they are getting an insight into what it really takes to play at the level of managing a major global coporate entity and are way out of their depths. They narrow-mindedly believe their problems will be solved when WW leaves not realising that he is simply being promoted to a position where he will still have responsibility for BA CC's costs and will thus hire competent staff under him to continue the action he has started. They pretend to understand what is good for BA but have no idea of the complex inter-relationships and balances that a CEO has to deal with on a daily basis to make the entity function.
BASSA and its leadership need help to do the honourable thing before somebody's desperation leads to endangerment of personal safety. The kindest help would come from close friends. Beyond that it should come from the UNITE leadership through its personnel (sorry, HR - showing my age!) department. Unfortunately BA has done everything it possibly can to show compassion in offering to preserve living standards, etc., until these valued staff retire but BASSA's leadership has simply not seen the light.
Last edited by Phil Rigg; 10th Aug 2010 at 10:42.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Holley certainly needs to be removed, but I imagine that someone, somewhere (Unite?) is wondering how to go about such a thing.
This foolish man has become the face and voice of this dispute, the Tokyo Rose of BASSA if you like.
However, removing him is akin to the care you have to take with an employee that is likely to become disgruntled and disruptive once he knows its coming. I’m sorry to say I have in the past had to change passwords on systems overnight and intercept people upon their arrival for work to tell them it’s their last day. Underhand, but alas sometimes a requirement.
Unite could have a similar situation with DH. He has access to “official” communications channels, membership databases (such as they are) and some degree of control over the forum – he’s already lost his job remember and may decide to go out kicking and screaming perhaps.
I certainly struggle to imagine a smooth handover of power based on what I have observed / read over the last few years of these fools operation.
This foolish man has become the face and voice of this dispute, the Tokyo Rose of BASSA if you like.
However, removing him is akin to the care you have to take with an employee that is likely to become disgruntled and disruptive once he knows its coming. I’m sorry to say I have in the past had to change passwords on systems overnight and intercept people upon their arrival for work to tell them it’s their last day. Underhand, but alas sometimes a requirement.
Unite could have a similar situation with DH. He has access to “official” communications channels, membership databases (such as they are) and some degree of control over the forum – he’s already lost his job remember and may decide to go out kicking and screaming perhaps.
I certainly struggle to imagine a smooth handover of power based on what I have observed / read over the last few years of these fools operation.
"Have also been told UNITE are talking with Willie and that Woodley has expressly excluded BASSA. He and UNITE are furious with Holley. Woodley told Holley his call for wildcat action re: shades must be withdrawn as it would give the co. carte blanche to sack. Holley refused so UNITE issued retraction themselves. Fuming !! He now wants to isolate BASSA. With internal elections coming up, woodley doesn't want anything to do with what he calls the BASSA DISASTER. It's over. It's no longer a fight for CC; it's an internal fight to preserve their own positions. Don't know where we go from here."
This is a txt sent to a poster (StoneyBridgeRadar) on the other thread from a colleague. Telling, don't you think?
This is a txt sent to a poster (StoneyBridgeRadar) on the other thread from a colleague. Telling, don't you think?
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Have also been told UNITE are talking with Willie and that Woodley has expressly excluded BASSA. He and UNITE are furious with Holley. Woodley told Holley his call for wildcat action re: shades must be withdrawn as it would give the co. carte blanche to sack. Holley refused so UNITE issued retraction themselves. Fuming !! He now wants to isolate BASSA. With internal elections coming up, woodley doesn't want anything to do with what he calls the BASSA DISASTER. It's over. It's no longer a fight for CC; it's an internal fight to preserve their own positions. Don't know where we go from here."
This is a txt sent to a poster (StoneyBridgeRadar) on the other thread from a colleague. Telling, don't you think?
This is a txt sent to a poster (StoneyBridgeRadar) on the other thread from a colleague. Telling, don't you think?
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Thailand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Holley certainly needs to be removed, but I imagine that someone, somewhere (Unite?) is wondering how to go about such a thing.
This foolish man has become the face and voice of this dispute, the Tokyo Rose of BASSA if you like.
This foolish man has become the face and voice of this dispute, the Tokyo Rose of BASSA if you like.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As we all commented at the time of the first strike call that McCluskey saw the "BASSA Disaster" with the potential damage it could cause to his union leadership ambitions early-on and distanced himself very smartly. What surprised me is how McCluskey, Woodley, Simpson, Holley, et. al., all continued to deliver the superior, righteous indignation, style union rhetoric (including factually provable lies in their often quoted numbers) to the press at large thus making themselves all look like clumsy and foolish dinosaurs in this progressive age where collaboration is the modern flavour for Industrial Relations. I have the vivid memory of feeling sorry for the undignified sight of Woodley at the end of his career being interviewed in front of the BBC News cameras trying desperately to spin the fact that only 3500 had actually been bothered to reject BA's offer and to make it sound like a crushing victory when everyone around could see it was all over!
Perhaps UNITE may be able to take the BASSA Disaster (together with its apparently overall declining membership) as a very big learning experience on how to modernise its entire approach to IR moving forwards. We can only hope they have learned that endorsing picketing with piggy posters, Hitler affiliations, men's underwear and mob mentality, jingoistic, bullying tactics, while BA's management and staff continued to work and respond professionally in the face of this unacceptable behaviour, just made the Union and its members look stupid and should have no place in the future.
No doubt we will see in time if anything has been learnt............
Perhaps UNITE may be able to take the BASSA Disaster (together with its apparently overall declining membership) as a very big learning experience on how to modernise its entire approach to IR moving forwards. We can only hope they have learned that endorsing picketing with piggy posters, Hitler affiliations, men's underwear and mob mentality, jingoistic, bullying tactics, while BA's management and staff continued to work and respond professionally in the face of this unacceptable behaviour, just made the Union and its members look stupid and should have no place in the future.
No doubt we will see in time if anything has been learnt............
Last edited by Phil Rigg; 10th Aug 2010 at 16:08.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 82
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone else begin to have the feeling that DH is becoming deranged - the image the springs to mind is the police superintendent in the pink panther, standing behind his desk, drooling, the eyes spinning as the white coats gently lead him away.
The only problem of course is that derangement can bring about a lot of destruction unless contained, and where is the containment going to come from in the present scenario - the unions (whichever one you look at) all seem pathetically useless - despite boasting about being worldwide, multimillion membership organisations.
Oh well, roll on Christmas!! (you've got to have something to look forward to).
The only problem of course is that derangement can bring about a lot of destruction unless contained, and where is the containment going to come from in the present scenario - the unions (whichever one you look at) all seem pathetically useless - despite boasting about being worldwide, multimillion membership organisations.
Oh well, roll on Christmas!!
(you've got to have something to look forward to).
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Litebulbs
I do love a bit of 70's style union rhetoric rhetoric.
Entaxei
As to Holley, no I don't think you are the only one who thinks he's deranged or, at least, very seriously deluded. I have thought that for some time, yet only now does it beg the question as to what to do about it and who is responsible?
If the Captain of a ship goes doolally, then there are procedures and protocols for deal with that situation as, I suspect, there are if the Captain of an airliner goes the same way. Rather a more serious and pressing problem there though.
If the CEO of a large company starts bothering bus queues and trying to smoke pigeons, then his/her fellow board members have procedures which, I believe, they are obliged to follow. Who though, will lead DH sobbing from the piece and ensure he is safe, warm and unlikely to hurt himself or others?
Roger.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a long-term CSD, DH would have been earning 40K+. He is reputed to get 70K+ from his job with BASSA, giving a total of 110K+.
He lost his job, so is reduced to the 70K+. He must relinquish that post at the next election, thus leaving him with just his BA pension.
His hope was to be granted a sinecure by Unite, but his last two wobblies have enraged the top brass there, so probably put the kibosh on that.
Is it any wonder the poor luvvy is deranged?
He lost his job, so is reduced to the 70K+. He must relinquish that post at the next election, thus leaving him with just his BA pension.
His hope was to be granted a sinecure by Unite, but his last two wobblies have enraged the top brass there, so probably put the kibosh on that.
Is it any wonder the poor luvvy is deranged?
Está servira para distraerle.
At a salary level of £110,000 there would be no personal tax allowance under the new rules established in the last Labour budget.Cigar box calculations lead to the conclusion that on £110,000 the tax liability would have been £36,440 for tax year 2010/2011 leaving a net of £73,560 after tax. On a miserly £70,000 the tax liability would be £17,654 so leaving a net after tax of £52,326. So the salary decrease might be £40,000 but in real terms any such job loss, based on rumoured figures and suspect calculations, makes a difference of only £21,214. Hard news if that's the mortgage payment of course. It is surprising just how significant the loss of the tax allowance calculated on a progressive basis on salaries over £100,000.
A balancing comment
A balancing comment..............
I would humbly suggest that we might think carefully about the labels that we give people.
For about 40 years, BA managers have allowed TUs to operate virtually without restriction. It is the managers that put in place lots of the stuff that customers complain about. It is the managers that allowed check-in staff and CC to have appalling sickness records. It is the managers that insisted that on-board customer feedback sheets were handed to the "CSDs".........thus allowing editing by some. It is the managers that allowed BA CC to claim extra money for lights not working, that allowed them such stupid s/h schedules and breaks at lhr. Anyone remember the old-style baggage handling regime? Anyone remember that BA Engineering used to re-write perfectly good manuals from the OEMs??
I could go on..............
Thus, when the "managers" start to take some ownership of things that they should have sorted out years ago, those staff impacted react.
Not surprising , that.
Local reps who have only known one way of doing things - theirs - will obviously react. Very few of them have worked in the real world. (Other than installing kitchens, of course).
As it has been many years since anything was different, it is also understandable that they think it is all down to WW, and that when he has gone, everything will revert to how it has been for 40 years.
When the only life you have known changes, it is tough.
I would humbly suggest that we might think carefully about the labels that we give people.
For about 40 years, BA managers have allowed TUs to operate virtually without restriction. It is the managers that put in place lots of the stuff that customers complain about. It is the managers that allowed check-in staff and CC to have appalling sickness records. It is the managers that insisted that on-board customer feedback sheets were handed to the "CSDs".........thus allowing editing by some. It is the managers that allowed BA CC to claim extra money for lights not working, that allowed them such stupid s/h schedules and breaks at lhr. Anyone remember the old-style baggage handling regime? Anyone remember that BA Engineering used to re-write perfectly good manuals from the OEMs??
I could go on..............
Thus, when the "managers" start to take some ownership of things that they should have sorted out years ago, those staff impacted react.
Not surprising , that.
Local reps who have only known one way of doing things - theirs - will obviously react. Very few of them have worked in the real world. (Other than installing kitchens, of course).
As it has been many years since anything was different, it is also understandable that they think it is all down to WW, and that when he has gone, everything will revert to how it has been for 40 years.
When the only life you have known changes, it is tough.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is pleasing to see balance coming back into this but I can't help feeling its only because there is a sense that it's all over now.
I also wonder about some of the logic used here.
Its not ok to post in the other forum as an outsider pretending to be a BA insider but it is ok to post here as a BA insider pretending to be an outsider.
Does it make any difference at the end of the day and if it is really such an issue why not take insiders behind closed doors?
I of course acknowledge that the forum belongs to someone else and it is their absolute prerogative to do as they choose but does it actually achieve anything.
I also wonder about some of the logic used here.
Its not ok to post in the other forum as an outsider pretending to be a BA insider but it is ok to post here as a BA insider pretending to be an outsider.
Does it make any difference at the end of the day and if it is really such an issue why not take insiders behind closed doors?
I of course acknowledge that the forum belongs to someone else and it is their absolute prerogative to do as they choose but does it actually achieve anything.
Safety concerns
If that comment "Its not ok to post in the other forum as an outsider pretending to be a BA insider but it is ok to post here as a BA insider pretending to be an outsider" refers to Ancient Observer I suspect he/she like me is a BA retiree, so not allowed to post there. I've not seen anything to imply that we shouldn't comment here using our vast stock of ancient history lessons and maybe quite recent background!
If that comment "Its not ok to post in the other forum as an outsider pretending to be a BA insider but it is ok to post here as a BA insider pretending to be an outsider" refers to Ancient Observer I suspect he/she like me is a BA retiree, so not allowed to post there. I've not seen anything to imply that we shouldn't comment here using our vast stock of ancient history lessons and maybe quite recent background!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the image the springs to mind is the police superintendent in the pink panther, standing behind his desk, drooling, the eyes spinning as the white coats gently lead him away.
YouTube - ‪Downfall trailer‬‎
The script lends itself to a parody of this dispute. There are some 'veally' good ones out there already (I particularly enjoyed the Indian Call Centre one) but I think DH warrants one of his own
Last edited by oggers; 10th Aug 2010 at 19:41.