Posted on the other JB forum, someone I cannot mention on here is petrified he is about to get topped.
As much as they build their defences along the river, Ukraine has already crossed that river further up country so the Russians are leaving themselves open to being cut off from the rear. They are also building up some pretty well built defences where they used to have the " Russian frontline border" in Crimea, Prudent yes, but it also makes you think that even Russia do not think they can hold the far bank. https://twitter.com/hashtag/kherson?f=live This also shows their desire, they are flying the EU flag alongside their own in Kherson. If anyone has earned a place, it is the Ukrainians. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....6e5e18cbc.jpeg |
I wonder how many more like this unfortunate or should that read lucky individuals are left behind.
"We were abandoned" https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....1492ff980.jpeg |
Most of the Russian occupiers stationed on the right bank of the Dnipro are still there. This force was estimated to be about 20,000. The Russians are trapped on the wrong side of destroyed bridges and crossings they no longer control.
The scale of Ukraine's victory is massive. Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine: «Більша половина окупаційних війсь ще знаходиться на правому березі Херсонщини» (Most of the occupying forces are still on the right bank of the Kherson region) |
Originally Posted by dead_pan
(Post 11329054)
Surprised their phones are still working after floating so far down the river. Fake?
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11329196)
Most of the Russian occupiers stationed on the right bank of the Dnipro are still there. This force was estimated to be about 20,000. The Russians are trapped on the wrong side of destroyed bridges and crossings they no longer control.
The scale of Ukraine's victory is massive. Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine: «Більша половина окупаційних війсь ще знаходиться на правому березі Херсонщини» (Most of the occupying forces are still on the right bank of the Kherson region) "if it looks too good to be true, it's not true |
Quote: Originally Posted by ORAC [img]images/buttons/viewpost.gif[/img] Russian paratrooper on his last order in Kherson region: "The last order was change into civilian clothing and run in any direction you wanted" That would be a breach of the Geneva Convention by the officers and their managers. How can it be a breach of GC to tell your defeated troops to try to save themselves any way they can? Surely that would also imply that an escaping PoW in civvies is beyond the GC? Numerous precedents in the European none-too distant past would suggest otherwise... Also, before getting too euphoric about Ukraine's alleged "Great Victory" we should wait a prudent period before acknowleging this not so much a UKR 'victory' (which it isn't purely by force of arms) rather then a RUS strategic withdrawal - and pause to see where the status quo lies in a few days or week's time. Russia seldom cedes territory without a strategic plan and UKR will have great trouble following them across the river while RUS will remain able to bombard from the other side. Kherson may yet be pulverised. Ley's not let out enthuisan get the better of us. The RUS have a plan I suspect, for once. I'd be thilled if they did not but it's a bit premature to be crowing just yet. Time will tell, and if all goes well perhaps another bridge properly dropped might even give hope for Crimea to return to civilisation. My point is... as we say in Norfolk, 'howd you haard bor..." (ie, don't be too hasty, lad) Slava Ukraini. |
|
|
Another new Vehicle type, this time Israeli, I wonder what they will standardise on post war, they have more or less road tested the best the West has got in this type of vehicle.
|
It all reminds me of when the Berlin Wall fell.
|
Most of the Russian occupiers stationed on the right bank of the Dnipro are still there. This force was estimated to be about 20,000. The Russians are trapped on the wrong side of destroyed bridges and crossings they no longer control. |
QUICK THREAD on comments about Russian defense industry made by one of Russia's key military commentators, Victor Murakhovsky. He posted the following in his Telegram channel….
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...739226113.html |
Ukraine's New Vessel Drone Revealed: Specifications, Photos and Detailed Capabilitieshttps://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and...ties-4824.html |
This is NOT the "UKRAINIAN WAR", it is "VLAD'S WAR"
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11329309)
It all reminds me of when the Berlin Wall fell.
https://twitter.com/thevenetiandoge/...77517729095681 As a point off order, the media, and this forum calls this disaster the "UKRAINE WAR". It is not It is "VLAD'S WAR" it is "PUTIN's WAR" It is "THE KREMLIN'S WAR" It is "RUSSIA'S WAR" It is NOT Ukraines war. Ukraine didn't attack it's neighbour breaking treaties with declaring WAR, that was Vlad, Putin, Kremlin, Russia, it was not Ukraine. Lets call a spade a spade rather than not calling a murderous criminal enterprise by Vlad something else and giving Russia a free pass in history. Words do matter. |
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11329285)
That surely is not right?
How can it be a breach of GC to tell your defeated troops to try to save themselves any way they can? Surely that would also imply that an escaping PoW in civvies is beyond the GC? Numerous precedents in the European none-too distant past would suggest otherwise... Also, before getting too euphoric about Ukraine's alleged "Great Victory" we should wait a prudent period before acknowleging this not so much a UKR 'victory' (which it isn't purely by force of arms) rather then a RUS strategic withdrawal - and pause to see where the status quo lies in a few days or week's time. Russia seldom cedes territory without a strategic plan and UKR will have great trouble following them across the river while RUS will remain able to bombard from the other side. Kherson may yet be pulverised. Ley's not let out enthuisan get the better of us. The RUS have a plan I suspect, for once. I'd be thilled if they did not but it's a bit premature to be crowing just yet. Time will tell, and if all goes well perhaps another bridge properly dropped might even give hope for Crimea to return to civilisation. My point is... as we say in Norfolk, 'howd you haard bor..." (ie, don't be too hasty, lad) Slava Ukraini. |
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11329285)
That surely is not right?
How can it be a breach of GC to tell your defeated troops to try to save themselves any way they can? Surely that would also imply that an escaping PoW in civvies is beyond the GC? Numerous precedents in the European none-too distant past would suggest otherwise... ...Slava Ukraini. ML2, refer #11498 for some context. Depends.
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11329285)
Also, before getting too euphoric about Ukraine's alleged "Great Victory" we should wait a prudent period before acknowleging this not so much a UKR 'victory' (which it isn't purely by force of arms) rather then a RUS strategic withdrawal - and pause to see where the status quo lies in a few days or week's time. Russia seldom cedes territory without a strategic plan and UKR will have great trouble following them across the river while RUS will remain able to bombard from the other side. Kherson may yet be pulverised. Ley's not let out enthuisan get the better of us. The RUS have a plan I suspect, for once. I'd be thilled if they did not but it's a bit premature to be crowing just yet. Time will tell, and if all goes well perhaps another bridge properly dropped might even give hope for Crimea to return to civilisation. My point is... as we say in Norfolk, 'howd you haard bor..." (ie, don't be too hasty, lad) Slava Ukraini. I would argue the evacuation of Kherson, (with some caution) is a tactical rout of RuZZian forces after their supply was compromised through the defence against the invaders by Ukraine. Would not be giving RuZZia credit for strategy that was forced upon them by the Ukrainians tactical interdiction in the field. Ukraine has achieved remarkable results from Russia gets an "F" for management, for application, for motivation, for logistics, for weapon design, for training, for tactical competency. Russia gets an "A" for assistance in destruction and demilitarisation of Russias military. The UN gets an "F", for, well nothing at all. The world gets a "C" for belatedly supporting a committed defender of it's own sovereignty, which is what the UN is supposed top do but doesn't. They get a "D+" for timeliness Time to get one of the Baltic and Scandinavian lady Prime Ministers to be the UN SG, at least there would bet some back bone then. |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 11329359)
Simply this: if a soldiers trades his uniform for civilian attire, he is no longer protected by the GC as a belligerent, can be shot as a spy, etc. What they should do is keep the uniform and surrender, become POW, and as such covered by the GC.
|
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11329285)
. Russia seldom cedes territory without a strategic plan . |
Next
[military content] So, luckily, and defying all reality, Russia evacuated all of its weapons and munitions across the Dneiper, darn neat trick without a viable bridge in the south, and limited traffic around the dam. But, well done. Credit where it is due, well done saving a couple of Ladas and Kamaz... the rifles, ammo, arty, tanks and other items that are designated as donations to Ukraines forces are undoubtedly received with appreciation. The troops themselves were apparently not considered to be weapons by Vlad; I think I would agree with that position.
Now Vlad wants to talk about getting' outta Dodge with his scalp intact. Would think that the window of opportunity for that is actually quite small, squandering time arguing about the shape and size of the table for holding discussions might not be wise for Vlad's Crossing the That situation would make negotiations too late for Vlad, so, he may have a smaller window [no pun intended, Vlad] of opportunity than he might otherwise expect. [military content concluded] Vlads concern about [aviation content] going flying [end aviation content] to a G-20 summit in SEA has been about being pushed onto all 4's and losing face, or being assassinated. I would think that there is a lower risk to his retirement plan outside of Russia than inside; his playmates are pretty loose and quick with the long knives and the window catches seem to be notoriously faulty in Russia. [life choice content] Vlad may need to consider a new vocation; master strategist doesn't seem to suit so much. Gardening is good therapy for anger management. [life choice content concluded] |
Officially releases are coming out about the a USV drones that ukraine used to strike the black sea fleet
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ly-break-cover |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:37. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.