Esteemed Colleagues in Military Aviation:
I recommend that you follow @dead_pan's example when you engage with what you assess as information of dubious merit. All of us at one time or another have come across sundry rumors, information that doesn't make sense, and outright nonsense. How do we deal with it? We do our best to find out what is correct, then we get that information out promptly. We do so because acting upon bad information risks the next operation (in peacetime or in war) ending badly. Please adopt those professional habits to this discourse. I have reduced some of the noise, and look forward to more aviation and military content. Warmest Regards T28B |
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
No argument, the law is silent in wartime.
Not a "war", a criminal home invasion, with special circumstances; pre-meditation, conspiracy, racial profiling, genocide, rape, murder, wilful property damage.
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
That imho is exactly what Mearsheimer and others have been harping on, when nations feel their vital interests are threatened, they will respond, irrespective of prior treaty obligations.
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
Given the results to date, it seems obvious that the Russian response was wrong. In context of Putin's oft quoted view that the collapse of the USSR was the seminal catastrophe of our era, the effort to decapitate the Ukraine simply provoked a concerted US/European effort to prevent Russia from turning back the clock.
Now, Russia fell apart in 1917, and walked off the battlefield, due to the revolt. That is where Russia is heading again at this time, due to the cynical action of the new emperor V Putin. Putin has done more damage to the Russian military than WW-1 did. To be clear, Putin did that by being an agent for the corruption that was endemic within the USSR to flourish under his rapacious kleptocratic governance. Your military is slightly more effective than Eritrea's.... own goal! Putin then set up the conditions precedent to not have a valid mental model of the world, through his despotic and poisonous, lethal, fall out of the window, drown in bathtub methods of managing dissent. Hardly a surprise that he was isolated... He expected Ukraine to fold like a soufflé.... he was wrong. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....80fe6a4c9d.png
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
So now both sides are stuck, while Europe hopes that sanctions will cause Russia to withdraw and Russia hopes that economic pressures will force Europe to remove the sanctions, .people are dying in Ukraine.
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
It is stupid beyond belief, even worse is that such stalemates make escalation almost inevitable, as Verdun and the Somme examples from WW1 underscore.
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
Mearsheimer points out that there is no visible diplomatic path forward to settle this conflict, so escalation is the most likely outcome.
Russia is on the precipice of losing the federation, It will start quietly and accelerate as the states that have been under Moscow's control determine that Moscow lost the plot, corrupted itself into ignominy and that there is no material gain to remaining a pet of Putin. the good ol' days of corruption will be coming home to roost soon enough.
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
Of course, imho this is just the latest in the west's fratricidal wars which have opened the door to Asian dominance in world affairs. .
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11285207)
I don't think that these wars are desirable.
Otherwise, glad to actually agree if you mean naked criminal aggression against a neighboring country in violation of the UN Charter. P.S.: you do know that Russia as a belligerent party has no vote in the UNSC on any matter pertaining to a conflict they are a party to? Time for reinforcement of global condemnation of Russia's habitual aggression against its neighbor states. I speak a little Russian, perhaps Russia will invade whatever country I am in to "protect" me? You make comments previously about protecting "Russian speaking" people, yet English is spoken by over half the world's population, yet, England doesn't feel a need to invade France anymore... because some countries have evolved, others are stuck in their glorious memories of bygone greatness. In the meantime, your national resource in energy has been mainly siphoned off to the oligarchs rather than giving benefit to the nation. The time of oil revenue dependency is coming to a close for Russia, and then what grift are they going to use to keep occupied? A protracted war was a possibility until Russia's performance amazed all with being so incompetent and so dependent on materiel and supply staggeringly compromised by endemic corruption. On military aviation matters, I have more confidence in the survivability fo the A-10 in the field; the predicate that air superiority needed to be in hand has been made moot by the performance of the Russian air assets, which have very little interest in actually coming into contact with the air defenses of Ukraine. Conversely, MANPADS and AAA from the Russian side of the lines will be a threat, but was ever thus. The A-10 is a veritable point source of "shock 'n awwwww"; given the chance to demonstrate, I doubt that many Ukrainian pilots will not jump at the opportunity to invite the guests to leave the country in style. One thing that has come out of the Russian tactics is the lob toss of rockets; would think that the A-10 would be a solid platform to get some 2.75"s into the area with a modicum of discomfort to the recipients. The GAU-8 is memorable, acts as a disincentive to troops mulling over the merits of assisting the criminal actions of Putin or not. Just a couple of squadrons would be a good start. Yes, don't expect them to returned serviceable, but many of the drivers will get back. The A-10 has high operational costs, certainly. But it has a level of survivability that is nearly unparalleled, and is available from an operator that has tried for years to kill it as a program. If someone has a few squadrons of Su-25's laying around with good munitions then that's a very good option, Ukraine has trained and competent Su-25 drivers already, the A-10 would not be an arduous transition should the Su-25 availability be constrained. Pretty sure Russia is unlikely to offer many to Ukraine.... |
Yes, the level of corruption must be staggering, when the oligarchs murdered, stole and bribed their way into companies and took over, they reaped the fortunes they were making on yachts, homes, and art for themselves instead of reinvesting it into modernising and diversifying into goods that they could only buy from the opening up western markets, and just like the EU who sold their energy security down the river for the cheap Russian gas this is coming back to haunt them.
Their need for western electronics in their aircraft and main battle tanks etc is proving to be their Achilles heal, something thank God I believe the west has started to wake up to over the likes of China and Huawei being involved in our telecommunications systems. I do hope the U.K. drops any plans to use them in the future and we all really need to look at our strategic suppliers for our core military and countrywide infrastructure ensuring if a war ever comes we will not be subject to the Vunerability the Europeans and Russia are finding themselves in with both energy and basic core parts used throughout industry, there is a lot to be said for homegrown. Just look at the inability to ramp up military production the world over due to dumping production facilities and selling off parts of it means a rapid growth possibility has gone, the availability of machining equipment as an example is no longer there. |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11285357)
I do hope the U.K. drops any plans to use them in the future
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11285357)
Just look at the inability to ramp up military production the world over due to dumping production facilities and selling off parts of it means a rapid growth possibility has gone, the availability of machining equipment as an example is no longer there.
|
Originally Posted by rattman
(Post 11285361)
Might not be an issue, the discussion going around is that Huawai is fevorishly fighting to stave off bankruptcy atm.
|
Originally Posted by Beamr
(Post 11285284)
Back in our regular program it appears that the HARM's in Ukraine aren't the latest batch.
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status...89397980512257 |
https://www.c4isrnet.com/newsletters...ile-launchers/
‘Vampire’ to transform Ukraine pickups into deadly missile launchers WASHINGTON — The U.S. is sending Ukraine “Vampire” kits that transform pickup trucks and other non-tactical vehicles into highly portable missile launchers. …..the Vehicle-Agnostic Modular Palletized ISR Rocket Equipment system is a portable kit that can be installed on most vehicles with a cargo bed for launching the Advanced Precision Kill Weapons System or other laser-guided munitions. The L3Harris-made weapon ― a small, four-barreled rocket launcher and sensor ball ― can be mounted in two hours and operated by a single person, the company said. It can be equipped with missiles to hit ground or air targets including unmanned aircraft systems. “The Vampire system itself is a counter-UAS system, ” said Colin Kahl, undersecretary of defense for policy, said at a press briefing Wednesday. “It is a kinetic system that uses small missiles essentially to shoot UAVs out of the sky.” While the Vampire system isn’t advertised as a counter-drone weapon on L3Harris’ website, Ukraine has used similar munition-style weapons to take down drones throughout its conflict with Russia….. The Biden administration selected the Vampire — a low-cost and easy-to-assemble weapon compared to other counter-drone measures, such as electronic warfare technologies — for a package advertised as providing supplies for Ukraine’s long-term needs. “We’re trying to be very deliberate about what systems we think makes the most sense for Ukraine to have in that context, and it also matters very much: Can they sustain it? Can they afford it? Because of course billions of dollars of international assistance may not be something 10 years from now or 20 years from now,” Kahl said…. APKWS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanc..._Weapon_System |
Originally Posted by B Fraser
(Post 11285385)
How old were the torpedoes that sank the Belgrano ? If they work as intended, that's good enough.
|
It’s not just what people think that matters, but how they think
Re T28B, #8450 ‘information of dubious merit
Debunking Handbook https://skepticalscience.com/docs/De...dbook_2011.pdf |
We've all seen plenty of these videos already where russkies MBT's blow up due to crew doing something idiotic so there is nothing new in this video. And that is actually the problem for them: I am overwhelmed by the scale of being stupid within the RuAF and how incredibly incompetent they are, It's as if they weren't trained at all and they would be missing even the slightest common sense. And it has been so since the war started, the day one.
There is no way they can keep up with this despite vast resources and being a military superpower (well, at least on paper). What springs to mind is that even though they are holding a fifth of Ukraine currently the collapse of RuAF will be sudden and violent once it happens. |
Originally Posted by rattman
(Post 11285394)
They used them because they knew they would work
|
I’d we’d had them, and the men trained to use and maintain them, and the gas system to fill them - they’d undoubtedly have been stored on the Atlantic Conveyor…
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11285357)
Yes, the level of corruption must be staggering, when the oligarchs murdered, stole and bribed their way into companies and took over, they reaped the fortunes they were making on yachts, homes, and art for themselves instead of reinvesting it into modernising and diversifying into goods that they could only buy from the opening up western markets, and just like the EU who sold their energy security down the river for the cheap Russian gas this is coming back to haunt them.
Their need for western electronics in their aircraft and main battle tanks etc is proving to be their Achilles heal, something thank God I believe the west has started to wake up to over the likes of China and Huawei being involved in our telecommunications systems. I do hope the U.K. drops any plans to use them in the future and we all really need to look at our strategic suppliers for our core military and countrywide infrastructure ensuring if a war ever comes we will not be subject to the Vunerability the Europeans and Russia are finding themselves in with both energy and basic core parts used throughout industry, there is a lot to be said for homegrown. Just look at the inability to ramp up military production the world over due to dumping production facilities and selling off parts of it means a rapid growth possibility has gone, the availability of machining equipment as an example is no longer there. |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11285357)
I do hope the U.K. drops any plans to use them in the future and we all really need to look at our strategic suppliers for our core military and countrywide infrastructure ensuring if a war ever comes we will not be subject to the Vunerability the Europeans and Russia are finding themselves in with both energy and basic core parts used throughout industry, there is a lot to be said for homegrown.
Just look at the inability to ramp up military production the world over due to dumping production facilities and selling off parts of it means a rapid growth possibility has gone, the availability of machining equipment as an example is no longer there. |
Regarding russian protective gear, Ukrainian soldiers from the 95th Air Assault Brigade inspect a set of captured ballistic vests.
They're probably, and I'll quote a Russian equipment expert on this; "locally made garbage from the DNR" |
@fdr - have to say your posts are excellent, spot-on.
If this is all Russia can achieve after spending c.20 years modernising its armed forces during a period of relative prosperity, then we really have nothing to fear. What does surprise me is that those restive regions haven't yet twigged that the game is up and begun taking matters into their own hands. |
Isn't there often a debate about how the armed forces want kit that works (e.g. from the US) rather than debugging some homegrown alternative? Isn't the price of 'homegrown' that you have to put up with all the problems till there's enough money to sort them out? Assuming we don’t expect to go to war without US support, then we can draw on their reserves - as we did during the Falklands war for AIM-9Ls, fuel etc. |
What does surprise me is that those restive regions haven't yet twigged that the game is up and begun taking matters into their own hands. Nobody wants to be first whilst the others wait to see how Russia responds. Most of their leaderships depend on Russian support to stay in power - kick out the Russians and you’ll probably quickly follow them out the door. Hence any move would probably follow a coup by a group claiming national support. |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11285444)
I’d we’d had them, and the men trained to use and maintain them, and the gas system to fill them - they’d undoubtedly have been stored on the Atlantic Conveyor…
I thought most of the British military's gash kit in 1982 was packed onto the Atlantic Conveyor? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:48. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.