Nutty: getting Russia to join the EU would be a political master stroke, by whomever figures out how to do it.
Mind you, I was also saying that in the late 1990's. |
I meant the Ukraine :)
|
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
(Post 11196190)
What are the odds that the Russians ever pull back from the territory they have gained so far?
In the south, I'd say very low. In the north, maybe. (These are things that I suspect are already being raised in "the talks" that are ongoing). Which airfields (civilian and military) in those zones are now in Russian-occupied territory? I keep going back to this, but the port city of Mariupol looks to be a serious campaign objective. I don't think Putin will stop until they have it. The question for me is how the populace in the captured cities will likely respond to living under Russian occupation, especially given Russia's economic travails. Major - and widespread - unrest, could place a major drain on its military resources and morale. |
I think that this will be protracted, and the longer it continues the worse the outcome will be for Vlad, and of course the Ukrainians. Russia with a crippled economy, degraded and demoralised military will struggle to deal with insurgents. Rumours of him pulling the plug on global internet access if it indeed happens will not go down well with the millennials when they find out.
There is the potential for major civil unrest in his beloved Motherland, and an ensuing coup cannot be discounted. Which ever way this plays out they need to be brought to their knees and kept there for a very long time, with all territories returned to Ukraine. |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11196205)
I meant the Ukraine :)
I was (unfortunately, it turns out) optimistic about "The West" and Russia continuing the thaw that began when the Wall came down. Between the partnership for Peace initiatives, joint ops in Northern Bosnia, and a host of other confidence building measures the beginning steps were made. The "what-could-have-beens" are legion, but that's water under the bridge. I'd still hope for a future where Russia is in the EU rather than not, although I have no idea how the folks in Brussels and Europe's capitals would view such a future. Between Brexit and the mess that the currency union has created in places like Greece and Italy, I wonder if the EU has peaked and doesn't know it yet. Time will tell.
Originally Posted by dead_pan
(Post 11196206)
- alas I don't think there is any prospect of Russia giving up any territory gained, assuming they can "freeze" the conflict at a point which suits (a big if, assuming Ukraine keeps on fighting). Any attack on captured territory would therefore be viewed as an attack on Russia itself and would likely be met with major retaliation (nukes).
That old saw about "possession is nine tenths of the law" comes to mind. I remember how my dad used to describe typical Soviet negotiating positions: "what's mine is mine, what's yours is negotiable". :p I am still pondering: are those two nuclear plants that they have possession of bargaining chips, or something else? |
Originally Posted by dead_pan
(Post 11196206)
Contrary view to other posters - alas I don't think there is any prospect of Russia giving up any territory gained, assuming they can "freeze" the conflict at a point which suits (a big if, assuming Ukraine keeps on fighting). Any attack on captured territory would therefore be viewed as an attack on Russia itself and would likely be met with major retaliation (nukes).
The question for me is how the populace in the captured cities will likely respond to living under Russian occupation, especially given Russia's economic travails. Major - and widespread - unrest, could place a major drain on its military resources and morale. I’m glad for the all the aid that the US, NATO and EU are giving Ukraine and hope the flow never ends until all Russian forces have vacated every square inch of Ukraine. |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 11196225)
... until all Russian forces have vacated every square inch of Ukraine.
Don't bet the rent money on that, is what I am suggesting. |
|
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
(Post 11196233)
Given that Russia is on the UN Security Council, and no UNSC resolution will pass to that effect, I honestly don't see him withdrawing from the two areas (Luchansk and Donetsk) whose declaration was the trigger (obviously planned ahead of time) for Russian tanks to roll.
Don't bet the rent money on that, is what I am suggesting. |
Both in the UN and cough, cough, his Country…
|
The lower echelon Russian leadership will have the clearest view of how this assault is going at battlefronts and on the homefront. They are not that stupid that they will allow this one-man-folly to destroy the Motherland.
Give it a few more days and we will learn of the sad death of the "hero" Putin, who finally succumbed to the illness that had affected his judgement. General Shotisblokov appointed temporary command and orders a complete cessation of hostilities as the Motherland enters a period of mourning. They will then arrange "peace talks" and graduated withdrawal. There will be some give and take, and some assurances and sanctions slowly and cautiously lifted. Other than all out MAD, I see this as a less frightening way out. We can only hope. |
Another dead Major General
Major General Vitaly Gerasimov, who took part in the second Chechen war, the war in Syria and the annexation of Crimea, was killed in battles near Kharkiv. |
It must be good for promotion, though that might be a bad thing in Russia.
One should feel sad at the death of another human being, but I don’t, people that target women, children and male civilians lost the right in my eyes to call themselves human beings. |
There's a heck of a lot of high ranking Russian commanders getting shot. I wonder if it happens within 30 minutes of their performance review ?
|
Originally Posted by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY
(Post 11196252)
The lower echelon Russian leadership will have the clearest view of how this assault is going at battlefronts and on the homefront. They are not that stupid that they will allow this one-man-folly to destroy the Motherland.
Give it a few more days and we will learn of the sad death of the "hero" Putin, who finally succumbed to the illness that had affected his judgement. General Shotisblokov appointed temporary command and orders a complete cessation of hostilities as the Motherland enters a period of mourning. They will then arrange "peace talks" and graduated withdrawal. There will be some give and take, and some assurances and sanctions slowly and cautiously lifted. Other than all out MAD, I see this as a less frightening way out. We can only hope. Oodles of exposure and experience to a young intelligent audience. Worth a peek. David Starkey explains why 'Putin has a stranglehold on the west thanks to Merkel' (youtube). He has harsh words to say, but I think that he is right. |
I believe that is a different Gerasimov that got whacked
|
What, two of them with a silly name?
|
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
(Post 11196224)
I
I'd still hope for a future where Russia is in the EU rather than not, although I have no idea how the folks in Brussels and Europe's capitals would view such a future. Between Brexit and the mess that the currency union has created in places like Greece and Italy, I wonder if the EU has peaked and doesn't know it yet. Time will tell e? |
There is the potential for major civil unrest in his beloved Motherland, and an ensuing coup cannot be discounted. Which ever way this plays out they need to be brought to their knees and kept there for a very long time, |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11196275)
What, two of them with a silly name?
Speculation is that the Dead one is related, maybe a nephew. The Gerasimov of ''doctrine'' fame, is the head honcho Armed forces wise. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:31. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.