Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

WW3 Battle of Britain

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

WW3 Battle of Britain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Oct 2013, 19:00
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bristol
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MFFO Hawks

Coltishall, Newcastle, and Aberdeen because it was closer to operational area were used during Exercises during the 80's. Hunters used Honington during early 80's as spares on site with Bucc Sqns. Although having spent time at Wattisham WOC along with an Oppo at Conningsby then Hawks/Hunters were expected to be on RS5, cockpit on the ORP at both airfields and used both types from Leeming/Leuchars during major Ex's.
trap one is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 06:46
  #142 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re the Hawks - Thanks for the replies. Very informative.
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 06:59
  #143 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks to clicker I have a decent OOB for the RAF in 1985. I created a PDF and added some bookmarks.
Just to remind us of when we had a half decent amount of Squadrons:

ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 07:50
  #144 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Aaaagh, 8 Sqn Maritime?

They didn't know one end of a kipper from another.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 10:00
  #145 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thought that might ruffle a few feathers

I just thought that as they tend to fly over the sea, they are up there with the rest of the Kippers, stick them in Maritime.

Thinking about it - I suppose they were 11 Group ?
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 12:09
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Harrier and Buccaneer OCUs ?
(not that it affects AD)
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 12:27
  #147 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
ExRAF, indeed they were.

Initially, when I joined them, they had lots of ex-V-force and a lot of abos. After the Nott cuts the V-force guys escaped and number of ex-maritime NCO aircrew joined. The old guard (the abos) were of course sierra hotel on PIs and fighter stuff and that was about all.

I have to say many went on to the F4 and some stayed and went to the E3.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 12:28
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
No Tanker support? (55 + 57 Sqn Victors at Marham or VC-10's at Brize (That is if the 101 Sqn VC-10s K2/3 fleet had worked up by then).

Is this game going to be like Harpoon in that the only AAR option is buddy- buddy stores and the mission aircraft and tanker have to launch together? It would be nice to have the option of putting a tanker up on patrol, give a command to whatever fighters are up to 'carry out AAR on what tanker is available within fuel range' and once the refuel is done automaticly break the aircraft away from the tanker with a request for 'what would you like us to do next?'
MAINJAFAD is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 12:48
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bristol
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OCU's +

Add the Red Arrows to AD as their 10 AC were part of the 75 Hawks wired for Aim 9L, LTF are not shown and in 85 they had both single and twin seaters enough to make a sqn.
Jag OCU
Add also the 360 and 100 Canberra sqn's
Re OCU's if it was all Hands to pumps then ALL aircraft with exception of Nucs would have been used, as Jags could carry 2x 9L on underwing pylons and harriers had the ability post 82 for 2 x 9L.
Also you miss out the tanker sqns at Marham.and 101 with the VC10s at Brize Norton
trap one is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 13:41
  #150 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MAINJAFAD
No Tanker support? (55 + 57 Sqn Victors at Marham or VC-10's at Brize (That is if the 101 Sqn VC-10s K2/3 fleet had worked up by then).
Don't forget 216.

I recall one memorable day when 4 pairs of Bear Foxtrots passed south through the Faeroes - Shetland Gap before returning via the Denmark Strait. All Q from Norway, north, south and Iceland were involved with tankers out of Marham and possibly Lossie. Still there was not enough fuel airborne and a T* on a pax flight from Cyprus had some giveaway and was employed to top up the tankers.

Sporty for the pax.

IIRC some 23 allied aircraft were involved in the operation.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 16:50
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Depends when the 216 Tankers reached IOC PN, Orbat is for 1985, C2's were in service, But the KC1's?. Thus the reason I questioned wherether the 101 Sqn 3 point VC-10 tankers were operational by then (seeing the Vulcan K2's were binned in early 84, I would suspect that they were).
MAINJAFAD is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 16:54
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In the early days of 360 we argued for a war role, but never had a formal one when I left I 69. According to the RAF Historical Society record on their seminar on the Canberra in RAF Service, it never did get one.
Wander00 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 16:58
  #153 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hold on - I'll do the complete list.
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:06
  #154 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:06
  #155 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:07
  #156 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:09
  #157 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Full tanker support is modeled in the game, even down to the different drogue/boom thing.
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:17
  #158 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm working my way through the list and adding them all to the game.

Granted they might all not be needed for a UK defense scenario but it might be fun to see how big we can get things. Strike planning into the Pact rear area's anyone ?

Plus if they are in there it's easier to remove them than add them

And in case you think this is complicated/big there are some people trying to get the game to simulate strategic nuclear war. The weapons systems are all in the game.

Personally not my cup of tea. There was an old board game called NATO back in the day that had this to say about a Strategic Nuclear exchange "To simulate the effects of a Strategic Nuclear War simply pour lighter fluid on game board and apply match"
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:26
  #159 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
216 as Tankers

My reference says this :

"ZD949, ZD950, ZD951, ZD953 are at Marshalls of Cambridge and are due to enter service later this year as Tristar K.1's. ZD948 and ZD952 are operating from Brize Norton as pure strategic transport aircraft and will go to Marshall's for conversion once the other aircraft are delivered.
Once all 6 aircraft have been converted to the K.1 standard, four aircraft will return back to Marshalls for further modification to include the installation of a freight door and then take up the designation KC.1
An additional 2 Tristar 500's have been purchased from PanAm and these aircraft will be allocated ZE704 - 705 "
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 17:27
  #160 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So depending on the month the scenario takes place 216 may not have a tanker role.
ExRAFRadar is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.