Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jan 2016, 18:30
  #8281 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK on a crosswind
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with the Sukhoi PAK FA apparently now due for full production in 2017 and intended service fairly soon thereafter, what do we now see as the advantages (if any) of F35?

While there is little likelihood of our coming into conflict with Russia, there is no guarantee as to whom they will sell it to. Iran?

If we found ourselves opposed to such a force, could we field the F35 with any confidence?

Royalistflyer is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 22:45
  #8282 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LowObservable
$14 million is two PowerPoints, coffee and donuts.

But I'm intrigued by the MSDM. I guess it's supposed to defeat all the AAMs that can't home on the F-35, which were launched by the adversary fighters that it shot down BVR before they knew it was there.
I think they are letting us down gently-you know...
glad rag is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 22:47
  #8283 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Courtney Mil
Completely wrecks it, Wander. Hence the desire to cram everything inside. External stores are for when the F-35s have killed everything else in the air and all the SAMs on day one (as they call it).
....yeah but what if.....
glad rag is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 08:28
  #8284 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
External stores are for when the F-35s have killed everything else in the air and all the SAMs on day one (as they call it).
Raises an interesting point CM and illustrates nicely that F-35 isn't just being procured for a "Day 1" scenario. Sure, it needs to enter theatre - from the Carrier if required - with an unprecedented level of relative immunity beyond aircraft we've procured in the past. However, it must also be the Day XX platform that conducts CAS or AI or Control of the Air where required. With external stores, call it a bomb truck or a missile truck; maybe it's tasked to conduct ISR. This is an important point that is often overlooked by folk who think F-35 is a silver bullet for the first stages of a campaign in contested airspace. It isn't. It will be the next generation work horse for the various air forces around the world.

Hey gr. If it doesn't work on the first day then, well, ..... b*gger! A pretty hard and expensive lesson to learn. Let's just hope the experts have gotten it right.
MSOCS is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 11:02
  #8285 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Classified
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.............

Last edited by Radix; 18th Mar 2016 at 02:08.
Radix is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 11:59
  #8286 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Awesome, MSOCS.

Given the USMC's IOC declaration last year, it's almost a shame that there's no current military operation where the jet's fused sensors and Z-axis networked capability would be valuable, and there's a latest-generation SAM threat in theater to make the JSF's stealth particularly valuable.

Wait, what?
LowObservable is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 13:24
  #8287 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LowObservable
Awesome, MSOCS.

Given the USMC's IOC declaration last year, it's almost a shame that there's no current military operation where the jet's fused sensors and Z-axis networked capability would be valuable, and there's a latest-generation SAM threat in theater to make the JSF's stealth particularly valuable.

Wait, what?
As you are well aware, IOC does not mean front line, and more importantly, the Russians very very very much do not want to mess with the US in Syria. They are well aware how much of a mistake that would be.

There is no serious threat to old school US aircraft from the Russians
Tourist is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 13:33
  #8288 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" IOC does not mean front line,"

Well that's something to be thankful for after the shambolic USMC IOC!!
glad rag is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 14:50
  #8289 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tourist
IOC does not mean front line
Even Wikipedia can do better than that.

Initial operating capability or Initial operational capability (IOC) is the state achieved when a capability is available in its minimum usefully deployable form. The term is often used in government or military procurement.

The United States Department of Defense chooses to use the term Initial Operational Capability (versus initial "operating" capability) when referring to IOC. For a U.S. Department of Defense military acquisition, IOC includes operating the training and maintaining parts of the overall system per DOTMLPF, and is defined[3] as 'In general, attained when some units and/or organizations in the force structure scheduled to receive a system have received it and have the ability to employ and maintain it.
Not front line? Or if you prefer it from the hourse's mouth, Gen Joe Dunford stated,

"I am pleased to announce that VMFA-121 has achieved initial operational capability in the F-35B, as defined by requirements outlined in the June 2014 Joint Report to Congressional Defense Committees," Dunford said in a statement. "VMFA-121 has ten aircraft in the Block 2B configuration with the requisite performance envelope and weapons clearances, to include the training, sustainment capabilities, and infrastructure to deploy to an austere site or a ship. It is capable of conducting close air support, offensive and defensive counter air, air interdiction, assault support escort and armed reconnaissance as part of a Marine Air Ground Task Force, or in support of the Joint Force."
Still not front line?
Mach Two is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 14:56
  #8290 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mess around with words all you like, we all know what IOC means, and pretending that IOC means "immediately send it to the hot spots instead of the mature platforms" just shows desperation.

There is plenty wrong with the F35 program, but pretending that the fact that it is not over Syria now means it is somehow rubbish is moronic.
Tourist is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 15:01
  #8291 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
You can hardly say that MT giving the real meaning of IOC is "messing around with words".

Originally Posted by Tourist
we all know what IOC means
Clearly you did not.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 15:05
  #8292 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Courtney Mil
You can hardly say that MT giving the real meaning of IOC is "messing around with words".



Clearly you did not.
Well aware what it means, and well aware that it is a political thing rather than an actual capability.

This is nothing new and it certainly doesn't mean its war ready.
Tourist is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 15:38
  #8293 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can we run a sweepstake as to when we think it WILL be "war ready"??

It's been so long a-building that significiant parts of it must qualify for the museum..................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 15:53
  #8294 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Well aware what it means, and well aware that it is a political thing rather than an actual capability.

So Dunford was telling porkies, then?

And if this harmless little toy is "no serious threat to old school aircraft", why are we spending $400bn on the new-school ones?



And, yes, I am sure that the Russians don't want to pickle one off at anything with stars and bars on it, but the silly s probably didn't want to shoot down MH17 either, did they?
LowObservable is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 16:15
  #8295 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possibly the Marines are going to put the 10 Block 2B IOCd F35s that they have on the USS Wasp and take them over to the Med and then fly them off to the new austere strip that the US has just lengthened, that was the subject of a thread: -
From BBC news 35 minutes ago

[URL="http://Syria conflict: 'US expanding air strip' in Kurdish north - BBC News"/URL]
What kind of use would a 1300 metre runway be put to use for beside Hercules muniton deliveries as mentioned and does this mean some form of escalation by the US? For deploying Marine F35Bs to make a point to members of PRUNE and the US Congress?
PhilipG is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 16:26
  #8296 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
That would be interesting, but something about hoofbeats, horses and zebras...
LowObservable is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 18:06
  #8297 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2x F35s heading for the UK airshows this summer...

If they don't break...
Nige321 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 18:53
  #8298 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
By hook or by crook...

LowObservable is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2016, 20:12
  #8299 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Original Post by MSOCS:
It will be the next generation work horse for the various air forces around the world.
Oooh, shudder at the thought... The USAF Chief of Air Combat Command's Advanced Air Dominance was to have said that he wakes up in a cold sweat at night at the thought of an F-35 going in (to combat) with only two air-dominance weapons.

Original Post by Heathrow Harry
can we run a sweepstake as to when we think it WILL be "war ready"??
It's been so long a-building that significiant parts of it must qualify for the museum..................
I am betting on the year 2022 with no margin for continued program slippage. With the year 2022, to put things in perspective from a time point of view in the USA: If you were born in the year the JAST program started, today you would have graduated from medical school and be in your internship program. If you were born in the year the JSF program started, you would be in medical school. If you were born in the year the F-35 program started, you would be in your third year of university studies. So, if you go from JAST, you can soon apply for an antique/historic license plate.

Les Aspin was Secretary of Defense at the time and forced the design into a single airframe for three service. General M. McPeak complained bitterly that both costs and program difficulties would skyrocket upward. Subsequently, Aspin resigned as Secretary resulting from the American deaths which occurred in Somalia during the disastrous raid there. Between then and now, nobody had the guts to change the three service program single airframe mandate, so we are getting
Turbine D is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 09:31
  #8300 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Operational testers flag F-35 software Issues

My apologies if this has already been covered..it seems quite a recent report.


Operational Testers Flag F-35 Software Issues « Breaking Defense - Defense industry news, analysis and commentary
DARK MATTER is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.