Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

COS18

Old 18th Sep 2018, 10:52
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 749
Many of the more senior pilots tried to warn everyone that the only system that works in the long run is "strict seniority". Many of you replied that we were being "selfish" and that as we were senior, we were being self-serving. Well, now you can see the main reason for strict seniority: with a whole new, separate COS, they can use the non-seniority rostering system (which we chose) to effectively provide more efficient rosters for the COS18 pilots (to get their hours up), and give us the remaining rubbish. We've done it to ourselves, because we wouldn't adopt the only proven system in civil aviation. I hate to say I told you so....
mngmt mole is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 12:29
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 296
Wait till type transfers are tweaked in only the way CX can to move COS18 crew where they want.

If anything is achieved by CC it must be

TYPE TRANSFERS IN STRICT SENIORITY including crew being able to downgrade for LIFESTYLE choice!
Avinthenews is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 13:30
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 749
CMP and COS18 will be looked back on as the moment in time that CX died as a career airline for pilots. We can argue all we like, that will be shown to be fact in hindsight. Its time for anyone with hopes of a viable career to wake up to reality and make a move as soon as possible. It is over.
mngmt mole is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 14:36
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 505
Originally Posted by Avinthenews View Post
Wait till type transfers are tweaked in only the way CX can to move COS18 crew where they want.

If anything is achieved by CC it must be

TYPE TRANSFERS IN STRICT SENIORITY including crew being able to downgrade for LIFESTYLE choice!
The first example of fleet transfer abuse will be current 777DCP staying on type for his command. Everyone else has had to move the A fleet but not our James.
unitedabx is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 15:23
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by morningcoffee View Post


None of the USA carriers mentioned are getting you into the LHS in a widebody in under 25 years. Though Iíd love to hear if thatís changed.
It has at FedEx. LHS widebody is half that time per the last system bid. Of course, FedEx's fleet skews toward the heavy side. LHS on the 757 in under 5.
CaliforniaPilot is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 15:29
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 64
Posts: 680
COSPLAY18 in all its glory, brought to you by the Jellyfish and his partner the Ayatollah.




Last edited by VR-HFX; 19th Sep 2018 at 10:15.
VR-HFX is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 15:35
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 26
There is a lot more to a career than the time it takes to get to the left seat.

I’ll also point out that upgrading at the US carriers (and Some EU) is often delayed by choice. A very senior FO with their choice of schedules and fleet (because of the seniority system) almost always has a significantly better schedule and in some cases better pay than a junior captain.

CX ex is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2018, 17:21
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nippi
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by CaliforniaPilot View Post
It has at FedEx. LHS widebody is half that time per the last system bid. Of course, FedEx's fleet skews toward the heavy side. LHS on the 757 in under 5.
Who cares about the seat. Itís about the $$$ and lifestyle. CX can not touch the yanks.
DropKnee is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2018, 05:38
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL370
Posts: 42
Originally Posted by mngmt mole View Post
...provide more efficient rosters for the COS18 pilots (to get their hours up), and give us the remaining rubbish...
I would have thought it would be the opposite actually. Those on COS 99/08 will get absolutely flogged, as we basically get paid the same regardless of hours (obviously no overtime though), whilst those on COS 18 will take a second 20% pay cut to fly substantially less than the target.
gretzky99 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2018, 08:00
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: HKG
Posts: 137
They will work the roster monthly and in real time for min cost. It wont be fair share, it won't be reasonable, it will only be about cost. Strict seniority will be the only way to see what is happening and call them on it. Fair share will only exist in name only.

Crew Control have a long history of manipulating the roster in breach of the Rostering Agreement. CMP will empower the company to really start screwing us around. Its not about us.
controlledrest is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2018, 12:11
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,681
Exactly. COS18 pilots will not be making their hours if it costs too much. This is exactly what happens in the airlines which use this model. They will use the cheaper option first and anyone joining under COS18 needs to understand that they will probably not be making the money they have been told to expect.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2018, 13:59
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ...
Posts: 65
Just curious: What's the chance that Cathay will give the Singapore Airlines (SQ) game a go?

Around 2012, SQ sacked 76 expat captains. The background at the time, was something along the lines that a new "local contract" was introduced without school or housing allowance. No requirement for anyone on expat contracts to sign the new contract. Word then quietly got around that it would be a smart idea to sign if you wanted to keep the job. Those coming from 3rd world countries generally signed the local contract. By the time it was clear that anyone who hadn't signed would be chopped, the new contract was no longer on the table. SQ 76'ers of 2012 were the last ones to be let go. I might not have the facts 100% here, but it's the general gist of the story.
MainDude is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2018, 14:49
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: uk
Posts: 505
CX will not make the same mistake as they did with the 49'ers. It was a massive PR defeat for the company worldwide which sadly had deadly consequences for 3 of our colleagues. Whilst you could argue CX Management does'nt learn from it's mistakes. That is one mistake they will never repeat. SAS is grounding flights due lack of crew. Norwegian has just added a sign on bonus for all type rated pilots. Jet2 will offer a type rating for free and BA are about to embark on their most ambitious recruiting drive in a decade. China needs 100,000 new pilots in the next 5 years and Europe 250,000 in the next 20. But only CX knows this is all wrong. We actually need less well paid pilots, kids to fill seats and careers lasting 5 years at best. Everyone else has got it wrong.

PS Sorry for the spelling mistakes ( it's obviously catching ).
unitedabx is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 02:16
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
As an outsider can someone give me a quick summary as to what COS18 is?
Foxdeux is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 02:25
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 38
See post #135
22N114E is online now  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 05:03
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Originally Posted by 22N114E View Post
See post #135
Thanks Mate. So is this the proverbial E scale?
Foxdeux is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 05:06
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Originally Posted by 22N114E View Post
See post #135
Should it not say "..which will enable productivity targets to BE more easily met....."
Foxdeux is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 06:56
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Here ---> X
Posts: 438
How dumb do you have to be exactly to sign into a productivity-based paycheck with a company that retains complete control over your productivity?

Enjoy your 70% salary during the next downturn...

Last edited by Yonosoy Marinero; 20th Sep 2018 at 09:43.
Yonosoy Marinero is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 07:38
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In Sin
Age: 49
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by unitedabx View Post
SAS is grounding flights due lack of crew. Norwegian has just added a sign on bonus for all type rated pilots. Jet2 will offer a type rating for free
.
Companies still donít want to typerate. A CX B777 10000 hour captain can apply to easyjet but they will pay for the $hitty 320 rating.

SAS are parking planes as they now have SAIL.
A low cost op from UK or Spain. Pay? Ä5000 for a 320 captain. Need to be rated. After tax= £3500/ month basic. For a captain. WTF.

So crew will still join on COS 18. It looks attractive.
Especially for Cathay Dragon where a command can be had in 18 months. You will still earn 3X that of a loco skipper in Europe. But of course the devil is in the
cost of living detail . And most guys donít really do their research in this respect, do they?
TheGreenDragon is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 07:52
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: All over
Posts: 165
As Iíve said one looks at raw numbers at oneís own peril. Especially if overly optimistic about a plan to operate on the pessimistic side of pay. This becomes important in that we seem now to be on a regional or low cost carrier compensation plan. With central planning (ie not involving input from you) rostering.

What you need to make depends entirely on where you live. Numbers in isolation mean nothing. Itís doubly worse if youíre not from the place youíre going and have no idea what expenses anyone has there. Or even what stuff costs.

Perhaps one could live like a king in some parts of rural Asia on USD 60k a year. Someone might be able to live quite well on 60K a year or so in some areas of the US with a decent house and yard. In metro San Fran or New York it might take 5 to 10 times this (perhaps even more) for an equivalent standard of living.

Hong Kong is San Fran on steroids.

Choose wisely.
Slasher1 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.