Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

BA CC industrial relations (current airline staff only)

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

BA CC industrial relations (current airline staff only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Apr 2011, 21:39
  #3781 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tunbridge Wells
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Miss M

stay!

Might not always agree with you but I really admire that you have the balls to put forward your point of view in a respectful manner when it would be so much easier to take the path of least resistance and just join in with the sheep on other forums
From Tunbridge Wells is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 07:21
  #3782 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

For Miss M (or anyone else who shares Miss M's views):

What do you expect a new strike to achieve given the lack of success of the previous strikes?
Human Factor is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 09:44
  #3783 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nice
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The volatile oil prices and political unrest are indeed now taking their affect on the cabin crew community. The Haneda is suspended for a short time now along with Tripoli. This is causing problems for Mixed Fleet Crew who operate these routes as it is meaning more home stand byes and changes to rosters. The rumours aboutey an announcement today re Mixed Fleet have gained momentum with the money being on a great pay increase. Who knows ? Galley FM and the other forums are now wild with it.
prism is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 12:59
  #3784 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well customer satisfaction on MF routes is up (so I've been told) so maybe this is the start of performance related pay increases.
coffeewhiteone is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 16:07
  #3785 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nice
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes that is correct coffeewhiteone but is way behind LGW which is ahead of LHR Worldwide.
prism is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 17:09
  #3786 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Where are you getting these figures from?

It is almost impossible to compare many of the statistics because some fleets hand out surveys and on some fleets customers do it on line.
Betty girl is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 17:32
  #3787 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just my thoughts Betty Girl. Plus the fact that there are only 5 MF European routes operating at the moment (would be 6 if TIP was operational) and 6 long-haul (would be 7 but for Haneda). LGW likewise has less routes than LHR so I don't see how they can be compared with LH LHR.

Last edited by 24-06; 5th Apr 2011 at 17:40. Reason: Typo
24-06 is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 18:07
  #3788 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: maidenhead
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

24-06.
Good point.

You can't compare any of the figures.

Different demographics of the passengers plus different fleets surveying at present in different ways.

The figures that you should be looking at are the targets each fleet are set and whether your fleet achieved those targets or not.

What gets me the most, is that two people can post unsubstantiated information and many people will just believe it as if it is fact!!!
Betty girl is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 18:51
  #3789 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recently heard from a reliable source that the total number of crew members that had their Staff Travel removed was c 5700. The last two strike ballots had c5700 votes in favour, coincidence? So this suggests that we are down to the hardcore BASSA supporters that are the problem in reolsving the dispute. It also suggests (no more than suggests) that the dispute could be solved reasonably easily by returning ST - it is a symbolic item that would cost very little. So this also suggests that BA are relatively happy with the dispute rumbling on rather than give BASSA even a hint of a win. BASSA really need to think about this sort of stuff.
Juan Tugoh is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 19:22
  #3790 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Willie Walsh admitted to 4,923 who had their ST removed. On the reasonable assumption that almost all of these would have voted for a strike, plus another 900 or so who wanted to "send a message to Keith", then you've got the total number who voted to strike.

If Unite badly wants ST back in full, then why should BA just hand it back. Instead, I can see BA offering full ST back if Unite behaves properly and works with BA to grow the company. This would include no more court cases and no more strikes.

If Unite does not agree and goes on strike, then they will lose. BA will ride out any strikes and, after the 12-week protection period is over, Unite will not have the mandate for any more IA. I actually think that Unite is under more pressure to get a resolution than BA.
Caribbean Boy is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 19:52
  #3791 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Staff Travel

This goes against the rhetoric that Bassa members were voting and working.
Litebulbs is online now  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 21:13
  #3792 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to WW, 667 of those who struck also worked.
Caribbean Boy is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2011, 21:24
  #3793 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May have worked?
Litebulbs is online now  
Old 6th Apr 2011, 16:20
  #3794 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...after the 12-week protection period is over, Unite will not have the mandate for any more IA.
It's a matter for some debate as to whether the 12-week protection period is already over.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2011, 18:16
  #3795 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Didsbury
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When do they have to announce dates by?
Miss BA is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2011, 18:28
  #3796 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UNITE have to take IA within 28 days of the ballot. Furthermore they must give 7 days notice of the IA. As the ballot was announced on the 28th of March, I believe they must announce no later than 17th of April.
Juan Tugoh is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2011, 19:01
  #3797 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Didsbury
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that Juan
Miss BA is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 09:14
  #3798 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: france
Age: 62
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest on "talks"

This from the Mental Messiah;

The only talks that have taken place so far have been between Len and Keith Williams. The purpose of these informal meetings is to decide whether there is enough intent from BA to end this dispute in a reasonable manner. Len is due to report back to BASSA very shortly and a decision will be taken then. In disputes we only have small windows of opportunity to resolve matters, we are in such a window now, so we have to cautious and make sure all avenues are fully explored. That takes time. However as you know we only have 21 days from the ballot announcement to announce dates, so the clock is ticking. We should be in a place to let you know within 48 hours, but at the moment the reps are spread all over the world so it is awkward.
If it wasn't for the fact Mark and I have been sacked and we now employ Ken/Penny in Unite House, BASSA would not be able to function at all so bear with us.

On another topic despite all the rumours on other forums I still have not been told the result of my tribunal. I am told it could be any day now. Obviously win, lose or draw I will let you know asap. Rgds Duncan
Funny isn't it that he keeps implying that BASSA has the upper hand, when in reality it's McClusky clambering for a deal. Projection at its finest.

And on the other topic, he has lost his ET he just hasn't been given the judgement in writing. No doubt he'll use it to wind up the barmy army before an actual strike, if that ever happens. If not, another ballot whoopy!

And didn't he say he doesn't read other forums, so how does he know what's been said here and elsewhere? I wonder who he is on here?

Still no BASSA accounts though.....
BASSAwitch is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 11:51
  #3799 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If BASSA can only operate now because it has, presumably, the full time services of Messrs Holley and Everard plus the two other full time employees, that doesn't sound very good. Does this mean that under normal conditions it fails to run efficiently? Isn't it the job of the executive to ensure that adequate resources are available to ensure this. Sounds like another failure to me. I do hope that members dues are not being used to fund this shortcoming.
Colonel White is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 12:05
  #3800 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: france
Age: 62
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to my mate Lou, he is indeed short-coming.
BASSAwitch is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.