Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

British Airways - CC Industrial Relations Mk VI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 14:17
  #1041 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: About to join the A1, UK
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct Paddy. So the corruption needs to be rooted out from within the CC community by voting for the best reps posibble to take on the 'mafia'. Sadly, BASSA's grip is so tight on (un)reality that it wont happen - until WW has finished that is. IMHO.

Nurj
nurjio is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 14:20
  #1042 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bath Road
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Papillon

Paragraph 39:

Let me test this finding: had BA sought to do the same thing in earlier years when there was no serious financial imperative and Miss Cumming's interests were the subject of effective representation, then my first limb consideration would have been against BA. I add: I was told the former factions were now as one so that negotiations have restarted and are proceeding.
winstonsmith is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 14:24
  #1043 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Winstonsmith

That's not referring to the overall judgement, just the specific element of the "first limb" as to the reasonableness of imposition, not the question of whether it is fair in law.
Papillon is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 14:25
  #1044 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But if, as alleged, it is the top table at BASSA, you would have thought it would be a tool that would be used. As they have not done so, then is there indeed any truth in it?
Litebulbs is online now  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 14:26
  #1045 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Basque Country
Age: 75
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....by voting for the best reps possible to take on the 'mafia'.
It would have to be a very brave man or woman to stand against the 'mafia'. Fake websites and Facebook entries would be just the start. What with whispering campaigns, smear tactics, threats and bullying; life down route would be made very uncomfortable for them. That's why breakaway unions are formed rather than resistance and reform within BASSA.

Last edited by PaddyMiguel; 22nd Feb 2010 at 14:29. Reason: added quote
PaddyMiguel is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 14:31
  #1046 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Totally agree with Paddy and nurgio

BA could not be said to be wholly concerned as to who does what in rostered trips as long as the job gets done. Similarly, they are probably flexible as to how the new WW crewing level is to be ultimately worked.

Talking about Longhaul (744 and 777), when the dust settles and BASSA has to agree the new crewing level, we can probably assume that the CSD role will revert to something akin to it's former self and the shortfall of one crew member will be taken up by the rest of the crew.

.......is that because the BASSA Reps are predominately CSD's?

Last edited by Rover90; 22nd Feb 2010 at 14:33. Reason: spelling/grammar
Rover90 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 14:36
  #1047 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bath Road
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking about Longhaul (744 and 777), when the dust settles and BASSA has to agree the new crewing level, we can probably assume that the CSD role will revert to something akin to it's former self and the shortfall of onecrew member will be taken up by the rest of the crew.

.......is that because the BASSA Reps are predominately CSD's?
Most likely scenario:

1. CSD goes back to a non-trolley position
2. WT and WTP lose 1 crew member which goes to CW.
3. WT Purser will be doing a trolley.
winstonsmith is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 15:08
  #1048 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: About to join the A1, UK
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PaddyMig..

..that brave man is Mr Willie Walsh Esq.

Most likely scenario: Post 1700 hrs this pm:

Ugliness, on a new scale, wth only one possible outcome. The City know it, the shareholders know it and the public are about to finally realise it.

Edited to add: My frustration in all of this is the ignorance of the many with regard the self-serving representation of BASSA.

I leave you with this;

Never in the field of 'Unionised Industrial Relations' have so many been shafted by so few, for so little negotiation. (Well they do like their analogies don't they?)

Last edited by nurjio; 22nd Feb 2010 at 15:27.
nurjio is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 15:17
  #1049 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the EU on a small Island
Age: 79
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is going to be so much pain, whichever side of the fence people are sitting.

I am genuinely sorry for all CC out there.
Two-Tone-Blue is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 15:28
  #1050 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From an outsiders point of view, a lack of transparency and management control on who is paid what would not be tolerated in any company I have ever worked for as it would fall clearly under unethical practices. Management virtually delegating BASSA reps to have control over people's income,opens the dorr to them favouring their mates and BASSA members. That's pretty corrupt in my view and should NOT be accepted practice in a modern company.

Truly amazing how far these people were allowed to go.

What the Hell do you realistically expect to achieve by striking? You have given management final permission to destroy what a lot of you still have?!?!??!

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 22nd Feb 2010 at 15:51.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 15:50
  #1051 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apparently a strong yes vote has been announced. expected. figures to follow from a better source i hope.
Matt101 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:00
  #1052 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BALLOT RESULT - IT'S A YES!
80.7 % in favour of industrial action
TopBunk is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:05
  #1053 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ballot Papers returned 9282
Invalid 11
Valid Returns 9271

Yes votes 7482 (80.7%)
No votes 1789 (19.3%)
TopBunk is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:09
  #1054 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Basque Country
Age: 75
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC reaction

BBC NEWS | Business | BA strike 'gets strong backing'


"We don't want to strike," said spokesperson Ken Ablard. "All we want is for BA to negotiate and not impose".
PaddyMiguel is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:10
  #1055 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bath Road
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Almost 81% voting in favour of a strike - it sounds a lot!

They sent out around 12.000 ballot papers - return was 80% - that's 9.600.

Out of 12.000 votes 7.482 has voted in favour - which is around 60%.

They received around 1.000 more NO votes this time which is very good + the rest who couldn't be bothered to vote. That's around 4.200 crew in total who won't be going on a striking.
winstonsmith is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:10
  #1056 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rugby
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ballot Papers returned 9282
Invalid 11
Valid Returns 9271

Yes votes 7482 (80.7%)
No votes 1789 (19.3%)
Roughly 57% of membership then in the "yes" camp.

Edit: Just to correct my erronius figures, they claim a membership of 10513, so the percentage figure I gave is too low, (in case someone took a screen grab.
Dawdler is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:11
  #1057 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So 7.482 yes votes on how many crew? Something like 12500 or so, right?

And WW already has how many replacements for them?

I think they can manage.
henkybaby is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:12
  #1058 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would appear there has been less than 65% support for a strike amongst the crew community. So, with 35% No votes, abstentions and spoilt ballots, plus all the crew who have voted yes but have no intention of striking, how long do we think this strike will last? I bet BA are laughing their socks off right now!
Timothy Claypole is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:19
  #1059 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LGW
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One has got to add to Dawdler's estimate of crew available to work, the X Factor.

X is the number of crew that voted "YES" but will come to work if a strike is called.

I still think that X = c5000 ie a high proportion of the Yes vote and I sense that Ken Ablard knows this when he insists that "BASSA do not want to strike".
Rover90 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 16:19
  #1060 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: down-route
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What percentage of BA cabin crew are members of BASSA?
False Capture is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.