Silhouette challenge
but no idea if it's on the net
think I saw it in a Jane's
and I've been at this for four hours now Graeme!
Noyade, looks suspiciously much like the Sawyer Skyjacker II
(except for the small extensions behind the fins)
Cheers.
Found this, but Walter Karl beat me to it. Again.
Popular Science - Google Bøger
Popular Science - Google Bøger
Oh for chrissake, what are the chances of that happening at the exact moment the camera was clicked!?
(Muffled voice from escape tunnel)...It's very dark in here! Bye!
(Muffled voice from escape tunnel)...It's very dark in here! Bye!
Could the "things" be weights, to move the CG aft?
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought they might be objects on the ground, but I didn't like to say what with Graeme going to all the the trouble of colouring them in an' all
Are we having another silhouette at all?
Are we having another silhouette at all?
In two hours it is 24 hours without sound from Walter Karl.
The "Things" are here too, but smaller.
The "Things" are here too, but smaller.
Oh OK then.
I personally feel that if someone wins a challenge and does not respond within 12 hours, we should go open house.
If we don't then the thread stalls and we all get
.
In any case, at 24 hours we'll have to.
I personally feel that if someone wins a challenge and does not respond within 12 hours, we should go open house.
If we don't then the thread stalls and we all get
.In any case, at 24 hours we'll have to.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Age: 65
Posts: 6,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good afternoon
Under the "unwritten" rules we wait 24 hrs from the time Noyade confirmed WK's guess, so that would be until 2043 this evening. I personally think (and I know I have said this before) that we should reduce the time....initially I said 12 hrs, which is perhaps a little short, particularly when its overnight, however 18 hrs would not (in my book) be unreasonable.
Thoughts anyone?
Ken
Under the "unwritten" rules we wait 24 hrs from the time Noyade confirmed WK's guess, so that would be until 2043 this evening. I personally think (and I know I have said this before) that we should reduce the time....initially I said 12 hrs, which is perhaps a little short, particularly when its overnight, however 18 hrs would not (in my book) be unreasonable.
Thoughts anyone?
Ken
"Under the "unwritten" rules we wait 24 hrs from the time Noyade confirmed WK's guess, so that would be until 2043 this evening"
I think it should be from the time the winner posts his answer. It is encumbent upon the winner to regularly check.
This, of course, assumes that the original poster does the same. Most of us do just that....
So then....is it 2043 or 1500?
I think it should be from the time the winner posts his answer. It is encumbent upon the winner to regularly check.
This, of course, assumes that the original poster does the same. Most of us do just that....
So then....is it 2043 or 1500?
Last edited by Lightning Mate; 7th Feb 2010 at 13:11. Reason: extra text
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Age: 65
Posts: 6,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1500 sounds good....oh, look at the time!
In fairness with the time differences involved, particularly as we have followers in Australia and western Canada it is not always possible for the encumbent to check things quickly. I just think 18 hrs from confirmation is a good time frame to work to, particularly as I suspect a lot of followers are working and cannot always monitor whats going on on a hour by hour basis.
In fairness with the time differences involved, particularly as we have followers in Australia and western Canada it is not always possible for the encumbent to check things quickly. I just think 18 hrs from confirmation is a good time frame to work to, particularly as I suspect a lot of followers are working and cannot always monitor whats going on on a hour by hour basis.