Silhouette challenge
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Martin,
I thought you'd gone and left your light on !
I don't think the Mako is the same mate, but I think you're correct with the ATX, I just found Ton's image and was going to post another shot, but you got there first
I'm off now, possibly back later!
I thought you'd gone and left your light on !
I don't think the Mako is the same mate, but I think you're correct with the ATX, I just found Ton's image and was going to post another shot, but you got there first
I'm off now, possibly back later!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oooops!!!
It looks like we might have a log-jam here!!
I dived in for a quick look for the first time today and just before I had to leave for an employees leaving party; I saw RR's post "I'm afraid that I will need to go soon so it will be "adios"!" and thought it to to mean he was not going to be able to play anymore and in my haste I thought it was teusje's challenge and addressed my answer to him
! I'd already logged off and was about to go when found the challenge image showing that it was a CASA ATX, so I hastily logged back on and saw what I thought was a parting comment from RR about my Mako answer, and as his light was still on, I posted my comment above, saying that I didn't think they were the same aircraft (as the Mako was a decade later) and thought that he had correctly identified the challenge, logged off and left for the party.
Home now and just had a look to see what's happening, and now I realise that it was Ton, who had left RR's challenge, and that RR hadn't been commenting at all, but seemingly assumed I had used an alternative name for his aircraft and awarded me the thread, despite the fact that I had requested an OH (but not addressed to him)!!
As RR revealed the Answer to his challenge when he answered my first post, and my new post at 16:46 would have been correct and before any others, if I hadn't thought RR had beaten me to it!! I will accept his judgement and declare the Open House I originally requestd, because I'm still struggling with a very poor connection and there's no hope of uploading an image at the moment.
Therefore it's Open House
Edited to say; thanks Brian, that's the image I had found before I saw RR's answer to my Mako guess (I just tried to post it, but couldn't get onto photbucket due to my connection). I hope you're not too confused by my explanation, (and can take the OH too)!!
It looks like we might have a log-jam here!!
I dived in for a quick look for the first time today and just before I had to leave for an employees leaving party; I saw RR's post "I'm afraid that I will need to go soon so it will be "adios"!" and thought it to to mean he was not going to be able to play anymore and in my haste I thought it was teusje's challenge and addressed my answer to him
! I'd already logged off and was about to go when found the challenge image showing that it was a CASA ATX, so I hastily logged back on and saw what I thought was a parting comment from RR about my Mako answer, and as his light was still on, I posted my comment above, saying that I didn't think they were the same aircraft (as the Mako was a decade later) and thought that he had correctly identified the challenge, logged off and left for the party.Home now and just had a look to see what's happening, and now I realise that it was Ton, who had left RR's challenge, and that RR hadn't been commenting at all, but seemingly assumed I had used an alternative name for his aircraft and awarded me the thread, despite the fact that I had requested an OH (but not addressed to him
)!!As RR revealed the Answer to his challenge when he answered my first post, and my new post at 16:46 would have been correct and before any others, if I hadn't thought RR had beaten me to it
!! I will accept his judgement and declare the Open House I originally requestd, because I'm still struggling with a very poor connection and there's no hope of uploading an image at the moment.Therefore it's Open House
Edited to say; thanks Brian, that's the image I had found before I saw RR's answer to my Mako guess (I just tried to post it, but couldn't get onto photbucket due to my connection). I hope you're not too confused by my explanation, (and can take the OH too)!!
Last edited by SincoTC; 15th Apr 2011 at 20:15. Reason: Posted my explanation and saw evanb's post
Evening Stig.
Have you tried ImageShack? Works well with Firefox and an account is not needed.
ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting
Just a matter of uploading each image one at a time. Usually not a problem though.
Have you tried ImageShack? Works well with Firefox and an account is not needed.
ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting
Just a matter of uploading each image one at a time. Usually not a problem though.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Graeme; but it's not a PB problem mate, it's still my bl
ng connection not sorted yet, with my broadband service provider and line ("damp string") company blaming each other for a 300Kb service that should be at least 10Mb 
Oh yes, and an almost inaudible telephone reception. At least I'm not paying a penny 'til it's sorted.
ng connection not sorted yet, with my broadband service provider and line ("damp string") company blaming each other for a 300Kb service that should be at least 10Mb Oh yes, and an almost inaudible telephone reception. At least I'm not paying a penny 'til it's sorted.
but it's not a PB problem mate, it's still my blng connection not sorted yet
ng connection not sorted yet
At least I'm not paying a penny 'til it's sorted.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minehead Somerset UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes mate, but not "out in the sticks" where I am, the only alternative here would be a satellite TV package, but we do have so called fast-broadband here and I'm only a couple of miles from the exchange, so it's only really a case of tracking down a bad joint, once they actually admit it's there to be found!!
The service provider is the one that supplies our company, and mine is part of a worthwhile contract for them, it's just that they say they've tested the line and are sure there's a fault in it, but the line company say they've tested it and it's OK!!
The service provider is the one that supplies our company, and mine is part of a worthwhile contract for them, it's just that they say they've tested the line and are sure there's a fault in it, but the line company say they've tested it and it's OK!!
it's just that they say they've tested the line and say there's a fault, but the line company say they've tested it and it's OK!!