Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10847276)
Covid 19 would be the ideal excuse for Qantas to dramatically increase Network as a B scale to Mainline domestically.
Crew costs cheaper than JQ (both in the cockpit and in the cabin) and able to charge mainline prices. An accountants dream. Crystal balling, but I’m predicting 20-30 airframes and east coast bases within 3-5 years. |
A couple of hundred A320 guys and gals from Tiger looking for a new seat too.
|
Originally Posted by Fatguyinalittlecoat
(Post 10847304)
Why not? There are heaps of pilots from the ME now looking for a job. Many have made plenty of money and the NW salary would be just fine. The original NW guys who signed up to the rubbish deal in the pursuit of something better in the wrong run however will now have to plan for their whole career being at the reduced remuneration. NW will take over all short haul flying using the A320 family, including JQ. It’s cheaper.
Anyone know if the Network folks got a pay bump for flying the A320 or are they doing it on F100 rates? |
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10847276)
Crystal balling, but I’m predicting 20-30 airframes and east coast bases within 3-5 years.
“The A320 has superior airfield performance to the 737 to utilise the short runways found at captial cities on the East Coast, particularly with global warming becoming a bigger consideration each year.” |
Originally Posted by Angle of Attack
(Post 10847281)
Also PER-SIN and PER - BNE apparently, and taking over the PER-CNS from Jetstar. After they get the next 10 airframes PER-HBA, PER-MEL-AKL, and also PER - SIN - TPE - NRT. SYD and BNE bases starting within a year.
.....on aircraft that are JQ’s hand me downs near the end of their service life. Seeing out their days before retirement performing low density FIFO charter in beaten down old aircraft that are apparently going to be used for high density RPT which requires near perfect dispatch reliability. Now if NW were getting brand new 320s straight off the production line I’d say these theories had some substance, until then it’s all baseless speculation. |
Wouldn’t there be a branding issue? There is a reason Network aircraft have LINK painted on the side of them
|
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10847343)
Anyone know if the Network folks got a pay bump for flying the A320 or are they doing it on F100 rates?
|
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 10847677)
All these world domination plans.....
.....on aircraft that are JQ’s hand me downs near the end of their service life. Seeing out their days before retirement performing low density FIFO charter in beaten down old aircraft that are apparently going to be used for high density RPT which requires near perfect dispatch reliability. Now if NW were getting brand new 320s straight off the production line I’d say these theories had some substance, until then it’s all baseless speculation. I wouldnt call the speculation completely baseless (albeit still speculation). First they were just getting 2 A320’s, then 4, now 9. I think there’s a chance they’ll start flying them on thin interstate routes (PER-ADL/CNS/DRW/CBR) especially during their down time on the weekends and it will grow from there. Who’s to say they won’t end up with some newer frames in the not too distant future? Only time will tell! |
You forget that many of us predicted that every F100 was going to be replaced by an A320. There is nothing new in this strategy.
|
Originally Posted by Keg
(Post 10847747)
You forget that many of us predicted that every F100 was going to be replaced by an A320. There is nothing new in this strategy.
my reading was that these are additional airframes, but I could be wrong |
Originally Posted by Telfer86
(Post 10847052)
Where this is different is that lwop is a pre-requisite to applying - never occurred before
In the past you could apply , do interview , receive offer , then apply for lwop from your particular QF airline So this process is something completely new |
Some good FUD campaign assistance here
good job :yuk::rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Going Boeing
(Post 10847701)
I was told by an ex Network pilot that they are flying the A320’s for F100 pay - they weren’t organised enough to insist on a higher pay scale.
|
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10847752)
But are F100s being retired?
my reading was that these are additional airframes, but I could be wrong |
Nothing like a good thread drift......
How Notwork getting clapped out JQ and JSA A320’s amounts to world domination I fail to understand. As far as I understand, the 4 they have are doing exactly what they said they would do. Last I checked, WA was going gangbusters with record iron ore prices. Back to the popcorn and chips.... |
Originally Posted by Arthur D
(Post 10847812)
Nothing like a good thread drift......
How Notwork getting clapped out JQ and JSA A320’s amounts to world domination I fail to understand. As far as I understand, the 4 they have are doing exactly what they said they would do. Last I checked, WA was going gangbusters with record iron ore prices. Back to the popcorn and chips.... |
There must be redundancies fast impending maybe starting with JQ crew with all the town halls scheduled from Wednesday. Guessing an ASX Wednesday morning
|
Originally Posted by Ragnor
(Post 10847850)
There must be redundancies fast impending maybe starting with JQ crew with all the town halls scheduled from Wednesday. Guessing an ASX Wednesday morning
|
I don’t think there has been 4 in one week organized tho.
|
Originally Posted by Ragnor
(Post 10847870)
I don’t think there has been 4 in one week organized tho.
The JQ one being first takes the sting out of that idea I think. If it were an announcement as big as more redundancies it would come straight from AJ at the QF townhall first. It’s only been 5 weeks since they announced the 6000 redundancies, they have barely scratched the surface of processing those. I wouldn’t read too much into the pilot dial in, probably just an update on the potential Flexi line arrangements. since the start of COVID, I count no less that 37 QF/JQ town halls and chief pilot dial ins, it could just so happen that these 3 have fallen in the same week, as they have before. But as always, I could be wrong. |
True, the whole situation is getting frustrating tho. the two flight ops ones will just be LWOP updates and general Q&A
|
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10847815)
32 positions at network are 32 less redundancies that would be required from elsewhere in the group. So that’s a positive
If however, it is flying that was previously done by a QF 737 then it will mean 32 more Qantas pilots stood down while the Group finds a cheaper contract to operate the sectors. I don’t believe that would be a positive on the whole. |
Originally Posted by Beer Baron
(Post 10848026)
That is true if they have gone out and found new business for those 32 pilots to fly to.
If however, it is flying that was previously done by a QF 737 then it will mean 32 more Qantas pilots stood down while the Group finds a cheaper contract to operate the sectors. I don’t believe that would be a positive on the whole. could be an uptick in the mining industry or could be taking QF737 flying. Could be either or a combination of the two |
It’s all new business, mining contracts.
|
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10847899)
I count 3, but yes, more than usual.
The JQ one being first takes the sting out of that idea I think. If it were an announcement as big as more redundancies it would come straight from AJ at the QF townhall first. It’s only been 5 weeks since they announced the 6000 redundancies, they have barely scratched the surface of processing those. I wouldn’t read too much into the pilot dial in, probably just an update on the potential Flexi line arrangements. since the start of COVID, I count no less that 37 QF/JQ town halls and chief pilot dial ins, it could just so happen that these 3 have fallen in the same week, as they have before. But as always, I could be wrong. |
This is the ultimate plan, to slowly replace all 737's with 320's. Soon all domestic aircraft will be branded Qantaslink crewed by network/cobham/sunstate/whatever and the passengers wouldn't know the difference all they see is the red tail, same same. Its been tested on the eastcoast with ****ty old 717s and no one seems to mind.
|
As Perth is pretty much the least affected state it makes sense to build up a large base that can operate with less restrictions .
This is about survival and being able to adjust to the market . East coast flying may dry up ! A320 Sim to be put in Perth . |
Originally Posted by unobtanium
(Post 10848471)
This is the ultimate plan, to slowly replace all 737's with 320's. Soon all domestic aircraft will be branded Qantaslink crewed by network/cobham/sunstate/whatever and the passengers wouldn't know the difference all they see is the red tail, same same. Its been tested on the eastcoast with ****ty old 717s and no one seems to mind.
|
It’s all new business, mining contracts Not to mention of course there would be serious issues if that info was to get out, what with being market sensitive and all |
You know Qantas never wanted Qantas domestic, it was imposed upon them with the merger of australian airlines. It's the very reason jetstar was created to absorb what was then australian airlines and sell it off as its own entity. When Air New Zealand bought into Ansett, there was a change in thinking.
I wouldn't rule out a return to that strategy in some form post covid. |
Originally Posted by airdualbleedfault
(Post 10848487)
LOL how's the coolaid? New business to keep 32 pilots and 5 A320s busy? I'll have what he's smoking
Not to mention of course there would be serious issues if that info was to get out, what with being market sensitive and all |
Too many pilots with too much time should be the name of this thread now.
|
Originally Posted by Xeptu
(Post 10848491)
You know Qantas never wanted Qantas domestic, it was imposed upon them with the merger of australian airlines. It's the very reason jetstar was created to absorb what was then australian airlines and sell it off as its own entity. When Air New Zealand bought into Ansett, there was a change in thinking.
I wouldn't rule out a return to that strategy in some form post covid. QF Domestic has been the life blood of Qantas since the “takeover” of Australian Airlines in 1992. The reality is that the current CEO has been looking for a reason to give up on Longhaul for his entire administration. Project Sunrise is its last best hope. Longhaul has managed to believe its own BS for decades now. This crisis has demonstrated how fragile ,and marginally profitable ,it is. Reality is the A380 will probably never fly again. |
You're quite right George, short haul saved the day after 911 and probably the GFC as well, this event will be no different. Short haul is sure to be back before long haul. The Company structure is messy though with all those subsidiaries in the mix. This might be an opportunity to clean that up and I can't see jetstar being on the cleanup list.
|
Originally Posted by goodonyamate
(Post 10848483)
thats not entirely true. The 717 is a different aircraft size. An a320 is effectively the same as a 737. So it hasn’t been tested as a ‘replacement’ as such, and when the 717 was growing, no one from the 737 was forced out of the business. Entirely different scenario if the a320 is growing and the 737 is shrinking.
|
Originally Posted by unobtanium
(Post 10848568)
717 took over 737 several slots into canberra and adelaide. Their eagerness to get rid of bag chucker's proofs they are gearing up for less ground handing requirements using a320 ULD system. Melbourne workshops have been churning out a million of them.
|
Originally Posted by unobtanium
(Post 10848568)
717 took over 737 several slots into canberra and adelaide. Their eagerness to get rid of bag chucker's proofs they are gearing up for less ground handing requirements using a320 ULD system. Melbourne workshops have been churning out a million of them.
|
Originally Posted by Xeptu
(Post 10848491)
You know Qantas never wanted Qantas domestic, it was imposed upon them with the merger of australian airlines. It's the very reason jetstar was created to absorb what was then australian airlines and sell it off as its own entity. When Air New Zealand bought into Ansett, there was a change in thinking.
I wouldn't rule out a return to that strategy in some form post covid. |
Originally Posted by Xeptu
(Post 10848491)
You know Qantas never wanted Qantas domestic, it was imposed upon them with the merger of australian airlines. It's the very reason jetstar was created to absorb what was then australian airlines and sell it off as its own entity. When Air New Zealand bought into Ansett, there was a change in thinking.
I wouldn't rule out a return to that strategy in some form post covid. At the time the then CEO of QF spent a lot of time pursuing the merger. He was rewarded with the success that Keating delivered. |
Originally Posted by JamieMaree
(Post 10848713)
That is absolute garbage.
At the time the then CEO of QF spent a lot of time pursuing the merger. He was rewarded with the success that Keating delivered. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.