Where are all the Dan haters now? What do they have to say about Gladys?
|
https://www.health.gov.au/sites/defa...-july-2021.pdf
I will bite. Gladys is STILL doing a much better job than Dan. Check out the numbers. |
Originally Posted by Ladloy
(Post 11075771)
Where are all the Dan haters now? What do they have to say about Gladys?
Remember the tv show "The Comedy Company" ( the last time we laughed) looks like the Premiers and their CHOs are making series 2. It used to be a weekly show, the new version is a daily show. |
Mark McGowan has just said that anyone from WA that is in NSW should come home now. He said that the hard border with NSW is about to get harder.
Sounds like no one from NSW will be allowed in.. no exemptions at all. Hope I am wrong. |
Originally Posted by SOPS
(Post 11075810)
Mark McGowan has just said that anyone from WA that is in NSW should come home now. He said that the hard border with NSW is about to get harder.
Sounds like no one from NSW will be allowed in.. no exemptions at all. Hope I am wrong. He has the consistency of extremums diarrhoea. |
Everything improved in Victoria when Dan fell down the stairs and took some time off
|
Originally Posted by Bend alot
(Post 11075865)
He does seem to get his medical advice from his Kellogg's morning brain farts. (can be quoted as such)
He has the consistency of extremums diarrhoea. |
Originally Posted by Ladloy
(Post 11075771)
Where are all the Dan haters now?
|
Originally Posted by SOPS
(Post 11075871)
I assume you don’t think there is a problem in NSW??
There is a very definite problem in "Sydney" and as much as McGowan would like to believe that makes up most of the state, a great many people still live outside it. Broken Hill is closer to Adelaide than Sydney, Ballina closer to Brisbane, and Albury closer to Melbourne. None of whose residents would fly via Sydney to get to Perth, but they are locked out by default, which is nothing more than a cheap political scaremongering and in can in no way be supported by "health advice". |
Here is a Harvard professors view.
|
In a nut shell there's two sides to this debacle, you either agree wth the lunatics or you don't, pick one and live by it!
|
International travel is looking good I’m 2022 hahahahahahaha. 2024 if we’re lucky. Can’t even agree on a strategy to keep our internal borders open. I’m Glad Gladys is taking the current approach and not “falling in to line” as the emperor of the West calls it.
|
Originally Posted by SHVC
(Post 11076120)
I’m Glad Gladys is taking the current approach and not “falling in to line” as the emperor of the West calls it.
“Unless there is a dramatic change, unless there is a dramatic turnaround in the numbers, I can’t see how we would be in a position to ease restrictions by next Friday,” she said. The NSW premier talked down health minister Brad Hazzard’s earlier comments that the state might have to learn to live with the virus, and said case numbers would need to be as close to zero as possible before lockdown would end. “No state or nation or any country on the planet can live with the Delta variant when our vaccination rates are so low. So please, do not think that the NSW government thinks we can live with this when our rate of vaccination is only at 9%,” she said. “When you only have 9% of your community vaccinated, opening up before you get as close to that zero number as possible, it means you would subject thousands and thousands to hospitalisation and death.” “I don’t want anyone to feel like that. But if you are not doing the right thing, please know that we will have to have the law come down on you, because the simple fact is, people doing the wrong thing means that all of us suffer,” she said. I don’t see how that differs from the basic approach every other state is taking or is “learning to live with” the virus. |
Originally Posted by SOPS
(Post 11075871)
I assume you don’t think there is a problem in NSW??
So I’d say the current measures are more than enough and anything more is a gross over reaction from McClown. But that’s how he operates, so who knows. |
If she followed the approach of other states she would lock everyone up 5 days no movement just stop living. She is still keeping a balance. All that’s affected is a few coffee shops that will bounce back and tourism/aviation which will bounce back. Rest of the world has moved on so should we.
|
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11075894)
Kulldorff routinely gives out-and-out nonsense oxygen by endorsing or spreading it on social media. His latest foray into the twilight zone is circulating lockdownsceptics.org's hysteria about New Zealand hospitals being 'flooded' with children suffering respiratory illness because lockdowns prevented them from acquiring general immunities through socialising. The facts of the matter are that there has been an outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) centred on Wellington, New Zealand. RSV is typically very common in the cooler/colder months and generally affects infants up to two years of age (older children and adults can be affected but most just register it as a cold). RSV infections in New Zealand had been at record lows coming into this outbreak, 98 percent below normal levels. There had been a similar near absence of RSV in Australia over the last 18 months which ended with a spike in March-April this year. Notably in Australia the RSV surges started in New South Wales and Western Australia; two states that had not used lockdowns (as opposed to lockouts) anywhere near as widely as other states during the period prior to the March-April 2021 RSV outbreaks. The Wellington outbreak is thought to be linked to the opening of travel under the Trans-Tasman Bubble. |
Originally Posted by SHVC
(Post 11076198)
If she followed the approach of other states she would lock everyone up 5 days no movement just stop living. She is still keeping a balance. All that’s affected is a few coffee shops that will bounce back and tourism/aviation which will bounce back. Rest of the world has moved on so should we.
|
Originally Posted by MickG0105
(Post 11076205)
..................... Notably in Australia the RSV surges started in New South Wales and Western Australia; two states that had not used lock-downs (as opposed to lockouts) anywhere near as widely as other states..........
WA has had five lock-downs (I think), four of them being short, sharp lock-downs. If people are restricted to their homes except where they cannot work from home or allowed out for shopping for essentials, restricted exercise, etc, etc. then I, and Mark, call it a lock-down. What makes you think that that is not a lock-down? What criteria has not been met? |
Originally Posted by Foxxster
(Post 11075894)
Here is a Harvard professors view.
Plus Sky News Outsiders? Of all the nutjob Sky News After Dark presenters those guys could qualify as the most nutty, they are still pushing stolen US election conspiracy theories months after the event. Just red meat to attract lunatics. |
Originally Posted by SHVC
(Post 11076198)
If she followed the approach of other states she would lock everyone up 5 days no movement just stop living. She is still keeping a balance. All that’s affected is a few coffee shops that will bounce back and tourism/aviation which will bounce back. Rest of the world has moved on so should we.
It’s more than just a “few coffee shops” affected..... EDIT: Sorry $1 billion a week. It’s still a massive hit on the economy |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.