PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Qantas Recruitment (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/584827-qantas-recruitment.html)

mikewil 19th Mar 2024 00:45


Originally Posted by morno (Post 11618871)
No longer done

I heard this may be the case. Interesting to still see it listed on some (recently posted) QF group direct entry job ads. The wonderful world of HR...

bendo77 19th Mar 2024 02:09

How long should an external applicant expect to be on the hold file from this round of recruits?

JPJP 20th Mar 2024 08:11


Originally Posted by dr dre (Post 11615333)
Why then is QF (the topic of this thread btw) always massively oversubscribed for recruitment? By a ratio of 4-5x as many positions as required? And it is uncommon to hear of mainline pilots resigning for other work.

Let me be clear, I mean mainline only, not the other outfits which have obviously inferior conditions. The benefits of overseas vs subsidiaries is apparent. Apparently according to Crikey news 5 NAA pilots resigned just this week. That’s almost unheard of in mainline despite being much larger.

The answer to your question is self evident. Qantas mainline is the proverbial one eyed man in the land of the blind. A big fish in a tiny monopoly, masquerading as an airline industry. A pilot group that lifted the shirt, licked the ring and voted in a B scale for new joiners. Terrified by empty threats centered around an aircraft that doesn’t even exist yet. Pilots apply to Qantas because it’s the lesser of two evils. An outsourced, poorly paid, whipsaw subsidiary. Or a deeply average set of terms and conditions at mainline.

Your schadenfreude is showing,

maggot 20th Mar 2024 08:34


Originally Posted by JPJP (Post 11619734)
The answer to your question is self evident. Qantas mainline is the proverbial one eyed man in the land of the blind. A big fish in a tiny monopoly, masquerading as an airline industry. A pilot group that lifted the shirt, licked the ring and voted in a B scale for new joiners. Terrified by empty threats centered around an aircraft that doesn’t even exist yet. Pilots apply to Qantas because it’s the lesser of two evils. An outsourced, poorly paid, whipsaw subsidiary. Or a deeply average set of terms and conditions at mainline.

Your schadenfreude is showing,

Give it a rest. History is the EA you're disparaging was voted on under the cloud of covid not motivated as you suggest in any way.
It was dead wood if it wasn't for covid

Parrot Pilot 21st Mar 2024 06:29


Originally Posted by maggot (Post 11619747)
Give it a rest. History is the EA you're disparaging was voted on under the cloud of covid not motivated as you suggest in any way.
It was dead wood if it wasn't for covid

COVID didn’t vote up the B scale - pilots who were scared of their own shadow and only cared about themselves did.

Still yet to find one in the wild though. It would appear that people who voted up the EBA are like greens voters - they obviously exist but you never seem to meet one.



Parrot Pilot 21st Mar 2024 09:50


Originally Posted by beautiful_butterfly (Post 11620513)
Back pay is quite useful when you’ve got an indefinite stand down letter in your hand? Context is important when reviewing the outcomes of prior votes.

Leaving it unresolved at that time would’ve left it wide open for unscrupulous opportunistic variations. The outcomes may have been significantly worse than what transpired.

Most of the B scale pilots dont have to look hard for the ‘unscrupulous opportunistic variation’, the company sends a reminder every fortnight in workday.



Thumb War 21st Mar 2024 10:31

I’m guessing most people here would agree. Not sure what should’ve been done differently given what was happening at the time though?

Beer Baron 21st Mar 2024 12:09


Originally Posted by Parrot Pilot (Post 11620471)
COVID didn’t vote up the B scale - pilots who were scared of their own shadow and only cared about themselves did.

You are wrong there. It was no shadow, it was 20 years of Qantas replacing us with cheaper labour.
Look around;
Jetstar with 80 jets
Network with 15 jets
JetConnect With 6 jets
Alliance contracted for ~26 jets
NJS with 29 jet on order.

All these planes, flying routes we used to fly, (even wearing our uniform and livery half the time) but Qantas set up or bought these entities to do it without us. And they had no problem hiring the hundreds and hundreds of pilots to do it.

So you can tell me Qantas were bluffing when they explicitly told us they would have other pilots fly the A350’s if we didn’t vote Yes? That was going to be the one time they actually didn’t sideline us (despite being crystal clear they would).

Then imagine how many new S/O’s would be hired onto any LH contract if the A350 was not flown by mainline, especially given it is the replacement for 50% of the LH fleet.

Yeah, the new S/O rate is **** but it lasts only as long as you’re an S/O (it’s actually a pay rise for the first 18 months) and that may only be a day currently. But given the existential threat to mainline LH, the fact that PIA was not even an option as we were ALL stood down indefinitely and no one knew if there would even be a paycheck in the next 2 years, the pilots were placed into an impossible situation where we had to eat one of 2 **** sandwiches which would effect future pilots for years to come.

I will admit I voted yes and I have admitted it to all the new S/O’s I fly with and have explained the circumstances.

If the outcome was so terrible then I don’t know how we still have so many people applying for these positions. Perhaps they see the pay and conditions secured where they will spend the majority of their career and may one day understand the reason we did what we did.

itsnotthatbloodyhard 21st Mar 2024 13:00

Also: the airline had just ground to a halt, with virtually no revenue coming in and an uncertain future. A lot of people were expecting Qantas to try and cancel the vote and offer up something much worse. Under the circumstances, we were pretty happy to take what was still on offer.

Aussie Fo 21st Mar 2024 20:07

Network with 15 jets. Keep counting brother. Your maths doesn’t pass grade 3.

The days of SO earning 300k$ are gone. Move on. Take a promotion. Get back to long haul and life is good.
The reason qantas has so many applicants ain’t the conditions. It’s a life in Australia. Beaches, mates, family, somewhere for kids to grow up. Parents eventually dying. Face facts. This job sucks at times. 24 hours in a hotel. Red eye flights.

I sympathise with the subsidiaries. A much harder life on less money and a crapload more difficult job. The guys/girls/thems on the maggot work hard under a **** award. But it’s home. Family. Loved ones.

Pilots are extremely selfish. Myself included. We always complain. But how long does flying the biggest jet count?

We dedicated a lot to do this. How much has any company dedicated to their staff. We are a utility/commodity. I treat them the same. Turn the phone off and go for a swim or surf.

work isn’t everything

Personally I’m still waiting for the 3 day Tahiti/ Hawaii where I’m not trying to recover from the endless nights awake be it from kids/ fatigue/jet lag.

i wish everyone the best

Beer Baron 21st Mar 2024 21:00


Originally Posted by Aussie Fo (Post 11620975)
Network with 15 jets. Keep counting brother. Your maths doesn’t pass grade 3.

At the end of 2023 Network had 15 A320s. These aircraft are flying routes previously operated by QF SH. I am not counting F100’s as many of these these pre-dated the QF acquisition and are not flying 737 routes.
It’s about comprehension not maths, ‘brother’.

ScepticalOptomist 21st Mar 2024 21:21

The SO rate was also reduced to try and stem the flow of the subsidiaries into mainline.

Almost poetic - the lower SO pay is directly due to the growth of the subsidiaries as Beer Baron explained, and yet most of the complaints I’ve heard are from the same group as they come across.

Not their fault by any means, they’re victims of the QF IR system.

Lapon 21st Mar 2024 23:07


Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist (Post 11621015)
The SO rate was also reduced to try and stem the flow of the subsidiaries into mainline.

You are kidding right?

The SO rate was reduced to end the back seater for life role and make a move to SH a necessity to make up for the now lost pay.

You don't need a new payscale to stem the flow of subsidiaries into mainline, those brakes are and always have been applied regardless of enthusiasm levels.

dejapoo 21st Mar 2024 23:26


Originally Posted by Beer Baron (Post 11621004)
At the end of 2023 Network had 15 A320s. These aircraft are flying routes previously operated by QF SH. I am not counting F100’s as many of these these pre-dated the QF acquisition and are not flying 737 routes.
It’s about comprehension not maths, ‘brother’.

Yep, never seen an F100 on Kal, KTA, PHE, BME, even DRW ASP when it was the abortion everyone said it would be. Good maths, brother !

Lapon 21st Mar 2024 23:29


Originally Posted by Beer Baron (Post 11620695)
You are wrong there. It was no shadow, it was 20 years of Qantas replacing us with cheaper labour.
Look around;
Jetstar with 80 jets
Network with 15 jets
JetConnect With 6 jets
Alliance contracted for ~26 jets
NJS with 29 jet on order.

All these planes, flying routes we used to fly, (even wearing our uniform and livery half the time) but Qantas set up or bought these entities to do it without us

No doubt some routes that used to be operated by mainline are no longer, but there is a tad bit of drama in your summation.

If Alliance (and to an extent NJS 717s) have picked up sectors from a 737, then cleary a 737 isn't the machine for it and I doubt those sectors would otherwise exists.
To suggest mainline would have ooperated 100 seat regional jets on the same EBA as a 737 requires a heck of an imagination.

I stand to be corrected but Jetconnect don't 'have' thier own aircraft anymore either.
Jetstar is closest you could claim as having 'taken' a number routes, but again I'd argue a fair portion of of that flying wouldn't otherwise exist in anywhere but the LCC space.

Like it or not the white hat isn't 'our' uniform, its a Qantas group uniform - SH, LH, Sunnies, Easterns, NJS, Network. That Alliance wear it too does little to change the price of bread.

dr dre 21st Mar 2024 23:42

This is all a moot discussion. You can go on all day long about what should have happened in the past, but the thread is about Qantas (mainline) recruiting in the present. Where they are actively hiring the largest number of new recruits in their history at an unprecedented rate, and internal training and promotion is at an unprecedented rate with each training year setting new records. And that’s without the A321 and A350 training vacancies published yet. When they are published the vacancies will spike by 50% over already record numbers.

Beer Baron 21st Mar 2024 23:47

Jesus, some people refuse to see the point of a post and only want to argue over minutiae. One of you insists I count F100’s and the other says I’m crazy to consider 100 seat regional aircraft, you decide amongst yourselves.

As for JetConnect, yes, now they fly from the same pool of aircraft on the mainline AOC but on much worse conditions. Is that less of a threat to mainline jobs or possibly much worse??

The point is, flying was going everywhere BUT mainline. It wasn’t in our imagination. We didn’t hire a new S/O for 7 years. The last LHEA was just the first time they had explicitly told us that they would continue to wipe us out if we didn’t comply. The previous 2 decades experience showed it was no idle threat.

ShandywithSugar 22nd Mar 2024 00:22

Water under the bridge and the passing of time the then International CEO has been onboard many flights.The recount of the interactions had were such an ASX release was ready to go had the vote gone down for Sunrise.

ExtraShot 22nd Mar 2024 01:36


Originally Posted by ShandywithSugar (Post 11621097)
Water under the bridge and the passing of time the then International CEO has been onboard many flights.The recount of the interactions had were such an ASX release was ready to go had the vote gone down for Sunrise.


This is verified by discussion with other managers at the time. It was no idle threat. Two asx releases were ready to go. The one we saw, and the other one announcing a new subsidiary. In spite of any legal challenges or whatever else that may have arisen to try and fight it, Alan Joyce was not bluffing. The international/widebody version of network/njs was on the cards.

Just as everyone was being stood down… no chance of effective PIA to fight it, no likelihood of sympathy from courts and governments who were wrapped up in other business at the time.

Many say they can’t believe qantas proceeded with the vote at the time. I reckon management couldn’t believe their luck! They certainly wouldn’t get away with it now.



Gas Chamber 22nd Mar 2024 04:06


Originally Posted by Thumb War (Post 11620609)
I’m guessing most people here would agree. Not sure what should’ve been done differently given what was happening at the time though?

COVID hadn’t kicked off for that vote. Just selfish pilots looking after themselves. B scale is a disgrace.
I was openly voicing my disdain at the time. Everyone was scared of jobs being outsourced.
Empty threats as usual…we always fall for it.
AIPA should be actively looking to abolish any B or C scale. They need to grow a spine


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:31.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.