Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF Short Haul EBA

Old 20th Apr 2022, 02:43
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,938
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
There are options for a 321XLR pilot rest, basically a curtained off business seat

dr dre is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 06:35
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,175
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Maybe it’s time to stop calling them short or long haul EBA’s as well. Widebody and narrowbody might be more appropriate.
morno is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 09:27
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,938
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by dctPub View Post
When Cathay flew the 330s to Australia the crew rest for pilots was a business class seat.
So it was a 3 crew operation then? I wonder if HK is just close enough for them to squeeze out a 2 pilot crew for the return flight, and anything further north requires a 3rd pilot.
dr dre is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 09:56
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by beautiful_butterfly View Post
787-8 might be better suited for these sort of routes for mainline making the discussion almost entirely mute.

A320/21s for similar routes for a low cost carrier.

Customers don’t really want this. Only MBA thin pencil people do.

What a naive comment.
Airlines will decide which aircraft and when and what routes they will operate.
Whether they get it right will depend on the success meaning profitability of the route.
Pilots are the participants.
wombat watcher is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 10:18
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,938
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by beautiful_butterfly View Post
787-8 might be better suited for these sort of routes for mainline making the discussion almost entirely mute.

A320/21s for similar routes for a low cost carrier.

Customers don’t really want this. Only MBA thin pencil people do.
It’s not just QF.

Plenty of full service carriers worldwide are moving to the 321XLR. American, United, Air Canada and Aer Lingus all getting the XLR to do transatlantic back of the clocks east coast USA to Europe on thinner routes.

And narrowbody long haul might be new to Australia but not to the rest of the world. The 757 had been doing lots of transatlantic flights through it’s history, and the 321XLR is basically the narrowbody replacement for the 757.

Just because pilots think they should be flying widebodies internationally doesn’t mean that’s what will happen.
dr dre is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 11:09
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting comment obviously talking about Virgin and Cathay
wombat watcher is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 11:57
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 272
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Longer, international sectors, particularly to the Asian ports to the north that involve back of clock returns, are not crewed by a third pilot for the sector itself. It is for operational integrity.
A simple diversion blows the duty. No longer one sector but two. So FRMS dictates crewing makeup.
t_cas is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 12:15
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And narrowbody long haul might be new to Australia
Erm....what do you think Qantas operated prior to the advent of the B747?
Ken Borough is online now  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 02:23
  #69 (permalink)  
34R
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 51
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken Borough View Post
Erm....what do you think Qantas operated prior to the advent of the B747?
Well if you’re referring to the 707, not sure it would be considered ‘long haul’……. Not by today’s standards anyway




34R is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 03:17
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,938
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by t_cas View Post
Longer, international sectors, particularly to the Asian ports to the north that involve back of clock returns, are not crewed by a third pilot for the sector itself. It is for operational integrity.
A simple diversion blows the duty. No longer one sector but two. So FRMS dictates crewing makeup.
I think the issue is FRMS is a bit of an unknown, and we all fear the unknown, and something we fear can get turned into a bogeyman. I would wait to see what the FRMS derived rosters will look like.
dr dre is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 05:00
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,594
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
Well if you’re referring to the 707, not sure it would be considered ‘long haul’……. Not by today’s standards anyway
I think London - Singapore is and was long haul. Not to be confused with Ultra LH.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 05:20
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wellington
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am just waiting for them to actually order new aircraft- remember the last order for Mainline aircraft? November 2005. 16 1/2 years.
Street garbage is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 06:25
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,938
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Hawk Circle View Post
Beware - FRMS is NOT a Lifestyle Management Tool.
It's only purpose is to keep rosters aligned with the regulations or the Company's (not your) Risk Assessment, this by converting your 'life' into algorithmic 1's and 0's.
Reading that excerpt it seems there’s a possibility the FRMS may be more restrictive than current flight and duty limits, depending on a host of variables?
dr dre is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 07:44
  #74 (permalink)  
34R
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 51
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icarus2001 View Post
I think London - Singapore is and was long haul. Not to be confused with Ultra LH.
fair enough
34R is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2022, 11:56
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you're talking about our beloved B707 you need to keep well in mind that the automatics were shite - 1950s technology. The cabin environment like air con left much to be desired. Then we remember the number of sectors flown between SYD and LHR. My PB was 11 landings in 3 tours of duty SYD-HKG-THR-LHR. The trip back was a repeat. Ah the Good Old Days!!

I call it long haul. No set it and forget it, T/O today and descending tomorrow matey. Overwater nav courtesy of a N/O and overland by NDB and VOR. There was plenty to do managing the old girl too.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2022, 10:20
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 285
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Sounds like AIPA is yet again bending over to management. Give up more hard fought entitlements aye boys. You’ll be a part of the GMC in no time…
aussieflyboy is online now  
Old 27th Apr 2022, 11:18
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,938
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy View Post
Sounds like AIPA is yet again bending over to management. Give up more hard fought entitlements aye boys. You’ll be a part of the GMC in no time…
Have they? Most pilot concerns seemed to be with rostering practices under an FRMS. It’s still a bit of an unknown how it will work, but the FRMS may actually help pilots with fatigue related concerns. A thread on this forum years back showed other airlines were concerned FRMS related rostering would increase required crew ie more protections for pilots.

FRMS can give more control to pilots, so if consistent reports show a duty is fatiguing, that would have been legal under the CAOs, then there’s more structure for that duty to not be rostered.

If anyone thought the aircraft would be operated under the LH EBA that was never going to happen.
dr dre is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2022, 12:29
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The suggestion a CASA approved airline FRMS would be a "win" for pilots is laughable
TimmyTee is online now  
Old 27th Apr 2022, 13:44
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 696
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy View Post
Sounds like AIPA is yet again bending over to management. Give up more hard fought entitlements aye boys. You’ll be a part of the GMC in no time…
If true, it spells the end of NJS and probably the end of QF shorthaul as a viable career.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2022, 14:35
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah right on Champ. Much rather a job with J* or Bain? Might get some shares in the float! Think I will stick with the best narrow body conditions in Aus. Keep on dreaming.
The_Equaliser is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.