Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar EBA 2019

Old 24th Nov 2022, 11:28
  #1061 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North of Perth
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Yíall make me glad I left. Seems like an alright deal all in all to me.
ZebraFlyer is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2022, 20:09
  #1062 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Ö..moaning on this thread about how badly treated they are on six figure salaries now bolstered in a recent 21% + + payrise here in the best country on Earth.
21++% payrise?
Other Qantas group entities with upcoming EA's to be negotiated will be delighted hear this.
C441 is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2022, 22:53
  #1063 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Here and now
Posts: 12
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well the AFAP knows how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once again, pushing this through when more favourable IR laws were on the way and have just been passed (https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fede...27-p5c1km.html)

All just amazing coincident that you'd rush this through. Looks like this union should've been included in that Royal Commission in '14.
Slugga is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2022, 02:31
  #1064 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 273
Received 39 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Slugga
Well the AFAP knows how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once again, pushing this through when more favourable IR laws were on the way and have just been passed (https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fede...27-p5c1km.html)
Can you share how you think multi-employer bargaining would have actually helped the JQ deal? From everything that I have read on the matter I donít think this option would have been open to JQ pilots. And even if it were, it would be incredibly complex to try and bargain with QF / VA pilots give the significant differences in their terms and conditions.
Colonel_Klink is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2022, 03:45
  #1065 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Here and now
Posts: 12
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Colonel_Klink
Can you share how you think multi-employer bargaining would have actually helped the JQ deal? From everything that I have read on the matter I donít think this option would have been open to JQ pilots. And even if it were, it would be incredibly complex to try and bargain with QF / VA pilots give the significant differences in their terms and conditions.
Seriously....The threat that QF management has used for years against the group.

Perhaps changing your name to Sergeant Schultzwould be more fitting
Slugga is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2022, 19:10
  #1066 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 273
Received 39 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Slugga
Seriously....The threat that QF management has used for years against the group.

Perhaps changing your name to Sergeant Schultzwould be more fitting
The threat of having flying transferred to another group was not made during the JQ negotiations.

It is a serious questions about the new legislative IR changes and how you think this would have affected the JQ negotiation. From everything that I have read, and from mates who work at law firms that specialise in IR - they canít confidently say how what is being proposed is going to affect bargaining (especially for those employee groups that already have agreements that are currently in force). So I donít know how you can be so sure in your assertions.

But then again - itís pretty easy to just read a headline that talks about proposed IR changes, slag off the union and infer that itís corrupt. 🙄
Colonel_Klink is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2022, 20:28
  #1067 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lower North Shore
Posts: 277
Received 23 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Colonel_Klink
The threat of having flying transferred to another group was not made during the JQ negotiations.

It is a serious questions about the new legislative IR changes and how you think this would have affected the JQ negotiation. From everything that I have read, and from mates who work at law firms that specialise in IR - they canít confidently say how what is being proposed is going to affect bargaining (especially for those employee groups that already have agreements that are currently in force). So I donít know how you can be so sure in your assertions.

But then again - itís pretty easy to just read a headline that talks about proposed IR changes, slag off the union and infer that itís corrupt. 🙄
It seems like the new IR changes would benefit Flight Attendant groups more - as they have several different agreements covering employees doing the same job. I can't see the proposed changes affecting any pilot groups.
Brakerider is online now  
Old 28th Nov 2022, 02:32
  #1068 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Goblin Town
Posts: 209
Received 209 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Brakerider
It seems like the new IR changes would benefit Flight Attendant groups more - as they have several different agreements covering employees doing the same job. I can't see the proposed changes affecting any pilot groups.
Well, let's just start by saying that flying a Boeing 787 = "The Same Job" as flying a Boeing 787 et al.
There are low cost passengers and low cost services, but Boeing and/or Airbus never designed Low Cost Pilot versions of the same type...
RealSatoshi is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2022, 03:07
  #1069 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: NSW
Posts: 74
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Multi-employer bargaining is just one of the areas that will change. There are a number of other changes that will assist Qantas group employees.
ddrwk is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2022, 04:19
  #1070 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cans
Posts: 149
Received 35 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by RealSatoshi
Well, let's just start by saying that flying a Boeing 787 = "The Same Job" as flying a Boeing 787 et al.
There are low cost passengers and low cost services, but Boeing and/or Airbus never designed Low Cost Pilot versions of the same type...
yep, two agreements for 787

4 different agreements covering the flying of A320 family in the group...

2 different agreements covering Dash 8 operations.
hillbillybob is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2022, 05:44
  #1071 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
yep, two agreements for 787

4 different agreements covering the flying of A320 family in the group...

2 different agreements covering Dash 8 operations.
Give them a break they need to justify all the management somehow. If they streamline the company then they might have to fire a few managers and shrink a few departments which is completely unacceptable to anyone in a high management position.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2024, 02:10
  #1072 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 55
Received 33 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
Give them a break they need to justify all the management somehow. If they streamline the company then they might have to fire a few managers and shrink a few departments which is completely unacceptable to anyone in a high management position.
live been in the company for a long time. The Dixon/Joyce model of chasing the virtual airline must be very top dollar heavy. Multiple types, training, sims, parts, managers blah blah blah. The wedge is the only goal but the cost and bull5h1t factor must be mind numbing.
Window heat is offline  
The following users liked this post:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.