Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

737 Type Freeze coming at Qantas: Crew shortage bites?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

737 Type Freeze coming at Qantas: Crew shortage bites?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Apr 2018, 11:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Arthur D(aley) from Hyperspace - join date Feb'18. Probably not a person with anything more than a bonus at stake to write on these pages.
V-Jet is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 11:08
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is not correct. The labour agreement that Qantas have applied to Home Affairs for does not cover mainline operations. ie. Does not apply to 737.
A source suggested that may be the case for a short period of time.
Rated De is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 11:11
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia the Awesome
Posts: 399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simple, the trainers just refuse to train 457 visa pilots, if that means they all resign from training, that is going to really put the company in a pickle.

Time to man up and protect your future
Roj approved is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 11:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I’ll put it to you Raded De that the only reason cancellations are being discussed at board level is because it effects Canberra and the boards mates. And that’s the 717/ DSh8 primarily . Anything else would be day of operations and wouldn’t make the minor CEO of Qantas let alone the board.

Andrew David can say all he wants but I doubt he can do much about individual awards.

Now what would AIPA agree to? Let me see Network, Jetconnect and 457 visas are on the table....

It’s always been a union for protecting the conditions of the old men on the gravey train.

“Don’t worry son you’ll be senior one day”
For anyone less than 55 that’s the 787 with no overtime no night credits. And the new award each aircraft will now be on.

The gravey train get shorter and shorter each year. As does the overtime of those on it
Aussie Fo is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 11:27
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 618
Received 155 Likes on 49 Posts
Sources stated that the Jetconnect and Network play was aimed at establishing the narrative for direct entry contract 457 737 pilots.
Respectfully we would suggest the nexus is the 'story' they told about Jetconnect and Network. The lack of progress recruiting 'suitable pilots' a cornerstone of their endeavour to expand the visa issue beyond what was initially stated.
Rated De,
What is the connection here that you refer to? You keep mentioning Jet Connect and 457 visas. You do realise that Jet Connect is based in New Zealand and as such will definitely NOT be sourcing pilots on a 457 visa?
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 11:40
  #26 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
It ain’t five. Closer to three. And that’d be the three equivalent hulls mainline gets back by having Jetconnect pilots fly VH aircraft.

When Jetconnect and Network can’t get enough crew not sure what 457 visas will achieve. They still need to be employed under the same award as currently. That means they join as S/Os. No way would AIPA agree to a variation to permit DE 737 F/O for 457s
Keg is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 12:24
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,572
Received 80 Likes on 33 Posts
Maybe this is a good opportunity for QF to get serious about “short” training courses and coming up with some clever ways to utilise the relative Boeing/Airbus experience within the airline.

We all know the Certified Agreements rule the roost, but surely the pilots, AIPA and the Company can come up with a solution which sees more sensible progression. For example, 737 F/Os go to the 787 or hang around for the left seat of the 737, and the Airbus pilots do something like A380 S/O to A330 F/O and stay on that fleet for a command, rather than the ridiculous flow of people from 737 to A330 and A330 to B787. Specifically those two moves are what is really hurting the company right how.
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 12:34
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: preferably somewhere colder!
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plenty of talk of jetconnect crewing Bne-Pom (as a start) despite the stated words in late 17 that j/c would only crew the Tasman (but apparently no assurances.....)
NGsim is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 13:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Transition Layer
Maybe this is a good opportunity for QF to get serious about “short” training courses and coming up with some clever ways to utilise the relative Boeing/Airbus experience within the airline.

We all know the Certified Agreements rule the roost, but surely the pilots, AIPA and the Company can come up with a solution which sees more sensible progression. For example, 737 F/Os go to the 787 or hang around for the left seat of the 737, and the Airbus pilots do something like A380 S/O to A330 F/O and stay on that fleet for a command, rather than the ridiculous flow of people from 737 to A330 and A330 to B787. Specifically those two moves are what is really hurting the company right how.
How about starting with 4 year freeze instead of 2.
This would have to be paid for of course!
This is going to be a fun year with 2 EBAs.
Tankengine is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 13:58
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How about QF actually have realistic hiring criteria. There are plenty of experienced, able, competent & qualified drivers getting a thanks but no thanks from Qantas. Skywest doesn't seem to have problems hiring Aussies with just a resume and a skype interview, and they are many many times bigger than QF. Flying in weather and airspace we can only dream of down here in the sheltered workshop of Oz. I predict a whole lot won't ever come back from the USA. It seems like even the Boeing Chief Pilot or Chuck Yeager would have a 50/50 chance of a knockback from QF.
Guptar is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 16:55
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
One change to make a cost difference in training.
In UK some airlines pay is tied to seniority not aircraft type. i.e.
A pilot with 10 year Company seniority on an A320, gets the same basic pay as someone with 10 year seniority on the A380. Flying hour pay and allowances can make a difference, with LH flying usually paying more.
The system allows a pilot who wishes to stay in the Short haul lifestyle not having to bid for LH to get the higher pay from a bigger aircraft type.. It also saves the Company multiple Type Rating courses as people move from fleet to fleet.

From a previous post, I'm amazed that a QF S/O on LH types, making no decisions and never flying the aircraft, gets paid more than a B737 FO on two pilot ops.
cessnapete is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 19:35
  #32 (permalink)  
viv
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Adelaide, SA, Aust.
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Put the 737 on the 787 contract ( including super)
viv is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 20:44
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
The mail I’m getting is that they are also going to go for 457 visas for direct entry 737 FOs. They just don’t get it, fix the short haul contract and the training will drop. I’m also hearing 6 787s coming from October 2019 thru to April 2020 at which point all the 747s will go. All this will do of course will make the training problem worse. I believe Joyce met AIPA on Wednesday, what was discussed I do not know.
And how do you suppose they will run jnb and scl?

And no, that can’t freeze 737 pilots
SkyScanner is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 21:28
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Presumably later this year, when more 787s arrive, and they pay off a bunch of 747s...there will be another RIN. I wonder if any of those newly minted 787 pilots will lose their slots to the displaced 747 people.

None of this would be happening if QF had a reasonable recruitment system, and took a few pilots every year, instead of turning the spigot on and off every decade or so.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 21:40
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wellington
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeux
Presumably later this year, when more 787s arrive, and they pay off a bunch of 747s...there will be another RIN. I wonder if any of those newly minted 787 pilots will lose their slots to the displaced 747 people.

None of this would be happening if QF had a reasonable recruitment system, and took a few pilots every year, instead of turning the spigot on and off every decade or so.
If they RIN off the B747 quite a lot of the senior people there would be able to displace junior A380 people- and so on...
MDC for the B737 please.
Street garbage is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 21:40
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 608
Received 67 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Guptar
It seems like even the Boeing Chief Pilot or Chuck Yeager would have a 50/50 chance of a knockback from QF.
No disrespect, but if Mr Yeager didn’t have a 99% likelihood of a knockback, then QF would really have to reconsider its selection criteria. Also, he’s 95, so would have to join as a direct entry FO on the 737.
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 23:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Street garbage
If they RIN off the B747 quite a lot of the senior people there would be able to displace junior A380 people- and so on...
MDC for the B737 please.
They don't RIN from the top, but from the bottom. And you need to be RINned to be able to displace. So, yes, some can displace to the 380, but not a lot. On the other hand, pretty well all (from 747 and 380) could displace to the 787.

I'm probably glad that my time is just about up.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 23:36
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wellington
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeux
They don't RIN from the top, but from the bottom. And you need to be RINned to be able to displace. So, yes, some can displace to the 380, but not a lot. On the other hand, pretty well all (from 747 and 380) could displace to the 787.

I'm probably glad that my time is just about up.
I disagree, only because I was senior on the B767 (top 20), when they RIN'd I was able to bid for the A380 and was awarded it.
I am happy for you that your time is up, because you can get before this mob totally destroy the place. Cheers.
Street garbage is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 23:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
It seems like even the Boeing Chief Pilot or Chuck Yeager would have a 50/50 chance of a knockback from QF.
If Mr Yeager applied with his boyfriend they would have no problems.
V-Jet is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2018, 00:01
  #40 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
To the original premise by Rated De. Freezing pilots on the 737 doesn’t help with crewing the A330, 787, and A380 vacancies that exist. Those vacancies (and there are lots of them) still need to be filled. The crewing shortages are almost as bad on the A330 in any case.
Keg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.