Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin Australia recruitment

Old 3rd Feb 2019, 18:10
  #821 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by "Littlebird" View Post
Skysook,
No doubt the employee would have signed a contract knowing the terms and conditions of the cap.
A contract is between both parties, therefore each has their own responsibilities. The employer is responsible for correctly applying the cap and then executing it by actually releasing 10% of the pilots. Please note, that awarding a position and actually releasing a person is two very different things.
I believe the EBA has expired, therefore the cap should be deemed expired.
Nevertheless, at the end of the day if you look after your employees they will run the company for you. I believe this is a Branson quote.
L.B
the conditions of an EBA remain in force even after it expires until replaced by another one.
MonsterC01 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 02:16
  #822 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MonsterC01 View Post


the conditions of an EBA remain in force even after it expires until replaced by another one.
Yes and how convenient that is for the company. Why would you have any sense of urgency to renew.
Pilot's can't operate without renewing their licence and medical so why is it a company can get to an EBA when they're good and ready.
L.B
"Littlebird" is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 04:11
  #823 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn’t the majority of the VARA ATR drivers agree to those terms too? And a question for you: on the day you joined VARA, did you know about, and accept the 10% cap, or did you sign on the dotted line before any guarantee of joint seniority?
TimmyTee is online now  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 06:43
  #824 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Aus
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I joined Skywest knowing that I could progress onto the f100 or the a320. Now with the way the ATR operation is, I would have to interview and pass a sim to be ‘approved’ to fly a jet with the employer I initially signed with.

Essentially the ATR pilot group is an unwanted/reject pilot group, neither wanted by Skywest or VA. If you do join on the ATR, join knowing that there will be no career progression and that since you ‘only fly a turboprop’ you may never be deemed ‘suitable’ to fly a jet.
Random22 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 10:10
  #825 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The people that joined the Virgin Group 8 years ago as ATR captains actually would have had no expectation of a position on the VAA 737 operation - as when they joined the ATR it was wholly operated by Skywest who at that stage were not owned by Virgin (think Cobham 717 - wear the uniform and fly the aeroplane with the tail painted in ‘mainline’ colours, but are employed by a contract company).

The only reason the ATR got group seniority once Skywest was bought by VA is because of the push by one of the unions (the one that does all the work). The only way the company was going to contemplate a group seniority list including VARA was if they had the 10% cap. Given the small amount of numbers of people on the ATR (and to a lesser extent the number of people in WA on the F100 / 320) this is not necessarily an unreasonable thing. How do you think the ATR operation would have survived if they had pulled 60 pilots from it over the course of 18 months? Quite simply the operation wouldn’t have survived. Some people here really ought to sit back and actually look at the reality of things from time to time rather than just shooting from the hip.

My understanding is that now the current ATR negotiations are going to look at phasing our the cap completely. EBAs are a constant work in progress - your first one saw the ATR guys have the opportunity to fly VAA 737s, albeit with the cap. The second one will see the cap removed.

I think it’s also important to note that Integration will take close to 10 years before it completely settles down and works as one would hope in an ideal world. We’ve had the 777 operation and 737 operation join lists, providing SOs on the V Australia operation the clear path to VA737 (and recently some initial 777 FOs taking VA737 commands). We have then had the VANZ pilots join the list, again giving some Aussies who were in NZ the opportunity to have a clear path to be able to move back to Australia (and again just recently now give some Australians - one who was an initial V Australia SO - take a command at VANZ on the 737), and also over the last two years plenty of ATR pilots move to the VA737 (and I believe some ATR FOs to the F100 and A320) as well as the opportunity for VARA F100 pilots to stay in Perth and move across to 737 mainline. And I also believe in the last bid import we saw a Tiger FO move across to the 777 as an SO.

All of these opportunities and movments cost the Company quite a lot of money in order to provide Pilots a ‘career’ in the Virgin Group. That the Company enforced the cap - to the inconvenience of some ATR pilots - is unfortunate for those people directly affected, but overall in the grand scheme of things, for the greater good - we now have full Integration with VAA (Narrowbody, Widebody, ATR), VANZ, VARA (F100 and A320) and now Tiger.

Virgin is now an airline where you can join as a cadet into the right seat of an ATR (or as direct entry into VANZ, or TT, or as an SO), move to the back seat of a 777 (or take an FO position in NZ or TT), then right seat VAA, then move to Left Seat ATR (or at TT, or in NZ) or perhaps take right seat of a widebody.

Some of those points are well worth remembering before just arbitrarily slagging the union that represents the greatest number of group employees (The one that drove integration). Or the company for that matter!

And some of those points above seem to be conveniently forgotten by some people.
Colonel_Klink is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 03:24
  #826 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So can you go VA 737 FO and upgrade to TT Command 320/737?
wheels_down is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 04:48
  #827 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Doomagee
Age: 9
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, you can go anywhere your Group date of joining position will take you. ATR has a cap as explained above and I think the 777 has a requirement for a narrow body command before taking a 777 command. Both widebody command and FO positions are very senior (mainly captains).
Berealgetreal is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 05:33
  #828 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can most certainly go from VA 73 FO to TT Command. In fact it looks as though that may happen in the near future given that their is only about 15 TT FOs before the rest of the VA pilots will have access to command (like what happened with VANZ).

My understanding is also that you do not require NB command to be eligible for WB Command. This was changed in Experience Requirements about 18 months ago. But Bereal is spot on - WB commands are going very very senior (first two pages of GDOJ list) and WB FO positions are going very senior too (a 1000 staff number 73 Capt recently took 330 FO). Also rumour is that the next WB FO positions will all go to 73 captains as a lot are looking at a better lifestyle.

The ATR CAP still looks to be phased out in the next EBA.
Colonel_Klink is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 10:39
  #829 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about a senior Tiger captain jumping over to the A330 FO?

Tiger was largely crewed from Cathay Dragon when it started in Singapore then Oz, a lot had the 330 rating.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 11:21
  #830 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Not far away
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W
Originally Posted by wheels_down View Post
What about a senior Tiger captain jumping over to the A330 FO?

Tiger was largely crewed from Cathay Dragon when it started in Singapore then Oz, a lot had the 330 rating.
I believe this is theoretically allowed for; however the most senior TT guys on the VA date of joining list are about 500 positions below the most junior A330 FO’s so might be a bit of a wait; regardless of mentioned experience.
Mr Google Head is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 13:33
  #831 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So for the pilots who joined the Tiger Payroll in 04/05 in Singapore, are they not ‘on the list’ in close proximity to those Virgin pilots who joined at the same time?
wheels_down is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 13:47
  #832 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wheels_down View Post
So for the pilots who joined the Tiger Payroll in 04/05 in Singapore, are they not ‘on the list’ in close proximity to those Virgin pilots who joined at the same time?
There are none still there. They went to Strategic/Jetstar/China. Many Aussies at Tiger Singapore were smart enough not to come and are still up there earning a lot more cash flying not flying old 737s.

There are a few still there from 07 but not many.
PoppaJo is online now  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 22:42
  #833 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Random22 View Post
I joined Skywest knowing that I could progress onto the f100 or the a320. Now with the way the ATR operation is, I would have to interview and pass a sim to be ‘approved’ to fly a jet with the employer I initially signed with.

Essentially the ATR pilot group is an unwanted/reject pilot group, neither wanted by Skywest or VA. If you do join on the ATR, join knowing that there will be no career progression and that since you ‘only fly a turboprop’ you may never be deemed ‘suitable’ to fly a jet.

Random22

According to this post you claim to have joined Skywest. However, in your previous post you were claiming entitlements because you had worked for the “VA group for 8+ years”. So which airline did you actually interview for and accept a position with? If it’s Skywest just remember that you’re part of the group by default (Virgin buys Skywest and now you’re on the list). Most VA737 drivers around you actually targeted VA mainline and got in. They’re on the list because they intended to be and not by default. So decide which one it is. Did you join Skywest or Virgin?
skysook is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 01:00
  #834 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A house
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re-read your post skyhook. What they said was technically correct - they didn’t say they are working for VA for 8 years - they worked in the VA GROUP for 8 years. There is a difference.

Good to see there is still animosity out there towards ATR pilots.....🙄
Chadzat is online now  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 01:15
  #835 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Doomagee
Age: 9
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forget widebody Fo slots, those are taken by people that have been around for 15 or more years. It was very junior at the start (recall an email encouraging senior guys to apply) and was juniorish before the last eba vote. The increases to salary and conditions combined with the lower tax bracket make it attractive to captains. Besides, MEL-HKG with three rounds of business catering and cappuccinos is better than 4 sectors between Ballina Syd and Coffs. The longer it goes the more senior it gets. The guys I know that fly it love it complaining only they don’t feel current as they don’t fly much.
Berealgetreal is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 03:35
  #836 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Aus
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by skysook View Post



Random22

According to this post you claim to have joined Skywest. However, in your previous post you were claiming entitlements because you had worked for the “VA group for 8+ years”. So which airline did you actually interview for and accept a position with? If it’s Skywest just remember that you’re part of the group by default (Virgin buys Skywest and now you’re on the list). Most VA737 drivers around you actually targeted VA mainline and got in. They’re on the list because they intended to be and not by default. So decide which one it is. Did you join Skywest or Virgin?
Skysook - regardless of which group I joined, the point remains that by being on the ATR I have had my career progression curbed by the company. As an ATR pilot I cannot go to ‘mainline (737)’ due to the 10% cap and I can’t go to the f100 without completing and interview and a sim. Why should I have to complete a sim and interview to move onto a fleet which was on the original (Skywest) seniority list I joined?

Again - avoid the ATR at all costs. You’re much better off starting on the 777 as an SO. At least you’re guaranteed progression after 30 months, not 10 years.
Random22 is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 05:57
  #837 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chadzat View Post
Re-read your post skyhook. What they said was technically correct - they didn’t say they are working for VA for 8 years - they worked in the VA GROUP for 8 years. There is a difference.

Good to see there is still animosity out there towards ATR pilots.....🙄
Re-read and my point still stands. You’ve missed it so I’ll explain.
It doesn’t matter if it’s VA or VA group. Skywest was never part the group when most ATR Pilots joined. Nor were they to be on the group seniority list (at the time of joining). The acquisition and joint seniority all happened by default. In contrast, many pilots on the 737 joined VA or the VA group intentionally (they didn’t end up on the list out of sheer luck). Now they have to listen to ATR pilots above them complain all the time because they didn’t get the icing on the cake that was made for them.
As for animosity... As long as they keep complaining it will be there. They have been blessed with their position on the list. “Do your time and be thankful with what you have”.
skysook is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 05:57
  #838 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Not far away
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wheels_down View Post
So for the pilots who joined the Tiger Payroll in 04/05 in Singapore, are they not ‘on the list’ in close proximity to those Virgin pilots who joined at the same time?
No they are not, Tiger had nothing to do with Virgin back then.
Mr Google Head is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 09:41
  #839 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Not far away
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Google Head View Post


No they are not, Tiger had nothing to do with Virgin back then.
on a side note the most senior TT pilots have a start date of end of 2006....
Mr Google Head is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2019, 22:25
  #840 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Back Paddock
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only reason the ATR got group seniority once Skywest was bought by VA is because of the push by one of the unions (the one that does all the work).
Some of those points are well worth remembering before just arbitrarily slagging the union that represents the greatest number of group employees (The one that drove integration).
Haha good one Shultz. Sorry, but I simply couldn't let your untruths go unchallenged. The union that does all the work......they probably should after not being a part of anything for decades (thank goodness-hence how decent the CEA was) and then waltzing in to mess things up last round. The whole integration wedge was AFAPs fault and the company played them like a fiddle, despite being warned beforehand that would happen.

If there was no MBF, I'm not sure it would be ethics or competence attracting members.
Capt. On Heat is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2022 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.