Doncaster Sheffield-3
Last edited by pug; 8th Apr 2023 at 10:59.
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Bawtry
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see Mark Chadwick is leading his disciples down a blind path, claiming to know talks are still ongoing.
Talks are not going on, they have ceased which is why they are looking into leasing/CPO.
I wish he would stop posting utter rubbish which he has absolutley no idea what he is doing. It will do more harm then good.
=AZWFq51f4Txdr-N2m2sLsqum0_YWjlIl6EmJn_UjUCErH2dGvmELQpmJ-PJJkReU33POwfGOWMlxcydTpzklXxhin85Zl7hyMlRufIcsVR7zo-v_s9RLi-A9aEFQsa1svGe_QOWVjE15FJaR3MhHoD8PG_InWwnx2Maeg3IeN7zfjWt4WG 0JcfH7qWHMuMm8pCM&__tn__=R]-R]Mark Chadwick
I've been informed that talks are still on going
Peel announced they've had no talks
but the information I have and its from a reputable source states talks on going
Last one was in March
I've been informed that talks are still on going
Peel announced they've had no talks
but the information I have and its from a reputable source states talks on going
Last one was in March
I wish he would stop posting utter rubbish which he has absolutley no idea what he is doing. It will do more harm then good.
I see Mark Chadwick is leading his disciples down a blind path, claiming to know talks are still ongoing.
Talks are not going on, they have ceased which is why they are looking into leasing/CPO.
I wish he would stop posting utter rubbish which he has absolutley no idea what he is doing. It will do more harm then good.
Talks are not going on, they have ceased which is why they are looking into leasing/CPO.
I wish he would stop posting utter rubbish which he has absolutley no idea what he is doing. It will do more harm then good.
I cannot divulge my sauces.
Apparently the vote is tomorrow to gain full council support for the next step, I expect this will be favourable. Still of the opinion that a lease agreement is the only plausible solution to see the airport reopen.
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Bawtry
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He's at it again this morning distributing 'facts' which he has zero idea and is simply guesswork on his behalf, sadly the diciples follow the messiah, in some sort of cult following.
ah - with all these new electric air taxis coming in 2 years (according ot all their promoters) they don't NEED a runway
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Doncaster
Age: 41
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's another nail in the coffin either way. But we keep being told the CPO would only be for the land.
Its madness that the coucil are still perusing this.
Its madness that the coucil are still perusing this.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Doncaster
Age: 41
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ros Jones has made an update stating talks with interested parties are still onoing and they have agreed for Peel to take down the lights and put them into storage.
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The lease for the land in which the landing lights are situated is coming to an end.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 58
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would the wording “…council have agreed” not suggest there is some agreement in principle to the council acquiring the site, it would appear they have no current legal position to allow or disallow anything. Peel presumably don't want to renew a lease on the lighting site they don’t own and won’t be used for 6-24 months if the airport were to reopen, so remove any equipment and leave it to new owners to take on the lighting site lease when required. Seems plausible.
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Bawtry
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes the approach lights, runway lights and so forth are all being removed and placed into "storage".. which is probably being carried out by Harry Hudini LTD.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Doncaster
Age: 50
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
99.9% sure PEEL has zero intention of letting it go without a fight. When approached by the first consortium (a group of TUI investors) PEEL we're quickly to throw them out claiming it wasn't a "serious offer". Then comes consortium number 2, and number 3 the "UAE".. from which they simply got the offer they wanted but rejected both on grounds of "we dont know the source of your funds". Simple, get out of jail free card. Now, PEEL are hoping that the CPO cannot be funded and gets thrown out thus leaving them with reason not to put in for redevelopment plans citing "no credible offers".
Yes the approach lights, runway lights and so forth are all being removed and placed into "storage".. which is probably being carried out by Harry Hudini LTD.
Yes the approach lights, runway lights and so forth are all being removed and placed into "storage".. which is probably being carried out by Harry Hudini LTD.
99.9% sure PEEL has zero intention of letting it go without a fight.
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Bawtry
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts