Doncaster Sheffield-3
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjpowell
lights etc are not that expensive.
leases would have to be agreed if they break these, but that’s not a massive issue if there is willing parties.
leases would have to be agreed if they break these, but that’s not a massive issue if there is willing parties.
I think people are forgetting that everything has been switched off. To create an airport again will require a not insignificant amount of money and effort just to become a working airport again. Does DMBC have the cash for this? Think we already know the answer to that.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Update from Nick Fletcher. Weekly meeting cancelled by DMBC due to nothing to report apparently. One nugget though, Peel have supposedly changed tack and may now not be terminating land leases, which I would take as a positive sign for the airport sale. Not confirmed though so who knows. Apparently a meeting happened between Peel and UAE based consortium on 3rd February, the same day DSAmole updated us on here.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://airspacechange.caa.co.uk/doc.../download/5365
Looks like LBA have applied to retain some of the DSA CTA and submitted the attached yesterday ahead of the proceedings to close the airspace with the delay to the procedure ending today.
Looks to me to be the Western side of the airspace they want to keep, and they have asked that the base altitude is increased from 4000ft to 4500ft in CTA 8 to not impact GA traffic in the area. As far as I can see there is nothing from Peel as yet to halt the airspace closure, I know Ros Jones submitted a request to hold off for 12 months but expect this has been rebuffed as there is no mention of it on the CAA webpage as of yet.
Looks like LBA have applied to retain some of the DSA CTA and submitted the attached yesterday ahead of the proceedings to close the airspace with the delay to the procedure ending today.
Looks to me to be the Western side of the airspace they want to keep, and they have asked that the base altitude is increased from 4000ft to 4500ft in CTA 8 to not impact GA traffic in the area. As far as I can see there is nothing from Peel as yet to halt the airspace closure, I know Ros Jones submitted a request to hold off for 12 months but expect this has been rebuffed as there is no mention of it on the CAA webpage as of yet.
Last edited by pug; 17th Feb 2023 at 11:07.
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone have any idea why G-PACO landed at DSA today, it is the helicopter owned by Peel Holdings. It dropped someone off at DSA around 3:00 pm and then went to Gamston for some Fuel and then returned to DSA at 4:15pm. Does anyone have any more info ?
Avoid imitations
It’s a privately owned aircraft, landing on privately owned land. Why should that be public knowledge?
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news...months-4053178
Contrary to popular belief elsewhere, this link confirms there are no current active discussions with any interested investor regarding selling DSA. The UAE based party appears to have pulled out in November after Peel accepted an offer in principle.
Contrary to popular belief elsewhere, this link confirms there are no current active discussions with any interested investor regarding selling DSA. The UAE based party appears to have pulled out in November after Peel accepted an offer in principle.
Last edited by pug; 7th Mar 2023 at 12:49.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Doncaster
Age: 40
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heard a rumour that Peel maybe looking at a legal case against a certain Facebook Group admin and the misinformation and claims about Peel being made there.
probably just putting the frighteners on - it would take forever, cost a fortune and have very limited effect except to drag the Peel Directors through the slime of social media reaction. Avoid!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
probably just putting the frighteners on - it would take forever, cost a fortune and have very limited effect except to drag the Peel Directors through the slime of social media reaction. Avoid!
Thing is, I bet they would sell it if someone turned up with the right credentials and offered the right price. To this end there is no reason to doubt that no offers are forthcoming - regardless of what a group on Facebook might say. Whether this is due to the DMBC statements of intent to pursue a CPO or not remains to be seen, but with the DMBC budget having no mention whatsoever of anything relating to CPO then it looks doubtful that this is being pursued.
Company is being wound up in May.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Doncaster
Age: 40
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ros Jones keeps bleating that the CPO would be for the land only, and apparently reading another forum, Peel do have plans to clear the hangars and terminal building. There seems to be a conflict of opinion of whether they need planning permission to do this - however given that the mayor keeps stating it will be for the land only means she is aware that the buildings won't be there much longer.
Also, Ros Jones has made no mention to the lease offer that Peel have made for a long time now - which tells you what you need to know,
Also, Ros Jones has made no mention to the lease offer that Peel have made for a long time now - which tells you what you need to know,
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TimmyW
Ros Jones keeps bleating that the CPO would be for the land only, and apparently reading another forum, Peel do have plans to clear the hangars and terminal building. There seems to be a conflict of opinion of whether they need planning permission to do this - however given that the mayor keeps stating it will be for the land only means she is aware that the buildings won't be there much longer.
Also, Ros Jones has made no mention to the lease offer that Peel have made for a long time now - which tells you what you need to know,
Also, Ros Jones has made no mention to the lease offer that Peel have made for a long time now - which tells you what you need to know,
I’ve never been the biggest fan of Peel or their MO. However we do have to concede that they do get things built when they say they will (DSA would be a prison now where it not for their commitment), and I fully believe that they currently don’t really know what to do with the site. My view being that a reasonably successful airport would have provided sufficient ROI with regards to land value in the vicinity of the airport, but they just cannot attract the airline/freight business they wanted to attract to make it viable. Perhaps some of the more financially fruitful uses for Gateway East would not sit well near an active airport? Who knows, but if nobody wants to buy it for the right price, Peel are not going to sell it. Let’s face it, no airlines were beating a path to their door when it was open, so any attempts at growth in that sector would require a huge financial outlay from any would-be airport operator just to get them interested. It’s another thing ensuring that the seats get sold to sustain those flight and that there are enough passengers using the airport to generate revenue to cover the high and ever-increasing operating costs. DMBC of course should know all this if they have applied their own due diligence, which I suspect they have and may explain why there are no provisions in their budget for a CPO, not even the estimated £1.1million legal costs that Ros Jones shared in one of her updates late last year.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Doncaster
Age: 40
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pug
They have tenants in the hangars so not sure why they would want to demolish those. The terminal could be repurposed. They also apparently have no current plans to remove the runway or hardstandings and have recently been renegotiating lease agreements with the landowners upon which the approach lights currently reside.
I’ve never been the biggest fan of Peel or their MO. However we do have to concede that they do get things built when they say they will (DSA would be a prison now where it not for their commitment), and I fully believe that they currently don’t really know what to do with the site. My view being that a reasonably successful airport would have provided sufficient ROI with regards to land value in the vicinity of the airport, but they just cannot attract the airline/freight business they wanted to attract to make it viable. Perhaps some of the more financially attractive uses for Gateway East would not sit well near an active airport? Who knows, but if nobody wants to buy it for the right price, Peel are not going to sell it. Let’s face it, no airlines were beating a path to their door when it was open, so any attempts at growth in that sector would require a huge financial outlay from any would-be airport operator just to get them interested. It’s another thing ensuring that the seats get sold to sustain those flight and that there are enough passengers using the airport to generate revenue to cover the high and ever-increasing operating costs. DMBC of course should know all this if they have applied their own due diligence, which I suspect they have and may explain why there are no provisions in their budget for a CPO, not even the estimated £1.1million legal costs that Ros Jones shared in one of her updates late last year.
I’ve never been the biggest fan of Peel or their MO. However we do have to concede that they do get things built when they say they will (DSA would be a prison now where it not for their commitment), and I fully believe that they currently don’t really know what to do with the site. My view being that a reasonably successful airport would have provided sufficient ROI with regards to land value in the vicinity of the airport, but they just cannot attract the airline/freight business they wanted to attract to make it viable. Perhaps some of the more financially attractive uses for Gateway East would not sit well near an active airport? Who knows, but if nobody wants to buy it for the right price, Peel are not going to sell it. Let’s face it, no airlines were beating a path to their door when it was open, so any attempts at growth in that sector would require a huge financial outlay from any would-be airport operator just to get them interested. It’s another thing ensuring that the seats get sold to sustain those flight and that there are enough passengers using the airport to generate revenue to cover the high and ever-increasing operating costs. DMBC of course should know all this if they have applied their own due diligence, which I suspect they have and may explain why there are no provisions in their budget for a CPO, not even the estimated £1.1million legal costs that Ros Jones shared in one of her updates late last year.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Durham
Age: 72
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TimmyW
Ros Jones keeps bleating that the CPO would be for the land only, and apparently reading another forum, Peel do have plans to clear the hangars and terminal building. There seems to be a conflict of opinion of whether they need planning permission to do this - however given that the mayor keeps stating it will be for the land only means she is aware that the buildings won't be there much longer.
Also, Ros Jones has made no mention to the lease offer that Peel have made for a long time now - which tells you what you need to know,
Also, Ros Jones has made no mention to the lease offer that Peel have made for a long time now - which tells you what you need to know,
Either way someone will have to pay the government rates even when empty. Is there anything left in the hangars at DSA?
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Bawtry
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pug
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news...months-4053178
Contrary to popular belief elsewhere, this link confirms there are no current active discussions with any interested investor regarding selling DSA. The UAE based party appears to have pulled out in November after Peel accepted an offer in principle.
Contrary to popular belief elsewhere, this link confirms there are no current active discussions with any interested investor regarding selling DSA. The UAE based party appears to have pulled out in November after Peel accepted an offer in principle.
/startsarcasm Mr chadwick of Facebook has stated he has held his own talks with the UAE party.. maybe there's hope a local garage monkey can save the day. /endsarcasm
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsamole
I put a post on here almost a month ago saying they'd walked.
/startsarcasm Mr chadwick of Facebook has stated he has held his own talks with the UAE party.. maybe there's hope a local garage monkey can save the day. /endsarcasm
/startsarcasm Mr chadwick of Facebook has stated he has held his own talks with the UAE party.. maybe there's hope a local garage monkey can save the day. /endsarcasm
Last edited by pug; 9th Mar 2023 at 09:59.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A post-punk postcard fair
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beafer
Is there anything left in the hangars at DSA?
