Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

British Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd May 2020, 14:00
  #601 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lichfield UK
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D7666
Be interesting if similar criteria is imposed on BA - should they receive a gov dot uk bale out - as been imposed on Air France w.r.t. short domestic flights:

https://www.railjournal.com/passenge...ail-in-france/

That would surely kill LHR to both MAN and LBA, and even NCL GLA and EDI if the French 1 h 15 min flight became a UK 1 h 30 m.

And UK+FR for example and/or other lands acting together could kill off LHR CDG / BRU, and so on. in favour of channel tunnel - in terms of flight time, if 1 h 30 m were set.

--
Nick
Of course France has the benefit of a large high speed rail system which had already eaten into domestic air services. That said Virgin's high frequency timetable was said to have done the same for Manchester - with the exception of those using Man-LHR to connect to other flights.

Also, I seem to recall that France has ducked, dived and evaded the EU's railway liberalisation rules. With these in mind, I think that Air France were themselves proposing to run trains between Paris, Paris CDG, Lyon and the south, but AFAIK this came to nothing.
RealFish is offline  
Old 2nd May 2020, 14:11
  #602 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,550
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
LHR isn't exactly connected to the rest of the country by high speed rail, so apples and oranges.
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 2nd May 2020, 14:30
  #603 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Freedom Sound
Posts: 355
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
AND when has France and Germany obeyed EU rules when it suits them! They disregard EU rules as and when is convenient to either or both of them.
esscee is online now  
Old 3rd May 2020, 01:06
  #604 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
esscee

OBB, Arriva and NS operate trains in Germany .

And the liberation is a British idea you know ruin every other integrated network !
Rutan16 is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 09:35
  #605 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And there's an independent operator in Italy also.
The EU may be slow to enforce its rules, but they do enforce them. The idea that only the UK obeys them is one of the founding myths of Brexit.
inOban is online now  
Old 3rd May 2020, 11:02
  #606 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,818
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by inOban
And there's an independent operator in Italy also.
The EU may be slow to enforce its rules, but they do enforce them. The idea that only the UK obeys them is one of the founding myths of Brexit.
Assuming you mean Italo, in their early days (maybe still) they were subjected to lots of dirty tricks by Trenitalia, the nationally-owned operator, while the government and the EU sat on their hands.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 3rd May 2020, 16:46
  #607 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They haven’t enforced it in Italy up until now - they have been in special administration for 3 years.

I’m not saying it’s necessarily a bad thing that the Italian government have propped up Alitalia over all of these years, protecting livelihoods, but you can understand when the likes of RYR complain about this sort of thing; when there’s a perception of one rule for one...
Dannyboy39 is online now  
Old 3rd May 2020, 22:06
  #608 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those BA staff remaining to go onto zero hours contracts.

Those being made redundant get Govt minima only.

Ruthless and opportunist.

I see trouble ahead.
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 07:28
  #609 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D7666
Be interesting if similar criteria is imposed on BA - should they receive a gov dot uk bale out - as been imposed on Air France w.r.t. short domestic flights:

https://www.railjournal.com/passenge...ail-in-france/

That would surely kill LHR to both MAN and LBA, and even NCL GLA and EDI if the French 1 h 15 min flight became a UK 1 h 30 m.

And UK+FR for example and/or other lands acting together could kill off LHR CDG / BRU, and so on. in favour of channel tunnel - in terms of flight time, if 1 h 30 m were set.

--
Nick
No danger of that soon.

The fastest Edinburgh to London train is OVER 4 hours.

Edinburgh to Manchester fastest is over 3 hours, Birmingham even longer
tictack67 is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 08:09
  #610 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the other hand, for Birmingham and Manchester at least, the train is much more frequent in normal times, and gives you uninterrupted work time.
inOban is online now  
Old 4th May 2020, 08:20
  #611 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,550
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
gives you uninterrupted work time
Hmm - that's a matter of opinion....
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 4th May 2020, 08:33
  #612 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: up north
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D7666
Be interesting if similar criteria is imposed on BA - should they receive a gov dot uk bale out - as been imposed on Air France w.r.t. short domestic flights:

https://www.railjournal.com/passenge...ail-in-france/

That would surely kill LHR to both MAN and LBA, and even NCL GLA and EDI if the French 1 h 15 min flight became a UK 1 h 30 m.

And UK+FR for example and/or other lands acting together could kill off LHR CDG / BRU, and so on. in favour of channel tunnel - in terms of flight time, if 1 h 30 m were set.

--
Nick
Except that the Air France agreement specifically exempts routes to/from "hub" airports such as CDG because of transit pax. So pretty much like the BA routes into LHR. Note it's the routes that are exempt, irrespective of whether pax are transiting or not..
Hipennine is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 15:51
  #613 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,271
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
On the other hand, for Birmingham and Manchester at least, the train is much more frequent in normal times, and gives you uninterrupted work time.
Riding on those God awaful Voyagers, no thanks!
crewmeal is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 16:34
  #614 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scotland to Manchester will now always be a brand new 397 aka Nova 2. To Birmingham it will usually be a pendolino, but you will sometimes unfortunately get a Voyager. Avanti will replace them.
inOban is online now  
Old 4th May 2020, 16:58
  #615 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crewmeal
Riding on those God awaful Voyagers, no thanks!
Its Pendolini on these routes
SealinkBF is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 18:17
  #616 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: london
Age: 56
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is supposed to be a thread about BA not a discussion about Thomas the tank engine
spacedog is offline  
Old 4th May 2020, 23:50
  #617 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Greece
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HZ123
I note that to often the reference is to BA! The reality is IAG are calling the shots and what counts are their plans. LGW can be operated by Vueling, Level and Iberia Express, particularly as IAG will in the future have a large fleet of surplus aircrafts. Indeed BA CityFlyer may also have a role to play at LHR and LGW, though immediate future of social distancing on an EMB will be a challenge. With the sad likelihood of at least 1 in 5 job losses it will be years before people have the finances to fly as frequently as they used to.
If BA did move its E-jet fleet to LGW, would they completely give up their profitable LCY routes or would they expand their Ejet fleet with more planes, say with E2 generation that flies farther and burning less fuel?
Also would they be able to increase seat count on their fleet and get the bigger E195s?
mariofly12 is offline  
Old 5th May 2020, 07:29
  #618 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,271
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
This is supposed to be a thread about BA not a discussion about Thomas the tank engine
If BA pull the domestic routes then we'll have no alternative to travel by Thomas the tank engine. NCL and LBA could be pulled sooner than one thinks!
crewmeal is offline  
Old 9th May 2020, 09:31
  #619 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://simpleflying.com/iag-uk-government-aid/amp/

Not seen this reported elsewhere yet
caaardiff is online now  
Old 9th May 2020, 09:48
  #620 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: IOM
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caaardiff
https://simpleflying.com/iag-uk-government-aid/amp/

Not seen this reported elsewhere yet
Its been widely reported. Same BoE scheme Easyjet used.
JSCL is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.