Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER - 9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2013, 23:06
  #741 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 'decline' at MAN is mainly attributes to the cut in frequency, overall load factor is still good.
Yeah they raised capacity to twice daily (by pulling LGW) which was unsustainable, for an airline that is essentially a projection of political power. 1-0 Emirates I would say.
but I know the number of passengers that flew with BA between MAN and London's two largest airports went down with at least 11 740 passengers in April.
Um wouldn't that be attributable to BA dropping MAN-LGW?

As for Little Red what do you want? Would you like BA and VS to compete against each other to their respective hubs at LHR or have no VS domestic at all? They're not in a position to make money on MAN-JFK so it's a good opportunity to keep Flying Club members happy, keep jobs in the UK (OK, Ireland for the moment) and keep BA on their toes.

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 21st May 2013 at 23:07.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 22nd May 2013, 08:30
  #742 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 58
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipness One Echo
Yeah they raised capacity to twice daily (by pulling LGW) which was unsustainable, for an airline that is essentially a projection of political power. 1-0 Emirates I would say.
Wasn't the capacity cut allegedly more to do with a shortage of aircraft because of the 787 delivery delays? I guess in 12 months time if it hasn't returned to double daily then we will have the real answer, but for now I would say it isn't clear. It makes sense that QR prioritise routes to accommodate that shortage if MAN is (for example) their 10th most profitable route, but one of the top 9 also need an aircraft 4 days a week. Doesn't make MAN a poor performer, just means that they're having to juggle with fewer aircraft than expected for a period.
Curious Pax is online now  
Old 22nd May 2013, 09:43
  #743 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but I know the number of passengers that flew with BA between MAN and London's two largest airports went down with at least 11 740 passengers in April.
I would'nt be surprised to find some of them lost 11,740 BA, Manchester - London pax are now using the Leeds/Bradford-Heathrow service as it carried just under 10,000 pax in April.

Last edited by LBIA; 22nd May 2013 at 09:47.
LBIA is offline  
Old 22nd May 2013, 11:27
  #744 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This post is nothing to do with capacity etc.....

It is about the CEO stating that he wants more pax to use our direct services than connect to same destination via London. Hence the fly local campaign. Is it not therefore somewhat barmy for somebody in marketing to execute the exact opposite of a strategy laid down at board level. ...or am I missing something.

Last edited by Bagso; 22nd May 2013 at 13:29.
Bagso is offline  
Old 22nd May 2013, 19:25
  #745 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAN lobbying time

Perhaps a more public campaign has started regarding the APD in place?

"It proposes an APD “holiday” on new long haul flights, which would mean the levy would not be applied to new services until they have been properly established.

That would help lure direct flights to far flung destinations like China, India and parts of the US to hubs like Manchester."

You wonder how they quantify "properly established".
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 22nd May 2013, 23:22
  #746 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Doncaster
Age: 63
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not only that, if it managed to lure a hypothetical direct flight to China free of APD, it would mightily p*** off the likes of BA, KLM and LH whereby Manchester- China passengers have to change in London, Amsterdam or Munich at the moment.

EDIT: And I forgot the Middle East Carriers.

Last edited by johnnychips; 22nd May 2013 at 23:24. Reason: Amnesia
johnnychips is offline  
Old 23rd May 2013, 00:23
  #747 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not only that, if it managed to lure a hypothetical direct flight to China free of APD, it would mightily p*** off the likes of BA, KLM and LH whereby Manchester- China passengers have to change in London, Amsterdam or Munich at the moment.
You're on shaky ground legally though I think. The APD holiday given to United's BFS-EWR is small fry, this would rightly see a legal challenge from everyone mentioned about MAN giving its' preferred carrier an unfair competitive advantage.
The playing field needs to be reasonably level, MAN is one of the big boys now.

Bit like the Scottish Government Route Development "Fund".

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 23rd May 2013 at 10:18.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 23rd May 2013, 09:36
  #748 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Age: 63
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAN may have something to learn from CPH?
http://www.cph.dk/NR/rdonlyres/86209...port_Nov12.pdf
LN-KGL is offline  
Old 23rd May 2013, 22:27
  #749 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems BA citiflyer has taken back the Saturdays only MAN-OLB flights off Flybe.

Flights re-commence 6th July.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 13:01
  #750 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PK709 7700 LHE-MAN

PIA709 7700'ed over North Sea, circled near GOLES FL160 and now heading south towards STN, apparently Typhoons have been scrambled and a pax has refused to be identified
JackRalston is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 13:51
  #751 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Live at LGW & Work in LHR .... Doh!
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manchester Bound Pakistan Flight Escorted in to Stansted by Typhoon Jets: BBC News

RAF Typhoon jets have been launched to investigate an incident involving a civilian aircraft within UK airspace, the Ministry of Defence has said.......

Story here...... Manchester Bound Pakistan Flight Escorted in to Stansted by Typhoon Jets: BBC News | The Airport Informer
ArtfulDodger is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 19:06
  #752 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hearing on the grapevine that the Thomas Cook Group are on the verge of signing a deal with Oakland Airport, in the San Fransisco bay area for flights.

Its expected that Frankfurt, Stockholm and Manchester would gain flights to Oakland.

Flights are likely to start in 2014, and will be 2 weekly from each airport.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 19:05
  #753 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oakland

Just over the bay from SFO, we creep nearer to a true West Coast destination. Has been done before, though. Who remembers the Trans International (later Transamerica) B747-200s flying it for Jetsave in the early 1980s?
roverman is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 20:38
  #754 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monte Carlo
Age: 65
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is about the CEO stating that he wants more pax to use our direct services than connect to same destination via London. Hence the fly local campaign. Is it not therefore somewhat barmy for somebody in marketing to execute the exact opposite of a strategy laid down at board level. ...or am I missing something.
The marketing campaign is aimed at people who drive to London.

Manchester Airport, the global gateway to and from Northern England, launches a ‘Fly Manchester’ campaign today to win back the four million passengers from its catchment area that currently travel by road/ rail to London airports when routes operate a short distance away in Manchester.
Considering the hefty contribution to the airport coffers that the BA LHR services make, it would be a pretty spectacular own goal to start a public advertising campaign to tell customers not to use it.

By the way, I've no idea how they came up with the "four million" passengers stat. Apparently it was CAA survey data, but that historically has always shown a very small number of people from the North West using road or rail to get to London. It was about half a million in the 2011 survey. Where do the other 3.5 million live?

Last edited by North West; 25th May 2013 at 20:38.
North West is offline  
Old 27th May 2013, 18:25
  #755 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if Qatar will be flying the 787 on Sunday? I need to go to Doha for business and would like to fly it if possible. Last time i flew EY via AUH as the timetable was better for me with the overnight flight but i might fly during the day if i can go 787
GavinC is offline  
Old 27th May 2013, 18:30
  #756 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currently down to be an A330-300 but ad-hoc changes seem to be common at the moment.

B787 last weekend, and the B777-200LR yesterday with the B777-300 appearing today.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 27th May 2013, 19:16
  #757 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Few good flights in over the past and next few days.

Firstly Virgin used an A340-600 from New York for a charter on Saturday.

Jetair fly of Belgium had their whole long haul fleet at MAN, with one B767 based and the other operating cruise charters to Venice.

An Etihad flight from Chicago to Abu Dhabi diverted in this morning due to a Medical emergency. Aircraft was B777-300ER.

Aegean started their new 2 weekly Athens flight on Saturday, strengthening the Star Alliance presence at MAN.

Freebird started the first of their 4 new summer destinations on Friday.

Egyptair start their new 5 weekly Cairo flights this week, another Star Alliance carrier to the MAN fold.

TAP Portugal increase their flights to Lisbon. Flights are now 10 weekly using larger A320 and A321 aircraft. Yet another star alliance increase.

Antonov design bureau AN124 (beast of an aircraft) are also using MAN as a fuel and pilot rest stop again, the first arriving this evening and departing tomorrow.

American Airlines switch the much larger B767-300 on the Chicago flight in the next week.

Delta have switched to the A330-200 this weekend too, with the larger A330-300 already being used.

Lastly BA citiflyer have run a few flights this weekend to various destinations. All are a one off basis apart from MAN-Olbia which runs all summer every Saturday.

Not a bad little period at MAN
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 27th May 2013, 21:07
  #758 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very true Lax.....a great few days plus RAF L1011.

I think however I will go and drill through my cranium as quite a few people are still missing the bloody point !

As LAX points out re Aegean, new service this week !

It is THIS type of service and indeed any DIRECT /NEW flights that MAG should be promoting on Tweetter, certainly not Virginholidays to JFK via LHR, especially as we have direct flights to New York, and not when the CEO is so strident in criticism of using LHR when we have our own flights !

My God its hard work at times...........

Last edited by Bagso; 27th May 2013 at 21:12.
Bagso is offline  
Old 27th May 2013, 21:20
  #759 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But the new Aegean flights have been advertised, by many sources with a MAG quote to bpot? Unless this is still not good enough?
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 27th May 2013, 23:31
  #760 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Danunder
Age: 49
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't the An-124 that arrived on Monday loading at MAN? I got told by a handler there that it was in from Ukraine and out to Russia... in which case it isn't a fuel & crew stop.

Don't have my records with me, but I'd be surprised if MAN was cheaper than other suitable "cargo" airports in the UK for techstops.... EMA, STN, PIK etc?
UnderASouthernSky is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.