Cityjet
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 'WHBM'
There are several minor destinations served from London City (Dundee for example, or several in France) which only work because they are the only service from any London airport. Having the only city-pair service is quite different to something which competes for that market with operations from Heathrow, Gatwick, etc, and/or with multiple operators.
Last edited by BAladdy; 19th Oct 2012 at 15:08.
I notice that Cityjet have yet to publish anything for summer 2013 on a number of routes - Avignon, Brest and Toulon come to mind
It's almost the end of November now. Perhaps time to start accepting bookings / making alternate plans, or is there something more strategic going on with the company ?
It's almost the end of November now. Perhaps time to start accepting bookings / making alternate plans, or is there something more strategic going on with the company ?
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I note incidentally that LCY to Brest and Toulon are available on the Air France site, but not Avignon - the AF site currently offers an appealing (not!) connection involving an LCY-ORY flight and an AF-coded TGV train from CDG TGV station to Avignon.
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cityjet is becoming London's carrier to the German regions...
Following LCY-FMO and LCY-NUE, LCY-PAD and LCY-DRS (both 6/7) have become bookable through Amadeus, starting 22APR13, official announcement will come next week.
Following LCY-FMO and LCY-NUE, LCY-PAD and LCY-DRS (both 6/7) have become bookable through Amadeus, starting 22APR13, official announcement will come next week.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by insuindi
Cityjet is becoming London's carrier to the German regions...
Following LCY-FMO and LCY-NUE, LCY-PAD and LCY-DRS (both 6/7) have become bookable through Amadeus, starting 22APR13, official announcement will come next week.
Following LCY-FMO and LCY-NUE, LCY-PAD and LCY-DRS (both 6/7) have become bookable through Amadeus, starting 22APR13, official announcement will come next week.
Dresden
AF5205 LCY 13:30 DRS 16:30 AR8 x6
AF5200 DRS 17:15 LCY 18:15 AR8 x6
Paderborn
AF5229 LCY 09:30 PAD 12:15 F50 x67
AF5229 LCY 12:30 PAD 15:15 F50 7
AF5224 PAD 12:45 LCY 13:30 F50 x67
AF5224 PAD 15:45 LCY 16:25 F50 7
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All routes appear to be available to book apart from one.
WX's 10 x weekly LCY-EIN service is currently not available to book after the 29th March 2013.
WX's 10 x weekly LCY-EIN service is currently not available to book after the 29th March 2013.
Last edited by BAladdy; 3rd Dec 2012 at 21:34.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Emergency Landing at DUB 04-12-2012
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brussels
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All routes appear to be available to book apart from one.
WX's 10 x weekly LCY-EIN service is currently not available to book after the 29th March 2013.
WX's 10 x weekly LCY-EIN service is currently not available to book after the 29th March 2013.
There has been much discussion about Cityjet making a loss rather than a profit.
The airline operates a number of routes at an airport with a very wealthy corporate catchment. It is backed (to some degree at least) by a very large European megacarrier. It has plenty of slots at a limited slots airport. In short, it should in theory be doing at least not too badly. So why is it regularly talked about (I haven't seen the accounts) as a great loser of funds ? Is there some big reason for the losses or just a string of minor bad things which adds up to major problems ?
Please don't give some stupid "if they didn't have to pay for fuel..." comment - all airlines have to pay for fuel at near market rates as part of the cost of flying planes
The airline operates a number of routes at an airport with a very wealthy corporate catchment. It is backed (to some degree at least) by a very large European megacarrier. It has plenty of slots at a limited slots airport. In short, it should in theory be doing at least not too badly. So why is it regularly talked about (I haven't seen the accounts) as a great loser of funds ? Is there some big reason for the losses or just a string of minor bad things which adds up to major problems ?
Please don't give some stupid "if they didn't have to pay for fuel..." comment - all airlines have to pay for fuel at near market rates as part of the cost of flying planes
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: dublin
Age: 64
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WX or AF
Well long story and very odd history
Dublin HQ
High number ROI based pilots
BUT
Most ops are ex CDG so high levels of ineffeicencies, overnites, long layovers
Aircraft are high cost , low powered , heavy maintaince 95 seaters, dont do well in bad weather.
Many failed attempts at getting good utilization on each hull per day, good yield for business traffic but loads aircraft sit around all day 10am-4pm not earning money waiting for bankers to go home ...
This airline is a goldmine,no other carrier can get away with GBP500 for rtrip londub lonpar lonrtm.....but they can , problem is crap fleet, under utilized and no partners other than a weak AF KLM m they wont survive
Dublin HQ
High number ROI based pilots
BUT
Most ops are ex CDG so high levels of ineffeicencies, overnites, long layovers
Aircraft are high cost , low powered , heavy maintaince 95 seaters, dont do well in bad weather.
Many failed attempts at getting good utilization on each hull per day, good yield for business traffic but loads aircraft sit around all day 10am-4pm not earning money waiting for bankers to go home ...
This airline is a goldmine,no other carrier can get away with GBP500 for rtrip londub lonpar lonrtm.....but they can , problem is crap fleet, under utilized and no partners other than a weak AF KLM m they wont survive
Most ops are ex CDG so high levels of ineffeicencies, overnites, long layovers
Aircraft are high cost , low powered , heavy maintaince 95 seaters, dont do well in bad weather.
Many failed attempts at getting good utilization on each hull per day, good yield for business traffic but loads aircraft sit around all day 10am-4pm not earning money waiting for bankers to go home ...
This airline is a goldmine,no other carrier can get away with GBP500 for rtrip londub lonpar lonrtm.....but they can , problem is crap fleet, under utilized and no partners other than a weak AF KLM m they wont survive
Aircraft are high cost , low powered , heavy maintaince 95 seaters, dont do well in bad weather.
Many failed attempts at getting good utilization on each hull per day, good yield for business traffic but loads aircraft sit around all day 10am-4pm not earning money waiting for bankers to go home ...
This airline is a goldmine,no other carrier can get away with GBP500 for rtrip londub lonpar lonrtm.....but they can , problem is crap fleet, under utilized and no partners other than a weak AF KLM m they wont survive
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: dublin
Age: 64
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AF/KL and WX
I wonder with the recent launch of HOP , three of the 4 subsids of AF rebranded , WX left out.....what are the plans
F50 is a fine plane for certain routes but is small and LCY is a real asset that needs its high yield customers on decent modern jets.
WX have challenging times ahead as usual but seem to survive once they have AF support , I just fear HOP indicates that support isnt quite as good as is needed....
F50 is a fine plane for certain routes but is small and LCY is a real asset that needs its high yield customers on decent modern jets.
WX have challenging times ahead as usual but seem to survive once they have AF support , I just fear HOP indicates that support isnt quite as good as is needed....
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what are the plans
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 41
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"I wonder with the recent launch of HOP , three of the 4 subsids of AF rebranded , WX left out.....what are the plans"
As mentioned above, WX has been for sale for many months now, and it's not hard to see why: between 2007 and 2011, it generated a net loss of €226m/USD$312m.
As mentioned above, WX has been for sale for many months now, and it's not hard to see why: between 2007 and 2011, it generated a net loss of €226m/USD$312m.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 14 days away 14 at home
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@hangar 6
And
Is actually a good combination. You rather have low capital high maintenance cost aircraft sit around most of the day instead of new high capital cost low maintenance cost aircraft.....
Aircraft are high cost , low powered , heavy maintaince 95 seaters,
Many failed attempts at getting good utilization on each hull per day, good yield for business traffic but loads aircraft sit around all day 10am-4pm