PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   BA Direct Entry Pilot. (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/538503-ba-direct-entry-pilot.html)

bex88 27th September 2018 11:59

Suitable for LH??!!!! I would have liked someone suitable for SH last week. Every approach back into LHR and some up north were all in and around the 25-30kt range gusting up to 39. It’s fine having a policy but if we are sending the weaker candidates to SH it’s not a great idea in my opinion. More junior commands, more junior FO’s. I don’t mind saying it but when it was gusting 35 across it was the most I had had to deal with until now.

VinceR 27th September 2018 13:41


Originally Posted by bex88 (Post 10259826)
Suitable for LH??!!!! I would have liked someone suitable for SH last week. Every approach back into LHR and some up north were all in and around the 25-30kt range gusting up to 39. It’s fine having a policy but if we are sending the weaker candidates to SH it’s not a great idea in my opinion. More junior commands, more junior FO’s. I don’t mind saying it but when it was gusting 35 across it was the most I had had to deal with until now.

The idea I guess is that pilots will have more chance to develop their flying skills in SH than LH : more approaches, more landings, more briefings with less time (LHR-MAN is a good example), etc.

Personally, I think this is not the real reason. It is just a very convenient way for BA to "force" people to go to SH. They must be fed up with people refusing their SH offer because they know they'll be offered LH if they wait.

wiggy 27th September 2018 14:26


Originally Posted by VinceR (Post 10259885)
...They must be fed up with people refusing their SH offer because they know they'll be offered LH if they wait.

That sounds like a bit of a high risk strategy - how often does it work?


VinceR 27th September 2018 14:49


Originally Posted by wiggy (Post 10259909)


That sounds a bit of a high risk strategy - how often does it work?

The only thing I know for sure is it worked. People preferred losing a bit on seniority to start directly on LH. Some rumors say that BA is now by far more strict on that. They clearly say that a "no" will be final (no more offer).
Rumor to be confirmed though.

zero/zero 27th September 2018 15:12


Originally Posted by VinceR (Post 10259922)
Rumor to be confirmed though.

Consider it confirmed. You get one email with an offer and 24hrs to reply with a yes. Turn it down or don’t reply and you get kicked out the holding pool.

Getting a ‘recommended for LH’ definitely does not mean that’s what you’re going to get offered

TheAirMission 27th September 2018 15:33

Friend of mine, <2000 hours, no unfrozen ATPL.. airbus TR. Straight on the 777

reeko 27th September 2018 15:46


Originally Posted by TheAirMission (Post 10259956)
Friend of mine, <2000 hours, no unfrozen ATPL.. airbus TR. Straight on the 777

how recent was this?

Icanseeclearly 27th September 2018 17:22

Couple of things come out from the company recently, you can only go LH if you have an unfrozen ATPL (and fairly unlikely if no “jet time”) and if you turn down your first job offer you are out the pool, no bargaining anymore.

BA will send you where they want you and make offers depending on what positions need filling at that particular time.

Good luck to everyone swimming the quicker you join the less I work.

TheAirMission 27th September 2018 21:21


Originally Posted by reeko (Post 10259972)


how recent was this?

Last month

Stocious 27th September 2018 23:01


Originally Posted by TheAirMission (Post 10259956)
Friend of mine, <2000 hours, no unfrozen ATPL.. airbus TR. Straight on the 777

Need the ATPL by end of TR course though so must have all the requirements met before starting the course.

reeko 28th September 2018 11:29


Originally Posted by Stocious (Post 10260285)
Need the ATPL by end of TR course though so must have all the requirements met before starting the course.

meaning the 1500 hours TT inclusive of x, y & z etc etc?

Stocious 28th September 2018 16:38


Originally Posted by reeko (Post 10260737)


meaning the 1500 hours TT inclusive of x, y & z etc etc?

Yes, the ATPL skills test will be done during the TR course LST, with a requirement to apply for it as soon as possible after. Otherwise they can't do APIC duties.

captain.weird 1st October 2018 11:28

Guys, how much do the verbal reasoning and TCAS test on latestpilotjobs reflect regarding the real test at Waterside? The verbal test seems to be a 100% miss..

Phantom4 3rd October 2018 11:46

Good friend,Sim early September,positive result to hold pool,A320 rated.Posted 777 Jan

captain.weird 3rd October 2018 11:47


Originally Posted by Phantom4 (Post 10264851)
Good friend,Sim early September,positive result to hold pool,A320 rated.Posted 777 Jan

What was his experience total?

student88 3rd October 2018 12:01

Direct Entry Pilot - First Officer has opened again today.

"To apply to this campaign you must have a valid type rating with a minimum of 500 hours or 100 sectors on type."

Phantom4 3rd October 2018 12:14

captain weird, She has 1500hrs

Dozza2k 6th October 2018 08:08

I'm not LGW based, but i believe they only have 3 night stops at the base, EDI/GLA and JER so lots of daytrips, gatwick has more flexible hours than LHR so some flights do get back at 0200 or so...

bex88 6th October 2018 16:04

Essentially it’s EZY in blue. Preference based rostering. 58.8k starting salary and pay is capped at year 10 but the increments are different to the 34 point scale at LHR too. You earn a little more basic pay but overall less than at LHR because the allowances are less. That’s my take on it but I am LHR

buzzc152 6th October 2018 16:45

Anyone know how long applications are open for ? I can’t see it on the website.

Cough 6th October 2018 18:35

Bex - Think the 34 PP scale has different salary caps to the 24PP scale...

Paddingtonbear 6th October 2018 18:57


Essentially it’s EZY in blue
Does that apply, if one achieves a command after a few years?

EllanVannin 6th October 2018 19:25


Originally Posted by bex88 (Post 10267464)
Essentially it’s EZY in blue.

A significant over simplification in my opinion.

I worked at EZY for 5 years, then spent my first 3 years in BA based down at LGW (leaving there not very long ago).

Some differences -

1. BA workload is much quieter during the winter than EZY. My highest annual hours were around 700. Easyjet was 800-900 each year.

2 True that nightstop destinations are limited, but lots of decent length layover times in the town centres rather than minimum rest at airport hotels. Decent amount of clear days off in EDI or GLA should that be your thing. I loved them.

3. Small base so you know everyone and so enjoy the friendly atmosphere that goes with it, which is not the case at the massive LGW easyjet base.

4. The knowledge that if you don’t enjoy it, or begin to lose your enjoyment of it, then you can move to LHR or long haul rather than being relatively trapped in the job at EZY.

5. Significantly lower number of 4 sector days.

6. Tastier crew food IMHO. Certainly healthier.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to slag off easyjet. There are plenty of plus points to working there.

Just trying to help people from avoiding the trap of not moving airlines because they took it at face value when someone said that BA at LGW is just EZY in blue. There are similarities but there are significant differences too.

Hope that helps anyone considering the move.

student88 6th October 2018 23:21


Originally Posted by bex88 (Post 10267464)
Essentially it’s EZY in blue.

Rubbish - I don't regret leaving easyJet for BA. It wasn't everything I imagines but perhaps I was being a bit naive. I feel like I'm treated as a professional at BA, and I'm no longer treated like a child by my management.

If you're flying an A320 at LGW for easyJet what have you got to lose by applying for BA at LGW? You can essentially carry on doing the same job whilst you build up seniority to make a move over to long haul if thats something you fancy doing, if you get in quick you'll probably get a command sooner at BA (I have heard C32X is down to the 4000's this year).

speedrestriction 7th October 2018 06:57


Originally Posted by student88 (Post 10267667)
If you're flying an A320 at LGW for easyJet what have you got to lose by applying for BA at LGW?

Money, you lose money. Management’s attitude to FOs is slowly shifting as well. About time too.

.89 7th October 2018 12:10

From what I was told, if you ask for 320 LGW, you’ll get it.

CXKA 7th October 2018 12:35

You can apply directly to LGW as they have split the applications, but need 500 hours on A320 or A330.

student88 7th October 2018 12:51


Originally Posted by speedrestriction (Post 10267768)


Money, you lose money.

I guess it depends how much you're being screwed over when you leave. My pay almost doubled the first year I joined BA, I was on a £39K Second Officer contract at easyJet..

AviatorNL 7th October 2018 14:15

Thanks for al the info!
From ppjn I calculated roughly the pp1 take home pay (incl tafb and block hour payments) for long haul. Is a figure of £4500,- net realistic? What would this be approximately in 5 years time?

Thanks again and good luck to all applying.

nrn 7th October 2018 14:48

It's more like around 4k on longhaul if you're lucky.. Not sure about the 5 year figure as I've only been in for 3 years

EllanVannin 7th October 2018 15:24


Originally Posted by The Foss (Post 10267915)


Thanks for all the info, I’d actually prefer minimum time away, how often were you generally doing nightstops each month?

Thanks to all others that replied as well! Does anyone know what the chances are of getting short haul if currently Boeing rated? Are you able to specify a preference and do they take this into consideration? I just have the sim check part of the interview to do now.

you can avoid nightstops quite easily at LGW if you want to, as there aren’t masses around. At LHR it’s harder to avoid them entirely though.

wiggy 7th October 2018 15:49

Re nightstops and:


At LHR it’s harder to avoid them entirely though.
I’ll admit short haul isn’t my aisle but I thought the days of BEA and “Back Every Afternoon” had long gone for all but the most senior (if that’s what they want)....If maximum number of nights at home per month is an important criteria is BA (certainly at LHR) necessarily a wise choice? That’s not intended as a pointed comment - I’m just throwing the question out there to hear what people think.

JW411 7th October 2018 16:35

I can't understand the modern desire to be home every night. I used to like being away and believed in the adage that absence makes the heart grow fonder.

RexBanner 7th October 2018 19:46


Originally Posted by nrn (Post 10268036)
It's more like around 4k on longhaul if you're lucky.. Not sure about the 5 year figure as I've only been in for 3 years

nrn you must be using host a LOT if you’re lucky to take home £4K after 3 years on LH. I’m a Short Hauler in the company a similar amount of time to you and even in quiet months I’m taking home £4K easily. Is your tax code correct?

RJ100 8th October 2018 03:41


Originally Posted by AIMINGHIGH123 (Post 10268223)
..........Also heard BA CityFlyer are upping pay.


Sorry to hijack the thread, but in reply:
There is rumour about BACF upping pay but nothing confirmed. We recently had two surveys thrown at us, one BALPA and one company re pay. Our current pay deal is until July 2019. There are also many more rumours going around BACF. Most laughable.
Too many people at BACF hear a rumour and then spout it as fact, often claiming first hand knowledge. Most do not materialise!! One fleet manager loves to gossip.

wiggy 8th October 2018 05:43


Originally Posted by AIMINGHIGH123 (Post 10268223)
Any guys/gals in BA know if a pay rise is due?

Last three year deal expired April this year, talks with the company are due so talks about the talks have been rattling along for some time on the in-house forum...

BA are making a massive profit, bonuses all round for the upper echelons so I’m expecting RPI plus not a lot for the pilots if history repeats itself, though TBF the Union is now operating under different management so who knows. As this forum’s existence demonstrates BA has not historically had a problem attracting pilots or retaining them though there are signs things might be changing.

The management POV is since BA still runs a seniority pay scale most pilots get a pay rise every year ..:oh:

Riskybis 8th October 2018 06:31

BA bonus
 
yeah I couldn’t believe the Bonus (if you can even call it that) we got ! Almost like a sick joke from the guys at the top !!
Just about sums up BA to be honest

bex88 8th October 2018 06:57

The pay question is a good one. BA’s incremental pay scale means you get about 2.3% per year. The issue is that when these scales were bought in SH commands were around 12 years. With the improved terms at RYR, EZY, Jet2 etc a command on SH at BA is not well rewarded for new commands. The gulf is huge. 78k to 148k for doing the same job!!? Let’s not point the finger at the top because that’s not the issue. The issue is how far behind the lower end of the pay scale has fallen away. I would hope that is addressed to at least match the low cost carriers....after all “Gap to market” was a favourite phrase from management until recently.

Another way way to look at it is that any increase is enjoyed by the tax man more than the pilot. Healthcare for the family would be very welcome. That’s just my view talking for myself and I know little of LH or FO pay etc. What I do know is our ex bmi colleagues should get flight pay and I feel some of our FO’s are dreadfully underpaid for any overtime that they do. It is time we were less of a push over. Yes invest in our future, but we invest for our future whilst the shareholders etc take now and tomorrow there is never any reward as we must invest again.

My take home home pay is static if not less than it was a few years ago.

no sponsor 8th October 2018 08:40

People are leaving BA. Of course there are those who retire and those who lose their medicals etc, but there is a small flow of people who decide BA is not for them. Some of these come from LH and some come from SH. I know directly of 2 FOs who decided the 744 in BA was not for them and quit to return to their previous employers. I’ve heard of a couple who got their command on SH and who’ve left to earn a lot more cash. I’m not sure how it was 10+ years ago, but BA certainly isn’t what it used to be. That said, I would rather look at the sun through a pair of binoculars than return to my previous employer (Jet2). But, everyone is different....

nrn 8th October 2018 09:46


Originally Posted by RexBanner (Post 10268199)


nrn you must be using host a LOT if you’re lucky to take home £4K after 3 years on LH. I’m a Short Hauler in the company a similar amount of time to you and even in quiet months I’m taking home £4K easily. Is your tax code correct?


Sorry thats a PP1 take home pay with minimal HOST and no overtime. I’m a TCP right now so I’m not sure how that compares to a PP4 line pilot. But right now it’s a lot more but that is because I do an extra sim every now and then.

With regards to the upcoming pay negotiations, I’m expecting the BACC to push for an absolute massive payrise. We all winge about lifestyle, but when you compare us to EasyJet we are lacking behind in cold hard cash. Right now we’re making a !!!! tonne of money and I bet you the company is going to hide behind BREXIT this time next year. The time is NOW!

the reality will probably be slightly different though....


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.