Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ICE ON WINGS

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ICE ON WINGS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Dec 2019, 11:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,494
Received 101 Likes on 61 Posts
Originally Posted by iggy
I know I am going to get a beating for saying this but here it goes anyway:

I wish I could see more respect for a decision that was made by a fellow professional pilot. This is a rumor network, granted, but the OP still knows the flight number and the airline and might try to get the crew flying that day into trouble, all because someone in the internet that is supposedly a pilot is saying - from the comfort of his/her home - that, based on a blurry picture, procedures were not followed, proper checks were not carried out, and safety was compromised.
OK, I’ll bite.

As you know, in aviation we generally pride ourselves on discovering the causes of accidents or almost-accidents, so that whatever the reasons were, lessons can be learned. The crew will only “get into trouble” if they deliberately do something wrong, e.g. refuse to de-ice. Wing upper surfaces must be completely clear of contamination. Are they? Difficult to tell from the photo, but I can see white patches which can only be frozen water of one kind or another.

Remember the Potomac river disaster, where there were a whole catalogue of errors in icing conditions.

If the passenger is truly concerned he/she should have contacted the relevant authorities upon arrival, not an internet forum.
The passenger was truly concerned but did not know what to do or who the relevant authorities are and is trying to find out.

If I had to take seriously all the comments.... .
”Captain, there is still ice on the top of your wings”...................
Uplinker is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2019, 12:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: expat
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The OP took care not to identify the flight and hence the crew.
Their post is not mischievous or fishing.
If they now contact the airline involved the correct processes will presumably be followed to review if a mistake was actually made and to correct any deficiencies if necessary.
It’s not malicious, it’s constructive.
HPSOV L is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2019, 16:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: oxford
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It might be ice, it might be not. I have it many times these days that the fuel temperature is around 1-2 degrees, we have some moisture in the air with low temperatures close to freezing and the only thing you find on the wing is a thin layer of water. Maybe the crew had somebody do a clear Ice check and they didnt see the necessity for a de-ice.
dk0152 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2019, 22:10
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Age: 56
Posts: 953
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FFbubus
No but they can ask to be offloaded if not convinced by the answer, That might pressure the crew enough to do the right thing...
Or, alternatively, it could pressure the pax to not say anything. Who wants to be off-loaded on the last flight of the day....
hans brinker is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2019, 22:35
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,365
Received 79 Likes on 36 Posts
One of my former colleagues was operating a flight from a new station with no de-icing equipment. A passenger objected about the contaminated wings to a cabin crew member. I don’t recall if the message got passed to the flight deck. Anyway...most of them died right after Vr, including the crew members concerned.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2019, 16:50
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hans brinker
Or, alternatively, it could pressure the pax to not say anything. Who wants to be off-loaded on the last flight of the day....
*I* would - if I had seen ice on the wings and believed the crew was ignoring it. I'd rather be alive and stuck somewhere an extra day.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2019, 19:35
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW1A 2AA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It’ll be OK. Just a bit of frost.

N90AG

The AAIB report on N90AG at BHX makes for a sobering read.

Never let a crew take you to the end of the runway with ice on top of the wings.
Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 09:04
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I would have come out and had a look myself.

Anyway, if you want to see a real eye opener take a look at the following China Airlines clip:

no sponsor is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 12:43
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by no sponsor
Personally, I would have come out and had a look myself.

Anyway, if you want to see a real eye opener take a look at the following China Airlines clip:

https://youtu.be/D6OjSd3ojHE
What's your point? It's snowing out.It happens often
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 15:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
What's your point? It's snowing out.It happens often
Wings covered with snow and no anti-ice fluid.
Vessbot is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 20:12
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
China Airlines 747 takeof with apparantly contaminated wing

This video was posted on this thread.

Is China Airlines exempt from the clean wing policy? Is there something I'm missing here?
Check Airman is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 20:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Out of a bag
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There’s a lot of information we don’t know. When was it de-iced. What was the fluid mix. What was the holdover time. In heavy precipitation the wing could well have snow on post de-icing but still be protected. I doubt they would have departed in those conditions without having considered winter SOPs.
Flying Wild is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 20:55
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by Vessbot
Wings covered with snow and no anti-ice fluid.
It’s difficult to see what’s on the wing. How can you tell they haven’t been de-iced from that video?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 21:59
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flying Wild
In heavy precipitation the wing could well have snow on post de-icing but still be protected..
No.
If the treated surfaces starts to collect snow, the anti-icing is no more.
The Bartender is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 21:59
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,365
Received 79 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Flying Wild
There’s a lot of information we don’t know. When was it de-iced. What was the fluid mix. What was the holdover time. In heavy precipitation the wing could well have snow on post de-icing but still be protected. I doubt they would have departed in those conditions without having considered winter SOPs.
uh, no. When the anti-icing film is compromised by accumulation of snow its time to get another spray job. That’s what you are actually looking for in a pre-takeoff inspection.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 22:26
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Colonies
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd be curious to know what the reported visibility was. Even if the critical surfaces had been treated, which is far from obvious, the snowfall intensity seems likely to be in excess of anything for which there's a published holdover time.
Capi_Cafre' is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 22:30
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Under the radar, over the rainbow
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capi_Cafre'
I'd be curious to know what the reported visibility was. Even if the critical surfaces had been treated, which is far from obvious, the snowfall intensity seems likely to be in excess of anything for which there's a published holdover time.
It certainly looks scary. We should remember, though, that the video was shot though a long (telephoto) lens, which compresses whatever is in the air between camera and subject. Still, there's obviously a lot of snow falling.
OldnGrounded is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 22:42
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Aus
Posts: 125
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Icing conditions and snow accumulations don’t affect B registered airplanes....
Switchbait is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 22:57
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 38 Likes on 17 Posts
Airbus can have hoarfrost on the top surface of the tanks with cold soaked fuel, even on a 20C day, and many A types are approved for takeoff in that condition as the chief pilot of a former employer advised me after I put in a query. Of course lift from that small section of the wing is next to nothing, but the rest of the wing still works.

Dry snow accumulation on an already cold wing during taxi with air temperature below 0C will blow off.

Other cases can be problematic.

There are combinations of wing, air and precipitation temperature that demand de-icing with a holdover time, generally when the precip sticks to the wing. I remember being seated over the wing. We were de-iced at the gate in ORD and joined the conga line. In the early takeoff acceleration, the entire blanket of snow slid off the wings and joined the pile left by departing aircraft.

Everything above 0C is good as is everything well below 0C.
RatherBeFlying is online now  
Old 11th Dec 2019, 23:37
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That aircraft’s slats, wings, tail were definitely contaminated and in Canada that would have been an illegal takeoff.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.