Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > South Asia and the Far East
Reload this Page >

BE-76 aka duchess not recognised by Indian DGCA anymore

Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and the Far East News and views on the fast growing and changing aviation scene on the planet.

BE-76 aka duchess not recognised by Indian DGCA anymore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jul 2011, 09:30
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: India
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, yeah! In Australia, aircrafts are generally categorised in accordance with the Max Take-off Weight. Fair enough.

As Cyril suggested, it is best to get this issue sorted out with the Dy Director of Licensing or any other reliable source before you jump onto the seat.
smurf84 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 09:40
  #242 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cochin VOCI , India
Age: 35
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be very insane if DGCA considers only P68C and not any other variants of P68.
Thats not the only thing that is insane within the DGCA


What I cant understand is the concept of issuing licenses that are specific to one a/c only ( type rating if you must ) for a/c with AUW under 5700 kg

Even according ICAO Annex 1 the category and class ratings are Single Engine Land , Multi Engine Land , Single Engine Sea , Multi Engine Sea for a/c with AUW upto 5700kg

IF the DGCA had made it like the above rule then issue of aircraft recognition wouldnt be there in the first place and woulnt be having this discussion

Lots of people would be allowed to fly aircraft that are cheaper to rent ( for eg duchess , seminole etc )

It would also play a small role in promoting general aviation in India


If we can get this rule changed I am sure that would benefit all the pilots in India....
cyrilroy21 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 12:57
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: aviationland
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I completely agree with you guys.
piston2jet is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 17:24
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1 CyrilRoy

I think Mr Bharat Bhushan has the potential to make good changes, lets see how it goes.
issues is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 07:39
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: aviationland
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was going thru Aircraft Registration Enquiry in DGCA website,was simply searching the P68 and i came across a strange thing.

Yash Air owns 2 P68C. VT-TAC is a multi piston engine aeroplane but VT-TAI is a single piston engine aeroplane.

When i searched for the details of these 2 aircrafts, i read that Aircraft Name, Type and Model of these two aircrafts are all same... P68C

How in the world is this possible? I always knew that Partenavia or P68 is a Twin Engined Aeroplane regardless of whether it is P68B or P68 C or P68R ETC.

Please correct me if i am wrong.
piston2jet is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 07:44
  #246 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cochin VOCI , India
Age: 35
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The DGCA screws up the details of the aircraft quite often

They once listed the DA 42 as a single engine airplane
cyrilroy21 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 15:05
  #247 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: India
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The DGCA is very capable of that 'intentional' error. Maybe one of the airworthiness babus inspected VT-TAI and spotted a faulty engine. Then he goes - "Hang on! Only one engine is operational, so I'll mention in the registration details that VT-TAI, the P68C is 'single-engine'!"

That was a bad one.
smurf84 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 18:29
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: india
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question final word?

so what is the verdict .....they screwed dutchess and now the seneca toooo...what if all the twins in india goes down .....then what? stop issuing multi license and fly only the single engines .... wow feeling so cursed to be with the DGCA retards ...

Is seneca good ? or is it got be the seneca 5 to be exact ....
flaps13 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 18:35
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: india
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

can the 10 hour flight training in another twin be counted for the 15 hour PIc time for DGCA recency .... i'm about to make some decision rather than waiting,, help me out people please.

thanks in advance guys
flaps13 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2011, 18:53
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: India
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adding to that - Aren't those 10 hours training on the twin-engine to be flown with an instructor on board? Shouldn't they be logged as dual? As per the DGCA conversion chart,

"Statement indicating at least 10 hrs of training on multi engine aircraft for which endorsement is requested (including test/ check)"
smurf84 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2011, 08:19
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello

had a doubt guys. just wanted to know, how exactly do find if an aircraft is currently airworthy in india . thanks in advance.
abhimakam is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2011, 09:39
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in abyss
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
had a doubt guys. just wanted to know, how exactly do find if an aircraft is currently airworthy in india . thanks in advance.

The answer is ... by GUESSING and SPECULATION of others.

Seriously ! Thats how it works in India the great !
estranged soul is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2011, 10:11
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are u sure there aint' another way? wat abt the active aircraft register on the DGCA website?
abhimakam is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2011, 10:27
  #254 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cochin VOCI , India
Age: 35
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the DGCA website on right part of the page you should be able see an option called C of A entry by operators

I'll post a link also just in case you cant find it

New Page 1
cyrilroy21 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2011, 22:52
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanx buddy.
abhimakam is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 02:22
  #256 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Inside DGCA office
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Instead of cursing the Bihari who did the wheels up landing, if 50 of us pool in and contribute Rs 10,000 each we could have enough money to fix the aeroplane for the poor Govt of Bihar, couldn't we. And have teh CoA and registration reinstated.

Has anyone thought along these lines?
avicon is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 02:31
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about a better idea.

Pool in the money not to pay for something which in civilized places around the world would absolutely guarantee you a good laugh but instead to initiate legal action on behalf of all BE76 pilots against the DGCA.

And what happens if the Bihari again forgets gear down after you pay to fix his mistake ??? Pay up again ???
rahulred5 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 11:37
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New Delhi
Age: 34
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up aviator

well... has anybody's license been rejected a BE76 Endorsement? because i heard they are still issuing license on BE76. The problem faced now is with the intrument rating on indian CPL. DGCA have started asking for MEIR endorsed in foreign license for conversion instead of the IR training hours and checks.
flyboyaviatior is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 13:00
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: India
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since when? Is that a new rumour doing the rounds? Has anyone been rejected a ME-IR on the Indian CPL due to that reason lately?
smurf84 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2011, 02:47
  #260 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Inside DGCA office
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not suggesting that we pay to fix the mistakes of someone else. I am only saying that we do this in solidarity and to not give in to the whims and fancy of the despicable DGCA. I do not see taking them to court on this issue to be fruitful. So this is the only way to 'defeat' them while at the same time get our job done for a fraction of the cost compared to getting endorsement on another aircraft.
avicon is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.