Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

SWISS - Once a fine airline, now.....

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

SWISS - Once a fine airline, now.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Aug 2002, 00:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Accruing MilliSiverts
Posts: 562
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
SWISS - Once a fine airline, now.....

How COULD this happen. This is more than 'teething' troubles, this indicates serious structural problems. Tha SAAB 340 crash, the Jumbolino crash and the SAAB 2000 crash should NEVER be repeated.

=========================================
Swiss pilots licensed by unqualified instructors: watchdog

Unqualified instructors passed 50 pilots to fly a particular type of aircraft for Switzerland's troubled new airline Swiss, according to a statement by the country's civil aviation authority (OFAC), which canceled the tests.

OFAC says between late March and mid-July three instructors had passed the pilots to fly the Brazilian-made Embraer 145, although "they were not entitled to do so".

The instructors concerned were authorised to carry out flying tests, but not for that particular type of aircraft.

OFAC says it has canceled the tests and barred the 50 Swiss airline pilots from flying the Embraer.

Swiss admitted they had made "probably a wrong interpretation" of the European aviation rules.

"There is no indication that leads us to conclude that Swiss and the instructors had acted intentionally or in violation of security norms," OFAC said.

But an OFAC committee is to investigate whether pilots were approved to fly other types of aircraft in the Swiss fleet by unqualified instructors.

OFAC is also considering opening criminal and civil cases against those responsible.
=====================================
Reproduced from the Australian Broadcasting Authority.
Al E. Vator is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 00:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,911
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Out of curiousity: is it more an "admin" problem or a qualification problem ?

--alex
atakacs is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 00:50
  #3 (permalink)  
e28 driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Betta stick to what you know down at Moorabbin mate! My line had a five thousand hour on type check captains license lapse while he wasn't looking. By the letter of the law all the OPC/LPCs he did were invalid but do you really think he was any less qualified to test just because his license was a couple of weeks out of date??

The final reports for some of those accidents mentioned have not been released and regarding the Saab 2000 accident, they found themselves in a situation we all dread - but thankfully extremely rarely face. In the circumstances they appear to have been unbelievable unlucky...
TDK mk2 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 01:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Accruing MilliSiverts
Posts: 562
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
Not 1 but 3 check captains unqualified.

Not 1 but 3 serious accidents.

I will not allow my family to travel on what was once Crossair. There are some good pilots there of course but the airline should be used as a classic example of why accountants should not run airlines.

The mantra was operate as cheaply as possible. This of course meant get the cheapest pilots. Not all were bad of course but far too many were simply not up to scratch or ill-trained (to save $).
The net result has been tragic for Switzerland, the reputation of the country and the travelling public.

This is not intended as a Swissair/Crossair battle, just a look at reality. If what was Crossair can't even run region ops safely (this should now be beyond doubt) how can they operate a world-class airline? Some serious soul-searching needed at Swiss NOW, berfore more tragedy occurs.
Al E. Vator is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 01:30
  #5 (permalink)  
e28 driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it's a good thing you don't have to, down yonder. Do you have a special interest in this particular airline, or just commenting for the sake of it?
TDK mk2 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 05:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Saudi Vegas
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
near enuf is good enuf

"a couple of weeks out of date",
Maybe a couple of months would be ok too or sher why not a few years. They are very experienced !
Actually why bother having a licence at all ?

If they can't be professional enuf to keep their licences in check I certainly don't want to fly with 'em.
near enuf is good enuf is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 05:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Al E. Vator

If what was Crossair can't even run region ops safely (this should now be beyond doubt) how can they operate a world-class airline? Some serious soul-searching needed at Swiss NOW, berfore more tragedy occurs.

My understanding is that regional operations is harder becuase it involves more cycles in potentially harder IFR than medium or long haul. Additionally mentality plays a hugh role on the operation if they are safe or not and I thought Swiss are excedingly safe. Although swissguide gave me some concern.


Rwy
Rwy in Sight is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 07:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, one could argue that what counts eventually is the real "hands-on" experience, which a certificate does not necessarily replace. But, come on, rules are rules and there is no reason why Swiss should not abide.
It's our taxpayer's money (and lives?) these people are playing with and how can Swiss can be so arrogant not to abide to established laws. As if Swiss really had the financial and structural health to mess around.
Swiss has been accumulating errors since the very first day and it seems that no one wants to react.

WHO IN THAT COUNTRY WILL EVENTUALLY SUPERVISE THAT COMPANY ???
Mr. Leuenberger, please wake up!
sottens is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 10:40
  #9 (permalink)  
e28 driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
near enuf is good enuf,

I see you've never made a mistake in your life, which is a good quality for an engineer. Unfortunately it's a fact of life that pilots make mistakes - even the very best ones...
TDK mk2 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 11:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: the wrong part of town
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
even the very best ones...

that is right. even I have made one mistake in my life
Cup B is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 21:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: europe
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
who is responsible for grounding so many pilots @swiss.

probably largest number of pilot being grounded in the history of aviation due to negligence or unprofessionalism at swiss.

why this happened in first place and who is responsible for such an unthinkable error.

NO 1:
I can only think that chief training pilot is directly responsible for all licencing,qualification and training related matters. This reflects there is plenty of room for improvement in the training department.

NO2:
The TRI/TRE them selves are directly responsile to maintain proper credentials before they even think of lecturing students.

NO3:
Runing a training department in JAR inviroment is no longer for amateurs, Chief training pilot has to be 100% upto the job and knowledge required.

NO4:
If Swiss really wish to retain their reputation as a national airlines, its high time to install a qualified chief training pilot.

NO4:
can not depend just on lady pilot related to foca chief to solve problems.
middlepath is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 21:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: europe
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tdk mk2

I think there is more than just a isolated mistake in this case.

crash of saab 340, 2000, erj 146, bending JAR rules will not be tolerated and blaming on foca and misinterpreting of rules will not be excused. FOCA need to look indepth with their training.
middlepath is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2002, 16:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: europe
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
any comment ?
middlepath is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2002, 08:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to TDK mk2

I was not at all referring to pilot mistakes - versions of all the latest events are so contradictory depending on who they're sourced from that it's impossible for a non-insider to base a judgement on it.
I was talking mainly about obstination and lack of pragmatism that lead to management errors. One simple example : corporate name and identity - Swiss Air Lines Ltd... and then suddenly Swiss International Air Lines... this kind of mistakes you can do only with hands full of cash (what they had), but not in a low-margin industry where cash is your blood.
and this is one example.
sottens is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2002, 12:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Licences...

Well, JAR in General leaves a lot of questions, and as far as i know, the Swiss FAA could have discreetly inform SWISS that because of a new rule (which was only brougth to attention by e-mail!!!) a type rating has to be entered also for instruction purposes...it's a paperstorm...

But for the beginning question, look exactly which part of SWISS is having/making problems?
Albatros6 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2002, 18:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ZRH
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, that people are making mistakes (even pilots..), but if you see in one part of the company all the mistakes and a not only a few and minor ones, than I think everybody should start thinking!

I still hear the following sentence from the ex-Crossair pilots union CCP: “Same work, same salary”. But same work means same quality, too. And definitely the regional part of SWISS doesn’t work the same quality; otherwise they wouldn’t be all the time with negative headlines in the press!
773829 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 14:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: LSZH
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how to define safety??????

to 126.9

so, you prefer to fly with other "safer" airlines? like lufthansa, which almost crashed an airbus because of a mis-connection of the captains joystick? or like alitalia, which smacked a dc9 on the stadlerberg, because of a catastrophic CRM? or like SIN, departing on a wrong runway?
how do suggest that swiss is less safe than others? i know many people which told me about some procedures in THEIR airline. it's not better than swiss...it's just that in some other countries the culture of ripping the own airlines on the front page of yellow press is not as developed in switzerland and after all, it has to do with good or bad luck.
have a look on some homepages of accident investigation boards. it's best to never fly again and take the train. (oh. sorry...forgot eschede). as far as i know, no airline is 100% safe. if you can prove the opposite, go ahead, but no "airline xxx has never crashed an airline in the last xxx years". to have a safe airline you have to remove the human factor. and that's definetly impossible!!!

cheers
theblipdriver is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 20:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ZRH
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Theblipdriver


- Safety is if you not have 3 (THREE) total losses within two years!
- If you don't have at least 2 (TWO) runway excoursions within 1 year!
- If you not have a pilot union, who is telling at the main TV station, that you have a safety problem, because you are fighting for a better CLA!
- If you not have used the wrong oil for your enginges!
- If you not have pilots taking drugs for work!
- etc.......


And just to make it clear, it is all in connection with former Crossair and not with former Swissair.


PLEASE TAKE CARE...................., because I care about SWISS Internation Airlines!
773829 is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 21:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: LSZH
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And just to make it clear, it is all in connection with former Crossair and not with former Swissair.


PLEASE TAKE CARE...................., because I care about SWISS Internation Airlines!


i DO CARE about swiss too, and I agree that there are more problems on the CRX than on the SWR-side regarding safety...for me, it's just wrong to yell around that swiss is unsafe, and all the other airlines are better. that was the main point.

one really good statement of ph. bruggisser was "you must not make publicity with safety. because everything can happen to everyone. and then people think you lied to them" (and this was before halifax)

so, what is now the safest airline?

i didn't mean to wash swiss' hands clean. but it's still far from an "unsafe" airline. and, most hopefully, will never get even close to...

cheers
theblipdriver is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2002, 03:55
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Airborne
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just another number

regarding middlepaths comments about the license problem with SWISS, all I have to say is this....find out the facts pal before making comments that you obviously have no clue about. Reading the Blick is hardly a form of reliable info.
The problem came about from the FOCA and they admitted the fault and THEY went to the papers and now the ERJ team are taking legal action.
Akro is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.