Are we putting profit before safety?
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Puzzle me this....Zippyz and BOAC"
Whoa TP! I think you are asking the WRONG person?
Ultimately the onus is the Captain to judge whether safety is being compromised, advised by his SCCM and F/O, plus F/E where fitted, and call !STOP! when necessary. That is where the primary 'buck' stops.
Whoa TP! I think you are asking the WRONG person?
Ultimately the onus is the Captain to judge whether safety is being compromised, advised by his SCCM and F/O, plus F/E where fitted, and call !STOP! when necessary. That is where the primary 'buck' stops.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
411A,
The point being made is that safety will inevitably be degraded due to multiple flight deck changes. Pilots are making decisions re fuel, wx etc on an individual bases. i.e. there is no cross checking on the important decisions with the other flight deck member as per easjets ops manual. We then get into the realm of presuming certain checks have been done. Briefings that are normally done in the briefing room are done in the flight deck.
On my last four sector day I had two F/O's, one aircraft change, 2 new No 1's, and I'm afraid to say that I lost track of the cabin crew down the back. Time allocated for each turn around is 25 mins. With new flight deck and cabin crew joining all the time it makes it that much harder to keep a tight grip on the situation. It's easy to say 'just take your time' but I'd like to see easyJet retain their pax and therefore keep my job.
The moral of this story is make sure your rostering department is under Flight Ops. The Carmen sytem was introduced without any consultation with Flight Ops. End result an expensive and dangerous mistake.
The point being made is that safety will inevitably be degraded due to multiple flight deck changes. Pilots are making decisions re fuel, wx etc on an individual bases. i.e. there is no cross checking on the important decisions with the other flight deck member as per easjets ops manual. We then get into the realm of presuming certain checks have been done. Briefings that are normally done in the briefing room are done in the flight deck.
On my last four sector day I had two F/O's, one aircraft change, 2 new No 1's, and I'm afraid to say that I lost track of the cabin crew down the back. Time allocated for each turn around is 25 mins. With new flight deck and cabin crew joining all the time it makes it that much harder to keep a tight grip on the situation. It's easy to say 'just take your time' but I'd like to see easyJet retain their pax and therefore keep my job.
The moral of this story is make sure your rostering department is under Flight Ops. The Carmen sytem was introduced without any consultation with Flight Ops. End result an expensive and dangerous mistake.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IBDS- there is nothing new here. BA has been operating with totally separate Flight Crew & Cabin Crew departments & rostering systems for umpteen years. When I flew shorthaul. I had occasionally 4 Cabin Crews in a day. Why do they need so much briefing?- the whole crew are professionals, let them get on with it. The BA experience seems to be the pilots actually operate more flights than the Cabin Crew. Whilst I wouldn't condone this system, I don't feel a finger can be pointed at it to say it's 'unsafe'. More of a hazard is the pressure from over-rapid turnarounds and other areas I think.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Who can say?
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree, Notso.
If all goes according to the book, then SOP's forward and aft will take care of it.
However, as soon as anything out of the ordinary occurs, then you have to revert to teamwork. To do that you have to have a team. And if the make-up of a crew is constantly changing throughout the day, then you have lost that element of protection. Put simply, you have just inserted a hole in one slice of Swiss cheese.
Furthermore, the entire design of FTL's in the UK (and elsewhere) includes the assumption that the entire team will be able to brief in the crew room before heading out to the aircraft and (preferably) debrief afterwards. Based upon this debrief, recommendations can be made to company, handling agents' performance reviewed, etc. etc.
The entire exercise smacks loudly to me of a beancounter's idea - false economy and eroded safety margins.
PS I must stress that the above is my personal opinion only, and does not necessarily represent the views of PPRuNe Management or other PPRuNe Moderators. I should have posted this under my normal posting nom-de-plume but neglected to do so.
If all goes according to the book, then SOP's forward and aft will take care of it.
However, as soon as anything out of the ordinary occurs, then you have to revert to teamwork. To do that you have to have a team. And if the make-up of a crew is constantly changing throughout the day, then you have lost that element of protection. Put simply, you have just inserted a hole in one slice of Swiss cheese.
Furthermore, the entire design of FTL's in the UK (and elsewhere) includes the assumption that the entire team will be able to brief in the crew room before heading out to the aircraft and (preferably) debrief afterwards. Based upon this debrief, recommendations can be made to company, handling agents' performance reviewed, etc. etc.
The entire exercise smacks loudly to me of a beancounter's idea - false economy and eroded safety margins.
PS I must stress that the above is my personal opinion only, and does not necessarily represent the views of PPRuNe Management or other PPRuNe Moderators. I should have posted this under my normal posting nom-de-plume but neglected to do so.
Last edited by Captain Stable; 28th Jul 2002 at 10:47.
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EJ is on a 5 month trial of Carmen system (ending in October) and all has been explained to EJ crews via communiques from the Ops Director some weeks ago. The trial of the system was driven by the need to cope with the complexity of a rapidly expanding, multi based operation. The point had come where manual rostering was simply not able to cope with the thousands of pairing permutations. It frankly, had nothing to do with profit but everything to do with assisting rosterers to do their job.
It is true that in the first few months it has taken some time to find the right balance. As rostering work some 6 weeks ahead of the published roster it is taking time to remove the more contentious elements of this type of rostering. The concerns of our crew have been heard and Augusts roster has moved away, for the most part, from multiple individual crew changes. Septemeber will see further adjustments.
It is cynical to suggest that the EJ management are oblivoius to the issues raised by our crews and those in the Company will be aware that rostering have/are indeed making changes. Further, there is NO pressure exerted on any crew member to achieve on time performance if in his/her opinion they need more time for a turnaround. ZippZ makes that point well.
It is true that in the first few months it has taken some time to find the right balance. As rostering work some 6 weeks ahead of the published roster it is taking time to remove the more contentious elements of this type of rostering. The concerns of our crew have been heard and Augusts roster has moved away, for the most part, from multiple individual crew changes. Septemeber will see further adjustments.
It is cynical to suggest that the EJ management are oblivoius to the issues raised by our crews and those in the Company will be aware that rostering have/are indeed making changes. Further, there is NO pressure exerted on any crew member to achieve on time performance if in his/her opinion they need more time for a turnaround. ZippZ makes that point well.
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A change of Flight or Cabin crew (in its entirety) shouldn't necessarily be a problem. However, The post above from The Barber of Seville is more than a little worrying.
Regularly picking up a fresh co-pilot or No. 1 on a 25 minute turn round strikes me as being a very unsatisfactory way to operate. For those of us with a few hours in our logbooks the potential pitfalls will be obvious.
I can only hope that the guys and gals at the Big O are vigorously pursuing this via BALPA and the CAA.
The following added by edit:
My apologies to no sig, if indeed the sentiments are sincere. My comments were written and posted whilst he/she was doing the same.
The
bit I'm not necessarily sold on though.
Regularly picking up a fresh co-pilot or No. 1 on a 25 minute turn round strikes me as being a very unsatisfactory way to operate. For those of us with a few hours in our logbooks the potential pitfalls will be obvious.
I can only hope that the guys and gals at the Big O are vigorously pursuing this via BALPA and the CAA.
The following added by edit:
My apologies to no sig, if indeed the sentiments are sincere. My comments were written and posted whilst he/she was doing the same.
The
NO pressure
Last edited by Pat Pong; 27th Jul 2002 at 23:15.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: europe
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nosig
Your comment on the Carmen system as having 'frankly, nothing to do with profit.....' directly contradicts the reply given to me on the subject by a senior pilot manager.
His reply was ' Yes, but it saves us money.'
The system is a shambles and it would be nice to get a direct acknowledgement of that fact, but I am not waiting for hell to freeze over.
By the way tell the boss that crew sickness is a symptom not the disease.
The answer to question in the thread title is YES.
Your comment on the Carmen system as having 'frankly, nothing to do with profit.....' directly contradicts the reply given to me on the subject by a senior pilot manager.
His reply was ' Yes, but it saves us money.'
The system is a shambles and it would be nice to get a direct acknowledgement of that fact, but I am not waiting for hell to freeze over.
By the way tell the boss that crew sickness is a symptom not the disease.
The answer to question in the thread title is YES.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am not able to comment on the current working practices at easyJet. However, having had experience of a computer roster system which changes aircraft and crews, I proffer the following:
It is no defence of any working practise merely to say it is within CAP371, is the law and is therefore satisfactory to all concerned. I have never heard an airline pilot say that 'because it's CAP 371 it's OK'
Some (and I means some) changes are inevitable in a high rotation operation. But to build these in to the system is to create yet more pathogens in a safety critical system.
I recall having a new First Officer per sector on a three sector day. The day had its aggravations (don't they all) but having to repeatedly build up my team from scratch made it a darn sight harder than it need be. It is much better to form up a team for the day andiron out all those little communication glitches that inevitably occur when folk are getting to know each other.
Fatigue again comes into it. Add aircraft and crew changes, in a duty which has many of its own challenges, to our system of organisation and you quite obviously make the day more tiring.
For my money the best roster system must be drawn up with the co-operation and understanding of the crews that have to work it.
Imposing working practices on safety professionals will always be a hit and miss affair with inevitable friction.
It is no defence of any working practise merely to say it is within CAP371, is the law and is therefore satisfactory to all concerned. I have never heard an airline pilot say that 'because it's CAP 371 it's OK'
Some (and I means some) changes are inevitable in a high rotation operation. But to build these in to the system is to create yet more pathogens in a safety critical system.
I recall having a new First Officer per sector on a three sector day. The day had its aggravations (don't they all) but having to repeatedly build up my team from scratch made it a darn sight harder than it need be. It is much better to form up a team for the day andiron out all those little communication glitches that inevitably occur when folk are getting to know each other.
Fatigue again comes into it. Add aircraft and crew changes, in a duty which has many of its own challenges, to our system of organisation and you quite obviously make the day more tiring.
For my money the best roster system must be drawn up with the co-operation and understanding of the crews that have to work it.
Imposing working practices on safety professionals will always be a hit and miss affair with inevitable friction.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No Sig,
Sorry No Sig but I can't help but ask a couple of questions.
Firstly why try, and pay for, a new system in the middle of a summer season when you know you are short of crew and the flying programme has increased by such a large amount? Alot of people's time has been taken up with merger. I understand that the decision to merge with Go was, in the big scheme of things, a last min plan but you did know it was going to lay open our resources. Since when has there been a summer without slots? I only hope for the sake of my shares the cost of chartering aircraft for pax and crew is not getting out of control. I thought before Carmen my rosters were issued from AIMS? And another thing.. why wasn't Flight Ops consulted?
I won't go on as this is not the place and I'm obviously not 'in the big picture' as you suggest. Maybe as aircrew we feel a little cut off from these decisions and more feedback would help reduce the frustration. For the purposes of the evaluation might I add that frustration and stress are safety issues that have to be considered when compounded by a Carmen roster. I'm glad to hear that the rank and file are being listened to. We are of course batting from a different pitch as the 'no blame culture' effects the office but quite rightly not the aircrew. Please don't get me wrong I do think that the no blame culture has a place in the office it's just that it does tend to seperate us.
I do hope we succeed and I'd like to think that I'm in it for the longhaul but there isn't one of us out there that can physcally and mentally sustain the current situation. Please take this into consideration when evaluating the Carmen system and the crewing levels. I hope I don't appear to be too much of wet blanket but I know I'm only human and open to make mistakes. But if the kitchen gets too hot......
Regards BofS
Sorry No Sig but I can't help but ask a couple of questions.
Firstly why try, and pay for, a new system in the middle of a summer season when you know you are short of crew and the flying programme has increased by such a large amount? Alot of people's time has been taken up with merger. I understand that the decision to merge with Go was, in the big scheme of things, a last min plan but you did know it was going to lay open our resources. Since when has there been a summer without slots? I only hope for the sake of my shares the cost of chartering aircraft for pax and crew is not getting out of control. I thought before Carmen my rosters were issued from AIMS? And another thing.. why wasn't Flight Ops consulted?
I won't go on as this is not the place and I'm obviously not 'in the big picture' as you suggest. Maybe as aircrew we feel a little cut off from these decisions and more feedback would help reduce the frustration. For the purposes of the evaluation might I add that frustration and stress are safety issues that have to be considered when compounded by a Carmen roster. I'm glad to hear that the rank and file are being listened to. We are of course batting from a different pitch as the 'no blame culture' effects the office but quite rightly not the aircrew. Please don't get me wrong I do think that the no blame culture has a place in the office it's just that it does tend to seperate us.
I do hope we succeed and I'd like to think that I'm in it for the longhaul but there isn't one of us out there that can physcally and mentally sustain the current situation. Please take this into consideration when evaluating the Carmen system and the crewing levels. I hope I don't appear to be too much of wet blanket but I know I'm only human and open to make mistakes. But if the kitchen gets too hot......
Regards BofS
How can any airline management not think safety is compromised by this sort of rostering.
Captain gets a new F/O, so presumably has to brief said worthy re a/c tech state, fuel state, WX etc etc etc. At the same time keep an eye on the turnround, slot, developing WX, De-iceing (and other winter operating factors)
Cabin crew changes. Presumably they have to brief each other on any peculiarities on the aircraft cabin also. This with all the other attendant problems of turnround plus get their pax off, get to a new aeroplane, get pax on etc. All in 25 mins? I don't think so!!
Not a good idea, definately a "bean counter" concept and not conducive to safety.
Doc C.
Captain gets a new F/O, so presumably has to brief said worthy re a/c tech state, fuel state, WX etc etc etc. At the same time keep an eye on the turnround, slot, developing WX, De-iceing (and other winter operating factors)
Cabin crew changes. Presumably they have to brief each other on any peculiarities on the aircraft cabin also. This with all the other attendant problems of turnround plus get their pax off, get to a new aeroplane, get pax on etc. All in 25 mins? I don't think so!!
Not a good idea, definately a "bean counter" concept and not conducive to safety.
Doc C.
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pat Pong, my comments are indeed sincere. Regarding pressure to meet OTP over the safe operation of our fleet, if you doubt me ask RDW himself.
GroundHog Night
The basis of the system is that it takes all crew resource and, within the default parameters, creates work patterns (pairings) which make the best use of available crew. That is efficient and therefore can save costs, e.g. although not popular with all, it significantly halved night stops thereby saving money, on the other hand this requires a higher degree of crew movements. Until all bases are fully up to strength then positioning will be necessary. I have not contradicted your senior pilot, he's right it does save money but, I say again, the introduction of the system is primarily to enable rostering to do their job efficiently, that of course will bring savings.
If you have missed the acknowledgement by the management group that we induced a complexity that we have had difficulty coping with operationally, then you may find it here. Further, if you examine the overall rostering patterns for August and latterly in September you'll see that the concerns of the crews have been heard.
GroundHog Night
The basis of the system is that it takes all crew resource and, within the default parameters, creates work patterns (pairings) which make the best use of available crew. That is efficient and therefore can save costs, e.g. although not popular with all, it significantly halved night stops thereby saving money, on the other hand this requires a higher degree of crew movements. Until all bases are fully up to strength then positioning will be necessary. I have not contradicted your senior pilot, he's right it does save money but, I say again, the introduction of the system is primarily to enable rostering to do their job efficiently, that of course will bring savings.
If you have missed the acknowledgement by the management group that we induced a complexity that we have had difficulty coping with operationally, then you may find it here. Further, if you examine the overall rostering patterns for August and latterly in September you'll see that the concerns of the crews have been heard.
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Luton, UK
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this the real issue?
Well for a start Thank God to see some reasoned debate!
Many of the posts have offered varying views on the thread and many have merit and raise different issues. This is the great thing about a somewhat anarchistic communication forum, you will always get some dross but on the whole this thread makes interesting reading.
The main thrust of the replies in the affirmative is that the multiple changes of pilots and cabin staff in some way imposes a time pressure on the crew thereby compromising safety. The reply from 'no sig', apparently a member of eJ NMC, refutes this and I am sure all line crews at eJ would have to agree with him.. albeit I am not a Captain at eJ but I know of NO instance where a crew has been time pressured to meet a schedule by anyone other than themselves. Sure we get encouraged to try and meet OTP targets and the company sets us some demanding tasks but never have I heard of eJ actually pushing anyone at all to cut corners in any way. This is first and foremost a safety oriented company.
Those in the negative seem to generally follow the reasoning of: Our job as Pilots is just that.. Pilotage = the action or business of piloting and the guidance of ships or airplanes from place to place (a funny word few will recognise
) but I am unable to find in any definition of that word a reference to schedule management or time pressure. This may seem like semantic pedantry but I do really believe that we are NOT managers, we are operators... OK we get the sharp end view of the operation and have much to offer the ‘office managers’ in addition to our hard earned skills, licences and experience, if they choose to heed it.. but the fundamental remains.. our function is to operate safely.. Pilotage refers soley to the operation of a vehicle from one place to another. The safety of that operation finally rests solely with the Pilot/s, ultimately the Captain.
Just a note on the idea of briefing before a flight:
If instead of doing one ‘first flight of the day’ briefing you have to do four then so be it. The crew room is just a meeting place with information readily to hand, all that same information is available in the aircraft. You can brief just as well sitting in your 'office chair with a view' as you can standing around a table, in some way you are not distracted when in the aircraft The onus is on the individuals to ensure we do our jobs well and I can honestly say that at the sharp end in eJ we do! So we come again to the issue of time pressure..and I think that it is the change away from the traditional flight preparation process that some find disconcerting rather than a concern that we don’t get enough time to prepare for a sector or series thereof. We are an innovative company and some of the innovations need a bit of tuning.. but like any orchestra with a new melody we all need to concentrate on and play our respective parts, if we do that to the best of our ability then we give the ‘conductor’ the best chance of tuning things to make a harmonious operation. We will always take all the time that is needed to play our part well, and there will be no questioning that. Let the ‘conductor’ rearrange the score. Again I stress, DON'T RUSH!
Just so ppl don’t think I am here as a company sycophant, I am as unhappy as everybody else with the levels of disruption to our personal lives currently being experienced. It has made an otherwise highly motivated and procompany group of employees quite unhappy and it needs VERY urgent attention. In ways this thread is emotionally hijacked by this quite different issue and I will risk airing my thoughts on it.
A roster is published not for conformance with FTLs or any other piece of legislation, that could be done without ever publishing a roster. A roster is published well in advance of the scheduled duties so that we, the operating crews, can have certainty and predictability in our personal lives in a very varied shift working environment.
Our job as Pilots and Cabin Crew is unique in many ways, only one of which is the strange hours we are required to work so that our companies remain successful in a highly competitive environment, it is completely different from just about any other job you can name. We have no public holidays, regular weekends, are away from our families and friends at important times, required to sleep away from our homes on a regular baisis etc etc.. but it is all part of the turf. We get some extra leave for it..but in reality that does little to compensate.. I would gladly give up the additonal leave to fly a 40 duty hour week Monday to Friday, have Christmas, Easter, Public Holidays and special family days off etc etc. Nor does any other job that comes to mind have you trying to change your circadian rythym nearly 36 hours in a week of duties. Starting with very early getups and then finishing work at almost the same time you were getting up (sounds like Monty Python ) by the end of the week is ridiculous and places very heavy and pretty much unnecessary strains on us as humans operating in a high stakes, complex and challenging environment let alone as people with families, friends and lives of our own. This is the error, IMVHO, that is causing the current problem at eJ. A lack of consideration and forethought of the human aspects of what is otherwise probably a profit maximising system. We have been assured that this major problem is to be addressed so lets wait and see a bit. Just remember: Our jobs are not our life, our jobs are what we do to support our lives and our lives should be prioritised above any profit/financial goals. Not very orange perhaps but I hope relasistic.
Many of the posts have offered varying views on the thread and many have merit and raise different issues. This is the great thing about a somewhat anarchistic communication forum, you will always get some dross but on the whole this thread makes interesting reading.
The main thrust of the replies in the affirmative is that the multiple changes of pilots and cabin staff in some way imposes a time pressure on the crew thereby compromising safety. The reply from 'no sig', apparently a member of eJ NMC, refutes this and I am sure all line crews at eJ would have to agree with him.. albeit I am not a Captain at eJ but I know of NO instance where a crew has been time pressured to meet a schedule by anyone other than themselves. Sure we get encouraged to try and meet OTP targets and the company sets us some demanding tasks but never have I heard of eJ actually pushing anyone at all to cut corners in any way. This is first and foremost a safety oriented company.
Those in the negative seem to generally follow the reasoning of: Our job as Pilots is just that.. Pilotage = the action or business of piloting and the guidance of ships or airplanes from place to place (a funny word few will recognise
) but I am unable to find in any definition of that word a reference to schedule management or time pressure. This may seem like semantic pedantry but I do really believe that we are NOT managers, we are operators... OK we get the sharp end view of the operation and have much to offer the ‘office managers’ in addition to our hard earned skills, licences and experience, if they choose to heed it.. but the fundamental remains.. our function is to operate safely.. Pilotage refers soley to the operation of a vehicle from one place to another. The safety of that operation finally rests solely with the Pilot/s, ultimately the Captain.Just a note on the idea of briefing before a flight:
If instead of doing one ‘first flight of the day’ briefing you have to do four then so be it. The crew room is just a meeting place with information readily to hand, all that same information is available in the aircraft. You can brief just as well sitting in your 'office chair with a view' as you can standing around a table, in some way you are not distracted when in the aircraft
The onus is on the individuals to ensure we do our jobs well and I can honestly say that at the sharp end in eJ we do! So we come again to the issue of time pressure..and I think that it is the change away from the traditional flight preparation process that some find disconcerting rather than a concern that we don’t get enough time to prepare for a sector or series thereof. We are an innovative company and some of the innovations need a bit of tuning.. but like any orchestra with a new melody we all need to concentrate on and play our respective parts, if we do that to the best of our ability then we give the ‘conductor’ the best chance of tuning things to make a harmonious operation. We will always take all the time that is needed to play our part well, and there will be no questioning that. Let the ‘conductor’ rearrange the score. Again I stress, DON'T RUSH!Just so ppl don’t think I am here as a company sycophant, I am as unhappy as everybody else with the levels of disruption to our personal lives currently being experienced. It has made an otherwise highly motivated and procompany group of employees quite unhappy and it needs VERY urgent attention. In ways this thread is emotionally hijacked by this quite different issue and I will risk airing my thoughts on it.
A roster is published not for conformance with FTLs or any other piece of legislation, that could be done without ever publishing a roster. A roster is published well in advance of the scheduled duties so that we, the operating crews, can have certainty and predictability in our personal lives in a very varied shift working environment.
Our job as Pilots and Cabin Crew is unique in many ways, only one of which is the strange hours we are required to work so that our companies remain successful in a highly competitive environment, it is completely different from just about any other job you can name. We have no public holidays, regular weekends, are away from our families and friends at important times, required to sleep away from our homes on a regular baisis etc etc.. but it is all part of the turf. We get some extra leave for it..but in reality that does little to compensate.. I would gladly give up the additonal leave to fly a 40 duty hour week Monday to Friday, have Christmas, Easter, Public Holidays and special family days off etc etc. Nor does any other job that comes to mind have you trying to change your circadian rythym nearly 36 hours in a week of duties. Starting with very early getups and then finishing work at almost the same time you were getting up (sounds like Monty Python
) by the end of the week is ridiculous and places very heavy and pretty much unnecessary strains on us as humans operating in a high stakes, complex and challenging environment let alone as people with families, friends and lives of our own. This is the error, IMVHO, that is causing the current problem at eJ. A lack of consideration and forethought of the human aspects of what is otherwise probably a profit maximising system. We have been assured that this major problem is to be addressed so lets wait and see a bit. Just remember: Our jobs are not our life, our jobs are what we do to support our lives and our lives should be prioritised above any profit/financial goals. Not very orange perhaps but I hope relasistic.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BoS
I agree with much of the sentiment expressed in your posts but must disagree on the no-blame question. You seem to accept that its OK to separate the aircrew from the office in this regard and I have to ask why?
I accept that if aircrew are found wilfully neglegent with regard to flight safety then of course blame must be apportioned. However I can see absolutely no difference between a policy from the top which might have the same impact. Decisions such as crew numbers, rostering policy and many others have a direct impact on the safety of the operation, as we well know. As you said at the end of your first post...' End result an expensive and dangerous mistake'. It's called corporate liability.
I no longer believe that the rank and file are listened to, its the OTP statistics and the bills that make changes. I and others consider the kitchen well alight and if you are a wet blanket you are desperately needed!
Nosig
Sorry but that's simply not good enough.
As an example of what happens in reality I would use the observations of a F/O made recently. During a short turnaround he was to join the Captain who operated the aircraft inbound. As he was strapping into his seat the question was asked ' Are you ready for a brief?' ie. the take-off brief! As he had not yet even seen the met, the notams, flight plan or practically any other information pertinent to the flight, he very sensibly declined.
This is not to judge the crew but it shows how the new system adds to existing pressures given the very nature of the operation.
I agree with much of the sentiment expressed in your posts but must disagree on the no-blame question. You seem to accept that its OK to separate the aircrew from the office in this regard and I have to ask why?
I accept that if aircrew are found wilfully neglegent with regard to flight safety then of course blame must be apportioned. However I can see absolutely no difference between a policy from the top which might have the same impact. Decisions such as crew numbers, rostering policy and many others have a direct impact on the safety of the operation, as we well know. As you said at the end of your first post...' End result an expensive and dangerous mistake'. It's called corporate liability.
I no longer believe that the rank and file are listened to, its the OTP statistics and the bills that make changes. I and others consider the kitchen well alight and if you are a wet blanket you are desperately needed!
Nosig
Sorry but that's simply not good enough.
As an example of what happens in reality I would use the observations of a F/O made recently. During a short turnaround he was to join the Captain who operated the aircraft inbound. As he was strapping into his seat the question was asked ' Are you ready for a brief?' ie. the take-off brief! As he had not yet even seen the met, the notams, flight plan or practically any other information pertinent to the flight, he very sensibly declined.
This is not to judge the crew but it shows how the new system adds to existing pressures given the very nature of the operation.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: europe
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nosig
I'm sorry but the messages are clearly contradictory to me, the pilots newsletter of June puts a figure to the savings.(That was the theory!)
My August roster has more crew pairing than my July one.
Everyone with whom I have discussed the letter from VHP considers it at best weak, at worst patronising. You're right, it does mention Carmen somewhere down the page but the crews thought it should have been the banner headline.
RDW's comments re crew sickness and the ramp at Luton just confirm the above.
zippyz has pretty much summed up the problem in the last few lines of his latest post.
I'm sorry but the messages are clearly contradictory to me, the pilots newsletter of June puts a figure to the savings.(That was the theory!)
My August roster has more crew pairing than my July one.
Everyone with whom I have discussed the letter from VHP considers it at best weak, at worst patronising. You're right, it does mention Carmen somewhere down the page but the crews thought it should have been the banner headline.
RDW's comments re crew sickness and the ramp at Luton just confirm the above.
zippyz has pretty much summed up the problem in the last few lines of his latest post.
Union Goon
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know its very interesting here and what I have noticed is that the rushing and the pressure is actually done by the pilots. Not the roster. If you just do your own thing at your normal pace and schedule be damned, then they will adjust the schedule to allow more time and thus reduce the delays.
"Pilot Pushing" is by and large self induced. We are all a highly motivated goal oriented lot. Many of us came out of the military. Hence the letter that Cecil Ewiell wrote to the pilots of American Airlines after Little Rock as he was leaving the position of Chief Pilot.
It was called : There is no Mission.
The thrust of it was exactly what the title says. This is not a war, lives will not be lost if we don't fly. However, pressing on no matter what WILL cost lives.
It was a good letter and the only time in my career that I have heard such a thing from management. (I have worked at 7 airlines) Usually a pilot is doing a rug dance because a gate agent complained he was slow to push back or something.
Cheers
Wino
"Pilot Pushing" is by and large self induced. We are all a highly motivated goal oriented lot. Many of us came out of the military. Hence the letter that Cecil Ewiell wrote to the pilots of American Airlines after Little Rock as he was leaving the position of Chief Pilot.
It was called : There is no Mission.
The thrust of it was exactly what the title says. This is not a war, lives will not be lost if we don't fly. However, pressing on no matter what WILL cost lives.
It was a good letter and the only time in my career that I have heard such a thing from management. (I have worked at 7 airlines) Usually a pilot is doing a rug dance because a gate agent complained he was slow to push back or something.
Cheers
Wino
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Years ago it was common practise in SV to change aircraft (L10, domestic) in the middle of a day due to fleet rotation. Usually this was when we were rather late and the turn around tight. Received a memo from the Fleet Manager indicating that crews should "hurry up" so as to minimize delays. (This was after the company "thought" that they had too many crews and so started not renewing contracts, and many promptly resigned, thus now short).
I walked into the FM's office with the ops manual and asked..."which part do you want me to ignore, in order to "hurry up?" Turns out I was the fifth that day that did so (all training Captains).
Memo promptly recinded and aircraft rotations were done at the end of the day.
Problem solved.
I walked into the FM's office with the ops manual and asked..."which part do you want me to ignore, in order to "hurry up?" Turns out I was the fifth that day that did so (all training Captains).
Memo promptly recinded and aircraft rotations were done at the end of the day.
Problem solved.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flanker,
I agree. I was just trying to find something nice to say while sucking on my wet blanket. Yes,the Carmen side of the rostering has increased in August.
Wino,
Why produce unworkable rosters that end up costing pax goodwill, company money and on a side note bring safety into question? It just wasn't thought out.
I've been in one less airline than you and I've never seen a mess like this.
Regards BofS
I agree. I was just trying to find something nice to say while sucking on my wet blanket. Yes,the Carmen side of the rostering has increased in August.
Wino,
Why produce unworkable rosters that end up costing pax goodwill, company money and on a side note bring safety into question? It just wasn't thought out.
I've been in one less airline than you and I've never seen a mess like this.Regards BofS
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are we saving money?look at the amount of lrv's or refunds offered,look at the amount of subcharters since the pairings.The
company wastes money from so many areas of the operation but
they seem more intent on saving money on the trivial matters than addressing the real and important issues.ej is not a small outfit anymore but some of the management mentality is still a couple of years behind reality,as for the pairings its no coinicidence that the samaritans number has been added to the speedial in NMC.Can't wait for the next 100 aircraft to arrive!
company wastes money from so many areas of the operation but
they seem more intent on saving money on the trivial matters than addressing the real and important issues.ej is not a small outfit anymore but some of the management mentality is still a couple of years behind reality,as for the pairings its no coinicidence that the samaritans number has been added to the speedial in NMC.Can't wait for the next 100 aircraft to arrive!